Victoria Beckham’s legs will haunt your nightmares

July 19th, 2007 // 189 Comments
victoria-beckham-old-legs-00.jpg

The Daily Mail has shots of Victoria Beckham heading to a photoshoot in Los Angeles with her legs looking like this. Apparently she keeps thin by dieting, but her friends say, “She doesn’t exercise at all.” Which still doesn’t explain what we’re looking at here. Is that even considered a leg anymore? I could put together a more human looking leg with a pile of ground beef and a hammer.

UPDATE: To get to the bottom of this I added some additional shots of her legs. The first three are from the Daily Mail and the last four are different higher quality shots. There’s definitely some Photoshop afoot, but the question is which? For the sake of my personal amusement, I’ll just assume the first three are real.

Victoria Beckham's Formal Hairstyle
Victoria Beckham
Victoria Beckham | CelebWarship
Victoria Beckham in Black Dress, 2007
Victoria Beckham covers i-D magazine's 2012 pre-spring issue
Victoria Beckham's fashion world domination continues with the 37-year-old mother of four starring on the cover of ultra-cool style bible i-D magazine's pre-spring issue. However, the fashion designer and former Spice Girl can't claim to have a monopoly on ...
Victoria Beckham For i-D: Designer Dishes Out Clothing Advice (PHOTO)
We'd hesitate before taking fashion advice from Victoria Beckham, if only because we'd find it hard to replicate. "Fill your closet with Christian Louboutins" or "You can't go wrong with a navy blue fascinator" aren't exactly the kind of tips we ...

Comments (189)

  1. Salopia | July 19, 2007 at 5:23 pm

    first!

    Reply
  2. Sprite | July 19, 2007 at 5:23 pm

    Ew

    Reply
  3. Godfella | July 19, 2007 at 5:23 pm

    first!!!!

    Reply
  4. bingo brown | July 19, 2007 at 5:23 pm

    is she a burn victim? sure looks like it.

    Reply
  5. Mira | July 19, 2007 at 5:24 pm

    That… is not… human.

    Reply
  6. mr funny | July 19, 2007 at 5:26 pm

    …yeah, a rug burn victim

    Reply
  7. Anon | July 19, 2007 at 5:26 pm

    Its a photoshop fake people.

    Reply
  8. Alex | July 19, 2007 at 5:27 pm

    u r so dumb for posting this – this is not only photoshop, it’s real bad photoshop, weren’t u just showing other pics of this woman with perfect legs when her husband was supposedly fingering her? make up ur mind!

    Reply
  9. Kiki | July 19, 2007 at 5:27 pm

    Surely that’s photoshopped… We see her legs all the time in pictures and they aren’t like that at all.

    Reply
  10. Ricky | July 19, 2007 at 5:28 pm

    Victoria is a fashion icon with amazing legs…this is simply a bad picture and a bad time. Ive seen her legs looks amazing tons of times.

    Reply
  11. Sassy | July 19, 2007 at 5:28 pm

    Ummm P.H.O.T.O.S.H.O.P.

    Reply
  12. Britney Crotch Juice | July 19, 2007 at 5:29 pm

    No. 8 — spot on. lets see more of britney’s unders! woohoo!

    Reply
  13. Rachael | July 19, 2007 at 5:30 pm

    Definately photoshopped! She has been seen in short skirts and shorts a million times before and her legs are definatley not like this! She has the most skinniest toned legs ever!
    Don’t belive these pics people. Obviously its a very slow news day!

    Reply
  14. wedgeone | July 19, 2007 at 5:30 pm

    Q: Why would one leg look so gross and the other one be normal looking (except for the mega-thinness)?

    A: It’s a FAKE!

    Got fooled again, Fish?

    Reply
  15. madame_no | July 19, 2007 at 5:33 pm

    I hate to admit it, but I actually watched her special Monday night. And for a few minutes she tricked me into believing that I liked her. She said that people always say how attractive David is and how funny she is, which means that they’re calling her a pig or something. But with legs like these, how could anyone call her anything less than a goddess? Her calf kind of looks like a clump of wet sand. And I bet you could carry things in that roll in her thigh. Who needs a purse? How convenient.

    Reply
  16. luxe | July 19, 2007 at 5:33 pm

    ooooooh, fake pictures.

    moving on…

    Reply
  17. justifiable | July 19, 2007 at 5:34 pm

    I call photoshop, you can see a blurred area.

    Reply
  18. Dee | July 19, 2007 at 5:35 pm

    As someone who’s job it is to retouch photos every day, I’d say without a doubt… this is a very PISS POOR photoshop job. I’d take this one down before embarassing myself by posting a fake photo.

    Reply
  19. madame_no | July 19, 2007 at 5:36 pm

    Ok, I retract my comments. Her legs did look pretty good on her NBC special. And if they really looked like this I don’t think she could cover it with just make up.

    Reply
  20. miss oblivious | July 19, 2007 at 5:37 pm

    no, I’m not buyin it. That pic is fixed. She’s always walking around in micro minis; I think someone would have noticed that problem by now. Not only that, but she’s much to vain…if her leg really looked like that she would have that shit covered up. Not buyin it

    Reply
  21. Cher | July 19, 2007 at 5:37 pm

    That is such a fake photo, that’s not her real leg!

    Reply
  22. ukn | July 19, 2007 at 5:37 pm

    Would be fun to take a shot of tequila out of her leg crevace.. yum.

    Reply
  23. Shellz | July 19, 2007 at 5:38 pm

    Whatevs…I’m a graphic artist and that leg is so f*cking Photshopped. Total bullsh*t.

    Reply
  24. swmo | July 19, 2007 at 5:39 pm

    I think someone is trying to pull our leg with this picture….correction, Victoria’s leg!

    Reply
  25. pyrrho | July 19, 2007 at 5:40 pm

    I wanna lick it

    Reply
  26. mrs.t | July 19, 2007 at 5:42 pm

    I would be so pissed if someone photoshopped Joan Rivers’ leg on me.

    I smell a lawsuit.

    Reply
  27. Katie | July 19, 2007 at 5:43 pm

    What was the point of posting this when TMZ KNEW they were fake photoshop pictures? Just lame, if you ask me. Bad photoshopping, too. At least get someone with some Photoshop skills. Why would someone have just one funky leg? Lame.

    Reply
  28. lambman | July 19, 2007 at 5:53 pm

    you can tell the first 3 are fake because her skin is orange in them

    Reply
  29. Victoria | July 19, 2007 at 5:54 pm

    I agree with comment #27, this is horrible photoshop and why wouldn’t the person photoshop just one leg b/c her right leg seems fine and her left leg looks like a 97 year olds.

    Reply
  30. All4One | July 19, 2007 at 5:55 pm

    It’s Fake..
    Try Harder next Time..

    Reply
  31. mdiz | July 19, 2007 at 5:56 pm

    Weak…

    Reply
  32. krazihottkelli???? | July 19, 2007 at 5:59 pm

    dude, if itz not
    photozhopped
    then I can underztand
    Y her legz
    would look like that
    after 3 kidz..
    I zee grozz zhit like
    that all the
    time at the beach….

    children ruin your body….?

    Reply
  33. wundersmack | July 19, 2007 at 6:02 pm

    Those cottage cheese gams are deffo FAKE, because when I hang out with Vic (she lets me call her that) we often comment on how we both have the same smooth, exquisitely sexy legs.

    Reply
  34. tiff | July 19, 2007 at 6:03 pm

    Those bad pics are totally photoshopped. If her leg was seriously that nasty she would not be prancing around in mini-skirts and short dresses every single day.

    Reply
  35. Rachael | July 19, 2007 at 6:03 pm

    Another reason i know this is photoshopped is because there is no way she would walk around showing off her legs if they looked like that.

    She said in an interview that you would never see her show off her stomach because she said it looks disgusting after having her boys – and you never ever see her in a bikini – ever. So this just proves that this is photoshopped – she is one high maintenance girl and would’nt be seen dead like this!

    Reply
  36. wundersmack | July 19, 2007 at 6:06 pm

    PS – my left thigh looks just like that.

    Happened in ‘Nam.

    Reply
  37. nia | July 19, 2007 at 6:11 pm

    the pics dont even match, the lady w/bad legs is really fair

    Reply
  38. Chauncey Gardner | July 19, 2007 at 6:15 pm

    I’ve always thought that Dogface Beckham looks like one of those horrific stop-motion creations from a Tool video, but this is ridiculous. Even the most deluded of female celebrities would cover shit like that the fuck up.

    Reply
  39. emily | July 19, 2007 at 6:18 pm

    35, mhm. she has really nice legs.

    Reply
  40. XXXfiles | July 19, 2007 at 6:18 pm

    #32 So can your mom get a retroactive abortion? Please say yes. We’ll all pay for it.

    Reply
  41. krazihottkelli???? | July 19, 2007 at 6:18 pm

    BULLZHIT: thatz
    what legz
    look like after
    kidz..zeriouzly..
    and when U zit down
    like in yezterdayz
    pic with her huzband
    and zpray your legz
    tan color..they alwayz
    look zo much better
    than walking…dumbzhitz…?

    Reply
  42. combustion8 | July 19, 2007 at 6:20 pm

    thats what happenes when you shit out 3 kids.. your body goes into self destruct mode… ladies can learn from this.

    Reply
  43. justifiable | July 19, 2007 at 6:21 pm

    #41 It’s photoshopped, you fucking moron!!! Because you’re a slow 12 year old, you have NO fucking idea what you’re talking about most of the time, pity that doesn’t stop you, though…

    Reply
  44. krazihottkelli???? | July 19, 2007 at 6:22 pm

    xxxxxxxxxxfuckinfilezfuckerfacexxxxxxx

    Y don’t U come down her
    zo I can drown
    your fuckin azz in the
    ocean, bitch…

    Reply
  45. teddy | July 19, 2007 at 6:23 pm

    prove its photoshopped… only way you can do that is to show the original side by side.

    Reply
  46. photoshopper | July 19, 2007 at 6:28 pm

    http://z.about.com/d/shoes/1/0/p/b/victoria_beckham.jpg

    #45 If her legs looked as heinous as in this shot, why is this the first time anyone’s seen them like this? This woman is photographed over and over, and now we just see the horrible truth? Get real. The paps would have been all over uggo legs if they existed, so to speak. Look at the blurry areas in the last picture, this is a piss-poor job of retouching.

    Reply
  47. krazihottkelli???? | July 19, 2007 at 6:28 pm

    43/
    R we having a bad
    day bitch?
    Zoundz like…I went
    zwimming while
    your old azz worked….
    yea, I’d hate
    my life too if I waz
    FUCKIN U, FUCKFACE?

    Reply
  48. photoshopper | July 19, 2007 at 6:30 pm

    #46 It’s the third picture now, the Superficial guy was just dumb enough to post more.

    Reply
  49. Fuquan | July 19, 2007 at 6:31 pm

    BULLSHIT! The daily mail is such a quality paper that they smelled my taint and wrote a story about it.

    Reply
  50. justifiable | July 19, 2007 at 6:32 pm

    #47 kelli, nobody gives a fuck what you do, no matter what mommy tells you. Tantrum much?

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Name (Visible)
Email (Required, Not Visible)