May 09, 2006
Scarlett Johansson is a prude
Execs at L'Oreal are allegedly pissed with Scarlett Johansson because she's refusing to strip for their latest ad campaign. She currently has a $5 million deal with them but has been showing up to shoots in long white dresses and no make-up in an attempt to distance herself from her "sex-kitten image." A source tells The Mail on Sunday newspaper:
"Understandably L'Oreal, which spent a fortune signing Scarlett, and actresses Eva Longoria and Penelope Cruz, want her sexy screen siren glamour. There has been a series of creative differences. She had a problem with the last ad she shot for body lotion. There were a few heated exchanges."
We've already determined Scarlett Johansson isn't a fan of photographers, but when you're getting paid $5 million to appear in pictures, you better damn well do what the photographer wants. He could show up with an angry bear, some handcuffs, and an extra large condom and the only thing she'd be allowed to complain about is the handcuffs being a little tight.
Previous Entries
» Jennifer Aniston wants Mr. T's house» Ashlee Simpson gets a new nose
» Tom Cruise needs a lift
» Jessica Simpson goes red
» Tom Cruise enjoys Mother's Day


Comments
1. Posted by Celeb_Hater on May 9, 2006 08:52 AM
again?
2. Posted by liya on May 9, 2006 08:53 AM
Damn you celeb, in the time it took me to sign in you beat me.
3. Posted by Celeb_Hater on May 9, 2006 08:54 AM
Two in a row!! my lucky day.
I hate SJ. Fat cow. Who would ever want to see that fatty strip??? Not to mention her face. Unfortunately because of all her FAT she doesn't even qualify as a butterface.
4. Posted by Gerald Tarrant on May 9, 2006 08:55 AM
That look on her face screams "punchasize".
5. Posted by liya on May 9, 2006 08:56 AM
Hey if she can strip for a magazine, then whats the problem here??? hate these moron celebs who think they can strip one day and then cover up the next and everyone will believe they're actually serious actors and not whores
6. Posted by sweetcheeks on May 9, 2006 09:04 AM
When you're fat and ugly, it's understandable that stripping would make you a touch uncomfortable. All the wobbly, dimple-y bits on display.
Nothing that the execs at Loreal can clean up with PhotoShop. Long live the myth.
7. Posted by ziggurat on May 9, 2006 09:12 AM
FUCK YOU Scarlett is hotter than 97% of Hollywood.
8. Posted by JollyJumjuck on May 9, 2006 09:17 AM
I think it's a great idea. She can appear as the "before" girl. "Before you put on L'Oreal, you look like this."
9. Posted by BarbadoSlim on May 9, 2006 09:21 AM
I don't know what her problem is really. Wasn't she the one who took it up the ass on an elevator from Benicio del Toro on some event last year.
Maybe they should call Benicio and "refocus" their campaign.
10. Posted by SuperSpence on May 9, 2006 09:23 AM
Finally, an excuse for me to look at cosmetics ads without feeling a little light in the loafers. Scarlett Johanssen MUST do these and she must do them in the nude. I swear by all that is unholy that I will incinerate this wretched Earth and all who live upon it in a boiling lake of fire unless that girl takes her clothes off.
11. Posted by Trotter on May 9, 2006 09:23 AM
I can't wait until she learns about L'Oreal's new line of douches and enemas. I hear Yoko Ono is going to shoot the spots.
12. Posted by SuperSpence on May 9, 2006 09:23 AM
P.S. I'm not kidding. Someone better talk to that girl or every single one of you will be a charcoal briquette.
13. Posted by heifferzzz on May 9, 2006 09:28 AM
Shut up already bitch!
14. Posted by Binky on May 9, 2006 09:29 AM
As the story says - this is a PR move. She wants to change her sex kitten image to ahhh...well... bitch, I guess... Worked for Hepburn.
15. Posted by Lala on May 9, 2006 09:39 AM
When the last ad was for body lotion and the next one is for butt-firming cream, I can see why she'd be pissed. It's finally dawning on her that L'Oreal didn't hire her for her face.
16. Posted by Pearly on May 9, 2006 09:49 AM
It was ok to be nude on the cover of Vanity Fair but not for her million dollar cosmetics campaign? She's an ass!!
17. Posted by evilcookie007 on May 9, 2006 09:56 AM
This chick is ugly. I'm sick of the media telling us who's attractive and who's not. She's not. Not on this planet or any other. GO AWAY!!!
18. Posted by Lala on May 9, 2006 09:57 AM
Pearly, literally or figuratively?
19. Posted by Proteon on May 9, 2006 10:05 AM
Would we hate her more as a stubborn bitch with the nerve to have both self respect and stubborness or if she married a scumbag or rich religious weirdo and pumped out kids?
Answer: All hate is created equal.
20. Posted by PapaHotNuts on May 9, 2006 10:09 AM
I knew a Vietnamese stripper named Scarlett, and she had no problem taking her clothes off for a crisp $5.00 bill. The sad part of this story is, it's completely true. So if L'Oreal is looking to hire someone for a slutty Asian stripper campaign, call me, I know just the chick for the job. She'll also fuck for a crisp $20.00 bill, if that helps get her the job.
21. Posted by sharkbite on May 9, 2006 10:12 AM
Aww, boo hoo, I'm a gorgeous actress, but I'd really rather grub down and look like the commonfolk.
http://www.wehateeverybody.com
22. Posted by 86 on May 9, 2006 10:27 AM
#16 I agree. I guess it's ok to get naked as long as you're selling your own product, but not for endorsements. Hmm.
23. Posted by Mr. Fritz on May 9, 2006 10:28 AM
I just saw "In Good Company" and she was kind of blah in it. She has nice lips and boobs, but that's about it. She reminds me of that episode of Seinfeld where Jerry dates a woman who only looks good in a certain booth at Monk's. I don't think she's fat; I think she has a nice figure. It's a hell of a lot better than Nicole Ritchie's or Lindsey Lohan's. Oh, yeah, Tom Cruise still loves the cock!
24. Posted by Tracy on May 9, 2006 10:30 AM
OK, I'm standing here naked, just waiting for L'Oreal to call. Call me, dammit! I'll do it for $100! One hundred bucks! Maybe I should put my robe on... the neighbors are staring.
25. Posted by Zanna on May 9, 2006 10:37 AM
I'm with you, Pearly.....it makes no sense.
26. Posted by Feed_Me_Chocolate on May 9, 2006 10:50 AM
#16, 22, 25,
That was the first thing that I thought of too. What a hypocrite. I don't know what the big fuss is with her anyways. I personally don't think she's all that. There are much more beautiful and talented actresses in Hollywood, but they don't get the exposure that Scarlett does because they're not mindless whores who wear their tits up to their chins.
27. Posted by thetruthhurts on May 9, 2006 11:07 AM
You don't get to be a whore only when it works for you honey. You took your clothes off to get this far, keep it up bitch!
Seriously, this chick is fugs...I don't get it. She can fade away into oblivion now.
28. Posted by oshkoshb-goshdammgosh on May 9, 2006 11:15 AM
Alexis Arquette is looking hawttt. But seriously folks, how are you going to promote an exfoliating breast cream without dressing up like a naughty nurse and then slowly peeling the uniform off your creamy skin while taking your own temperature? The numbers don't lie, people. Marketing. Yeah.
29. Posted by colormeskanky on May 9, 2006 11:17 AM
i guess they should'be hired x-tina, huh? no such problems there.
30. Posted by colormeskanky on May 9, 2006 11:18 AM
*should've
31. Posted by Iambananas on May 9, 2006 11:26 AM
I can't stand her... she's weird-looking.
32. Posted by dubya24 on May 9, 2006 11:48 AM
Did everyone forget SHE SHOWED HER ASS ON THE COVER OF VANITY FAIR recently?
33. Posted by Gerald Tarrant on May 9, 2006 11:52 AM
@32 - You just might be the real Dubya being that illiterate. I use post #16 as my evidence.
34. Posted by dubya24 on May 9, 2006 11:59 AM
@33
You think I have nothing better to do than read all the posts?
Fuck that. I leave my opinion and get lost.
I wouldn't have used the word "illiterate"...I would have used "negligent"
35. Posted by Amani on May 9, 2006 12:36 PM
Celeb_hater, are you by any chance _blind_?! Scarlett is not fat. She's hot like forkin magma.
36. Posted by gogoboots on May 9, 2006 01:28 PM
Ok, what the fuck was Vanity Fair then?! Sure her tits were covered cause she was laying down but you had a clear view of her ass. If you do it once, people are going to ask you to do it again...so don't be pissed off, in fact, stop wearing all those dresses that showcase your boobage factor... if you're going to be REALLY prudish!
37. Posted by redsonja1313 on May 9, 2006 01:51 PM
# 16 DITTO
38. Posted by TrannyGranny on May 9, 2006 02:27 PM
28 Osh
Tell me it's not an oral thermometer, please!
39. Posted by Nikk The Templar on May 9, 2006 02:46 PM
I support Scarlett in whatever she does. Good for her for sticking to her guns.
40. Posted by Amani on May 9, 2006 03:24 PM
Yeah, Nikk, that's exactly what I was thingking. However much clothes she's got on, I'll be right behind her. I mean... I'll be all over... dammit...
Honestly though. On or off, it doesn't change my opinion, she's cute either way.
41. Posted by Alma on May 9, 2006 03:25 PM
this proves that she actually thinks with her brain and not with her vagina. and if you really think that she is oh so fat and ugly compared to anorexic skanks like paris hilton or nicole ritchie, i pity you.
go scarlett, go charlize, go rachel mcadams and all the beautiful actresses who are celebrities cause they know how to play, not cause they spread STDs.
42. Posted by Captain Awesome on May 9, 2006 04:20 PM
You sign a 5 mil deal to allow a company to whore you out as a spoke person for their make-up products but don't want to strip?
Get over yourself and drop trou, sluttikins.
43. Posted by ProbablyTooOld on May 9, 2006 05:54 PM
She always had a stupid look on her face and now I know it isn't a look.
Come on, honey! You stripped for Vanity Fair and are annoyed at showing skin for a L'Oreal body lotion ad? No one is that stupid. This latest bit of idiocy must be to drum up publicity for some reason.
Besides, since when is L'Oreal a sex kitten line? A couple of the models sort of reek of dirty sex in the back of a flat bed truck (Eva Longoria and Beyonce), but the rest are sort of classy. Andie MacDowell, Penelope Cruz--they're sex kittens? On what planet?
Whatever. Scarlett's a dolt. And soon will be a jobless dolt if she continues to eschew photographs and major cosmetic endorsements. Soon not even Woody Allen will want her for his yawnfests.
44. Posted by Fa Cube Itches on May 9, 2006 06:02 PM
Forget Vanity Fair - the girl owes her entire career to the opening shot of "Lost in Translation" which was her ass crack through a pair of see through panties.
SuperSpence - I'll help you land her on the condition that you always keep your dick in her mouth so she can never talk again. I'll help you find your #2 girl if you pinch her nostrils shut while you are inserted.
45. Posted by Seamus Begonia Smell on May 9, 2006 06:43 PM
what's with the people who called her FAT?! jealous that your fat isn't deposited exclusively in your tits and asses? losers.
46. Posted by sid on May 9, 2006 07:32 PM
Ah, it is only ME who pines for her co-star in Ghost World, Thora Birch.
Thora, it should be YOU getting those deals! I have very little, but I'll give you all I have, Thora...just give me a moment...
Thora....THORRRAAAAAAA! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
-----------------------
Yeah, pfft. That Scarlett is a stupid bitch and a hypocrite.
Tom loves the cock.
Peace.
47. Posted by MasterofMuppets on May 9, 2006 07:44 PM
I'm sorry, what's this thread about? I've just been staring at her boobs for three minutes.
48. Posted by Captain Awesome on May 9, 2006 07:50 PM
Im with sid, Thora needs to sit on my face.
49. Posted by To_Bill_Braskey! on May 10, 2006 10:36 AM
46, i pine for thora as well, i remember her in american beauty
scarlett posed nude for vanity fair! what the fuck is her problem? she needs to get fucked with my cock
50. Posted by brideoffrank on May 10, 2006 11:51 AM
Wait a minute, she was on the cover of Vanity Fair naked! It was VF right? Anyway, she was way nude, and way pale.
51. Posted by Sammie on May 15, 2006 12:43 AM
A prude with a hideous overbite, no less. Oh, it's a hard life for her.
52. Posted by Serg on May 16, 2006 05:32 PM
Actually she wanted to change her sexy image to holly women Jesus value carrier…, so think disjunctive!
53. Posted by Serg on May 16, 2006 05:35 PM
Actually she wanted to change her sexy image to holly women Jesus value carrier…, so think disjunctive!