Oscar winner and Tom Cruise victim Nicole Kidman says having the chest of an 11-year-old boy is no big deal. In a recent interview, she says she accepts her shortcomings, and is in no rush to show off her tiny tatas.
She told Grazia magazine: “I’m not very big on revealing clothes. If I show a bit of skin in one place, I’ll cover the rest. I’m not big on a lot of cleavage – not that I have a lot of cleavage!”
I guess if you have a career like Kidman’s, then it doesn’t matter if you look like a guard for the Sacramento Monarchs. I never understood why she’s considered among the most beautiful women in entertainment. I’d rather stare at a paraplegic prostitute than watch any of Nicole’s movies.
rick mcginnis | December 14, 2005 at 3:39 pm
Hold it now – wasn’t she buck nekkid in that damn near unwatchable Eyes Wide Shut fillum by that Kubrick fella? Damn near lost my Pepsi when I saw that, I’ll tell ya…
Captain Awesome | December 14, 2005 at 3:41 pm
I’d hit that, like it owed me money.
becca11 | December 14, 2005 at 3:50 pm
star jones has big tits, but i would rather see nicole naked… big boobs aren’t everything….
becca11 | December 14, 2005 at 3:50 pm
yeah she was REALLY naked in eyes wide shut
Nikk The Templar | December 14, 2005 at 3:59 pm
Why flaunt your breasts when you’ve got legs like hers??
Juliette | December 14, 2005 at 4:07 pm
She is considered one of the most beautiful women in the world because she is naturally beautiful and she has class. The fact that she doesnt need to show off skin makes her sexy. She is intelligent and knows that she doesn’t need to dress like a slut to be a georgeous woman.
sammygirl | December 14, 2005 at 4:15 pm
I thought she was topless in that movie with Jude Law and Renee Zellweger. Cold Mountain? Anyway, she definitely flashed a boob.
zenmasterfoo | December 14, 2005 at 4:34 pm
yup nekkid. but pimple for ta ta’s.
http://tinyurl.com/82bvp
enjoy. or not. whatever…
Bea Arthur's Balls | December 14, 2005 at 4:37 pm
Naw, a classy broad like Nic wouldn’t flash a whole boob – maybe just a nip, like Mischa Barton. (Everyone loves the nips!)
SayWhat?! | December 14, 2005 at 5:11 pm
If it wasn’t for boob bags every size “0″ female in Hollywood would have a chest like hers. No such thing as a tiny waste and naturally birthed lunch tray boobs.
andrewthezeppo | December 14, 2005 at 5:38 pm
Nicole is one of the most beautiful women that have ever lived and our best working actress.
sadietolstoy | December 14, 2005 at 5:41 pm
She does have class and it is no big deal to me that she doesn’t have big boobs, but she is not naturally beautiful. She’s had tones of plastic surgery and she bleaches her hair.
bcgirl | December 14, 2005 at 5:55 pm
Hey SayWhat?,it is possible to have a tiny waist and big boobs,but with these blessings come another :a big fat ass.Do you think any hollywood actress would be caught dead with a fat ass,except for J-Lo.At one point in my life I weighed 145-150 and my height is 5′ 7 .I had a very small waist 27,huge rack 34D and ,I thought, a big fat butt(at least 40-42 inch butt ).Then I lost 25 pounds .Now my chest is a 36B,waist 25 and butt is 37.Any woman knows that the breast is made up of mainly fat tissue ,so lose fat and lose your boobs.It is impossible to be a size 0 and have big boobs,period.If rail thin Nicole gained 20 or so pounds ,she would have a chest,period.
firestar | December 14, 2005 at 6:17 pm
anyone notice that nicole got more beautiful after her divorce from tom cruise..coincedence i think not. Tom used to suck the life force out of her. anyone notice that katie holmes had been getting uglier. she was prettier before tom came along. Tom Cruise doesnt use botox he sucks the life out of ppl.
Mintarded | December 14, 2005 at 6:38 pm
Nicole is fine! You just have to learn to open your eyes in order to see the difference between a beauty like Nicole and skankwhores like Britney Spears or Paris Hilton. Big-titted fuglies like Jessica Alba are NOT beautiful, they just have big tits and act like $5 strippers. But you have to open your eyes to see that. Can’t you see tha… Oh.
Suite4 | December 14, 2005 at 7:53 pm
Jessica Alba and Nicole K??? There’s absolutely no comparison. Nicole K.’s beauty is insipid. You’d pass her in the street, you’d think “yeah she’s beautiful” for about 5 seconds and then you’d go home and you’d forget her. Jessica Alba is a gorgeous woman with beautiful curves. She actually doesn’t have big boobs. She just happens to have a tiny waist, which makes her boobs and thighs look bigger. She’s the kind of girl you instantly hate and get so jealous of that you call her “fugly”. I don’t think there’s that many girls who can pride themselves of having a great face (even without make-up) ANd great boobs AND a great waist ANd a great ass ANd great legs… all at the right place and at the righ size. And I think there are more women who want to look like Jessica A. than like Nicole K. Why be an uptight Jaguar when you can be an exciting Porsche?
derekd | December 14, 2005 at 9:27 pm
Well said Suite4.
TrompeyNo | December 14, 2005 at 9:50 pm
As far as comparing celebrities, say what you want. But in “desert island companion” terms, Nicole Kidman is way up near the pinnacle of what you could get stuck with. Eyes Wide Shut sucks, but that opening scene shows a heavenly woman. “No tits”?
I’ve seen the girlfriends/wives of guys who slag on actresses. Not a Kidman in the bunch.
TrompeyNo | December 14, 2005 at 10:29 pm
…so, boobs. Rock guy Steve Albini provides these useful classifications, self-explanatory. Tots, tits, boobs, jugs, and dugs.
The connoisseur must remember, each type is either “nice” or “ew”. Within their classes, they all vary in naked-oglability. It can be affected or decided by skin color and transparency. Some nipple types are good with some classes and not so in others. I was told that support-style growing up, such as an ill-fit training bra, can signficantly alter breast destiny.
Your breastophile does not like to see certain types of breast in a strip club or a photo as a matter of aesthetics. Their wife/girlfriend is a whole other thing. On the flip side, who knows if Ms. Jessica Alba has deal-breaker nipples. Probably not, but for all we know there is an unpleasant surprise in store for her conquerors.
HollyJ | December 14, 2005 at 11:53 pm
Eyes Wide Shut. Yeah, I really enjoyed her sharing her fake piss-and-wipe with us. Thanks Kubrick.
slinkhard | December 15, 2005 at 5:05 am
She was prettier when she still had red hair and weighed over 100 pounds.
PostAcidYouth | December 15, 2005 at 3:40 pm
Shockingly, not everyone actually thinks Miss Alba is attractive. I for one don’t. I find that she has a very young looking face.
As for boobs….a woman with big tits that takes every opportunity to flop them out (kelly brook) is infinitely less classy than a woman with small ones who knows she doesn’t need to show them to be sexy (keira knightley, forgiven for that dress accident) This ‘bigger is better’ attitude is misleading and quite misogynistic. Boobs are boobs, they’re nice in all shapes and sizes, and people like Nicole Kidman and Mischa Barton should feel under no pressure to change
alteaon | December 16, 2005 at 12:50 am
The issue of big tits, and big butts…isn’t always the case. THere are women with wide hips (not fat, but bone structure) who are just not born with huge or moderately large breasts.
I agree with whoever said that Nic looked better with red hair. She looks rather washed out now.
I still find all the comparisons funny. In one thread, a woman can be all that because she’s curvy, in another thread she can be too fat..
PostAcidYouth | December 17, 2005 at 1:58 pm
An interesting thing regarding these threads, and also general opinion. My measurements are exactly those of Jessica Alba’s…only I have an A cup instead of a C. So, while Miss Alba is regarded ‘curvy’, ‘sexy’, and ‘perfect’, I’m regarded as ‘too skinny’, ‘boyish’ and ‘shapeless’. All because I have small breasts. I just find it odd that for the sake of two bags of fat on my chest, the opinions can be so different.
sneakindeacon | May 12, 2006 at 5:48 pm
Nicole was also nude in “Billy Bathgate” and showed off a nice tight booty.
fijian | July 7, 2006 at 2:01 am
Nicole is GORGEOUS. I’ve got small tits too. Sure, they’d be bigger–if I was. Lol. So I applaud Nicole. She looks gorgeous and very classy the way she is. She inspires beauty in smaller frames everywhere.
antigravity33 | October 15, 2006 at 10:04 pm
Nicole Kidman is beautiful. She looks rather angelic with her bright, clear eyes (see: Moulin Rouge), but has those dramatic eyebrows that make her stand out onscreen. Her complexion is flawless, and while I am grossed out by her choice to dye her gorgeous red hair…um, albino yellow/white, I still think she’s phenomenal. Perhaps her intensity onscreen contributes to this striking quality about her. You simply can’t say things like that about actresses of Jessica Alba’s caliber–she’s so new, so young, and relatively inexperienced compared with more established actresses like Kidman. And boobs? I will not discuss boobs, because honestly, they have nothing to do with the quality or beauty of the actress. It’s all about command for attention. I feel Nicole has it moreso than Jessica.
antigravity33 | October 15, 2006 at 10:05 pm
Nicole Kidman is beautiful. She looks rather angelic with her bright, clear eyes (see: Moulin Rouge), but has those dramatic eyebrows that make her stand out onscreen. Her complexion is flawless, and while I am grossed out by her choice to dye her gorgeous red hair…um, albino yellow/white, I still think she’s phenomenal. Perhaps her intensity onscreen contributes to this striking quality about her. You simply can’t say things like that about actresses of Jessica Alba’s caliber–she’s so new, so young, and relatively inexperienced compared with more established actresses like Kidman. And boobs? I will not discuss boobs, because honestly, they have nothing to do with the quality or beauty of the actress. It’s all about command for attention. I feel Nicole has it moreso than Jessica.