Paris Hilton didn’t show up to best friend Kim Kardashian’s birthday party at Tao in Las Vegas last Friday and apparently it’s because their egos are clashing. Kardashian didn’t want to go clubbing in Paris’ shadow and Paris is pissed that Kardashian is being called the New Paris. Kardashian’s former publicist says:
“Even when I would talk to editors of magazines and other media outlets about featuring Kim, they would comment on how they are moving past Paris in hopes to bring someone fresh to the spotlight, like Kim.” What’s more, the former PR man claims that Paris Hilton’s other ex-BFF, Britney Spears, broke off their friendship because she was worried about her image. He also claims that Spears wooed Kardashian. “Britney was in NYC and kept texting Kim to hang out and go bowling or something.”
So is being called the New Paris a good thing? It’s not like being compared to Leonardo DaVinci or Albert Einstein. I mean this is Paris Hilton. It’d be more flattering to be compared to a giant slab of salami.
allyrising | April 10, 2007 at 10:30 am
The only thing she’s good for is motorboating.
veggi | April 10, 2007 at 10:30 am
Paris has a friend???? What did that cost?
Fifth Stooge | April 10, 2007 at 10:31 am
Enough of this boring crap. You have to see what the dude a Celebslam has come up with. It’s damn funny and as timely as todays headlines.
Click my handle to view. (Scroll up)
mango1 | April 10, 2007 at 10:32 am
dang, it i didn’t have to sign in, i could have had a “frist”
bugger. which is probably what Paris….
D'arcy | April 10, 2007 at 10:33 am
Who is this person and what does she want?!
mango1 | April 10, 2007 at 10:33 am
In west london, many an asian (london english for ‘south-asian’) have make-up that bad.
get her
monkeyrotica | April 10, 2007 at 10:37 am
Of course she’s better than Paris. She just upped the ante by being used as a toilet. Guess they have to cancel production on Celebrity Pissmops: Volume 2.
Something about her makes me think of Salma Hayek’s ridiculously swollen lactating floobies.
InvaderZim | April 10, 2007 at 10:40 am
That is one nice looking gal…
xXrebeccaXx | April 10, 2007 at 10:43 am
Well she’s beautiful though….Paris is strange looking with a saggy ass and small boobs. This girl has big boobs, big ass, and a beautiful face. The only drawback is the fact that she allows people to piss all over her…shame..
lambman | April 10, 2007 at 10:45 am
Lets see, WAY better body, much cuter face, much less VD, no wonkey eye
Um what did we need Paris for?
Jimbo | April 10, 2007 at 10:45 am
Holy Shit! that is a nice rack. Can I touch them to see if they are real?
@7 don’t be jealous. Those are very nice “ridiculously swollen lactating floobies”
Debutantejaim | April 10, 2007 at 10:45 am
Nice voluptuous body, I’ll give her that but the face?
I’m thinking a real-life busted-version of Disney’s Jasmin.
sharpman | April 10, 2007 at 10:45 am
well at least she got bigger boobs than paris
rrd | April 10, 2007 at 10:46 am
FIfth Stooge you’re an ass. That sight sucks.
whitegold | April 10, 2007 at 10:47 am
Wow, Paris is starting to go through friends quicker than she goes through men! But seriously, I think that for Paris, to not have the spotlight on her for a while might actually be a very good thing for her!
But Kim’s a pathetic loser, and who are the two girls hanging around her in the pic, trying to become quasi-famous also?!
veggi | April 10, 2007 at 10:48 am
I thought this was a fucking celebrity bashing site. Who the fuck is this? Snore.
monkeyrotica | April 10, 2007 at 10:48 am
“hang out and go bowling or something” WTF? Can you imagine finding Kim and Britney bowling together? Unless by “bowling” she means “forcefed bearded clam dip.”
Conky | April 10, 2007 at 10:52 am
BFF’s just don’t last as long as they did in olden times.
I blame GWB.
veggi | April 10, 2007 at 10:53 am
Oh, my bad. Just found out she’s famous for hanging out with Paris and a never released sex tape. Man, what a resume.
freak_show | April 10, 2007 at 10:55 am
Since when it is sexy to have makeup caked on so thick you need a putty knife to remove it? None of them are sexy up close when you see how much they have to wear in order to look “good” to others.
She’s just another J-Lo-HO. Better than looking at old Wonky-Eye herself, but still. Looks like she has her own share of STDs, I don’t care what anyone says.
Blah!
pirhan | April 10, 2007 at 10:58 am
Question is, who does the better close ups? Picture six is scary as hell.
freak_show | April 10, 2007 at 10:58 am
Amen, PIRHAN!
DrPhowstus | April 10, 2007 at 11:02 am
The things I would do to this woman would violate every commandment in the Bible. Twice.
Debutantejaim | April 10, 2007 at 11:02 am
That sandnig was unheard of until she was seen with Paris, same goes for the chic on her right(someting D’Amore?).
Just like Paris the only cred she has is her father.
Kim used Paris(smart bitch) to get some spotlight then copied off Paris by doing a sex-tape(if you’ve seen it you know it’s so obviously staged).
Now Kim is hanging with ALL the chics Paris kicked to the curb or is rivals with.
The HIGHSCHOOL-DRAMA is just getting started folks.
Jimbo | April 10, 2007 at 11:02 am
Veggi – What else does she need for her resume?
whitegold | April 10, 2007 at 11:04 am
If Britney really wants to make friends, maybe she should offer to pee on her. Apparently Kim’s in to that.
And speaking of which, has anyone actually seen this sex tape? For all the hype surronding the activities that allegedly take place in the tape, has anyone actually proven it? Unless somebody says otherwise, I’m starting to think Kim is an even more pathetic loser and the whole thing was just to get people to actually recognize her name. At least Paris actually released her sex tape.
Debutantejaim | April 10, 2007 at 11:05 am
Picture 6!!
WOW! Easy on the makeup, if your pretty less really is more & PLEASE thin those brows out.
Hecubus | April 10, 2007 at 11:08 am
It’s not even slightly funny anymore. This is our fucking culture. WHAT DOES SHE DO ????? WHAT HAS SHE EVER DONE ??????
… OH, so now this is the level our culture is at. She’s famous and has a career in the spotlight because she got pissed on. Honestly can you imagine if some sdvanced alien civilisation came down to Earth to check up on us. We’d have to kill ourselves out of shame.
kamihi | April 10, 2007 at 11:09 am
Sex tape where someone pees on you is just LOW yeah shes much prettier & sexier than Paris, but whats next? someone shitting on you? Shes a slleazy ho, worse than Paris.
Superfish | April 10, 2007 at 11:12 am
I’d totally do her if she didn’t smell like urine.
Debutantejaim | April 10, 2007 at 11:12 am
You gotta be a disease-infested whore when your ALLOWING someone to piss on you.
N@ughty | April 10, 2007 at 11:13 am
#30 I wouldn’t bang her for that exact reason. my only other objections are that she’s a tramp…and I’m a gil.
DIPSET!!!
N@ughty | April 10, 2007 at 11:15 am
@29 she probably did get shitted on but ray j cut out that scene due to “underaged children” that are subsequently allowed to watch porn nowadays. oh boy, what has this world come to. lmao
Debutantejaim | April 10, 2007 at 11:16 am
A gil?
veggi | April 10, 2007 at 11:16 am
yeah, dipset!
N@ughty | April 10, 2007 at 11:17 am
yes a girl. why u think i say N@ughty?…wait, dont answer that.
Debutantejaim | April 10, 2007 at 11:17 am
He shitted on her, twirled his dick in the pile he left on her chest then put that sloppy mess in her sloppy hershey-hole!
jrzmommy♠ | April 10, 2007 at 11:18 am
leave it to someone who enjoys getting pissed on to think it’s a compliment to be called “The New Paris.”
Celebrityoops.TV | April 10, 2007 at 11:18 am
Big B@@BS! that’s all I need
N@ughty | April 10, 2007 at 11:19 am
BY THE WAY…i just noticed i spelled “GIRL” wrong..hehe. i never wos gude at wurds
Debutantejaim | April 10, 2007 at 11:19 am
#38 Well said
Rachelraquel | April 10, 2007 at 11:29 am
I don’t know who this girl is, but she’s cuter than Paris. Sadly, someone called the new Paris will probably end up as nasty as Paris.
DrPhowstus | April 10, 2007 at 11:44 am
@27 — C’mon, those thick brows are there to tickle my balls.
shanonorato | April 10, 2007 at 11:45 am
Butterface.
wedgeone | April 10, 2007 at 11:53 am
Why is no one commenting on the broad to the left of Kim in the main photo? Those be some Ginormous cans too & she should have less baggage. Makes her more desirable than Kim in my book.
While the promo clips of Kim’s video were hot, knowing that she got pissed on just put out the flames of passion in my loins.
All that being said, I’d still rather bang Kim than Paris at this point.
NicotineEyePatch | April 10, 2007 at 11:54 am
Happily maintaining the idea that fame only costs as much as the self-esteem you’re willing to sell!
She’s not the ‘next’ Paris, that implies Paris started this whole whore train, when all she did was just jump on like a fucking flea. This one’s no better, she’s only prettier.
ffordegroupie | April 10, 2007 at 12:10 pm
Hecubus, actually this is nothing new — Andy Warhol could preen all he wanted, but famous-for-being-famous celebs have existed for more than a century, and in multiple countries.
ivve | April 10, 2007 at 12:30 pm
Picture 6 is just plain scary. Plus, most of these pictures make me think of Jesus’s mom (see handle link).
I think she might have a pretty face underneath all that makeup. We might be able to see it if she cut that hair curtain that makes her forehead look weird and pinky-promised us not to ever make that face in picture #6 ever again.
blondewithnobrain | April 10, 2007 at 12:33 pm
ummmmm, i don’t GET it…her birthday is in OCTOBER. why is she celebrating it in April???
HollyJ | April 10, 2007 at 12:38 pm
She’s be really beautiful if the spacing between her eyebrows and hairline was more than 2 nanometers. Where the hell is her forehead?