You’d think Natalie Portman naked and crying would be a little more entertaining than this, but you’d be wrong. You’d be so wrong. Especially if you thought ‘naked’ meant juggling chainsaws like I did. C’mon, woman, you call that juggling? I’ve seen better juggling at the platypus! I really need to learn what words mean.
Click the image for Natalie Portman’s slightly NSFW nude scene from Goya’s Ghosts.
 |
Courteney Cox's Shocking Confession About Her Sex Life – Huffington Post |
 Why Was This Celebrity Booed Off This Hit TV Show? – Fox News | |
| 50 Most Scandalous Cheerleaders in Sports History – Bleacher Report | |
| Skinny Star in a Bikini Talks About Being Anorexic – Evil Beet Gossip | |
| Sasha Grey keeps doing it for the kids. – TMZ | |
| Kate Middleton Steps Out On Her Own – Lainey Gossip |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Adam Levine Signs 'Glee' Guy to New Label, Poses For Terry Richardson (PHOTOS) |
Relationship Expert on Halle Berry's Reported Move: It's About Being Selfless, Not Selfish (PHOTOS) |
Camila Alves Flashes Engagement Ring, Talks Wedding Plans (PHOTOS) |
'Madly in Love' Robert Pattinson & Kristen Stewart Hang Tight in Los Angeles |
Lady Gaga's Tattooed 'Born This Way' Costar Reveals 'Top Secret' Project with Singer |
Lindsay Lohan's Platinum Blonde Locks: Yay or Nay? (PHOTOS) |
veggi | March 21, 2007 at 9:31 am
boring.
veggi | March 21, 2007 at 9:32 am
oh, and FRIST! That was for you FRIST!
jakebarnes | March 21, 2007 at 9:32 am
Yeah she needs to get on the Britney/Lohan trolley, mostly because people actually would like to see her naked.
ponk | March 21, 2007 at 9:33 am
i read this blurb twice and I have no idea what the hell you’re talking about. Is this a superficial post or an ad?
YouRang | March 21, 2007 at 9:33 am
Disappointing. That plain fucking sucked. I got the lotion and tissues out for nothing. Fuck you fish. Liar!
Spock's Left Nut | March 21, 2007 at 9:34 am
Where was the torture? I was promised torture.
BarbadoSlim | March 21, 2007 at 9:37 am
“I’ve seen better juggling at the platypus! I really need to learn what words mean.” WTF!?!?!
*sigh*
I would enjoy looking at Natalie naked but I’m pretty sure looking at naked pictures of 12 year old boys over the internet is a federal rap.
veggi | March 21, 2007 at 9:37 am
where’s my man?
HerpesHilton | March 21, 2007 at 9:38 am
I have such a girl-crush on her.
danielle | March 21, 2007 at 9:39 am
What these kind of people will do for green paper. So sad.
PatreeseD | March 21, 2007 at 9:40 am
Um… Okay. Why didn’t we get to see what happened after he started grabbing her like that? I want some rape and torture, damnit!
Oh, by the way, where was his mask? I thought that movie with her being tortured that dude had a mask on. Now, THAT is scary.
DrPhowstus | March 21, 2007 at 9:46 am
I suddenly have a hankering for some ribs.
F-Sucker | March 21, 2007 at 9:47 am
Let’s see some cooch.
imran karim | March 21, 2007 at 9:48 am
that was lame. esp if it was a body double in the end
jrzmommy | March 21, 2007 at 9:49 am
I’m just…I….I really just don’t care about her.
veggi | March 21, 2007 at 9:56 am
why must we be forced to look at these hobbits? Pile Eva L., Nat, and the charmed chick on top of each other, and they’d be 5’8″.
Bugman4045 | March 21, 2007 at 10:20 am
I prefer her semi nude scenes in “The Professional”
Rowr!
sdserf | March 21, 2007 at 10:21 am
Man.. I read this headline, got up and walked all the way the drug store to pick up some lube and tissue. Got home, hooked up my computer to the living-room LCD, sat down and pressed play. I felt a little flutter in my grotchable area but nothing, absolutely nothing. And the worst part is the drug store will not give me a refund now.
Alllegiononflegit | March 21, 2007 at 10:23 am
She is gorgeous. Too bad you don’t see more. We will just have to wait for her career to tank and she will show it all. They always do.
Alllegiononflegit | March 21, 2007 at 10:25 am
She is gorgeous. Too bad you don’t see more. We will just have to wait for her career to tank and she will show it all. They always do.
p911gt10c | March 21, 2007 at 10:32 am
Meh, I’ve already seen pics of her topless on a beach from a couple of years back, I’m good. This was just dull.
wedgeone | March 21, 2007 at 10:42 am
Looks like AntiClown Media officially hired DamYell to write their unfunny diatribe. Pathetic.
Oh, and so was this “nude scene”.
combustion8 | March 21, 2007 at 11:19 am
nuthin wrong with a little side ass, I’d hit it till the cows came home.
kristynn | March 21, 2007 at 11:56 am
she could be spread eagle and touching herself and it wouldn’t matter with that hair…
woodhorse | March 21, 2007 at 12:05 pm
Pay attention Wally!! I would so hit it!! I would do anything she wanted me to. And the bitch knows it.
^Jenna^ | March 21, 2007 at 1:52 pm
I see more nudity getting dressed to go to college every day.
Completely separate point: Is she getting molested (well, slightly touched more like) by a priest?
I knew Catholic priests were into boys, but this scene just gives it a whole new meaning
Truthseeker013 | March 21, 2007 at 3:54 pm
I’m not hearing hate from the Star Wars set…
Rascalnikov | March 21, 2007 at 6:08 pm
She’s a crap actress. This is like the poorly-played tortured victim routine she did in V For Vendetta. She was crap in that too. Don’t even get me started about how bad she was in the Star Wars flicks.
mika85 | March 21, 2007 at 6:12 pm
17: she was actually 10-12 years old then i think. pedophile much? sick nasty fucker…
she still looks 10-12 in this clip.
chundadownunda | March 21, 2007 at 7:08 pm
I guess false advertising is acceptable in the viral promotion of a film…’nude’ will always get punters in for a peak. Without this innuendo sites like the Superficial would ignore it. Close up of pictures by Goya anyone? Nah don’t think that will sell it… It hasn’t a ghost of a chance…ghost get it..oh never mind. Next!
Ithrowball,youleave | March 21, 2007 at 7:15 pm
Check out the links to the other scenes. The scene where they’ve got her arms pulled up behind her and she’s hanging by them from the ceiling made my toes curl. OUCH!
woodhorse | March 21, 2007 at 7:17 pm
None of you sadly unenlightened have seen Natalie in “Closer” which is a totally HAWT movie and Natalie can act her ass off – and literally does – Keira is only a Natalie wannabe….
Pikachelsea | March 22, 2007 at 5:22 pm
This is considered entertainment?
herbiefrog | March 24, 2007 at 6:00 pm
she is a “great” actor
…or actress : )
and you dont need to see her naked
…are we nearly there yet ?
jon | July 24, 2007 at 6:10 pm
um…it’s a body double retards. she didnt actually get nude for this shit flick
gucci outlet | May 26, 2010 at 7:23 am
I like…so beautiful and sexy,good!