Sophie Monk in a bikini

August 10th, 2009 // 90 Comments

Here’s Sophie Monk in Malibu over the weekend, and she’s famous, right? Not that that’s going to stop me from posting these pics, but I just thought I’d ask. You know, make you guys feel like you’re part of a conversation where I dictate all the terms because this is my blog, and I love breasts, dammit.

I’m a service to the community.

Photos: Fame
Sophie Monk Height and Weight - Celebrities Height, Weight And More ...
Sophie Monk
Sophie Monk talked with ShocktilyouDrop about her role in 2009’s ...
Sophie Monk Wallpaper gallery | zunaxx.com
Sophie Monk: 'Glamour modelling is just another acting job'
Monk began appearing in films after Bardot disbanded. She appeared in a minor role as Marilyn Monroe for a high-budget telemovie The Mystery Of Natalie Wood (2004), and she was in the music video "Always" for rock group blink-182. In 2005 Monk portrayed ...
Sophie Monk Covers Maxim Australia March 2012
Bringing her hotness to the Land Down Under forefront, Sophie Monk sizzles on the cover of the March 2012 issue of Maxim Australia. The 32-year-old blonde beauty dons a skimpy black bikini for the magazine's front page while talking about topics like ...

Comments (90)

  1. dubba | August 10, 2009 at 11:12 am

    pam anderson 2.0

    …lets keep the hepatitis off this one …ok

    Reply
  2. jlylec | August 10, 2009 at 11:15 am

    holy christ

    Reply
  3. echoechoecho | August 10, 2009 at 11:16 am

    I wonder how much cock she can fit in her ass?

    Reply
  4. Pistol | August 10, 2009 at 11:17 am

    She really needs to lay off the ghost-white deodorant…..

    Also, is she just pretending she poses like that for shits and giggles by herself, or is this a photo shoot??

    Reply
  5. sokka | August 10, 2009 at 11:17 am

    @1

    you mean “out of this one”

    and by ‘hepatitis” you mean “any penis but mine”

    and by “mine”, i mean “not yours”

    Reply
  6. de | August 10, 2009 at 11:19 am

    lol her fake tan is coming off all patchy
    looks odd
    she’d be much more attractive without the lip collagen

    Reply
  7. ??? | August 10, 2009 at 11:21 am

    who is this and why should I care?

    Reply
  8. Gerald_Tarrant | August 10, 2009 at 11:21 am

    Apparently she took off her top and laid out with her hands covering her breasts. With all these pics they couldn’t have gotten any of her tits out? Paps are slipping.

    Reply
  9. Jesus, Son of God | August 10, 2009 at 11:27 am

    16 photos and not one ass shot. Pathetic!

    Reply
  10. Polit | August 10, 2009 at 11:31 am

    Typical american sex toy. Nothing spectacular, but eminantly fuckable.

    I approve.

    Reply
  11. uh Uh UH! Yeah ... hand me a kleenex, and clean yourself up. Here's $10, take a taxi home. | August 10, 2009 at 11:32 am

    ya where’s dat butt shot?

    Reply
  12. Erica | August 10, 2009 at 11:33 am

    Her mouth never closes… eek.

    Reply
  13. Bay | August 10, 2009 at 11:34 am

    Looks like her belly button is infected.

    Reply
  14. Kelley | August 10, 2009 at 11:34 am

    … and an ill-fitting one at that …

    Reply
  15. Kelley | August 10, 2009 at 11:36 am

    #10 … you mean iminently … no such word as eminently, bonehead.

    Reply
  16. Mike | August 10, 2009 at 11:40 am

    Eminently=noteworthy; Webster online isn’t your friend.

    Reply
  17. Kelley | August 10, 2009 at 11:57 am

    Webster had nothing to do with it. And I know what it means, he doesn’t.

    Reply
  18. Billy | August 10, 2009 at 12:01 pm

    Marta Kristen clone (look it up)…

    Reply
  19. The Jerk | August 10, 2009 at 12:05 pm

    It’s always amazing when nobody’s end up posing somewhere in a bikini for papz to take pics. I ended up looking up her wiki and I saw nothing noteworthy to mention except something about how her vagina is able to create black holes or was it that she had a black cock, ah hell I can’t remember..

    Reply
  20. Fo sure | August 10, 2009 at 12:11 pm

    Hubba, hubba, hubba. For those guys who don’t find this woman attractive, its time to officially announce YOU are gay.

    Reply
  21. g | August 10, 2009 at 12:11 pm

    bad tit job; bad lip job; no thanks

    Reply
  22. frank the dolphin | August 10, 2009 at 12:15 pm

    Aussie’s are spoilt. Miranda Kerr and Sophie Monk. Exports you can bank the economy on.

    Reply
  23. bonehead | August 10, 2009 at 12:17 pm

    Who the hell is she?

    Nice tits tho…

    Reply
  24. Jason | August 10, 2009 at 12:19 pm

    Poor Kelley. “Imminently fuckable?” LOL. That makes no sense. “She’s about to be fucked any second now”.

    Now, an “eminently fuckable” (noteworthy fuck) is spot on.

    Reply
  25. ROUGH Daddy | August 10, 2009 at 12:20 pm

    All I wanna know is why did she gets dump for Paris…Maybe shes all show and no action…

    Reply
  26. Perkin Merkin | August 10, 2009 at 12:39 pm

    She’s good looking. Definitely wouldn’t kick her out of bed.

    Reply
  27. Perkin Merkin | August 10, 2009 at 12:39 pm

    She’s good looking. Definitely wouldn’t kick her out of bed.

    Reply
  28. Kelley | August 10, 2009 at 12:48 pm

    Poor Jason, there is no such word as eminently. Good one, though.

    Reply
  29. Chuck Nunchuck | August 10, 2009 at 12:49 pm

    Knowing her last name, if I were making sex with her I would have images of the main guy from Monk in my head. Not good.

    Reply
  30. Rod | August 10, 2009 at 12:53 pm

    ugly face.. looks like a weasel smelling garbage

    Reply
  31. DeviousJinx | August 10, 2009 at 12:55 pm

    #28 – I think someone pointed it out earlier, you really should make friends with Merriam Webster online (provided you can copy and paste that into the browser because God knows you can’t spell it).

    http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/eminently

    Reply
  32. Mike Wallace | August 10, 2009 at 1:06 pm

    I love her eyes………………………..and other parts!!

    Reply
  33. thumper | August 10, 2009 at 1:14 pm

    @32 – And I love your gumption and hard-nose reporting style!

    Reply
  34. Viv | August 10, 2009 at 1:56 pm

    Let’s see…

    Main Entry: em·i·nent·ly
    Pronunciation: \-l?\
    Function: adverb
    Date: 1616
    : to a high degree : very

    Main Entry: im·mi·nent
    Pronunciation: \'i-m?-n?nt\
    Function: adjective
    Etymology: Latin imminent-, imminens, present participle of immin?re to project, threaten, from in- + -min?re (akin to Latin mont-, mons mountain) -- more at mount
    Date: 1528
    : ready to take place; especially : hanging threateningly over one's head

    – im·mi·nent·ly adverb

    It looks to me that Polit’s “eminantly” was just a typo but used the word correctly…

    Kelley on the other hand: yours was eminently not a brain fart, it was a brain defecation….look it up

    Reply
  35. Funeral Guy | August 10, 2009 at 2:16 pm

    Not hot, whoever the fuck she is.

    Reply
  36. The Jerk | August 10, 2009 at 2:17 pm

    Look’s like the nazi grammar and spelling police are out today except @34…did you actually mean brain defection? Next time use an autocheck program when you want to pwn someone in a battle of spelling/proper grammar wit.

    Reply
  37. www.thinspiration.info | August 10, 2009 at 2:18 pm

    Gorgeous!

    Reply
  38. pretty sophie | August 10, 2009 at 2:25 pm

    I think she is still beautiful. I wonder what happened between her and benji all the time. Her eyes are mesmerizing !

    Reply
  39. Superbiggerevil | August 10, 2009 at 2:29 pm

    Nice to look at and probably fun to violate in the bathroom of some wedding reception hall, but who the fuck is she?

    Reply
  40. Viv | August 10, 2009 at 2:43 pm

    Just because you’ve never seen a word before it doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist Look it up jerk.

    Reply
  41. The Jerk | August 10, 2009 at 3:07 pm

    @40…Worst.Comeback.Ever

    Reply
  42. Anonymous | August 10, 2009 at 3:13 pm

    She is frighteningly ugly.

    Reply
  43. Viv | August 10, 2009 at 3:16 pm

    You’re not even worth the trouble, Jerk

    Reply
  44. lizzy | August 10, 2009 at 3:35 pm

    she is useless, but that suit is adorable.

    Reply
  45. The Jerk | August 10, 2009 at 3:38 pm

    @43. Viv the mere fact you have provded nothing but FAIL in this thread and continue to keep tapping those chubby fingers of yours with the replies is priceless and fucking amusing..now shush.

    Reply
  46. Viv | August 10, 2009 at 4:35 pm

    Actually you are an ignorant twat. “defecation” is a real word and you couldn’t even grasp that. You talk about a battle of spelling/proper grammar wit but you have already failed at that miserably. You do not even have a full understanding of the English language to know that “defecation” is a word.

    pathetic loser.

    Reply
  47. Pistol (the double English degree holder) | August 10, 2009 at 5:06 pm

    Dear The Jerk:

    “Look’s like the nazi grammar and spelling police are out today except @34…did you actually mean brain defection? Next time use an autocheck program when you want to pwn someone in a battle of spelling/proper grammar wit.”

    I find it hilarious that you managed to type up this message preaching the necessity of using proper spelling/grammar in a battle of spelling/grammar, yet YOUR OWN FIRST WORD was “Look’s.”

    Look’s? Is look a noun? Does it possess a like? No. You, too, fail at English.

    Reply
  48. The Jerk | August 10, 2009 at 5:16 pm

    @46..”Kelley on the other hand: yours was eminently not a brain fart, it was a brain defecation”…once again your stupidity has led you to ignore the fact you couldn’t answer a simple fucking question I asked whether you meant a brain DEFECT or that the person you failed to insult with having the brain shit all over themselves, much like yourself has done still.. -_-

    @47..LOLz..Pistol, I bet you spent a whole fucking half hour proof-reading your message before you sent that comment. I can just tell you made sure to dot your I’s and cross your T’s with all the perfection of the apostrophes and punctuation..Bravo shitbag, Bravo.

    Reply
  49. The ZaZ | August 10, 2009 at 5:21 pm

    Yum.

    Reply
  50. You live up to your name | August 10, 2009 at 5:30 pm

    You are definitely “the jerk.”

    @46..”Kelley on the other hand: yours was eminently not a brain fart, it was a brain defecation”…once again your stupidity has led you to ignore the fact you couldn’t answer a simple fucking question I asked whether you meant a brain DEFECT or that the person you failed to insult with having the brain shit all over themselves, much like yourself has done still.. -_-

    Try and cover it up all you like, the simple point is that YOU fucked up and are trying to backpedal. You had to ask the question of did she mean to say brain defect because you had no understanding of the word defecation. It makes common since in the original post. Why is it that you could not grasp that?

    Whine like the pussy that you are all you like about someone not answering a retarded question of yours. The simple fact is that it did not deserve an answer because the original meaning was very clear in the post. You on the other hand failed and had to ask a question. Give it up and face the fact that you have made yourself look like a complete tool. Preaching to people about spelling and grammar and you cannot even grasp it yourself.

    douchebag

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Name (Visible)
Email (Required, Not Visible)