Roseanne Barr goes on insane offense against Angelina Jolie & Brad Pitt (Is it Crazy Day?)

August 18th, 2008 // 162 Comments

Roseanne Barr must’ve decided she wanted to feel relevant this weekend and posted an entry on her blog attacking Jon Voight, Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt. I’ll give kudos to Roseanne for calling Glenn Beck a “used tampon” before she dives completely off the deep end in an ultra-liberal rant that makes Rosie O’Donnell look like Rush Limbaugh. I’m, of course, talking politically and not physically because, until last week, I swore they were twins:

[Jon Voight] is a frightened little girl in a pink ballet tutu, who acts like Obama just wandered in from the rain forest with a bone thru his nose and a communist pamphlet in his loincloth. The neocons who own jon voight and make him dance on the chabad telethons are the worst most elitist people on earth. glen beck and jon voight are their bitches… both of them are used tampons who must be flushed down the toilet immediately! jon voight your evil spawn angelina jolie and her vacuous hubby brad pitt make about forty million dollars a year in violent psychopathic movies and give away three of it to starving children trying to look as if they give a crap about humanity as they spit out more dunces that will consume more than their fair share and wreck the earth even more. (just sayin’).

Wow. Somebody’s going through the change. Did she just attack Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie for providing a home to poor underprivileged children? Yeah, these two are clearly diabolical. I bet next they’ll build a hospital for AIDS victims. God, what a pair of assholes. If only some heroic comedian that everyone assumed was dead would lambaste them on her blog. Oh, wait.

Photo: Getty Images
superficial

  1. jolie and bread are both DAMN DIRTY and SMELLY SHIT-PIT’S!!!!

  2. grow up

    To all the idiots you have NO IDEA how much some of us contribute because you don’t know us. “I don’t see any of you contributing” FUCKING RETARD read the goddamned posts some of us do nothing but give back (see #125) and the reason you can’t “see us” is because you can’t see people from a comment board through the computer screen. Fucking ridiculous. We are talking about LIFESTYLE, the greedy hypocritical lifestyle of these celebritards. From a woman who has gone on ad on in interviews about how every child and every life matters she lives an obscenely luxurious life of multiple million dollar mansions, private planes, a 70 million dollar chateau and more expensive designer shit than you can imagine. All that obscene excess could save so many children’s lives, since they all matter. No one is saying they shouldn’t have comfort and enjoy life but 7 mansions is a little fucking hypocritical for people who constantly talk about how much need and suffering there is in the world.

    On a final note regarding a comment here there is such thing as volunteer firefighters and the point is many people have far more noble, difficult and important jobs than these two, but they aren’t overpaid and completely spoiled and they truly give of themselves not easy money from selling their children’s first baby pictures to the highest bidder or from being paid millions just to wear a brand of clothing. $16 million was paid for pictures of Brad and Angelina’s twins $16 million for a few hours of work in a world where people work like crazy at dangerous jobs saving lives or being exploited just in order to feed their families. It’s easy to donate easy money, it’s much harder to adjust your lifestyle and TAKE LESS, when these two turn their wasteful mansions into shelters or homes for children with cancer then they’ll really be giving.

  3. 125, grow up

    125 ( Alyssa and Sarah)- so you must hate a lot of people, again, some people have jobs helping people, they get paid to do that and don’t always do it out of the kindness of their heart, also the toothfairy isn’t real. Roseanne thinks that Brad and Angie make 40 million per movie ( which they don’t ) yet there is proof they gave more than 3 million dollars to charity this year. 125- you have no life, your post shows this, and obviously you need to get out more if you think even 10 percent of the people in this world are as good and kind as angelina and brad. I have seen them get down in the dirt to help build homes, visit those less fortunate, and they even rescue children, yet you still think you are better?

    I am going to be honest, I don’t know one person that gives any money to charity, so to know that someone gives MINIMUM 8% of their annual income to charity, I wouldn’t think of them as evil.

    What does Roseanne do other than blog, whine and eat?

    face it, you are simply a Jennifer Aniston fan ( who earned more than these two last year according to Forbes and what does she do besides sleep around ) trying to justify yourself…

  4. Annie

    I totally agree. Angelina is completely unprincipled. How can you advocate “save the refugees” and “help Hurrican Katrina victims,” and not know who to vote for in 2008? If she was out there pouring her heart out about small government and fiscal responsibility, maybe I would understand why she likes McCain. However, she advocates for increased government aid, big government, and the expansion of social programs. How the heck can she say that she does not know who to vote for?

    Her comments suggest that her “humanitarism” is merely a form of narcissim (sp?). She cares about the image of promoting human good, but would rather keep her taxes low. She is a complete hypocrite. I used to love her until she made these comments about not knowing who to vote for. She displayed her lack of depth, ability to lie to the press, and hypocrisy.

  5. mmz

    What is it with these fat, bitter, angry marxist ChubHuskers (Roseanne, Rosie O’donnell)??? Angelina, you rock! BTW, Roseanne, you ignorant trailer park blob, say what you will about the GOP(and I’ll agree with a lot of it), but they’ve done more for Africa under Bush than any other President.

  6. missywissy

    OKAY, this entire subject will always be subject to debate, because #1- You have to be a judgemental person at any angle you look at it and #2 Both arguments are true in nature. I felt Roseanne was right on, but then I think out of anyone doing shit for anybody it is Jolie/Pitt, however their’s is probably more publicized. I think there are a lot of people out there that volunteer in other countries (missionaries, peace corp, etc) that don’t get the same attention because they are not rich or celebs. I think Jolie/Pitt are basically poster children for how the world could be if you think with your heart. They are a hypocrisy of themselves, and that’s where the argument lies. Question is, would they still be hot commodities in the industry if they shopped at Wal-Mart and lived in a subdivision somewhere in LA? Probably not. Shit, people that bitch in these forums are usaully dogging on somebody because their clothes look cheap. I applaud Jolie/Pitt because at least they’re doing SOMETHING. Their awareness happens to live with them everyday, and not just on Sundays.

  7. gigi

    Wow – maybe if Roseanne gave up half the food she eats she could take care of starvation in several 3rd World countries.

  8. liz

    I actually agree

  9. !!!!!

    FUCK YESSS. GO ROSEANNE! IT WOULDN’T KILL HER TO BE A BIT MORE COHESIVE AND MATURE WITH HER SENTENCE STRUCTURE, BUT I AGREE %100 WITH WHAT SHE HAS TO SAY.

  10. Camel Toe

    And the problem with this is…….

  11. I agree with Rosanne, and everyone else here who agrees with Roseanne. There’s something bogus about Brangelina. This post is old but the latest news about their latest donation in Ethopia again seems, well, bogus.

    I can’t understand why people go on about these two as humanitarians. Their donations are tax write-offs and every little media stint they pretend bothers them is what gets them that extra cash when they want to pawn out pictures of their newborns.

    What I don’t get, is how people don’t see this.

  12. Nik

    Hah. The comment hullaballoo this has stirred up is hilarious.
    I’m with Roseanne on this one. People are entitled to their opinions, and even though I wouldn’t be so abrasive and expect people to take me seriously, you have to admit, she’s right.

    It doesn’t matter what Roseanne has contributed (besides laughter and relatable television for lower class families), she’s never called herself a humanitarian. I doubt that 3 million per year really makes a dent in the Jolie-Pitts’ big bank accounts. One less chateau they can buy every year. One year, I would like to see a real humanitarian give up the majority of their earnings and live a middle-class life. That would be impressive. :)

Leave A Comment