Natalie Portman’s underwear

May 14th, 2009 // 65 Comments

Here’s Natalie Portman on the set of her new film Hesher, and yes, that’s her underwear. Not exactly the prettiest of settings, but beggars can’t be choosers. In the meantime, why do her legs always look like she just kickboxed Dolph Lundgren for 24 hours straight? They were the same way in Hotel Chevalier. Does she fight crime at night or something? I mean, besides in my head while wearing a Wonder Woman costume. That’s invisible.

Photos: Fame
Natalie Portman - Natalie Portman Wallpaper (4733556) - Fanpop
Natalie Portman - Natalie Portman Wallpaper (17374249) - Fanpop
Natalie Portman 1024x768 wallpaper - right click and choose Set as ...
Natalie Portman Picture 41
Natalie Portman signs two films
Los Angeles, Feb 10 (PTI) ''Black Swan'' star Natalie Portman has signed up for two new Terrence Malick movies, although it is unclear what roles she will play. The 30-year-old Oscar-winning actress, who is taking some time off from Hollywood following the ...
Natalie Portman turns heads: Giambattista Valli gown at SAG Awards (photos)
Natalie Portman has had a busy year since last time she was at the SAG Awards. Returning a year after winning the award in 2011 for her performance in Black Swan, Portman looked outstanding on the red carpet Sunday night. A new mom and currently working on ...

Comments (65)

  1. LPB | May 14, 2009 at 11:36 am

    Her legs look that way because her boyfriend keeps dropping her on the ground.

    Reply
  2. GoGoGo | May 14, 2009 at 11:37 am

    This reminds me of Easter.

    Reply
  3. Reality check | May 14, 2009 at 11:39 am

    She is so damn overrated, i never thought this chick was hot. Ugly legs too.

    She bores me.

    Reply
  4. lulwut | May 14, 2009 at 11:40 am

    Why is she wearing two pairs of underwear?

    Reply
  5. ROUGH--likes em natural | May 14, 2009 at 11:45 am

    Is this for the professional part 2? that was sickening hot!

    Reply
  6. dude | May 14, 2009 at 11:46 am

    I think it’s nice that Portman reminds us the glam is an illusion. She looks like any ordinary girl here.

    Reply
  7. iddoher | May 14, 2009 at 11:49 am

    man, what a porker. she should lose some weight.

    Reply
  8. Max Planck | May 14, 2009 at 11:51 am

    Oy! Like this a nice Jewish girl should behave?

    Reply
  9. Salty Bob | May 14, 2009 at 11:51 am

    Granny pants!

    Reply
  10. cathy smith | May 14, 2009 at 11:52 am

    She is a se-xy girl
    Recently I found a hot club
    – S e e k I n g t a l l. C o M –
    Where U can find tall se-xy girls and hamdsome guys.I’m sure your love is there.

    Reply
  11. RichPort's Ghost | May 14, 2009 at 11:52 am

    From the back or the front, she doesn’t look too different.

    Reply
  12. titsonsnack | May 14, 2009 at 11:53 am

    Weird underwear. Is her boyfriend a sixteen year old gnomeÉ
    I can`t make a question mark on my keyboard this morning for some reason, they just come out like this É
    deal with it.

    Reply
  13. guyacrossthepond | May 14, 2009 at 11:58 am

    better underwear shot of hers in V for Vendetta – thong

    Reply
  14. lizzy | May 14, 2009 at 12:08 pm

    #3 — yes you’re so right!!!!

    she’s wearing spanx over her underwear, fyi. you can see her undwear underneath them.

    Reply
  15. mikeock | May 14, 2009 at 12:10 pm

    “I did it for…..Matilda!”

    Reply
  16. Simon Barsinister | May 14, 2009 at 12:12 pm

    What the hell is the little hand reaching up in picture #6?
    Are they stepping on a midget or a baby?

    Reply
  17. Zanna | May 14, 2009 at 12:14 pm

    Is this movie about retards because she’s dressed like one and he looks like one. And there is a hand reaching up from the ground in the 6th picture.

    Reply
  18. Zanna | May 14, 2009 at 12:15 pm

    @16- maybe it’s a zombie ‘tard.

    Reply
  19. Valerie | May 14, 2009 at 12:35 pm

    15–I loved that movie! :D

    Reply
  20. chupacabra | May 14, 2009 at 12:37 pm

    just remember: she was fucking devendra bernhardt.
    http://www.devendrabanhart.com/

    Reply
  21. ohmy | May 14, 2009 at 12:39 pm

    you people cant be this ignorant….those are light pink bike shorts over her underwear. she obviously wore them for the scene since her dress was going to ride up….sheeeesh

    Reply
  22. lulu | May 14, 2009 at 12:48 pm

    since she started fuckin sean penn i lost all respect for her

    Reply
  23. mishi | May 14, 2009 at 12:59 pm

    I live in new york city where this one lives and everyone knows this chick is a total ho-bag. she goes out at night and it ain’t hard to get her to go home with you. i don’t know why everyone thinks she is so fantastic. as long as he bumped into her out and about, any guy could bang her if he wanted to. i know plenty of guys who already have. bring condoms!

    Reply
  24. just some New Yorker | May 14, 2009 at 1:05 pm

    i don’t understand why some people are obsessed with this chick. she is ordinary at best.

    I actually saw her at a cafe in NYC with her family. I passed by her and guess what: she is a midget 5’2”-5’4” max. she looked just like any other girl on the street, even worse actually. if she wasn’t famous nobody would bother to look at her, let alone stick their wieners in her

    Reply
  25. pockrocks | May 14, 2009 at 1:14 pm

    wow, can’t believe some people so angry over panties.

    Reply
  26. scatterflake | May 14, 2009 at 1:17 pm

    Oh my you people are cruel. She looks like any girl you went to school with, pretty but normal. We don’t all dress like Paris Hilton 24-7! Be comfy, Natalie. My legs have bruises on them too, guess why? LIFE! I garden, I play, I work. Maybe she does too. Normal stuff. I think she’s lovely. And I don’t car if she’s got Spanx on over her undies, so what? Probably everyone in film wears them.

    Reply
  27. hell yeh | May 14, 2009 at 1:18 pm

    23 & 24 — you’re both amazing and speak the truth!!!

    Reply
  28. chango666 | May 14, 2009 at 1:27 pm

    With a spoon I would eat that . . .

    Reply
  29. mamamiasweetpeaches | May 14, 2009 at 1:31 pm

    “Dolph Lundregn”????

    Where ?? Where????

    More pee pee shots, please!

    * Two pairs of underwear WHY???

    Reply
  30. blah | May 14, 2009 at 1:37 pm

    two pair so her butt cheeks dont hang out. cant blame her for being discreet

    Reply
  31. hershlag | May 14, 2009 at 1:56 pm

    love her nailpolish!

    those shoes with that outfit is terrible… she looks cute though in the last picture.

    but behind all the fame, we know she’s just an average long island jew.

    Reply
  32. Just Damn | May 14, 2009 at 2:00 pm

    Eww.
    Granny panties.

    Reply
  33. gotmilk? | May 14, 2009 at 2:03 pm

    spanx, seriously? i don’t think so. those are more along the lines of bloomers, like cheerleaders wear.

    Reply
  34. Vince Lombardi | May 14, 2009 at 2:05 pm

    Anyone who’s ever given a horsey-back ride to knows you have to reach back and grab the girl’s ass and hoist her up higher — which is why I’m guessing the second wave of hosiery is present. Clearly pussy-boy there has technique issues, which explains the MMA marks all over her legs. Poor Nat needs a crash helmet at this rate.

    As for her height being 5-02 to 5-04, that is a normal chick. And given some of the midget leading men in Hollyweird, she’s actually tall for a female actor.

    Reply
  35. megan | May 14, 2009 at 2:07 pm

    ouuu. kudos, superficial writer, for sneakily letting us know you watch cool movies. i preferred her legs in Mars Attacks!, but that’s just me.

    Reply
  36. megan | May 14, 2009 at 2:07 pm

    ouuu. kudos, superficial writer, for sneakily letting us know you watch cool movies. i preferred her legs in Mars Attacks!, but that’s just me.

    Reply
  37. megan | May 14, 2009 at 2:08 pm

    ouuu. kudos, superficial writer, for sneakily letting us know you watch cool movies. i preferred her legs in Mars Attacks!, but that’s just me.

    Reply
  38. megan | May 14, 2009 at 2:08 pm

    ouuu. kudos, superficial writer, for sneakily letting us know you watch cool movies. i preferred her legs in Mars Attacks!, but that’s just me.

    Reply
  39. megan | May 14, 2009 at 2:08 pm

    ouuu. kudos, superficial writer, for sneakily letting us know you watch cool movies. i preferred her legs in Mars Attacks!, but that’s just me.

    Reply
  40. megan | May 14, 2009 at 2:08 pm

    ouuu. kudos, superficial writer, for sneakily letting us know you watch cool movies. i preferred her legs in Mars Attacks!, but that’s just me.

    Reply
  41. megan | May 14, 2009 at 2:08 pm

    ouuu. kudos, superficial writer, for sneakily letting us know you watch cool movies. i preferred her legs in Mars Attacks!, but that’s just me.

    Reply
  42. megan | May 14, 2009 at 2:08 pm

    ouuu. kudos, superficial writer, for sneakily letting us know you watch cool movies. i preferred her legs in Mars Attacks!, but that’s just me.

    Reply
  43. megan | May 14, 2009 at 2:13 pm

    i did not mean to post a million times, sorry superficial!!

    Reply
  44. Jay | May 14, 2009 at 2:21 pm

    Totally bizarre. From IMDB, “Hesher” is the story of a family struggling to deal with a loss (the mom) and the anarchist (Hesher) who helps them do it. Portman plays a friend of the son. I wish she’d do another Pirates or maybe a spy thriller.

    Reply
  45. sonny | May 14, 2009 at 5:13 pm

    I would eat her poo. such a hot jewess.

    Reply
  46. bah, i hate you all | May 14, 2009 at 5:36 pm

    i don’t know why you guys think you’re so cool talking crap.
    I’m guessing you aren’t aware that on a film shoot, even the underwear is chosen by the COSTUME DESIGNER. she’s wearing two pairs because one are tights cut like biker shorts, as you can see the sheer fabric, and the little roses on it, its part of her outfit for her character… so obviously they’re not hers.

    Reply
  47. spinal | May 14, 2009 at 5:37 pm

    I think her legs look pale, skinny and bruised because of her veganism – iron deficiency anemia is common with that sort of diet.

    And I always thought she was a ho-bag. Sean Penn is just one in a string of dirty, STD-ridden dudes she has ‘dated’ (remember the pube guy?) Still love her in “Leon” though.

    Reply
  48. Danny | May 14, 2009 at 7:09 pm

    Are they acting there? Is that what that is? If so, she should get an award for her portrayal of Lisa Loopner.

    Reply
  49. kisjijoe | May 14, 2009 at 9:31 pm

    so fukin ugly

    Reply
  50. War Horse | May 14, 2009 at 10:03 pm

    Forget Natalie, check out the yellow Stang in the background. Man, that thing looks mint from 1992!

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Name (Visible)
Email (Required, Not Visible)