Marking possibly the first time Maxim has ever been accused of showing too much, the February 2011 cover featuring Olivia Munn is apparently under fire for featuring her in see-through panties that reveal an entirely airbrushed pubic region that might as well be Barbie’s crotch. Hide your kids! FOX411 reports:
“It’s disgusting,” Dan Gainor, Vice President of Business & Culture at the Media Research Center, tells FOX411.“Maxim has moved their magazine from tawdry to full-on pornography.”
With America now privy to Munn’s personal grooming habits, Gainor predicts that retailers will race to put the offending issue under the counter.
“Any store could have children coming in. If I were a parent, and I walked into a store and saw that cover, I would make a scene until the manager hid it,” Gainor said.
Yes, because causing a scene wouldn’t draw your child’s attention immediately to the cover. “Hey, why’s dad freaking out about this magazine? And why can’t I stop staring at this girl’s underwear while feeling like it has the answers to everything? I’m dropping out of school.”
Now look what you did.
Photos: Maxim, Splash News
You know, I find this cover many times less provocative than the Maxim covers with topless women that don’t really show anything.
I find Maxim itself less provocative than Popular Mechanics. I don’t understand why it exists. Pictures of almost naked chicks is…almost interesting.
It’s really funny that the guy is bothered by the panties, but not at all concerned by the “Threesome Operator’s Manual” headline.
You see less girl crotch here than at the Miley Cyris concert, but he’s not all up in arms about that either.
Porn? Really???
I find her underwear choice rather conservative…
its whats for dinner.
How is this full-on pornography? Does this Dan guy even have the internet?
Good call. If that’s porn I want to know what to label my browser history. It’s got to be one vily descriptive word.
Lol
Disgusting?
Dryhump.
PHOTOSHOP OVERLOAD!
I agree with McFeely…the huge headline on top of her overly Photoshopped face is the Threesome’s Operating Manual. That should be more offensive then Olivia’s beauty. Plus anyone who has ever seen Olivia Munn knows this photo is photoshopped to death! Her jawline is famous & kinda gives her face the personality that makes her look diff than all the other chicks out right now & they’ve cropped her face so much! Who knows what else they did to her body.
Where is the un-airbrushed version?
Olivia Munn is fucking hot. Dan is a retard.
Nudity is not pornography, ya idiot.
what if I jerk off to it?
seconded
It still don’t count Mcfeely. I once offloaded to a picture of Betty White.
Then what is Playboy?
I thought pornography showed the dong actually goin in, as Ali G said…
she’s hot here, but def silmmed in pshop. Her face is wider in reality. Nice little hips though….finally something I’m actually attracted to.
are you people blind? you can see her god damn vagina
I don’t think you know what a vagina is.
please point me to this unobscured photo of her vagina, I would very much like to see it
Type vagina into google and educate yourself. You can’t see shit.
Lets hope that your “lil swimmers” have poor motility so you don’t spread this ignorance…there is no vagina visible in that picture
Especially since a “vagina” is the inside part of a woman. It would be quite something if a vagina was visible on the cover.
You see what? since when is hair or no hair nudity
As long as you’re pretending to know female anatomy, can you please get it right? The *uterus* is the womb.
Rachel are you trying to correct me? The vagina is the inside part of the woman BEFORE you get to the uterus. The part you see from the outside is the vulva. Are you seriously telling me that you are a girl and you don’t know this? AND you are trying to correct me in a condescending manner? Please, go type “vagina” into wikipedia and learn something about your own sexual organs.
If I remember my biology correctly, the vagina is inside. It’s the womb. Unless you’re conducting an OBGYN exam, at most you could see a female’s labia from the outside, and in this photo that’s not even visible.
Can someone tell if that’s just a shadow or actual pubic hair showing under the panties?
Who the fuck trims the middle and leaves thick sideburns on their twat? It’s a shadow dipshit.
Close but no cigar. The vagina is inside, for sure, but it’s not the womb. The womb (uterus) is where babies hang out. The vagina is the long tube heading towards the womb, where the penis does the hokey-pokey. The vulva (including labia) is what you see from the outside. Class dismissed.
you tell ‘em xanax. Honestly It’s really not that difficult, but really scary how misinformed it seems everyone is. Don’t confuse them by telling them that the labia actually has a majora and minora and also located down there is a separate urethra hole. They probably think the pee comes out of the hokey-pokey area
wowww, i’d love to see her peach! haha
Is Dan gay? Has he never seen a woman naked?
I LIKE IT.
.
I think it’s funny she bitched about the Playboy thing, that she was coerced into posing nude, and yet she has no problem posing in lacy panties. I wish she would just admit enjoying being a sex figure, instead of playing the role of the wide-eyed innocent doe. Her body won’t look that tight forever, better to enjoy it now.
And if this is the greatest fighter that dude Gainer has, he needs to seriously re-prioritize things to advocate for and against.
And by wide-eyed doe you mean small narrow squinty eyed doe.
It’s just nice to see Olivia Munn doing what she does best, standing around and letting men stare at her. At least this photo shoot kept her from ruining another episode of The Daily Show. Olivia, thank you for not trying to be funny and just showing us your goodies instead.
God this man is a pervert. How hard do you have to look at her crotch region to see that??
And her face still looks worse than my hairy ass.
She has a face???? Hmm… Hmmm…. Holy crap!!! You are right!!!!
At least she’s not saying that they had to airbrush because her lips were puffy due to the flu.
Which lips?
LOL…Good question.
holy fuck. :P
The only way ill be impress with this chick is, if she re-enforce the five senses like she did *I just broke up with my girlfriend Timberlake*
““It’s disgusting,” Dan Gainor, Vice President of Business & Culture at the Media Research Center, tells FOX411.“Maxim has moved their magazine from tawdry to full-on pornography.”
If he considers this to be full on pornography, he’s going to shit the bed when he looks at the saved photos on his daughter’s cell phone.
Dan Gainor is a publicity seeking douchebag.
So what if you can vaguely see her Photoshopped mons thru filmy panties?
So what?!
“Full blown pornography” indeed.
I’d love to see Dan’s own computer history. But such types will always say that they were on that site watching an underaged Chinese girl have sex with a dog for research purposes. They do it for the children.
My Nose is a Bicycle Seat as far a Olivia Munn is concerned.
Awesome pics & awesome tits !! Love Olivia Munn from hair to toe. Would love to seen her in even more darnig shoots like this & better. Thanks a lot for the awesome post. Plz continue the good work.
My Cock is a Bicycle Seat as far a Olivia Munn is concerned.
People have to be offended by something, otherwise nothing will be taboo anymore and that takes all the fun out of everything.
P.S. Not that she is ugly or anything but I can never get over her weird small eyes.
Oh wait i just read she was half chinese or some shit. I guess she’s entitled to it then. I thought she was just a white chick with weird eyes. Oops now I’m a racist!!!!!!
It’s not racist if you want to fuck her.
television autslboely incredreble!!!!Samsung always ahead competitors.People really see tv believe well delivers picture quality.Well done Samsung im sure keep delivering best technology future!!
I’ve seen more snatch in photos of Miley Cyrus concerts than on the cover of this mag. I really don’t think this conservative moron knows what porn actually is (hint: it’s not watching GI Joe dry hump your daughter’s Barbie dolls)
It doesn’t matter. Stupid address label is gonna cover it all up….
That lacy underwear is hot as hell. I want one. And she looks very sexy; I see nothing wrong with the picture.
I like how Walmart is all proud of itself that it banned Maxim in its stores, yet god forbid someone gives them shit for selling hollow-tipped bullets…..they conveniently pull the-
“They’re trying to take our freedom!” card…
Funny how that prudish conservative crowd talks about losing freedoms all while they ask stores to ban magazines with hot girls on them.
Sorry asshats, freedom means I can see a copy of Maxim at Wal Mart while I buy my uzi. You dipwads can’t whine about freedoms while denying my right to look at beautiful half naked women.
she has a nice body, even though its photoshopped to look so perfect…but her face leaves alot to be desired, she always looks drugged up or drowsy.
I say we should get this Gainor character to put on a t-shirt and fold his arm in real tight, then look down at his elbow. At this point, we should all raise a fuss until he cuts off his arm.
met her once at a party – shes actually pretty awesome – however I had to hide my erection every time we spoke
Hmm. The impression I get is that her talking would eliminate any erection I had. I stand cheerfully corrected.
Mmm, I’m thinking Arby’s.
I don’t get the controversy over showing her snatch. Don’t all chicks do that now? I just want to stick my weiner in Olivia’s butt.
Penises in bums = gay, FACT. Also that’s where feces comes out. Fact.
Hey, you’re only half a moron! FACT.
Gotta agree with Xanax. Might as well be a dude. If you gotta go cornhole with a girl, what’s an inch or two below (assuming doggy style) isn’t meeting your “needs”.
One click of the mouse and any kid can find a cock being fingered and THIS cover is a problem?
Wait, are you completely clear on that nomenclature. I need to see your browser history.
Clear as an unmuddied lake.Let me screen capture it for you. Right after I get my finger out of cock.
Finger…in the cock? What, does the guy have a urethra like a wind sock?
Poor bastard.
It’s just nice to see Olivia Munn doing what she does best, standing around and letting men stare at her. At least this photo shoot kept her from ruining another episode of The Daily Show. Olivia, thank you for not trying to be funny and just showing us your goodies instead.
maybe this guy should realize that taking his kid to the BEACH makes one privy to EVERYONE’s personal grooming habits since these panties cover more of her than ANY BIKINI SOLD NOWADAYS.
$50 says if he checked his daughter’s cell phone, he’d learn what real porn is.
You already said that.
half of my posts disappear into the spam filter, sometimes never to emerge. duplicate wit is the obvious result.
Bullshit. Wasnt funny the first time, so reposting it a second doesnt change that…no one replied the first time for a reason…it wasnt noteworthy. Try again a third time maybe?
Okay first of all she’s not being penetrated, so it’s not pornographic. Second, if that dipshit were in a store with their kid(s) and they were freaked out by a girl in their underwear… I hope said kids turn into XXX superstars as a result of their ridiculous parentage and oppression.
there’s no pornography without penetration?
Better definition would be “no deliberate sex act is being performed”, cause pics of people masturbating, even alone, still count as porn. Auto-manual sex is still sex, just with oneself. Nudity and posing nude however are not sexual acts even if they are intended to be erotic. The nasty looking tribal people in National Geographic, which you can buy in grocery stores as well, with their tits drooping all the way to their knees and the men with their dicks bound in these weird wooden cone pieces of shit with their equally drooping balls showing are way more nekkidy nekkid than Olivia Munn, but because their pics represent their cultural attire, and her pics have a teasing aspect they’re somehow “full-blown porn”?
This country just loves demonizing women, that’s all it is. This guy clearly never gets laid since he has no idea what porn even fucking IS in the first place, and just needs to exert that frustration elsewhere. He’ll probably be a rapist in like three more years. The Upper West Side Bed Intruder strikes again!
rgersge, don’t demonize the entire country because of what a single ultra-conservative jesus nutjob says. The vast majority of the country didn’t even NOTICE this Maxim cover.
Also, could you do some more describing of National Geographic? I got some awesome wood off that last post.
“I hope said kids turn into XXX superstars as a result of their ridiculous parentage and oppression,”
Maybe Laurence Fishburne freaked out over a quasi-salacious magazine when Montana was young?
This country is far too uptight, if it had been a murdered body on the cover I’m sure that sales would go down for that issue but it wouldn’t be news worthy. What is pornographic about a woman in her underwear (or nude for that matter)? The only thing messed up here is the way these people think. The real problem on this planet is hate, not scantily clad women.
She has no belly button, therefore is a clone. Alert the media; no wait, alert Twitter, the media is useless.
Hey, maybe they should just put mailing labels over it so that it’s totally covered… like they did to MY subscription copy!! Damn labels!!
Causing a scene in the store is far more damaging to the child than it seeing some naked flesh. Parents need to get the fuck over themselves. The world does not revolve around your spoiled little mistakes.
Haha Dan thinks that female pubic regions are disgusting.
Im more concerned about where her belly button is?!
“It’s disgusting,” Dan Gainor, Vice President of NAMBLA, tells FOX411.
No belly button.
SHE’S A CLONE!
Maybe he found the lack of camel toe disgusting.
maybe he found her lack of faith disturbing…and crushed her windpipe with the force.
The ‘shop is really bad on this one. It looks like both her tummy and her thighs have been unnaturally slimmed and the aforementioned labia have been shopped out so she looks like a barbie. I don’t understand why magazines and women like Munn think this stuff makes them look good. You can tell from the other pictures that she SHOCK! actually has hips and her waist/crotch look NOTHING like that cover image.
Needs more photoshop on the face
I wish somebody would hire me to airbrush her snatch, and by airbrush I mean wet it with my tongue.
Translation: “When are all you non-Evangelical Christians going to realize that nudity does not exist except between a man and his wife, for the two minutes they spend while conceiving each of their 8 children?”
Or between a man and another man in a public restroom. But it’s not gay, it’s just the temptation of Satan.