
The Daily Mail has shots of Victoria Beckham heading to a photoshoot in Los Angeles with her legs looking like this. Apparently she keeps thin by dieting, but her friends say, “She doesn’t exercise at all.” Which still doesn’t explain what we’re looking at here. Is that even considered a leg anymore? I could put together a more human looking leg with a pile of ground beef and a hammer.
UPDATE: To get to the bottom of this I added some additional shots of her legs. The first three are from the Daily Mail and the last four are different higher quality shots. There’s definitely some Photoshop afoot, but the question is which? For the sake of my personal amusement, I’ll just assume the first three are real.























Salopia | July 19, 2007 at 5:23 pm
first!
Sprite | July 19, 2007 at 5:23 pm
Ew
Godfella | July 19, 2007 at 5:23 pm
first!!!!
bingo brown | July 19, 2007 at 5:23 pm
is she a burn victim? sure looks like it.
Mira | July 19, 2007 at 5:24 pm
That… is not… human.
mr funny | July 19, 2007 at 5:26 pm
…yeah, a rug burn victim
Anon | July 19, 2007 at 5:26 pm
Its a photoshop fake people.
Alex | July 19, 2007 at 5:27 pm
u r so dumb for posting this – this is not only photoshop, it’s real bad photoshop, weren’t u just showing other pics of this woman with perfect legs when her husband was supposedly fingering her? make up ur mind!
Kiki | July 19, 2007 at 5:27 pm
Surely that’s photoshopped… We see her legs all the time in pictures and they aren’t like that at all.
Ricky | July 19, 2007 at 5:28 pm
Victoria is a fashion icon with amazing legs…this is simply a bad picture and a bad time. Ive seen her legs looks amazing tons of times.
Sassy | July 19, 2007 at 5:28 pm
Ummm P.H.O.T.O.S.H.O.P.
Britney Crotch Juice | July 19, 2007 at 5:29 pm
No. 8 — spot on. lets see more of britney’s unders! woohoo!
Rachael | July 19, 2007 at 5:30 pm
Definately photoshopped! She has been seen in short skirts and shorts a million times before and her legs are definatley not like this! She has the most skinniest toned legs ever!
Don’t belive these pics people. Obviously its a very slow news day!
wedgeone | July 19, 2007 at 5:30 pm
Q: Why would one leg look so gross and the other one be normal looking (except for the mega-thinness)?
A: It’s a FAKE!
Got fooled again, Fish?
madame_no | July 19, 2007 at 5:33 pm
I hate to admit it, but I actually watched her special Monday night. And for a few minutes she tricked me into believing that I liked her. She said that people always say how attractive David is and how funny she is, which means that they’re calling her a pig or something. But with legs like these, how could anyone call her anything less than a goddess? Her calf kind of looks like a clump of wet sand. And I bet you could carry things in that roll in her thigh. Who needs a purse? How convenient.
luxe | July 19, 2007 at 5:33 pm
ooooooh, fake pictures.
moving on…
justifiable | July 19, 2007 at 5:34 pm
I call photoshop, you can see a blurred area.
Dee | July 19, 2007 at 5:35 pm
As someone who’s job it is to retouch photos every day, I’d say without a doubt… this is a very PISS POOR photoshop job. I’d take this one down before embarassing myself by posting a fake photo.
madame_no | July 19, 2007 at 5:36 pm
Ok, I retract my comments. Her legs did look pretty good on her NBC special. And if they really looked like this I don’t think she could cover it with just make up.
miss oblivious | July 19, 2007 at 5:37 pm
no, I’m not buyin it. That pic is fixed. She’s always walking around in micro minis; I think someone would have noticed that problem by now. Not only that, but she’s much to vain…if her leg really looked like that she would have that shit covered up. Not buyin it
Cher | July 19, 2007 at 5:37 pm
That is such a fake photo, that’s not her real leg!
ukn | July 19, 2007 at 5:37 pm
Would be fun to take a shot of tequila out of her leg crevace.. yum.
Shellz | July 19, 2007 at 5:38 pm
Whatevs…I’m a graphic artist and that leg is so f*cking Photshopped. Total bullsh*t.
swmo | July 19, 2007 at 5:39 pm
I think someone is trying to pull our leg with this picture….correction, Victoria’s leg!
pyrrho | July 19, 2007 at 5:40 pm
I wanna lick it
mrs.t | July 19, 2007 at 5:42 pm
I would be so pissed if someone photoshopped Joan Rivers’ leg on me.
I smell a lawsuit.
Katie | July 19, 2007 at 5:43 pm
What was the point of posting this when TMZ KNEW they were fake photoshop pictures? Just lame, if you ask me. Bad photoshopping, too. At least get someone with some Photoshop skills. Why would someone have just one funky leg? Lame.
lambman | July 19, 2007 at 5:53 pm
you can tell the first 3 are fake because her skin is orange in them
Victoria | July 19, 2007 at 5:54 pm
I agree with comment #27, this is horrible photoshop and why wouldn’t the person photoshop just one leg b/c her right leg seems fine and her left leg looks like a 97 year olds.
All4One | July 19, 2007 at 5:55 pm
It’s Fake..
Try Harder next Time..
mdiz | July 19, 2007 at 5:56 pm
Weak…
krazihottkelli???? | July 19, 2007 at 5:59 pm
dude, if itz not
photozhopped
then I can underztand
Y her legz
would look like that
after 3 kidz..
I zee grozz zhit like
that all the
time at the beach….
children ruin your body….?
wundersmack | July 19, 2007 at 6:02 pm
Those cottage cheese gams are deffo FAKE, because when I hang out with Vic (she lets me call her that) we often comment on how we both have the same smooth, exquisitely sexy legs.
tiff | July 19, 2007 at 6:03 pm
Those bad pics are totally photoshopped. If her leg was seriously that nasty she would not be prancing around in mini-skirts and short dresses every single day.
Rachael | July 19, 2007 at 6:03 pm
Another reason i know this is photoshopped is because there is no way she would walk around showing off her legs if they looked like that.
She said in an interview that you would never see her show off her stomach because she said it looks disgusting after having her boys – and you never ever see her in a bikini – ever. So this just proves that this is photoshopped – she is one high maintenance girl and would’nt be seen dead like this!
wundersmack | July 19, 2007 at 6:06 pm
PS – my left thigh looks just like that.
Happened in ‘Nam.
nia | July 19, 2007 at 6:11 pm
the pics dont even match, the lady w/bad legs is really fair
Chauncey Gardner | July 19, 2007 at 6:15 pm
I’ve always thought that Dogface Beckham looks like one of those horrific stop-motion creations from a Tool video, but this is ridiculous. Even the most deluded of female celebrities would cover shit like that the fuck up.
emily | July 19, 2007 at 6:18 pm
35, mhm. she has really nice legs.
XXXfiles | July 19, 2007 at 6:18 pm
#32 So can your mom get a retroactive abortion? Please say yes. We’ll all pay for it.
krazihottkelli???? | July 19, 2007 at 6:18 pm
BULLZHIT: thatz
what legz
look like after
kidz..zeriouzly..
and when U zit down
like in yezterdayz
pic with her huzband
and zpray your legz
tan color..they alwayz
look zo much better
than walking…dumbzhitz…?
combustion8 | July 19, 2007 at 6:20 pm
thats what happenes when you shit out 3 kids.. your body goes into self destruct mode… ladies can learn from this.
justifiable | July 19, 2007 at 6:21 pm
#41 It’s photoshopped, you fucking moron!!! Because you’re a slow 12 year old, you have NO fucking idea what you’re talking about most of the time, pity that doesn’t stop you, though…
krazihottkelli???? | July 19, 2007 at 6:22 pm
xxxxxxxxxxfuckinfilezfuckerfacexxxxxxx
Y don’t U come down her
zo I can drown
your fuckin azz in the
ocean, bitch…
teddy | July 19, 2007 at 6:23 pm
prove its photoshopped… only way you can do that is to show the original side by side.
photoshopper | July 19, 2007 at 6:28 pm
http://z.about.com/d/shoes/1/0/p/b/victoria_beckham.jpg
#45 If her legs looked as heinous as in this shot, why is this the first time anyone’s seen them like this? This woman is photographed over and over, and now we just see the horrible truth? Get real. The paps would have been all over uggo legs if they existed, so to speak. Look at the blurry areas in the last picture, this is a piss-poor job of retouching.
krazihottkelli???? | July 19, 2007 at 6:28 pm
43/
R we having a bad
day bitch?
Zoundz like…I went
zwimming while
your old azz worked….
yea, I’d hate
my life too if I waz
FUCKIN U, FUCKFACE?
photoshopper | July 19, 2007 at 6:30 pm
#46 It’s the third picture now, the Superficial guy was just dumb enough to post more.
Fuquan | July 19, 2007 at 6:31 pm
BULLSHIT! The daily mail is such a quality paper that they smelled my taint and wrote a story about it.
justifiable | July 19, 2007 at 6:32 pm
#47 kelli, nobody gives a fuck what you do, no matter what mommy tells you. Tantrum much?