Execs at L’Oreal are allegedly pissed with Scarlett Johansson because she’s refusing to strip for their latest ad campaign. She currently has a $5 million deal with them but has been showing up to shoots in long white dresses and no make-up in an attempt to distance herself from her “sex-kitten image.” A source tells The Mail on Sunday newspaper:
“Understandably L’Oreal, which spent a fortune signing Scarlett, and actresses Eva Longoria and Penelope Cruz, want her sexy screen siren glamour. There has been a series of creative differences. She had a problem with the last ad she shot for body lotion. There were a few heated exchanges.”
We’ve already determined Scarlett Johansson isn’t a fan of photographers, but when you’re getting paid $5 million to appear in pictures, you better damn well do what the photographer wants. He could show up with an angry bear, some handcuffs, and an extra large condom and the only thing she’d be allowed to complain about is the handcuffs being a little tight.
Celeb_Hater | May 9, 2006 at 8:52 am
again?
liya | May 9, 2006 at 8:53 am
Damn you celeb, in the time it took me to sign in you beat me.
Celeb_Hater | May 9, 2006 at 8:54 am
Two in a row!! my lucky day.
I hate SJ. Fat cow. Who would ever want to see that fatty strip??? Not to mention her face. Unfortunately because of all her FAT she doesn’t even qualify as a butterface.
Gerald Tarrant | May 9, 2006 at 8:55 am
That look on her face screams “punchasize”.
liya | May 9, 2006 at 8:56 am
Hey if she can strip for a magazine, then whats the problem here??? hate these moron celebs who think they can strip one day and then cover up the next and everyone will believe they’re actually serious actors and not whores
sweetcheeks | May 9, 2006 at 9:04 am
When you’re fat and ugly, it’s understandable that stripping would make you a touch uncomfortable. All the wobbly, dimple-y bits on display.
Nothing that the execs at Loreal can clean up with PhotoShop. Long live the myth.
ziggurat | May 9, 2006 at 9:12 am
FUCK YOU Scarlett is hotter than 97% of Hollywood.
JollyJumjuck | May 9, 2006 at 9:17 am
I think it’s a great idea. She can appear as the “before” girl. “Before you put on L’Oreal, you look like this.”
BarbadoSlim | May 9, 2006 at 9:21 am
I don’t know what her problem is really. Wasn’t she the one who took it up the ass on an elevator from Benicio del Toro on some event last year.
Maybe they should call Benicio and “refocus” their campaign.
SuperSpence | May 9, 2006 at 9:23 am
Finally, an excuse for me to look at cosmetics ads without feeling a little light in the loafers. Scarlett Johanssen MUST do these and she must do them in the nude. I swear by all that is unholy that I will incinerate this wretched Earth and all who live upon it in a boiling lake of fire unless that girl takes her clothes off.
Trotter | May 9, 2006 at 9:23 am
I can’t wait until she learns about L’Oreal’s new line of douches and enemas. I hear Yoko Ono is going to shoot the spots.
SuperSpence | May 9, 2006 at 9:23 am
P.S. I’m not kidding. Someone better talk to that girl or every single one of you will be a charcoal briquette.
heifferzzz | May 9, 2006 at 9:28 am
Shut up already bitch!
Binky | May 9, 2006 at 9:29 am
As the story says – this is a PR move. She wants to change her sex kitten image to ahhh…well… bitch, I guess… Worked for Hepburn.
Lala | May 9, 2006 at 9:39 am
When the last ad was for body lotion and the next one is for butt-firming cream, I can see why she’d be pissed. It’s finally dawning on her that L’Oreal didn’t hire her for her face.
Pearly | May 9, 2006 at 9:49 am
It was ok to be nude on the cover of Vanity Fair but not for her million dollar cosmetics campaign? She’s an ass!!
evilcookie007 | May 9, 2006 at 9:56 am
This chick is ugly. I’m sick of the media telling us who’s attractive and who’s not. She’s not. Not on this planet or any other. GO AWAY!!!
Lala | May 9, 2006 at 9:57 am
Pearly, literally or figuratively?
Proteon | May 9, 2006 at 10:05 am
Would we hate her more as a stubborn bitch with the nerve to have both self respect and stubborness or if she married a scumbag or rich religious weirdo and pumped out kids?
Answer: All hate is created equal.
PapaHotNuts | May 9, 2006 at 10:09 am
I knew a Vietnamese stripper named Scarlett, and she had no problem taking her clothes off for a crisp $5.00 bill. The sad part of this story is, it’s completely true. So if L’Oreal is looking to hire someone for a slutty Asian stripper campaign, call me, I know just the chick for the job. She’ll also fuck for a crisp $20.00 bill, if that helps get her the job.
sharkbite | May 9, 2006 at 10:12 am
Aww, boo hoo, I’m a gorgeous actress, but I’d really rather grub down and look like the commonfolk.
http://www.wehateeverybody.com
86 | May 9, 2006 at 10:27 am
#16 I agree. I guess it’s ok to get naked as long as you’re selling your own product, but not for endorsements. Hmm.
Mr. Fritz | May 9, 2006 at 10:28 am
I just saw “In Good Company” and she was kind of blah in it. She has nice lips and boobs, but that’s about it. She reminds me of that episode of Seinfeld where Jerry dates a woman who only looks good in a certain booth at Monk’s. I don’t think she’s fat; I think she has a nice figure. It’s a hell of a lot better than Nicole Ritchie’s or Lindsey Lohan’s. Oh, yeah, Tom Cruise still loves the cock!
Tracy | May 9, 2006 at 10:30 am
OK, I’m standing here naked, just waiting for L’Oreal to call. Call me, dammit! I’ll do it for $100! One hundred bucks! Maybe I should put my robe on… the neighbors are staring.
Zanna | May 9, 2006 at 10:37 am
I’m with you, Pearly…..it makes no sense.
Feed_Me_Chocolate | May 9, 2006 at 10:50 am
#16, 22, 25,
That was the first thing that I thought of too. What a hypocrite. I don’t know what the big fuss is with her anyways. I personally don’t think she’s all that. There are much more beautiful and talented actresses in Hollywood, but they don’t get the exposure that Scarlett does because they’re not mindless whores who wear their tits up to their chins.
thetruthhurts | May 9, 2006 at 11:07 am
You don’t get to be a whore only when it works for you honey. You took your clothes off to get this far, keep it up bitch!
Seriously, this chick is fugs…I don’t get it. She can fade away into oblivion now.
oshkoshb-goshdammgosh | May 9, 2006 at 11:15 am
Alexis Arquette is looking hawttt. But seriously folks, how are you going to promote an exfoliating breast cream without dressing up like a naughty nurse and then slowly peeling the uniform off your creamy skin while taking your own temperature? The numbers don’t lie, people. Marketing. Yeah.
colormeskanky | May 9, 2006 at 11:17 am
i guess they should’be hired x-tina, huh? no such problems there.
colormeskanky | May 9, 2006 at 11:18 am
*should’ve
Iambananas | May 9, 2006 at 11:26 am
I can’t stand her… she’s weird-looking.
dubya24 | May 9, 2006 at 11:48 am
Did everyone forget SHE SHOWED HER ASS ON THE COVER OF VANITY FAIR recently?
Gerald Tarrant | May 9, 2006 at 11:52 am
@32 – You just might be the real Dubya being that illiterate. I use post #16 as my evidence.
dubya24 | May 9, 2006 at 11:59 am
@33
You think I have nothing better to do than read all the posts?
Fuck that. I leave my opinion and get lost.
I wouldn’t have used the word “illiterate”…I would have used “negligent”
Amani | May 9, 2006 at 12:36 pm
Celeb_hater, are you by any chance _blind_?! Scarlett is not fat. She’s hot like forkin magma.
gogoboots | May 9, 2006 at 1:28 pm
Ok, what the fuck was Vanity Fair then?! Sure her tits were covered cause she was laying down but you had a clear view of her ass. If you do it once, people are going to ask you to do it again…so don’t be pissed off, in fact, stop wearing all those dresses that showcase your boobage factor… if you’re going to be REALLY prudish!
redsonja1313 | May 9, 2006 at 1:51 pm
# 16 DITTO
TrannyGranny | May 9, 2006 at 2:27 pm
28 Osh
Tell me it’s not an oral thermometer, please!
Nikk The Templar | May 9, 2006 at 2:46 pm
I support Scarlett in whatever she does. Good for her for sticking to her guns.
Amani | May 9, 2006 at 3:24 pm
Yeah, Nikk, that’s exactly what I was thingking. However much clothes she’s got on, I’ll be right behind her. I mean… I’ll be all over… dammit…
Honestly though. On or off, it doesn’t change my opinion, she’s cute either way.
Alma | May 9, 2006 at 3:25 pm
this proves that she actually thinks with her brain and not with her vagina. and if you really think that she is oh so fat and ugly compared to anorexic skanks like paris hilton or nicole ritchie, i pity you.
go scarlett, go charlize, go rachel mcadams and all the beautiful actresses who are celebrities cause they know how to play, not cause they spread STDs.
Captain Awesome | May 9, 2006 at 4:20 pm
You sign a 5 mil deal to allow a company to whore you out as a spoke person for their make-up products but don’t want to strip?
Get over yourself and drop trou, sluttikins.
ProbablyTooOld | May 9, 2006 at 5:54 pm
She always had a stupid look on her face and now I know it isn’t a look.
Come on, honey! You stripped for Vanity Fair and are annoyed at showing skin for a L’Oreal body lotion ad? No one is that stupid. This latest bit of idiocy must be to drum up publicity for some reason.
Besides, since when is L’Oreal a sex kitten line? A couple of the models sort of reek of dirty sex in the back of a flat bed truck (Eva Longoria and Beyonce), but the rest are sort of classy. Andie MacDowell, Penelope Cruz–they’re sex kittens? On what planet?
Whatever. Scarlett’s a dolt. And soon will be a jobless dolt if she continues to eschew photographs and major cosmetic endorsements. Soon not even Woody Allen will want her for his yawnfests.
Fa Cube Itches | May 9, 2006 at 6:02 pm
Forget Vanity Fair – the girl owes her entire career to the opening shot of “Lost in Translation” which was her ass crack through a pair of see through panties.
SuperSpence – I’ll help you land her on the condition that you always keep your dick in her mouth so she can never talk again. I’ll help you find your #2 girl if you pinch her nostrils shut while you are inserted.
Seamus Begonia Smell | May 9, 2006 at 6:43 pm
what’s with the people who called her FAT?! jealous that your fat isn’t deposited exclusively in your tits and asses? losers.
sid | May 9, 2006 at 7:32 pm
Ah, it is only ME who pines for her co-star in Ghost World, Thora Birch.
Thora, it should be YOU getting those deals! I have very little, but I’ll give you all I have, Thora…just give me a moment…
Thora….THORRRAAAAAAA! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
———————–
Yeah, pfft. That Scarlett is a stupid bitch and a hypocrite.
Tom loves the cock.
Peace.
MasterofMuppets | May 9, 2006 at 7:44 pm
I’m sorry, what’s this thread about? I’ve just been staring at her boobs for three minutes.
Captain Awesome | May 9, 2006 at 7:50 pm
Im with sid, Thora needs to sit on my face.
To_Bill_Braskey! | May 10, 2006 at 10:36 am
46, i pine for thora as well, i remember her in american beauty
scarlett posed nude for vanity fair! what the fuck is her problem? she needs to get fucked with my cock
brideoffrank | May 10, 2006 at 11:51 am
Wait a minute, she was on the cover of Vanity Fair naked! It was VF right? Anyway, she was way nude, and way pale.