Scarlett Johansson and Keira Knightley pose nude in Vanity Fair

February 7th, 2006 // 109 Comments
vanity-fair-shoot.jpg

In typical Vanity Fair fashion, tomorrow’s issue will feature Scarlett Johansson and Keira Knightley posing nude, but with all the fun parts covered up. Sure they’re technically naked, but that’s like saying Paris Hilton is technically dressed. If you’re wearing clothes but everybody can see your breasts and coochie hanging out, it doesn’t count.

Source

Posted Under: , ,
Free Keira Knightley Wallpapers and Keira Knightley Backgrounds
Keira Knightley
Keira Knightley
Keira Knightley
"Not exploitative or sexy but clinical and necessary": Keira Knightley's verdict on racy moments in A Dangerous Method
For an actress best known for the family-friendly Pirates Of The Caribbean franchise, Keira Knightley has rarely shocked the cinema-going public... until now. Keira's new film A Dangerous Method, looks at the relationship between pioneering therapists ...
Steve Carell, Keira Knightley 'Seeking a Friend for the End of the World' in New Trailer (Video)
If the title of the film wasn't a big enough spoiler on its own, the introductory scene in the Seeking a Friend for the End of the World trailer reveals that the protagonists have only three weeks to live before a 70-mile-wide asteroid smacks into the earth.

Comments (109)

  1. A2Bcom | February 7, 2006 at 4:15 pm

    The tease of all teases! But I’ll take what I can get of these two babes. :)

    Reply
  2. Dean | February 7, 2006 at 4:17 pm

    Absolutely! I’m picking this one up!

    Reply
  3. LaydeeBug | February 7, 2006 at 4:22 pm

    Yeah…OK. Whatev…. No really, I still don’t know if I like Johannsen yet. I really liked her in Lost in Translation, but I’m getting a “my shit don’t stink” vibe off of that one. Knightly, well, she’s kind of cool. I like her in those tough, kick-ass roles (but honestly, she doesn’t look strong enough to rip a piece of foil.)

    Reply
  4. TorontoGirl | February 7, 2006 at 4:23 pm

    I’m pretty sure the only people who want to see Keira naked are closet pedo’s.

    Seriously. She’s built like a nine year old boy.

    Reply
  5. Wild Rose | February 7, 2006 at 4:24 pm

    Wow, Scarlett looks like she’s straight out of an Ingres painting…yay for a gal who actually has curves. Hope this cover doesn’t get anyone’s knickers in a knot. It’s tastefully done!

    Reply
  6. Tania | February 7, 2006 at 4:26 pm

    I think Keira looks good there (look at her abs!), but Scarlett just does not look attractive! She reminds me of one of the really pale, puffy women in those really old, antique paintings.

    Maybe that was the point, but why would anyone do that on purpose?! Not hot!

    Reply
  7. cornelius_prot | February 7, 2006 at 4:32 pm

    torontogirl,
    sounds like you need to go on a diet. it’s okay, you don’t really need an extra layer of blubber to survive the harsh canadian winter: that’s just a story made up by the big food industry.

    Reply
  8. PinkRose | February 7, 2006 at 4:36 pm

    It’s a terrible picture.

    Reply
  9. thebor | February 7, 2006 at 4:37 pm

    Do hate ladys, those girls are hot hot hot…opps my balls just exploded.

    Reply
  10. thebor | February 7, 2006 at 4:38 pm

    opps again, DONT hate ladies.

    Reply
  11. Lynette Carrington | February 7, 2006 at 4:40 pm

    Yes, I know Tom Ford is gay. But DAUMMN…..he’s fine.

    Reply
  12. SuperSpence | February 7, 2006 at 4:40 pm

    I will have those two girls and anyone who stands in my way is gettin’ slayed.

    My name is Brown, that’s what they call me.

    Reply
  13. escapevelocity | February 7, 2006 at 4:41 pm

    gotta love that tush. i think scarlett looks better than keira in this picture, who looks like she’s about to turn 40. scarlett’s feminine curves over muscled-up keira anytime.

    Reply
  14. SuperSpence | February 7, 2006 at 4:42 pm

    11. Posted by Lynette Carrington on February 7, 2006 04:40 PM

    Yes, I know Tom Ford is gay. But DAUMMN…..he’s fine.

    REPLY: If bald gay guys are hot what chance do I — a devastatingly handsome straight dude with a full head of hair — have in this world?

    Reply
  15. Samson | February 7, 2006 at 4:43 pm

    Toronto Girl: please refrain from making idiotic Canadian comments from now on.–That’s all.

    Reply
  16. Sally | February 7, 2006 at 4:51 pm

    Keira looks hot, Scarlett does not. Even thought Scarlett is actually a lot prettier than Keira and there’s no pictures of Scarlett with dodgy ass skin, the pose is all wrong for her. I think they should swap poses. Nobody wants to see a fat ass looking pasty and in that pic it looks as tough her whole upper leg area is one big white ass. Also, would it have killed Scarlett to suck in her stomach? Oh and, trust me, I’m not jealous – of Jessica Alba, yes just a little…

    Reply
  17. escapevelocity | February 7, 2006 at 4:51 pm

    check out the vanity fair website, they have a behind-the-scenes video of the shoot. scarlett was on the phone the entire time, probably with josh hartnett trying to convince her not to do it.

    Reply
  18. ESQ | February 7, 2006 at 4:52 pm

    Scarlett Johansson and Keira Knightley posing nude is classy, angelic looking. Paris Hilton nude = used up slag period

    Reply
  19. cibby | February 7, 2006 at 4:55 pm

    Eh, it’s a cool spread, but Ms. Johansson gets the sweet pose, while Ms. Knightley doesn’t get to stretch it out…

    Reply
  20. LaydeeBug | February 7, 2006 at 4:56 pm

    Kudos to Tom Ford for being all kinds of fucking FINE. Word #11 Lynette. And by the way, only shallow girls care about balding men. Hair or no hair, it’s all the same to me.

    By the way, SJ is very pretty and I see what they were going for with the old style, but it just makes her look old and pasty. Come to think of it, now that I look again, they both look old. And Tom looks great. Hmmmmm. Gay Mafia anyone!

    Reply
  21. hermanita | February 7, 2006 at 4:58 pm

    Well I’d rather have the girl that won’t show her boobs even in a shot like that then the girl that will show them everytime even when not asked.

    Keira is so beautiful! It just has to be mentioned. She’s perfect. I don’t know much about Scarlett…she seems too pale. But how much makeup do they have on their bodies? Not one scar, not on pimple, no nothing…it’s weird.

    PS:TorontoGirl,that’s just your jealousy speaking. Do lay off the burgers, like someone already said.

    Reply
  22. PapaHotNuts | February 7, 2006 at 4:58 pm

    What’s the best way to clean sper- I mean mayonaisse off a keyboard?

    Reply
  23. ohyeah | February 7, 2006 at 4:59 pm

    They both look pretty good, but Scarlett is quite pasty for a black background. Not to say that Keira is ugly or anything, but I’d do Scarlett over her any day. Need some shading or different lighting in the next photo, guys.

    Reply
  24. Captain Awesome | February 7, 2006 at 5:00 pm

    “She reminds me of one of the really pale, puffy women in those really old, antique paintings.”

    That was the point of the shoot, and shes extra pale considering they used a talc powder coating on her the most. The blame would go to the photographer here if anything else.

    Reply
  25. ohyeah | February 7, 2006 at 5:03 pm

    Next to Keira, anyone would look thick. She has nice breasts, but the rest is not that great. Her face is especially stretched-looking in this shot.

    Reply
  26. lomies | February 7, 2006 at 5:08 pm

    Sure it’s nice that they’re posing nude and all but why are their faces not-so-sexy-as-they-could-be?

    Reply
  27. Kealeen | February 7, 2006 at 5:09 pm

    Such negativity from everyone. Let’s slap your purty ass on VF and see how awesome you look.

    Reply
  28. spamnews | February 7, 2006 at 5:10 pm

    Samson you said on February 7, 2006 at 04:43 PM
    ”
    Toronto Girl: please refrain from making idiotic Canadian comments from now on.–That’s all.
    ”

    She’s not from Canada, she’s from Toronto – the World Class City. It’s o.k. to ignore her.

    signed,

    Your friend,
    The rest of Canada

    Reply
  29. ayteesevn | February 7, 2006 at 5:15 pm

    That dude looks wayyy too much like Jeremy Piven for his own good.

    Reply
  30. akahuge | February 7, 2006 at 5:19 pm

    Tom Ford looks like a 70′s pornstar with his hairline and his shirt open like that.

    Reply
  31. escapevelocity | February 7, 2006 at 5:20 pm

    oooooo just had an epiphany: i now know where i got the “looks like she’s about to turn 40″ remark from: she’s going for a sharon stone pose. stone always poses that way in pictures, especially the way she turns up her face – it’s uncanny.

    Reply
  32. andrewthezeppo | February 7, 2006 at 5:22 pm

    Scarlet looks demented, what’s going on with her face it looks all kinds of fugly. And something about her lowerback/ass area just looks wrong, like they photo shoped the bodies of two people together and it didn’t quite match up…also she’s a whore

    Reply
  33. DannyJames | February 7, 2006 at 5:25 pm

    they need to get some dudes posin nude in this magazine, shit.

    Reply
  34. ferret1 | February 7, 2006 at 5:27 pm

    Looks like Scarlett fell into a vat of Bisquick. And I don’t care for the “I’m ready to have my temperature taken” pose. I’m just glad that she can’t talk in a photo. Such a manly voice on that woman – could she be covering the balls?

    Reply
  35. whackjob | February 7, 2006 at 5:32 pm

    Why is SJ flashing Vulcan gang signs? or maybe it’s a secret “V, is for…”

    yummmm, pasty. I’d hit it.

    Reply
  36. The Lazy Asian | February 7, 2006 at 5:34 pm

    Spank-ity Fair

    Reply
  37. Linnea | February 7, 2006 at 5:35 pm

    I think Scarlett looks better than Keira here. Keira is a beautiful girl although I do think she’d do to gain a little weight.
    And anybody who is calling SJ fat is crazy.

    Reply
  38. Wild Rose | February 7, 2006 at 5:36 pm

    Watch the video–was Tom Ford even in the same room room as them? I think we’re witnessing a little bit of “Hollywood magic” here, folks. The test shots only featured Scarlett and Keira, or was I missing something? They both looked a little uncomfortable and embarassed; it was refreshing to see two young actresses behaving so modestly. Ha, betcha the thought of Keira and Scarlett gettin’ all snuggly in that tiny room is makin’ all you guys really hot and bothered now.

    Reply
  39. escapevelocity | February 7, 2006 at 5:39 pm

    here’s a link to the video, btw: http://www.vanityfair.com/features/outtakes/060207feou

    Reply
  40. HughJorganthethird | February 7, 2006 at 5:40 pm

    On first glance it appears as if The Rock is about to bite some anorexic eastern european hooker’s ear clean off.

    Can you smell what the rock is cooking?

    Thats right. Tuna.

    Reply
  41. akahuge | February 7, 2006 at 5:42 pm

    They should have forgot about John Ford and the drab Keira and just went with the hot Scarlett J. with this photo and been done with it.

    http://www.scarlettjohansson.org/gallery/albums/publicappearances/2006/goldenglobes/normal_002.jpg

    Reply
  42. Allie D. | February 7, 2006 at 5:42 pm

    Scarlett is a beautiful girl, but the angle of her face in this photo was not very flattering. I think Keira is pretty too, but she looks too angular next to Scarlett.

    And anybody who is doubting whether or not Scarlett is pretty should see Match Point.

    Reply
  43. JollyJumjuck | February 7, 2006 at 6:42 pm

    What would make the photo better would be a Keira-sized handprint on Scarlett’s left ass cheek. Give the girl a bit of color. Oh, and Tom Ford to grow a cheesy mustache to complete the 70′s porno-dude look. And talk like Antonio Banderas.

    Reply
  44. urheartshapedbox | February 7, 2006 at 6:45 pm

    DAMIT keira can sit up like that and she has absolutely no fat at all. that takes a lot up situps and some fast metabolism to get that. im pretty skinny too but shes just wow. and scarlett doesnt need to suck in her stomach thats what your stomach does when you like down like that. its called gravity

    Reply
  45. Solaera | February 7, 2006 at 6:51 pm

    Comment #29 Spot on. I thought it WAS Jeremy Piven until I read the text.

    Scarlett appears borderline retarded in that shot. What’s up with that goofy look on her face? She looks like a chubby Traci Lords.

    Plumpness and scrawniness aside neither girl looks very good in that pic.

    Reply
  46. Brokeneyes | February 7, 2006 at 7:55 pm

    I think the shot was extremely well done. Keira does look a little too thin to be pair with SJ there, but it doesn’t throw off the shot that horribly. I’m hoping people see more the artistic side of it all instead of a “cheap 70′s porno.”

    Reply
  47. a concerned fan | February 7, 2006 at 8:26 pm

    Wait….so people still read Vanity Fair? Riiiiight. Maybe this will egg Jennifer Love Hewitt on to do something….

    Reply
  48. funkygoldmedallions | February 7, 2006 at 9:15 pm

    Let me just state for the record what all hetero guys are thinking right now: 1. Scarlett’s tits and Keira’s body = peanute butter cups. Hmmm… peanut butter cups. 2. What guy do you girls keep talking about? I don’t see a guy in the picture.

    Reply
  49. QuiteFrog | February 7, 2006 at 9:17 pm

    Ok so why isn’t George Clooney naked COME ON fair is fair

    Reply
  50. xAgonyxScenex | February 7, 2006 at 9:37 pm

    I never really found either of them that hot

    Reply
1 2 3

Leave a Comment

Name (Visible)
Email (Required, Not Visible)