Olivia Wilde won the Emmys. All of them.

September 20th, 2009 // 43 Comments

Here’s Olivia Wilde (House) arriving at the 61st Annual Primetime Emmy Awards and I would give her every fucking award at that thing regardless of how manly of a punch Jon Hamm would land on my face. I don’t even care that she has some sort of giant zipper going down her back. Unless, of course, her spine pops out mid-coitus and touches my hand causing me to shriek like a schoolgirl. But notice I never said anything about stopping. M’lady?

Olivia Wilde in GQ

Photos: Getty, WireImage
emmys
eWomenNetwork is Heading to the 61st Primetime Emmys!
... : Tamara Braun Daytime Emmys 2009 | tamara braun daytime emmys 2009 2
Lea Michele Emmys 2011 PHOTOS: Love It Or Leave It?
Telluride filmmaker, producer nominated for two Emmys
Chris Hanson might want to start writing another acceptance speech. Hanson, a Telluride-based filmmaker and producer, has been nominated for two Emmys by the Heartland Chapter of the National Academy of Television Arts and Sciences for work he ...
Film and TV faceoff: Who's better, who's best?
Last year's Oscar broadcast drew 37.6 million, compared with 12.4 million for their smallscreen counterpart, the Emmys. But if you mixed film and television in the same awards competition, you might find that TV is more deserving of accolades.

Comments (43)

  1. Dave | September 20, 2009 at 8:03 pm

    Delicious…

    Reply
  2. It's Me Fuckers | September 20, 2009 at 8:08 pm

    fucker. Still no COCK!!!!!!

    Reply
  3. LaLaLa | September 20, 2009 at 8:12 pm

    Nicccce, but can’t they find sumin’ better to keep the dress together than that ugly cheap lookin’ zipper??

    Reply
  4. marie | September 20, 2009 at 8:17 pm

    perfection. just perfection. will you look at those eyes?!! she’s THE sexiest woman in the country, period. only she can wear that dress: she looks delicious

    Reply
  5. Urbanspaceman | September 20, 2009 at 8:25 pm

    She’s a goddess, perfect in every way and the only reason for watching House.

    Reply
  6. necessary ROUGHness | September 20, 2009 at 8:39 pm

    She looks like a swan in pic 7 but yeah! that zipper looks tackier than lady GaGa at a ballroom gala…

    Reply
  7. sogemal | September 20, 2009 at 8:41 pm
  8. Intermino | September 20, 2009 at 8:41 pm

    She is GORGEOUS! That’s a lovely dress too, but I agree, the zipper sorta ruins it

    Reply
  9. flappaflap | September 20, 2009 at 8:59 pm

    What is the deal with the hair? I’m just sayin – why spend all the $$ on the zippa dress and then have your hair look like some barber from the 50′s put a handfull of brylcreem in it?

    Reply
  10. Steveo | September 20, 2009 at 9:04 pm

    This ‘star’ is just like the US education system.. no substance, yet continues to get paid

    Reply
  11. necessary ROUGHness | September 20, 2009 at 9:08 pm

    ———Touch down GIANTS———-Romo looks nervous!

    Reply
  12. me | September 20, 2009 at 9:10 pm

    blake lively looked better… post her teets please.

    Reply
  13. Danklin24 | September 20, 2009 at 9:33 pm

    Aside from having no breasts to speak of, Olivia Wilde is perfect. I’d go as far to say she’s hotter than Megan Fox.

    Reply
  14. Kamakazi Kunt | September 20, 2009 at 9:39 pm

    Ugh gross, seriously she reminds me of an Asian chipmunk.

    Reply
  15. jimbob | September 20, 2009 at 9:56 pm

    fivehead and no tits. Wake me up when she gets some huge implants.

    Reply
  16. chas | September 20, 2009 at 10:09 pm

    That dress would have looked better without the zipper. Nothing more sexy that looking at the bare of a womans back. How the shape of her ass leads to the small of her back. +2 for no tats. Nice tight body. PLEASE don’t get fake breasts.

    P.S. When a view of the back, she needs to show just a peek of the top of her “coin slot”. That would have been really sexy.

    Reply
  17. Dread not | September 20, 2009 at 10:12 pm

    Looks like the wife of a prince.

    Reply
  18. tromba | September 20, 2009 at 10:33 pm

    Beautiful woman. God-awful gown.

    Reply
  19. illy | September 20, 2009 at 11:16 pm

    eeeewwww! ugly dress. like….REEEEALLY ugly. dont these people have fashion stylists?

    Reply
  20. neptune | September 20, 2009 at 11:17 pm

    Lovely dress, but the back looks unfinished. The designer could have let the fabric trail up her side to join with the sleeve strap, rather than slapping that zipper into the flesh net. Other than that awful zipper, she really does look amazing.

    Reply
  21. jones | September 20, 2009 at 11:55 pm

    now all she needs is a few bad movies and a tattoo of Bea Arthur on her forearm and her journey to the darkside will be complete

    Reply
  22. Maximus | September 21, 2009 at 12:05 am

    Spectacular eyes. Truly.

    Reply
  23. michelle | September 21, 2009 at 12:17 am

    i don’t know what’s the big deal. personally, i think blake lively is much more appealing and has a fantastic figure, but most people think she’s not that great. what’s so attractive about olivia wilde?

    Reply
  24. Fai | September 21, 2009 at 1:29 am

    That’s what side zippers are made for. The seamstress who sabotaged this dress is a dumbfuck. Wilde is gorgeous as always, but that dress is an epic fail.

    Reply
  25. http://www.thefamousphere.com | September 21, 2009 at 2:51 am

    No tits and her face is fucking frightening. Whoever drew her eyebrows on should have to go to prison.

    Reply
  26. whatever | September 21, 2009 at 3:33 am

    i dont Fish realizes that theres a sheer element to the dress. its like a sleeveless gown, but some parts are sheer.

    Reply
  27. Miss | September 21, 2009 at 6:44 am

    this girl is nothing as far as looks go, the only thing she’s got going for her are nice eyes. she has an old face and it’s clear she’s going to age bad and her body is not even worth mentioning.

    Reply
  28. Miss | September 21, 2009 at 6:45 am

    this girl is nothing as far as looks go, the only thing she’s got going for her are nice eyes. she has an old face and it’s clear she’s going to age bad and her body is not even worth mentioning.

    Reply
  29. Max Planck | September 21, 2009 at 9:18 am

    No tattoos!

    How cool is that!

    Reply
  30. lisa | September 21, 2009 at 9:54 am

    Argh that zipper, i’d rather she’d had some tattoo’s! But she’s absolutely gorgeous regardless

    Reply
  31. laurente | September 21, 2009 at 10:08 am

    pretty eyes
    absolutely a bony body
    build like a boy
    but don’t get the implants please
    looks like Blake Lively got fake hootters?

    Reply
  32. Jen | September 21, 2009 at 2:07 pm

    I like her, but that mess on the dress is so ugly and the ZIPPER!! Looks like my 5 year old made the zipper. Awful. She should have just made it all mesh in back. NO ZIPPERS!!!

    Reply
  33. Jen | September 21, 2009 at 2:08 pm

    I like her, but that mess on the dress is so ugly and the ZIPPER!! Looks like my 5 year old made the zipper. Awful. She should have just made it all mesh in back. NO ZIPPERS!!!

    Reply
  34. Galtacticus | September 21, 2009 at 2:32 pm

    She looks a whole lot different dressed in clothes!

    Reply
  35. Darth | September 21, 2009 at 2:39 pm

    I didn’t almost recognize her.Luckily there’s a pic taken of her back too.

    Reply
  36. Lain | September 22, 2009 at 12:18 am

    She is fucking gorgeous. And a zipper? What are you guys, gay? It’s a fucking zipper. Get over it.

    Reply
  37. dumdeedoo | September 22, 2009 at 7:26 am

    she looks like me, that’s probably why i dont find her appealing at all hahaha

    Reply
  38. memememe | September 25, 2009 at 10:15 am

    @3: I agree, they should’ve put it on the side.

    Reply
  39. Kaldia | September 25, 2009 at 12:16 pm

    Sometimes I think she’s gorgeous. Sometimes I think she looks like an alien.

    Like that Giada lady from the cooking how–ridiculously hot for like .2 seconds and then something just comes along and fucks it up.

    Reply
  40. Jim | September 25, 2009 at 4:26 pm

    Dark meat lover…pass.

    Reply
  41. keith | October 20, 2009 at 1:56 am

    I think she’s sexy, especially on the movie “Year One”. I also thought that was Giada from the food network channel before I checked the credits, look just alike, Giada’s mouth is wider, plus she smiles a lot….

    Reply
  42. nano | November 16, 2009 at 8:03 am

    It’s horrible. The zipper is a poor, poor idea and given the flexibility of the “nude” knit, I’m not even sure a zipper was necessary. It looks great from the front though.

    Reply
  43. buy r4 card | January 25, 2010 at 8:48 am

    It’s horrible. The zipper is a poor, poor idea and given the flexibility of the “nude” knit, I’m not even sure a zipper was necessary. It looks great from the front though.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Name (Visible)
Email (Required, Not Visible)