Kate Upton Is Your ‘Sports Illustrated’ Swimsuit Cover Model. Again.

February 11th, 2013 // 32 Comments

Here’s Kate Upton posing for the 2013 Sports Illustrated Swimsuit issue where she’s become the first model since Tyra Banks (1996 – 1997) to be on two consecutive covers. And apparently all it took is being a blonde with really awesome jugs which you’d just assume would’ve happen sooner. So everybody shut up about stupid ice caps for a minute, have we reached peak tit? Is the world running out of boobs? Does this have to do with throwing strippers in landfills instead of recycling them? Because I fucking told those guys.

Photos: Sports Illustrated / Pacific Coast News

superficial

  1. FattyFatty2X4

    A milking we will go, a milking we will go………

  2. this cover nicely sums up what we want in a “swimsuit edition”.

    No swimsuits.

  3. Kate Upton Swimsuit Cover Sports Illustrated 2013
    JG
    Commented on this photo:

    i like that she has curves…not skeletor like all the other girls

  4. Perfect. Funny that cold makes nipples erect, but shrinks penises.

  5. Max Shreck

    This is sort of the “awesome tits” equivalent of getting Christian Bale to play Batman in three consecutive films.

  6. Kate Upton Swimsuit Cover Sports Illustrated 2013
    BiJenni
    Commented on this photo:

    Damn good thing Time-Warner owns SI, and not CBS. If they did, they’d probably put blackout strips across her cleavage.

  7. Kate Upton Swimsuit Cover Sports Illustrated 2013
    Commented on this photo:

    They should’ve gone with Hannah Davis (the girl in the top right corner of the cover). She’s the model in the DirecTV Genie commercials.

  8. Kate Upton Swimsuit Cover Sports Illustrated 2013
    erica
    Commented on this photo:

    But… sports illustrated? She’s like the least athletic-girl I’ve EVER seen. I’m not saying she isn’t hot, but why make her the poster girl of THIS magazine?

    • SLiver

      Yeah, they should make her the cover model of Breastfeeding Babies Magazine.

    • erica, is this a serious question? The models have nothing whatsoever to do with sports or athleticism. They are eye-candy to spur the male couch potatoes to get up off their dead asses and go to their rooms and masturbate. Now THAT’S athletic.

    • As a young equestrian, Upton showed at the American Paint Horse Association and competed at a national level.[13] With her horse Roanie Pony, she won three APHA Reserve World Championships — 13 and Under Western Riding, 13 and Under Horsemanship, and 14–18 Western Riding. She was named the 13 and Under Reserve All-Around Champion, giving her a total of four reserve championships (2nd place). In addition, Upton ended up third overall on the APHA youth Top Twenty. With a second horse, Zipped, she won 14–18 Western Riding and was included in the top 5 in 14–18 Horsemanship and 14–18 Western Pleasure in 2009

  9. FUCKBEAST

    Meh

  10. I am good with this. Those boobs.

  11. Deacon Jones

    Im a Kate upton fan, well, from the waist up, but FUCK…

    Have you guys seen these pics of Nina Agdal??? Never heard of her until today and holy shit

  12. Flesh Gordon

    Photoshop FTW. Her titties are not that large.

  13. Nina agdal has an incredible body, but that face gives me a corky from “life goes on” vibe.

  14. Cock Dr

    I have no problems with this.
    None at all.

  15. Pixie

    It depresses me that instead of devoting one issue out of the year to highlight female athletes and their accomplishments, they slap a big tittied fap blaster on the cover and make the rest of the issue look like playboy lite. It sure would be nice to be viewed as a whole human being rather than some guy’s sex fantasy. Guys have more depth than this as well, so it must be frustrating on some level to be pandered to like this all the time.

    • Cher X

      Dude…have you never seen the SI Swimsuit edition?

    • Don’t buy it. And hit the gym. Then maybe guys will rub one out to you too. It’s not “pandering”, it’s nature.

      • Pixie

        Well at least you guys have given me hope!! Maybe if I work out hard enough, some guy will want to blow his load to MY image! It certainly gives one something to aspire to!

    • Pat C.

      I read some years ago that the Swimsuit issue sold 10 times as much as a regular Sports Ilustrated issue. They would have to be feeling extremely charitable to say, “nah, we don’t care about that money, at all”.
      Now, how would an issue dedicated to “Women in Sports” do commercially? Interesting question.

      • Pixie

        Oh yeah well money is definitely part of the equation. They put these things out there because this is what sells. I wasn’t arguing that. I was simply stating that it would be really nice for once to be thought of as a whole complex human being who is capable of doing more than serving as a piece of eye candy for the other half of the population. Women buy into these images as well and think their only self worth is in their appearance, so it kind of sucks for everyone.

  16. Kate Upton Swimsuit Cover Sports Illustrated 2013
    Throb the Wonder Mule
    Commented on this photo:

    Love her squishy bits SO much.
    Nope, not an athlete for sure.
    Nom,nom,nom.
    Brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr-onsky !

  17. SLiver

    Kate Upton…nekkid with only paint on…
    http://www.celebuzz.com/2013-02-12/watch-kate-upton-bares-all-in-nothing-but-paint/
    Uh..you’re wel-COME.
    :D

  18. lara

    She probably paid them to feature her again, just like she bought her way in the Met Gala.

  19. Kate Upton Swimsuit Cover Sports Illustrated 2013
    Petey
    Commented on this photo:

    This girl does not have CURVES – she has big boobs, but that does not equal curves. She has no waist whatsoever, no hips, and her legs and arms are toothpicks. She’s very oddly shaped and besides her awesome rack, I’m not sure why she’s so famous.

Leave A Comment