superficial

  1. JosieBelle

    Yikes, the early stages of her patented taint-reveal.

  2. Alexandrov Fedoseev

    I ‘m fairly certain that there was a 50-year-old man passing by when they took this picture.

  3. Ruth

    The photographer is a bit sick in the head. Asking a preteen/teen to lift up her skirt? Really? Can we say exploitation? Ew.

    • Jamie

      Yeah totally thinking the same thing. This photog should be flagged to the police, maybe get his compy checked… what a scumbag.

  4. Deryn

    Oh, ffs.

  5. Charro

    Daddy: “yeah, baby, just like that….*pant pant* lift it just a little higher for daddy…*pant pant*…yeah, daddy has a SEXY little girl…”

  6. kyla

    who is taking these pictures this is like child porn what the fuck is wrong with people !!

    • jf

      She’s not naked, stupid. This is no worse than the way normal teenagers going to school everyday dress and act.

  7. McGee

    OK, Ye Bible Thumpers, just remember that throughout all of human history, up until 4 days ago, girls this age would be celebrating their 2nd wedding anniversary… probably by popping out their 2nd baby. :rolleyes:

    • What, you mean back in the days where they were traded to their husbands like furniture and everyone died by age 40? You don’t say!

      • jf

        That has nothing to do with the fact that a physically developed 16 year-old is not a child, neither then, NOR now. There was a never a time where getting married and having babies at 10 yrs old or younger was a common practice, since 10 or younger is pre-pubescent, pre-sexual, pre-fertile, and is ultimately a child who is still in need of parental care. The fact that 15-16 DID used to be a common age for starting families and being treated like an adult, shows how ENTIRELY different that age is to an actual child And no, I don’t condone teens living like that in this day and age…it is a different world now (frankly I don’t even trust today’s 20-21 year olds to have babies). The point is though, is that a physically mature teenager should NOT be referred to as a child.

      • Marcus

        First of all, let’s say that Courtney Stodden’s body is real (for hypothetical purposes), just because she has a “physically developed” ( as you stated it) body doesn’t mean her frontal lobe which is responsible for rational thinking is developed fully. Therefore, she is still a child … Physically mature teens (as you stated it) just go through their physical changes fast but as you know because you are obviously an intelligent human (questionable), your brain takes years to develop. It doesn’t happen overnight. Anyway I thought I would clear that up because you infuriate me :/ so grow a brain of your own overnight.

      • Marcus

        First of all, let’s say that Courtney Stodden’s body is real (for hypothetical purposes), just because she has a “physically developed” ( as you stated it) body doesn’t mean her frontal lobe which is responsible for rational thinking is developed fully. Therefore, she is still a child … A physically mature teens (as you stated it) just go through their physical changes fast but as you know because you are obviously an intelligent human (questionable), your brain takes years to develop. It doesn’t happen overnight. Anyway I thought I would clear that up because you infuriate me :/ so grow a brain of your own overnight.

  8. cris

    this picture = pedophilia …she just looks 13,no 13 year old kid thinks of taking pictures like this it’s just not natural

    • jf

      Get real. Pedophiles are attracted to prepubescent children. The girl is about 15 or 16 here and she can pass for 20-21, and not to mention she’s still CLOTHED. These are pretty normal modeling pictures, and in fact there are lot of teenaged professional models who do stuff like this or more risque. Quit with the ridiculous predator hysteria. The girl is a bit messed up, but she is not a CHILD being taken advantage of. She’s physically and sexually mature,which is normal for an adult man to be attracted to (including some of the concern-trolls who won’t admit it), and these images are nowhere near pornographic/smutty.

  9. Amy

    This is ridiculous! I don’t know why these pictures were taken but she was obviously WAY to young to be posing like this. SHAME on her parents!!! Makes me sick!!!

  10. Thadeous

    #1) No, she doesn’t look 13 in that pic.
    #2) If I didn’t know her age and she slid her dress up like that in front of me …I’d tear her open like it was Christmas morning.

    In conclusion, she is a slut and has been for a while.

  11. vla815

    Um, if anyone has any knowledge of the bible, it was pretty commonplace for girls as young as 12 to be married off. Royalty has been bartering their toddler girls for new lands to conquer since before the Hapsburgs et al. In fact, most princes already had a bride picked out for them….right after she was born of a much needed adjacent country.

  12. Jen

    eww ppl she is ugly here too and she dosnt look 13 either she looks like she is 20.. shes always looked old… only in a few pics she looks young.

Leave A Comment