![]() |
Courtney Stodden Is On The Verge Of A Wardrobe Malfunction – Celebuzz |
Is Anyone Surprised That Courtney Stodden Has A Sex Tape? – Dlisted | |
Kesha Is Making Sidebutt A Thing – Buzzfeed | |
Ba-Donka-Donk! Emma Watson Shows Off Some Sexy Curves – Popoholic | |
These Sexy Girls Want To Give Your Ride A Wash – The Chive | |
We Are Loving Anne Hathaway's Sideboob And (Almost) Nip Slip – Lainey Gossip |























first
Why the hell can’t I get rid of the damn stars anymore – this new layout stinks!
I totally agree. They have really messed up the access to NSFW.
guys to view it without the star, click on NSFW version below and then again click the same on top of the pic…u can view “ALL” what u wanna see……njoy!!
WHY THE FUCK U RETARDS GOT COMMENT BOXES FOR EVERY FUCKING PIC……HOW DUMB…….IT SHOULD JUST BE 1 FOR THE ARTICLE FFS…..AM I THE ONLY PERSON THINKING ON THIS PLANET!! WAKE UP
yarrhggg not first.
I smell fish .
Anti-climactic. Oh wait, I just climaxed.
Nice clam.
Man this site’s really been slipping lately. First the anatomically impossible Kardashian “nip slip”, that didn’t even look like a nip, and now this. This is LSFW at best and isn’t even exciting. I love Katy Perry and this does nothing. The star was a misleading cock tease!
definitely panties
i thought that was jordan at first. this bitch is ugly. hot bod, but she has the face of a retard and is so annoying. i’d hit it, with a tyre iron.
I don’t like this site anymore. I don’t visit Perez anymore because he became irrevelant. Go back to the way you were or lots of us will go elsewhere.
freeb: I dont think anyone would shed many tears were you to go elsewhere. Bye!
You have to click ‘view full size’ to see it!
Works just fine for me. Try clicking “View Full Size” above the picture after you click through … you know, like it says everywhere to do …
I guess not everyone can read the directions which very clearly say:
NOTE: Click “View Full Size” to see NSFW versions.
Seriously, how many times do some of you people need to be told you have to click the “view full size” link to see the NSFW version, before you figure it out?
It’s pitiful – good lord, I am 53 and figured it out the first time I visited this site
“STUPID” knows no age limits. The assholes that cant figure it out, also cant figure out why their girlfriends ass holes are all wallowed out lately. It took me 3 clicks to figure it out. I think I was drunk at the time too….so anyway. Rock on old dude!
Is that the Quake logo?
That is a PANTY big news.
*cums*
JC Penney doesn’t hide their panty shots behind a star, they send you the catalog in mail every week. Who cares about the panty shot?!?
Man-the new format blows-I can almost never get the pic to show w/out the star! Yes, I clicked “View Original”!
@sairax: you don’t hit “view original” you moron you hit “view Full Size” did you even read the 100 comments that said this
nice ass though
Seriously amateur shit going on with these stars. Get it together, Fish. Your ads suck balls too.
If by “suck balls” you mean they rock, I concur
Is this woman sporting a diaphram in there? I think they can be removed after the act of fornicating.
star -.- help me
yeah what is this star shit? what a waste, what is there to comment on other than that. “star steals thunder” …
NOTE: Click “View Full Size” to see NSFW versions.
I like the old way where you just click on the pic to see full-size, not that little link above pic! Easy to miss!!
why must i have to click the picture 10 times?! make me click that shit twice to see the uncensored shit! you make my life so difficult with 10 clicks!
pardon my retardation, but how the fuck do you get rid of the star these days
never mind, got it duh.
this chick is f’n UGLY ..
even worse she has a stupid face ..
clumsy ..ewwwww
thank god i love latinas ..lol
this site is so irritating now i’m obliged to click on everything. and the stars don’t disappear for me either.
the web designers for this site should be shot. just make it so when you click the image it goes to full size rather than having a stupid text hyper link to do it. that’s just piss poor.
So did she shit herself or what? It looks like there are some serious skid marks there. She still has a great rack, however.
So FAKE.
People ought to learn how to use Photoshop before they post their weak crap.
Seriously, Superficial writer, have some standards…
that’s so fake, no wonder it took 24 hours to get it out there. no way that is real, so obviously photoshopped. does anyone actually believe this is real? i don’t.
what the hell is it we’re supposed to be so shocked by? her wedgie?
under where? oh! underwear!
All I see is some camel Backtoe and frankly I find it disgusting. Sorry, she is cute in that plasticity kind of way but catching a frame of her ass from the wrong side just rubs me the wrong effin way.
And to everyone that doesnt get how to see the NSFW… GET OFF THE FREAGIN INTERNET! You do not belong here.
About the new layout… it’s probably my fault guys. haha. I recently emailed Anti Clown about the superficial because I wasn’t’ able to post Lindsay Lohan’s failing life to FB with a relevant thumbnail because it always defaulted to the right hand column pictures. So you can blame me for change but always blame yourselves for not being smart enough to roll with the punches!… PEACE!
I figured it out! You have to click on “View full size” above the image (to the left) to see her vajayjay.
http://www.thesuperficial.com/enlargedimage?postid=444721&parent=444701
Those cheeks are very ‘clutchable’. She’s marrying Russell Brand? Shit.
What a shitty performer though.
I’m going to drunken stepfather. Fuck this star crap.
WTF! I can’t get rid of the fucking dumb ass star..
fuk da star
pics are junk not even good
Katy gives good upskirt.