1. Dana

    Women who were burqas aren’t terrorists u racist idiot

  2. Ajmed

    It’s the husbands that are the terrorists, these chicks just stink.

  3. Jdub

    I am the Dread Pirate Roberts. There will be no survivors. My men are here, and I am here, but soon you will not be here. The Dread Pirate Roberts takes no survivors. All your worst nightmares are about to come true. The Dread Pirate Roberts is here for your souls!

  4. LOL FISH u imbecil….All this time i actually thought you were witty and smart….this artilce…says otherwise :)

    This article of yours spews out..IGNORANCE…

  5. MrBrightwell

    Googled this:
    Terrorist
    ter·ror·ist
    noun
    1. a person, usually a member of a group, who uses or advocates terrorism.
    2. a person who terrorizes or frightens others.
    3. (formerly) a member of a political group in Russia aiming at the demoralization of the government by terror.
    4. an agent or partisan of the revolutionary tribunal during the Reign of Terror in France.

    I think she’s defined in point 2.

    I mean, the thought that one day she could reproduce frightens the shit out of me.

  6. Erica

    Can I just be super lame and just point out these are not technically burqas? Burqas cover at least part of the face and sometimes all of it. Hijab is the general term that you want here, which refers to Islamic modesty clothes in a general way. Hijab is also used to refer to the body covering, and niqab or purdah specifically refers to the face veil. I don’t know why I’m trying to be serious on this site, but there ya go.

  7. wow

    Alot of you people are really lame. Like, being offended and making poor attempts at taking a “politically informed” stance on a post about Kim Kardashian? Who gives a shit? Like, racial profiling and stereotyping is the highest form of comedy.

  8. The questions is what WON’T she sell?

Leave A Comment