Hey, I like mummies. I really do. But there’s a reason you don’t often see them having sex, and it’s not because they’re afraid the video camera will eat their soul. I mean, look at this picture. Sharon’s face has more lines than Kate Moss’s bathroom. Yep, can’t wait to see this naked.
 |
Gisele Bundchen Speaks Out After Her Latest Controversy – Lainey Gossip |
 Lady Gaga Reveals Her Eating Disorder – Huffington Post | |
| Naomi Campbell sexy new photoshoot. – Fox News | |
| Vanessa Hudgens Falls Out Of Her Shirt – Popoholic | |
| Celebrities' Real Names Exposed – Newser | |
| No bras here. – The Chive |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Jennifer Lopez Smacks Marc Anthony On Camera (VIDEO) |
Kissing Connection: Justin Bieber's Past & Present Loves (VIDEO) |
Kristen Stewart's Movie Roles Through the Years (PHOTOS) |
Adam Levine Signs 'Glee' Guy to New Label, Poses For Terry Richardson (PHOTOS) |
Camila Alves Flashes Engagement Ring, Talks Wedding Plans (PHOTOS) |
'Madly in Love' Robert Pattinson & Kristen Stewart Hang Tight in Los Angeles |
llanelwy | March 13, 2006 at 9:55 am
man i thinbk anyone would have loads of lines if they were pulling a face like that.
–Steve
blondi | March 13, 2006 at 10:06 am
I thought she’s had facial work done, though?
T-Bag | March 13, 2006 at 10:12 am
I think I just crapped my pants
chronic | March 13, 2006 at 10:14 am
Agree with #1. What’s the point of trashing someone’s appearance when it’s obviously just a ridiculous photo in the first place. Anyone would look bad and wrinkled pulling that face. Lame.
DrDanny | March 13, 2006 at 10:17 am
Y’all are crazy, ya know that? She’s hot for sure, and if you were over 30 you’d recognize that. Even better, she’s a woman with the cojones to not care what you think.
Bring it on, Ms. Stone!
suz0111 | March 13, 2006 at 10:17 am
Give the woman a break. She’s 48, for God’s sake. Give her some credit for not mutilating her face like Meg Ryan obviously has.
Becca | March 13, 2006 at 10:19 am
The camera caught her at a bad moment. But damn it would be priceless if her face permanently froze that way hahaha.
mamacita | March 13, 2006 at 10:25 am
I agree. You can’t expect someone to not have a lot of lines when they’re making that kind of face, can you? I guess that proves that she hasn’t gone the Botox route. Now, that’s what would be bizarre. Imagine making a face like that and NOT having any lines. Freaky.
LinguisticAnthro | March 13, 2006 at 10:27 am
I’m more concerned about her ghastly lipstick color. That and the fact that she looks exactly like Clay Aiken.
DevastatorX | March 13, 2006 at 10:28 am
I hear she’s in the running for anew reality show called “Desperate B-List Actresses>”
I wonder how many lines her old ass has? Any guesses?
MacMac | March 13, 2006 at 10:28 am
Yeah, that lip color IS awful.
But I thought she looked more like Owen Wilson!
Spindoc | March 13, 2006 at 10:35 am
OK, I hate myself for even remotely supporting Sharon Stone, however, for a Blond, over 40 in the Ca. sun thats not so bad.
lysistrata11 | March 13, 2006 at 10:39 am
Wow I thought someone would’ve already said “I’d hit it”.
Go Sip | March 13, 2006 at 10:47 am
More lines than Kate Moss’s bathroom, funny stuff.
Someone turned that Hollywood smile into a Bunny Grimace
Go Sip | March 13, 2006 at 10:47 am
More lines than Kate Moss’s bathroom, funny stuff.
Someone turned that Hollywood smile into a Bunny Grimace
blondi | March 13, 2006 at 10:53 am
#12, she’s not a natural blonde, check out those dark eyebrows. And that’s a very fake yellow color she’s got there. Not that celebrities-with-fake-looking-blonde-color is anything new or special.
aimatcha | March 13, 2006 at 10:55 am
She DOES look good for her age. I like Sharon Stone. If I didn’t, my comment would have been “The Cryptkeeper called…he wants his face back.”
ESQ | March 13, 2006 at 11:05 am
It is amazing what Hollywood special effects artists can do.
BarbadoSlim | March 13, 2006 at 11:06 am
“more lines than kate Moss’ bathroom….”
that’s GOLD Jerry, GOLD!!
hahahahahahahaha
Lala | March 13, 2006 at 11:07 am
Strangely, I can now see into Lindsay Lohan’s future and this is what she looks like.
BarbadoSlim | March 13, 2006 at 11:09 am
I don’t know #20, all I see in La Lohan’s future is a casket.
LRonHoover | March 13, 2006 at 11:25 am
I’d HIT IT!!!!!!!
Grphdesi23 | March 13, 2006 at 11:36 am
She’s plotting evil………again.
andrewthezeppo | March 13, 2006 at 11:37 am
I feel like I’m caught between a rock and a harpy place…
On the one hand I don’t think its fair to make fun of a woman who’s almost 50, but on the other had if that woman gets herself cast in a sexy thriller and then forces producers to digitally remove wrinkles she should be endlessly made fun of.
So I’ll sum up by saying this.
Sigourney Weaver is 9 years older than Sharron Stone and DAMN SIGOURNEY IS STILL FINE! and a hell of a lot better an actress too, and not made of plastic.
Grphdesi23 | March 13, 2006 at 11:38 am
She’s a maneater………Watch out boy she’ll chew you up
Fatty Boom-Batty | March 13, 2006 at 11:42 am
She puts the “GRrrr” in ELDERLY.
Fatty Boom-Batty | March 13, 2006 at 11:44 am
Wait. That joke sucked…How about this one instead.
She puts the “GRRrrr” in Great-Grandmother.
Better?
lysistrata11 | March 13, 2006 at 11:56 am
#27-that makes much more sense. lol
PBlo | March 13, 2006 at 11:58 am
Meh. Can’t we just go back to that happier time when nobody remembered Sharon Stone was supposed to be famous?
Allie D. | March 13, 2006 at 12:05 pm
Um, ok! That picture is not exactly the best example of trying to prove how wrinkled someone’s face truly is when they have that kind of an expression on their face.
gogoboots | March 13, 2006 at 12:16 pm
Uhm, she is 48 and probably doesn’t have face lifts very often. I’m not totally suprised. Find something else to bitch about.
bootface | March 13, 2006 at 12:24 pm
I think she looks like a cross between Lindsay Lohan and Clay Aiken in that pic…FREAK!
id still fuck her
scorp69 | March 13, 2006 at 12:25 pm
omg! A celebrity over 40 that actually has EXPRESSION in her face (gasp!)!! what is the world coming too? Plastic faces, I say…for everybody!
they’re wrinkles people…we’ll all get them.
honeycomb's_big_yeahyeahyeah | March 13, 2006 at 12:28 pm
Upon reading this I remembered what my first grade teacher Sister Michaelmas would say when she heard one of us miserable Catholic school brats say something totally untrue or uncalled-for.
“Shut up your face!”
So yeah, shut up your face Superfish!
The woman is getting up there, sure, but we should all look so good, brah. I’ve seen people in their supposed prime with less beauty and tone. And this picture just sucks dingleberries anyhow.
It’s too early in the day to quote the Maltese nuns of my elementary school days…but look what you’ve made me do!
suzy | March 13, 2006 at 12:32 pm
ugh, she just hadn’t taken her botox shot… that’s all
my_glorious_lawn | March 13, 2006 at 12:39 pm
Yeah, agreed, it’s a pic where anyone would look like that way if they were pulling that kind of clown face.
However, if she was on top and got all hot with me and stuff, I wouldn’t mind if she looked that way. She is Sharon Stone, I only care about what lies in between her thighs. :)
She is still hot if you ask me.
Shaun | March 13, 2006 at 12:40 pm
She’s not that bad. But her movies still blow.
Evangelia | March 13, 2006 at 12:47 pm
lol, #9! she does look exactly like clay aiken! possibly related? too bad there is no chance of them having a baby that looks EXACTLY LIKE THEMSELVES (!), since:
1. clay is a fag.
2. sharon is about 20 years past menopause, and
3. even a heterosexual man would not go near this bitch’s vag. we’ve all seen it 547679 times already anyway.
i have a special vendetta against sharon stone ever since i saw her high on crack at a benefit concert for the marines. it’s hard to believe, but even men who had been stuck in the iraqi desert for months, without nary a playboy to slake their desires, would get in this old ho’s pants. she’s just that crazy and gross.
The Lazy Asian | March 13, 2006 at 12:53 pm
She still looked pretty good in those Basic Instinct 2 trailers. I’m giving her the benefit of the doubt.
Evangelia | March 13, 2006 at 12:58 pm
and fine, i commend her for not getting face lifts and being “natural” or whatever, but she shouldn’t be making pornos at her age either. am i being age-ist? probably. i don’t care.
blueballs | March 13, 2006 at 1:09 pm
Her face might look like she had acid thrown on it, but her pussy still looks terrific!
DancingQueen | March 13, 2006 at 1:34 pm
Hey look, at least she not “Stone-faced!” I commend her for not being all botoxed-up like the rest of Hollywood over 35.
HollyJ | March 13, 2006 at 1:48 pm
I’d have that facial expression, too, if someone just stuck their middle finger up my ass.
boobtube | March 13, 2006 at 1:58 pm
basic instinct 2 = box office blast!
TrompeyNo | March 13, 2006 at 2:06 pm
The lines are nothing. It’s that splotchy skin. I have heard that’s from taking birth control pills for too long (no joke). It looks worse in person; why would a woman let that happen?
LOOKWHATICANDO | March 13, 2006 at 2:35 pm
Sharon Rocks, and will always be sexy to me, even with her squincing her face like that, she is still hot stuff.
BarbadoSlim | March 13, 2006 at 2:57 pm
that would have to read: all her movies suck AND blow #37:)
prideofchucky | March 13, 2006 at 3:12 pm
With a face like that she shouldn’t be remaking BASIC INSTINCT she should be remaking DRIVING MISS DAISY
“Hoke… You my best friend.”
mrschickee | March 13, 2006 at 3:28 pm
Completely off topic, but #34 – Because of you, I could not read any more comments on this post. Your name caused the Honeycombs jingle from my youth to continually play in my head, forcing me to lose concentration and rendering me incapable of any coherent thought.
Thanks.
happy_bunny | March 13, 2006 at 3:34 pm
When I imitate that facial expression, my face wrinkles up too. And I’m twelve years old.