That is NOT a 17 year-old ass.
Why not? It’s small and perky and whatnot. If you’re referring to the tiny “dimple” under her butt, a ton of girls have it. No how matter how slim and fit a girl may be, the truth is that in a woman, fat stores itself in the thighs. Maybe you’ve just been jaded by Photoshop. I love butt dimples.
Anyway, this girl is a ho.
blah blah blah..she’s gross either way. mostly just tacky. her skin matches the pumpkins.
I agree that she’s nasty. She doesn’t have a nice round butt, either. But that has nothing to do with her age.
NOT perky. For that little of a booty, that’s some gravity effect.
it looks like a 40 year old whose goes to the gyms ass.
no ass…wheres the beef?
exactly. doesn’t matter what age she is, she has NO ass. way to show off your chicken ass in Daisy Dukes. ULTRA-fail.
The fact that her skin looks tight and there is no cellulite leads me to believe that her age might be close to what she claims.
disgusting whore. she looks about as 17 as george burns.
and she has those scrawny bird legs that should never be shown off.
throw in the disgusting orange skin and this is just fucking gross!
“Ahhh…I love the smell of anal bleach cream first thing in the morning…”
Commenting as a Guest
Sign in or Join.