You know what’s sexier than Rachel McAdams slipping her nipple at the premiere of The Family Stone? Rachel McAdams slipping her nipple at the premiere of The Family Stone, only to have it discovered that she has hairy nipples. Sure it’s not quite sasquatch territory, but when dealing with the female breast the maximum allowed number of hairs is zero. Any more than that and you’re practically a man. I don’t know the proper etiquette when it comes to nipple hair hygeine, but I imagine plucking would be the way to go. I don’t picture a Schick Quattro really doing the trick.
Outrageously NSFW image and closeup after the jump. Thanks to Dean for the pics.
NOTE: When did Rachel McAdams turn into the Joker?
UPDATE: The images have been taken down at the request of Rachel McAdams’ lawyer.
superD | December 15, 2005 at 6:10 pm
Looks pretty Photoshopped to me. Nipple is way too high and there is color contrasting around the nipple.
~S.Starr~ | December 15, 2005 at 6:14 pm
That is TOTALLY photoshopped.
Captain Awesome | December 15, 2005 at 6:17 pm
Hahaha what a crap photoshop job. Look at the seam or the top of the dress where it meets her anatomically incorrect areola. You can see the artifacting from here.
Sally | December 15, 2005 at 6:22 pm
I don’t know what to be more shocked about: that a supposedly squeaky-clean-nice-Canadian-girl exposes her nipple to the world (and don’t tell me she did it unknowingly because stuff like that just does not happen without you noticing – unless you’re high)or that she has nipple hairs… I guess she believes the old wives tale that if you pluck your boob hair you’ll get cancer… Or maybe she’s into Italian men…
Binky | December 15, 2005 at 6:32 pm
Looks photoshopped to me as well. The last time I saw him – Sly Stone was black and had an afro. He didn’t look at all like Rachel McYumyum. The hair is probably a Rogain thing.
Gregory | December 15, 2005 at 7:21 pm
Heres a gallery of images from that event… Her dress looks fine there, and its in the same location, so the pictures posted here are obviously fake… (Even though anyone who’s ever seen a human being knows that either its a badly photoshopped picture, or Rachel McAdams was born near Chernobyl)
http://rachelmcadams.org/gallery/thumbnails.php?album=209
Zanathon | December 15, 2005 at 7:44 pm
I too think that Ms. McAdams is being missrepresented by these photo shopped pics.
Before the digital alterations, the reporter who made that headline was probably referring to what kind of shooter drink Rachel had consumed.
Hairy Nipple. Yeah, I’m going to ask the night club bar tender to make me one of those.
overcast | December 15, 2005 at 7:46 pm
First column , fourth row on that link you posted Gregory. http://rachelmcadams.org/gallery/displayimage.php?album=209&pos=9
Her nip is sticking out. Click the pic to show high res. So the exposed nippled is valid. The hair however was either taken out, or put in.
celebvixen | December 15, 2005 at 7:48 pm
The link Gregory posted shows Rachel’s nipple! so it would seem that its not as photoshoped as everyone thought. Check out picture 10 (4th down on the left)from Gregory’s link – it in fact shows her nipple, so it seems as though she was possibly born near Chernobyl. Poor Rachel.
unshavenfan | December 15, 2005 at 7:56 pm
I think hairy nipples are HOT!
Caroline | December 15, 2005 at 8:07 pm
It’s not Photoshopped. She’s just hairy. And hair will grow however it wants to.
TheRuckus | December 15, 2005 at 8:08 pm
I don’t think any photoshopping has been done. In all likely-hood, a PR staffer spotter the hairs, ran by and bit them out.
firestar | December 15, 2005 at 8:09 pm
i love it when stars let a nipple out but dont notice and still are smiling..u would think that these stars would get there dresses altered so that it fits their body
ruhroh | December 15, 2005 at 9:00 pm
Joker smile…Bride of Frankenstein hairdo..Cookie Monster wooble-eyed nips…with hair?!…Someone’s PR staff is hacked off at ‘em. I’d still let her do me though.
dhampir | December 15, 2005 at 9:27 pm
Even though she has a gargantuan number of: 1 (one) faults, I would try my very hardest not to let it interfere with our crazy, mango-smeared lesbian sex. But hey, I’m only human, and there’s only so many miniscule, easily-removable strands of nipple hair that I can stand. Right girls? Right.
Gregory | December 15, 2005 at 9:29 pm
Wow.. sorry about that.. I looked at most of the pictures, and I couldn’t find anything unusual about them…
I think the problem with the pictures is the dress is kinda baggy on the top, so it makes it look like she’s disfigured..
Then again, who knows? Maybe she used her Make-A-Wish wish to become an actress?
ppp | December 15, 2005 at 9:32 pm
I don’t get what’s wrong with nipple hair? Especially her nipple hair, which is practicaly not there.
Juliette | December 15, 2005 at 9:36 pm
Everyone has some nipple hair. If those are even real that is. It’s not like the hair is long, black, and curly, so let her be.
OhAySis | December 15, 2005 at 11:31 pm
Legimate photo sites (getty) are showing these pics, so they’re not PS’ed at all, except maybe the hair, who knows, but the photos are legit.
AD | December 15, 2005 at 11:50 pm
“I don’t know the proper etiquette when it comes to nipple hair hygeine, but I imagine plucking would be the way to go.”
one word: Ow!
And whether or not it’s Photoshopped, I don’t see any ‘ew’ factor here. If a guy is gonna get freaked out over something so stupid, he deserved to be kicked out of her bed.
HollyJ | December 16, 2005 at 12:53 am
There’s no way her nipple on her left is this high and the right one was low enough to stay totally hidden. It doesn’t even look normal with the shape of her boob. That HAS to be photoshop.
Besides, I’m sure if she has areolar eyebrows, she would TOTALLY wax it.
cap077 | December 16, 2005 at 1:17 am
You know plucking nipple hair doesn’t hurt anywhere near as much as you’d think…and NO i don’t know that from personal experience!
Linnea | December 16, 2005 at 1:50 am
The nipple is the last thing I’m worried about in this picture. What the hell happened, Rachel!?
I’m not even going to try to be witty. That’s how sad this makes me.
TrompeyNo | December 16, 2005 at 1:51 am
The picture at perezhilton.com is from a different angle, and looks a little more real and more like a slip. I don’t know anything. I agree that the top photo looks kind of physically impossible, and the other two look suspicious as egregious malfunctions. I mean, it’s not like a murder where no one would step in to help. Last is simply that there’s some freaky whalebone shit up in that. I observe that the fashion-plate thing doesn’t suit her, at least not that night.
naeco | December 16, 2005 at 2:31 am
are you guys blind?? there is no nipple and it’s completely photoshopped, it doesn’t take a friggin rocket scientist to figure that one…
FIVE0 | December 16, 2005 at 9:16 am
Unless someone has more time on their hands than me, those aren’t photoshopped. Take a look and the following photos from the above mentioned site: Pg 2, Row2, Column 2; Pg 2, Row 5, Column 2; Pg 2, Row 4, Column 3; Pg 2, Row 12, Columns 1 & 2. Everyone of them has some sort of nipplage, and as far as the nipple hair goes, it could be the “NewsCom” watermark.
Justin Cider | December 16, 2005 at 9:26 am
It looks like the nipple has now been photoshopped out of those pictures from Greg’s links.
Escribo | December 16, 2005 at 12:07 pm
After the Keira Knightley slippage, you know ya’ll are just wishful thinking. Just because Keira Knightley lets her nips show in just about EVERY photo that was ever taken of her, doesn’t mean everyone else in Hollywood doesn’t know how to dress…Although…it could be a conspiracy to jump on the nip bandwagon…
nikki | December 16, 2005 at 1:42 pm
i think she’s ugly. period.
Luigi Novi | December 16, 2005 at 2:08 pm
I looked at the ri-res version of the tenth photo (first one on the fourth row of the left column) that overcast and celebvixen pointed to, and there is no nipple, let alone hair.
Luigi Novi | December 16, 2005 at 2:08 pm
I looked at the ri-res version of the tenth photo (first one on the fourth row of the left column) that overcast and celebvixen pointed to, and there is no nipple, let alone hair.
Kat | December 16, 2005 at 2:28 pm
*GASP!!!* You mean to tell me that mammals have hair?!?
“…but when dealing with the female breast the maximum allowed number of hairs is zero.”
But guys are allowed to have more hair than a grizzly bear?
I’ll start plucking the hair off my body when guys start plucking the hair off their sensitive areas.
ohokay | December 16, 2005 at 2:30 pm
I guess The Superficial didn’t pay attention to sex ed. in middle school, when they answered all those imperative sex & puberty questions. Here’s a crash course:
“It’s normal for girls (and guys) to have hair on their nipples and other parts of their bodies. But it can make some girls feel embarrassed because they may think that women aren’t supposed to have a lot of hair on their bodies, even though it’s natural.”
http://www.teenwire.com/ask/2004/as-20041207p924-hair.php
ohokay | December 16, 2005 at 2:33 pm
“*GASP!!!* You mean to tell me that mammals have hair?!?”
HAHAHAHA.
“I’ll start plucking the hair off my body when guys start plucking the hair off their sensitive areas.”
Like their balls.
Taelron | December 16, 2005 at 2:34 pm
I just went through the site, those pics are not photoshopped… Easy ways to tell are to flip them to grey scale, then the edits pop out…
Anyways, If you look closely, its not hair on the nipple, someone did a really piss poor job adding the water mark to the pics. Those with photoshop can blow it up and see them. It says: NewsCoM with an arc over the top of it…
Taelron | December 16, 2005 at 2:38 pm
Hmm though now that I think about it, she does have a nice adams apple…
ohokay | December 16, 2005 at 2:49 pm
Okay, last post, but seriously, I’m friggen’ appalled. I wonder if whomever took the time to examine an HQ pic of her nipple has ever gotten laid… Or if it’s a girl, are you insecure and extremely obese? Because most girls have hair around that area, and those who say they don’t are effing with you and shaved it off. But seriously, who cares? Announcing McAdams has A COUPLE STRAY HAIRS is like announcing she breathes air.
ReginaGeorge | December 16, 2005 at 2:53 pm
Are you all blind?!!!!!
Rachel McAdams is gorgeous, stunning, breathtaking…..and actually talented (after all, she made a Wes Craven hatchet job bearable!).
She’s the only woman in the world I’d leave Angelina Jolie for….who’s the only woman in the world I’d become a lesbian for.
And if you claim you’ve never had nipple hair, you’re a liar!
becca11 | December 16, 2005 at 4:37 pm
i honestly have never had nipple hair, but i agree with you on everything else ReginaGeorge.
archyros | December 16, 2005 at 4:41 pm
hairy girl nipples mean lots more hair, everywhere!
me like hairy girls, they smell good! and taste even better!
Dawn7 | December 16, 2005 at 4:45 pm
ACTUALLY, FILE # 56/190 ON GREGORY’S POSTED LINK FROM DECEMBER 15 SHOWS HER NIPPLE SLIPPING OUT- SO OBVIOUSLY IT DID. THE SAME DARK SHADING IS AROUND HER AREOLA’S THERE AS WELL. THERE YOU GO KIDDIES, IT’S A REAL PHOTO.
derekd | December 16, 2005 at 6:19 pm
There are all types of laser removal preocedures available to us lowly civilians. I’m sure most celebrities are aware of these options.
sirokai | December 16, 2005 at 10:58 pm
derekd: I’m sure most celebrities are aware of these options.
I’m sure most celebrities are aware of BRAS! They cover your nipples! What a novel idea!
Katie | December 17, 2005 at 3:19 am
jeez, silly people. that’s no hair. it’s a very natural set of veins that can be frequently found on womens’ breasts. if any boys/men on this site have actually SEEN a pair of breasts in real life, they’ll know what i’m talking about. hair does happen, it’s true. but i can say with great certainty that Rachel McAdams would not go out to a big event in a strapless dress with hair sprouting around her nipples. that’s what tweezers are for. and i’m sure she knows just when to use them.
M0MUS | December 17, 2005 at 9:34 am
note:
http://rachelmcadams.org/gallery/displayimage.php?album=209&pos=55
and
http://rachelmcadams.org/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=13606&fullsize=1
You can clearly see that there is both an areola and a few stray hairs.
That said, there’s no freaky mutation here folks. She has small breasts, and is wearing a push-up bra with a lot of underpadding. It pushes the nipples (and everything else) up like that to create more cleavage.
Most women either have a few hairs around their nipples, or develop hairs there in their late-20s/early-30s, so if they offend you that much, well…
a) Date blondes because the hairs are less noticable
b) Date Asian girls because they have less body hair
c) Date underage girls
d) Date women who are really body-conscious and obsess about every detail
PS
Does anyone else think Rachel in these photos is a near-lookalike of Annette Bening?
Stacyy | December 17, 2005 at 2:35 pm
http://rachelmcadams.org/gallery/displayimage.php?album=209&pos=9
- go to that site NOW and look at the second pic of rachel at high res.
IT DOESNT TAKE A BRAINIAC to see that howcome on the other boob there is no nipple where there is supposed to be one? i mean either she has very disproportionate boobs or the person who photoshopped these pics r stupid. in the pic on that link rachel has padding in front of her boob that the person who photoshopped these pictures took out although u can still see that he left a darker mark cuz obviously it wasnt very good photoshopping!
and btw for those ppl that said her nipple is showing in pic ten well uhh.. NO ITS NOT!!!!!!!!!!
HollyJ | December 17, 2005 at 4:33 pm
@ #10 – BIG SURPRISE that someone named “unshavenfan” would love nipple hair!
Leaving long hairs around your nipples is like leaving a huge long black curly hair growing out of a mole in the middle of your face. I mean, wouldn’t most people pluck a long black face pube? What’s the difference in plucking THAT and removing a boob brow?
As it stands now, though:
PRO nipple hair 7
ANTI nipple hair 5
I guess the hairy people win thus far. Rachel gets to keep her nipple fur (if it’s not PS).
Sweet_cheeks | December 17, 2005 at 6:49 pm
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v280/photographs/rose.jpg
here morons, i pointed out to you where her nipples actually are!
ausman | December 19, 2005 at 2:47 am
Right there guys. It is not that hard to find it.
Binky | December 20, 2005 at 11:43 pm
I’d just like to assure Rachel McAdams lawyer that my previous ‘Sly and the Family Stone’ reference was an obvious, simple, mis-identification. I won’t even classify it as ‘fair comment’ as I’m not sure the name of Ms McAdams band. It was, in legal terms, a “My Bad”
However – these Superficial people – sue the bastards !! I understand they not only steal stories – they steal JOKES !!!