It takes a talented person to make Rachel McAdams look like crap, so congratulations to Mr. Person who did her up for the Screen Actors Guild Awards. She looks like Jared Leto playing the role of Rachel McAdams in some futuristic Japanese kid’s show.
 |
Courteney Cox's Shocking Confession About Her Sex Life – Huffington Post |
 Why Was This Celebrity Booed Off This Hit TV Show? – Fox News | |
| 50 Most Scandalous Cheerleaders in Sports History – Bleacher Report | |
| Skinny Star in a Bikini Talks About Being Anorexic – Evil Beet Gossip | |
| Sasha Grey keeps doing it for the kids. – TMZ | |
| Kate Middleton Steps Out On Her Own – Lainey Gossip |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Adam Levine Signs 'Glee' Guy to New Label, Poses For Terry Richardson (PHOTOS) |
Relationship Expert on Halle Berry's Reported Move: It's About Being Selfless, Not Selfish (PHOTOS) |
Camila Alves Flashes Engagement Ring, Talks Wedding Plans (PHOTOS) |
'Madly in Love' Robert Pattinson & Kristen Stewart Hang Tight in Los Angeles |
Lady Gaga's Tattooed 'Born This Way' Costar Reveals 'Top Secret' Project with Singer |
Lindsay Lohan's Platinum Blonde Locks: Yay or Nay? (PHOTOS) |
missdavis | January 29, 2007 at 4:16 am
1st?
missdavis | January 29, 2007 at 4:17 am
very excited! have no idea who this is but she looks like crap, sly. her dress is quite cute though, not with the shoes, they look cheap.
huegwagn | January 29, 2007 at 4:25 am
Who the hell is Rachel McAdams?
bellaparis | January 29, 2007 at 4:25 am
She looks like an Olsen reject.
hellcat1983 | January 29, 2007 at 4:31 am
Oh my god and there I was thinking it wasn’t possible for this woman to look bad! She looks liek someone just stuck some retro wallpaper on her! For those of you who don’t know who she is, she was in “Mean Girls”, “Wedding Crashers”, “The Hot Chick”, “Red Eye” but is barely recognisable here.
keys open doors | January 29, 2007 at 4:35 am
she does look like a 12 year old lol
damn you’re up earlier than normal
WhoTheFuckCares | January 29, 2007 at 4:39 am
I feel like hitting her with a pillow, then after she is down, I would do her. That’s rape right?
Mandy | January 29, 2007 at 4:40 am
lol . . . Jared Leto playing Rachel McAdams . . .
You’re right on the money.
Anyhow, it’s the pink shit in her hair and the shoes that ruin the whole look. Mostly the shoes ruin it. Some strappy silver shoes woulda pulled it off . . .
Maybe.
Niecy | January 29, 2007 at 4:45 am
Rachel McAdam’s to-do list:
1. Fire stylist
2. Buy glasses so I am able to see when my stylist makes me look like crap
katzie | January 29, 2007 at 5:20 am
oh whatevv guys this girl is gorgeous, some fucked up hair and a retarded dress cant kill her overall image, just a bad day, and her and ryan gosling are probably the cutest couple everrrrr.
MrSemprini | January 29, 2007 at 5:44 am
Dress? Bad, just bad. Looks like somebody had too much leftover Christmas wrap and dumped it on top of her.
Hair? Looks OK. Better than any woman I see walking into or out of Wal-Mart. Wait… Why am I at Wal-Mart?
Legs? Oh, my. What beauty. I’ve seen very few that compare. She, my dear fish, has a good leg. The shoes just accent it like a fine coffee accents a good meal. But, who’s the dork?
F-Sucker | January 29, 2007 at 5:50 am
Simple fix:
1. Remove Dress
2. Bend her over a table
Problem solved.
NicotineEyePatch | January 29, 2007 at 5:53 am
If I can’t smell her cooze just looking at her picture, and I haven’t seen her sex video, she automatically has some of my respect.
And she totally upstaged Lohan in Mean Girls, so I’ll forgive the amorphous sack she’s sportin’.
BigJim | January 29, 2007 at 6:55 am
I wonder how much she charges for babysitting.
RichPort | January 29, 2007 at 7:18 am
Well the hard on I had since my Mean Girls marathon is now officially gone, and somewhere in Hollywood, a stylist will have to die. Violently.
Lowlands | January 29, 2007 at 7:29 am
I’ve seen dressed up poodles spotting with pink in their fleece.But i must admit the dress what she’s wearing is different.
Spindoc | January 29, 2007 at 7:37 am
It’s amazing, it’s always the really pretty girls that aren’t satisfied being really pretty and have to fuck up the way they look. Hey Rachel, Leave looking “Interesting” to warthogs like Kelly Osbourne.
ImaCracka | January 29, 2007 at 7:46 am
really… who is she? The notebook chick?
hamjachok | January 29, 2007 at 8:07 am
who the hell is she. and what an awful dress.
monday | January 29, 2007 at 8:14 am
what a silly look, she’s such a gosling
Pointandlaugh | January 29, 2007 at 8:15 am
#12 – yes. My thoughts exactly.
Love the dress length. very sexy.
elizabeththewellread | January 29, 2007 at 8:18 am
This woman rminds me of how my retarded little sister used to dress up her Barbies.
jrzmommy | January 29, 2007 at 8:22 am
I’m assuming her stylist went to the Helen Keller Academy of Fashion Design?
SonJaSpiCe | January 29, 2007 at 8:25 am
I don’t know… usually when people wear dresses like that it’s to hide a babybump. I’m just saying is all.
She’s still adorable.
86 | January 29, 2007 at 8:35 am
I don’t care what she wears, I still want to be her.
meee | January 29, 2007 at 8:39 am
i’m in love with her (in a straight sort of way…yes…) but whats with the pink streaks in her hair? god it’s not 1997-2001 anymore!
Jim Treacher | January 29, 2007 at 9:25 am
Okay, so she looks like she just woke up from a coma she’s been in since she was 7 and the last thing she saw was a Rainbow Brite cartoon, but with legs like that she can wear a potato sack for all I care.
Jason The Barbarian | January 29, 2007 at 9:33 am
If that’s a 12-year-old, then prepare to see me getting busted on “To Catch A Predator”.
Me | January 29, 2007 at 9:36 am
Ummmm…….SO she and Young Herculese are still together huh? Weird.
N'Arianne | January 29, 2007 at 9:41 am
The Olsen twins look constantly spooked. I mean, really freaked out. Why is that? And why do they insist on making in worse with smokey eyes? They remind me of that blur girl from the grudge…Yeah, that’s right, the dead one. Except they’re twons, so they’re twice as scary…that’s some fraky shit.
jrzmommy | January 29, 2007 at 9:41 am
she’s just a little teeny tiny too close to resembling Lohan for my comfort.
sol | January 29, 2007 at 10:10 am
i would wait for a gust of wind then rush in and bite her hiney.
carpemundus | January 29, 2007 at 10:40 am
agreed. shes real pretty, but not here
http://www.carpemundus.com – judgemental
Miss Skyline | January 29, 2007 at 10:44 am
31. Agreed muchly! What a hideous dress.
UNCLE NED | January 29, 2007 at 11:10 am
Never heard of her. Nice legs, though.
Wild Rose | January 29, 2007 at 11:34 am
Beautiful Legs!!! She needs to wear short dresses more often. Treat us to some class and gams that are truly worth showing off! Compare hers to Britney’s—Gahhhh!
Craig & "em" | January 29, 2007 at 11:44 am
She’s one of my favorite actresses, BUT WTF?
You should attach a streaming music file to these pics. I’m thinking Cindy Lauper’s famous 80′s song “GIRLS JUST WANNA DO CRACK!”
4DPants | January 29, 2007 at 11:48 am
This dress looks like it was designed by Vincent from last season of “Project Runway.”
fame is funny | January 29, 2007 at 12:05 pm
Sigh. I love her.
jc7676 | January 29, 2007 at 12:08 pm
#17 nailed it.
I hate it when really pretty girls ugly themselves up trying to be fashion forward.
ambrosia | January 29, 2007 at 1:35 pm
I think she looks fine mini balloon dresses w/o tights, high waisted skinny pants, highwaisted balloon pants,are in right know pick up a vogue she just needed to pull hair back and have wisp bang to the side the dree would look better on someone who is taller it is supposed to elongate the legs. It looks fine she should be confident and not let the dress wear her the except for the aforementioned hair the first mini pic is a good pose to complete outfit. Also the shoes i think some wedges , or more toe sleavage definetly more heel would of done it.
http://www.myspace.com/sashambrosia
Depraved22 | January 29, 2007 at 3:47 pm
Except for that God-awful hair, the dress, shoes & the makeup, she doesn’t look half bad.
metaphor | January 29, 2007 at 4:12 pm
What is she wearing, wallpaper?
Great legs though.
dk | January 29, 2007 at 5:27 pm
WOW WHAT IS GOING ON WITH ALL THE YOUNG ACTRESSES THESE DAYS?!
kathleen170 | January 29, 2007 at 5:51 pm
She may as well have worn a paper bag.
The-Guslet | January 29, 2007 at 7:38 pm
Apparantly the pink streaks were for a role… I dunno – just one of the rumours going around.
Agree with the comment re: dress, shoes and legs.
(Though those shoes – in every colour – are big in Japan at the mo…)
FecalPellets | January 29, 2007 at 8:34 pm
Anyone else have the Jem theme running through their head??
FecalPellets | January 29, 2007 at 8:37 pm
BTW she’s adorable, but REALLY needs to slice that cancerous shit off her chin.
drowningfool | January 29, 2007 at 8:56 pm
Looks like she’s trying to hop on the pedafile (sp?) bandwagon…a la Olsen twins pre-18 years old…that’s so yesterday. Get with the times. Its all about young BOYS now, not young girls. Sheesh.
licklick | January 29, 2007 at 11:30 pm
So that’s what it takes to be a celebrity…lumpy legs and taste up the ass.