Shiloh Nouvel Jolie-Pitt wax figure goes live

July 26th, 2006 // 150 Comments
Angelina Jolie in Salt Wallpaper in 1024x768 Resolution
Angelina Jolie - Angelina Jolie Wallpaper (64026) - Fanpop
Angelina Jolie Photos That You Probably Newer Seen | Anand's World ...
Angelina Jolie - Angelina Jolie Wallpaper (4103831) - Fanpop
Angelina Jolie & Kids Visit Berlin's Legoland
Angelina Jolie is in Berlin promoting her feature directorial debut, "In the Land of Blood and Honey," but she managed to escape the film circuit for a bit of fun with three of kids. On Thursday afternoon, the 36-year-old actress-turned-writer/director was ...
Angelina Jolie added to Oscar show
LOS ANGELES, Feb 8 (TheWrap.com) - Now Angelina Jolie has another reason to accompany her Oscar-nominated husband Brad Pitt to the Academy Awards on February 26: Jolie will serve as a presenter, producers Brian Grazer and Don Mischer announced on Wednesday.

Comments (150)

  1. gatorbates | July 26, 2006 at 2:55 pm

    She’s a whore I tell you!!

    Reply
  2. gammanormids | July 26, 2006 at 2:55 pm

    how stupid, honestly…

    Reply
  3. gatorbates | July 26, 2006 at 2:55 pm

    She’s a whore I tell you!!

    Reply
  4. will | July 26, 2006 at 2:56 pm

    you know, i’m getting really sick and tired of this site and its constant degradation of celebrities. have you ever thought how hard it is to be one of them? they’re always in the spotlight, and every little thing they do is blown up in the media. try to put yourself in their shoes for once.

    hahahahaha, yea, right, i love this site.

    Reply
  5. SoftBlueGlow | July 26, 2006 at 2:56 pm

    Gah! Cover that ridiculously ugly thing up!

    …the baby, not Angelina…

    http://www.VeryLiberating.com

    Reply
  6. will | July 26, 2006 at 2:57 pm

    oh, and what is up with brad pitt’s face. it kind of looks like david duchovney’s shunken hand in zoolander.

    Reply
  7. leahdeadly | July 26, 2006 at 2:58 pm

    that angelina looks a lot like mandy moore. questionable.

    Reply
  8. CoJo | July 26, 2006 at 2:58 pm

    what is up with the nipple shot in #3? Someone wish from the last brangelina post came true…she’s kinda naked…NICE!

    Reply
  9. eXtasyStef | July 26, 2006 at 2:59 pm

    Had me going there, will.

    They look like Fembots. Brad is the version for gay men.

    Reply
  10. AnastasiaBeaverhausen | July 26, 2006 at 3:01 pm

    Brad Pitt looks pretty mad. How can you be mad standing next to Angelina Jolie?…unless since the baby her snatch is all stretched out and flappy. Oh well, all the better for fisting, I say.

    Reply
  11. mamasita | July 26, 2006 at 3:02 pm

    Weird

    Reply
  12. elliott | July 26, 2006 at 3:03 pm

    they got the nipples right anyway.

    Reply
  13. jrzmommy | July 26, 2006 at 3:03 pm

    Did they give the other two kids back? What the fuck? Aren’t the brown kids important anymore? What a cunt!

    Reply
  14. will | July 26, 2006 at 3:05 pm

    ooh, i got it. brad pitt was unavailable for the posing, so ben folds offered to stand in.

    Reply
  15. Ver | July 26, 2006 at 3:05 pm

    I am amused at the attention to detail. The sculptors went so far as to give her realistic pointy nipples and put her in a semi-transparent top.

    Reply
  16. jrzmommy | July 26, 2006 at 3:10 pm

    The display will be vandalized. The Angelina statue will have a knife stuck in it’s back and the hair ripped out. The Brad statue will have the genital area mutilated beyond recognition and the baby statue will be stolen. The authorities find a drunken and dazed Jennifer Aniston at the top of the tallest building in town trying to breastfeed the baby statue.

    Reply
  17. BoognishRising | July 26, 2006 at 3:14 pm

    Is the Angelina Jolie figure anatomically-correct from the waist down? If so, is it for sale?

    Reply
  18. Erienne | July 26, 2006 at 3:14 pm

    jrzmommy, you are fucked up. Like seriously sick in the head.

    I think they did a good job on Angelina, Brad does look irritated.

    Reply
  19. Jacq | July 26, 2006 at 3:15 pm

    Love that they gave her nips and Brad doesn’t even look like Brad.
    He must have been scupleted by that blind lady from Lionel Richie’s “Hello” video – cause that bust didn’t look like him, either.

    Reply
  20. jrzmommy | July 26, 2006 at 3:18 pm

    18–You think what I posted is sick? HA! That’s TAME! Read some of the other comments on some of the other threads if you want sick.

    Reply
  21. Astriastar | July 26, 2006 at 3:19 pm

    #19 you beat me to the punch on the nipple comment. They really went for realism, at least on her.

    Reply
  22. Memphis Chick | July 26, 2006 at 3:19 pm

    The big lips & nips are correct, wonder if they got the latitude & longitude tatts correct??

    Reply
  23. twzzlrgirl | July 26, 2006 at 3:25 pm

    Click on the last picture in the top row. That is just scary. Angelina looks possessed, and Brad, in wax, looks like he’s melting — that’s why the head is so small.

    And I think she’s gorgeous, so it’s the wax figures that are screwed up.

    Reply
  24. pinky_nip | July 26, 2006 at 3:26 pm

    I didn’t realize David Spade was banging Angelina.

    Reply
  25. Praz | July 26, 2006 at 3:28 pm

    At least they got one detail correct: Brad Pitt is always behind his wife, never next to and definitely never in front of.

    Reply
  26. jemsinamood | July 26, 2006 at 3:31 pm

    This whole thing is just wrong.

    Reply
  27. thatshot | July 26, 2006 at 3:31 pm

    I love that they put standing Brad behind Angelina, like her little puppy dog…is it just me or does he look small next to her, too.. like he’s the woman and he’s cowering in her shadow.. that’s great.
    And Madame Tussaud’s getting a little R rated no? See through shirt and areolas… wow..

    Reply
  28. sometimesboy | July 26, 2006 at 3:31 pm

    the interesting thing is, plans were scrapped to do the new tom cruise family, because, as you may already know…no one likes waxed fruit…a real shame, really, because katie holmes and the ‘baby’ already have that blank, soulless look…

    Reply
  29. stingybtchsuzy | July 26, 2006 at 3:33 pm

    Why is the baby in a doggy bed? And why is Jerry Bruckheimer in this exhibit?

    Reply
  30. Italian Stallion | July 26, 2006 at 3:34 pm

    They look like they just got back from a robbery……….

    Reply
  31. Glossed Over | July 26, 2006 at 3:35 pm

    Were they trying to make an already scary family even more frightening? Because they succeeded. I’m going to have nightmares about this.

    http://glossedover.com

    Reply
  32. sometimesboy | July 26, 2006 at 3:35 pm

    “katie, d’ya wanna be a wax dummy?”

    katie- “sure.”

    i’m in the soup, baby.

    Reply
  33. jrzmommy | July 26, 2006 at 3:45 pm

    I’d like to wear some of those wax lips and blow Brad Pitt’s wax dick! Who wants to watch? C’mon you know you do LOL!!

    Reply
  34. jrzmommy | July 26, 2006 at 3:46 pm

    Stallion, baby, I think they robbed your sense of humor! Lighten up, baby.

    Reply
  35. CMonster0125 | July 26, 2006 at 3:46 pm

    I like how someone is holding the wax baby up to be in the picture (#3). Just like in real life, wax celebrities don’t want anything mucking up a perfectly good manicure.

    Reply
  36. purplepuppy | July 26, 2006 at 3:47 pm

    Yikes! Very creepy (shudder).

    Reply
  37. twzzlrgirl | July 26, 2006 at 3:48 pm

    #28 — waxed fruit! Priceless.

    Reply
  38. jrzmommy | July 26, 2006 at 3:51 pm

    Imposter trolls are everywhere. Triflin’ cunts, I tell ya.

    Reply
  39. keksr | July 26, 2006 at 3:52 pm

    looks like anyone but angelina. except for the lips and nipples, maybe.

    Reply
  40. Fugurself | July 26, 2006 at 3:54 pm

    If a tree falls on a baby in the forest, and no one is around to hear it, is it still hilarious?

    Reply
  41. Iambananas | July 26, 2006 at 3:54 pm

    Wow… that… baby… looks… so… real.

    Reply
  42. Iambananas | July 26, 2006 at 3:55 pm

    When do we get a wax lovely image of Tom and Kaite’s baby?

    Reply
  43. Iambananas | July 26, 2006 at 3:56 pm

    Oh, I forgot…
    THE
    BANANA
    IS
    BACK
    .

    Reply
  44. jrzmommy | July 26, 2006 at 3:57 pm

    I can wax poetic… get it?

    BTW, fucking trolls under my nails.. I tells ya.. me thinks me a pirate. Argh, matey!

    Reply
  45. Fisher55 | July 26, 2006 at 3:57 pm

    celebrity wax babies are fucking hot

    Reply
  46. ob1 | July 26, 2006 at 3:58 pm

    Wow, nice nips.

    that bitch has three titties… one for milk, one for water, and one that’s out of order.

    Reply
  47. pinky_nip | July 26, 2006 at 3:58 pm

    I would love to see these three sitting in a car in the parking lot with the windows up.

    Reply
  48. Iambananas | July 26, 2006 at 3:59 pm

    Lets see how many losers who are still posting on this site EVERY DAY still since Ive been gone…

    Italian Stallion… get a life already!

    pinky_nip… go outside… it’s summer!

    Jacq … there is life outside the computer!

    Is it… can it be… is jane’s eyre gone? Probably left when I did because she had no one to stalk anymore.

    Reply
  49. jrzmommy | July 26, 2006 at 4:01 pm

    YEAH! lambananas didn’t mention me! Do you like my posts bananas! I know everyone else enjoys my funny sense of humor… I should hit the comedy club circuits! I could be the next Paula Poundstone!!!

    Reply
  50. Iambananas | July 26, 2006 at 4:03 pm

    jrzmommy… actually, I don’t remember you from when this site was cool and not all about Lindsey Hohan, Paris Hilton and Angelina Jolie. So, you’re a newbie.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Name (Visible)
Email (Required, Not Visible)