Russian supermodel Natalia “Supernova” Vodianova hit Ipanema Beach with her family yesterday which has given The Superficial its first “two bikini posts in one day” since dinosaurs roamed the earth outside a young Madonna’s hut. If you’re wondering how this plethora of swimwear happened, apparently Santa Claus is way early this year – much like in the bedroom. Before you jump to conclusions, big guy, I’m not saying Mrs. Claus squealed. But she’s a lonely woman, and I own a snowmobile. ‘Nuff said.
Photos: Flynet
male superficial commenters | November 13, 2008 at 6:06 pm
Meh.
We prefer boys.
There, we said it.
too hott | November 13, 2008 at 6:06 pm
First!!! I’ve never been first in my life! Is that her kid?
wohooo | November 13, 2008 at 6:06 pm
nice butt
Rough Daddy | November 13, 2008 at 6:06 pm
Theres nothing sexy here, whats with the freaking kid???
iepoz | November 13, 2008 at 6:08 pm
What—where are all you vapid tweens?
iepoz | November 13, 2008 at 6:08 pm
What—where are all you vapid tweens?
iepoz | November 13, 2008 at 6:08 pm
What—where are all you vapid tweens?
db | November 13, 2008 at 6:15 pm
the dimples above her buttocks indicate a high degree of probability that she’s a squirter.
Ted Kennedy's tumor | November 13, 2008 at 6:17 pm
Dang she has a nice ass. I met some russian hookers who looked a lot like this, when I was in Bahrain. Those smelly arabs love the blond russian booty.
boinoinoing! | November 13, 2008 at 6:20 pm
There isn’t a square inch on that woman’s body where I wouldn’t put my tongue!
boognish | November 13, 2008 at 6:21 pm
You should rename this site – ‘Some Woman You’ve Never Heard Of In a Bikini’.
Kahlee | November 13, 2008 at 6:22 pm
@1 XD
Randal | November 13, 2008 at 6:24 pm
I recall the very first time you appeared as a model for Gucci as your face became THE face for their perfume line. You’ve matured a lot since those days, becoming a mother not once, not twice, but three times … a lady.
May you, Justin and your three beautiful children live long and healthy.
Randal
lori | November 13, 2008 at 6:27 pm
She is beautiful.
CGI | November 13, 2008 at 6:37 pm
Stunner.
Why can’t all women look like this after having kids?!?
Parker | November 13, 2008 at 6:39 pm
wow, for this I could overlook the fact she has a kid. I can almost feel that warm, tight ass of hers enveloping my cock. The joy to be found in an ass like that is a thing of beauty on its own. Plus, it’s easy enough to lock a kid in its room while I’m douching the mom’s pooper with my dick. They stop crying eventually. The moms, I mean, not the kids. Those things never shut up. Mommy why do you cry when uncle Joe gets behind you? Why is uncle Joe lifting up the back of your dress? Why is uncle Joe bumping into you?
Ralph | November 13, 2008 at 6:39 pm
A super model?…no ass, no tits, no waist, average face. I guess all you need it to be is tall and skinny.
GrandpaMccain | November 13, 2008 at 6:44 pm
I want to spread her butt-ski and pummel her anally with my dick-ski.
steph | November 13, 2008 at 7:01 pm
17: models don’t need ass or tits… they are MODELS, duh and not porn stars or actresses. and Natalia has a gorgeous face, just pick up any high fashion mag and you’ll see.
steph | November 13, 2008 at 7:04 pm
oh and it depends on what type of modeling ur thinking of. she is in the BIG league, like THE fashion fashion. not the cutesy fashion crap, ‘cheap glamor modeling crap’
Sport | November 13, 2008 at 7:08 pm
Nice ass.
Ralph's dad | November 13, 2008 at 7:09 pm
Yes, Ralph, you finally understand. Good for you, son. Supermodels are tall, skinny girls who marry tall skinny guys, not fat boys. Now put the box of Twinkies down and get some exercise, would you? Your mom and I are worried you’ll get so fat that one day we’ll eventually have to take the side of the house off to get you out to the doctor.
Parker | November 13, 2008 at 7:23 pm
Hey steph, how long do you figure before they *do* turn a model into a porn star and make her do a video called [fill in the name]‘s Amazing All Anal Adventures? Cause I would probably want to buy that video. Especially if the model was this Natalia girl. Also I didn’t know that stuff about many levels of models. That’s good to know. I think I prefer cutesy fashion not cheap fashion but as I said, if this Natalia girl is fashion fashion then I will try to embrace that world as well.
amanda | November 13, 2008 at 7:24 pm
im tall + skinny and im not a model.
theres got to be more to it than that, like and intense hatered for food or a gym addiction.
regardless, i wish my ass was that nice!
Vas Deferens | November 13, 2008 at 7:47 pm
Holy sweet ass, Lenin!
I would love to stick my khui in her pizda.
cutesy | November 13, 2008 at 8:14 pm
She’s a GODESSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!
rawr | November 13, 2008 at 8:30 pm
duh shes gorgeous…shes from russia!! maybe if the united states turned communist like russia, our woman would look like this too!!
Myrtle Beach | November 13, 2008 at 8:35 pm
A girl can’t have a little wedgie in peace anymore.
Natalia | November 13, 2008 at 8:42 pm
My name’s Natalia!
That means I’m sexy =]
yleine | November 13, 2008 at 8:46 pm
I heard that she appeared on a millionaire & celebrity dating club ^^^^^^MillionaireLoving. C O M^^ ^^^^with a personal account there. Maybe you have the chance to talk to her online or meet some celebrities there. It is amazing.
steph | November 13, 2008 at 8:54 pm
23: it was supposed to be a.k.a. and then the ‘ apostrophe in the last sentence after the , comma
steph | November 13, 2008 at 8:59 pm
because glamor modeling is cheap and mostly they do cute stuff like cute hair and cute clothes and the girls need to have tits and ass too to be in in.
fashion modeling is THE only modeling i see. i wish i was 5’10. this lady i know, her daugher does it and shes basically living my dream.
Ted from LA | November 13, 2008 at 8:59 pm
Is this the girl from Ipanema?
#16, You’re new here aren’t you? We needed more sick fucks. Welcome.
Urbanspaceman | November 13, 2008 at 9:02 pm
When Linda Evangelista referred to a “Russian prostitute who calls herself a supermodel” in a recent Vanity Fair, was she referring to Natalia Vodianova?
F-Obama | November 13, 2008 at 9:05 pm
perfect ass
BLUE STATES | November 13, 2008 at 9:05 pm
Please red states, just secede already:
“We believe this split will be beneficial to the nation, and especially to the people of the new country of New California. To sum up briefly: You get Texas, Oklahoma and all the slave states.
We get stem cell research and the best beaches.
We get the Statue of Liberty. You get Dollywood.
We get Intel and Microsoft. You get WorldCom.
We get Harvard. You get Ole’ Miss.
We get 85% of America’s venture capital and entrepreneurs.
You get Alabama. We get Hollywood and Yosemite, thank you.
We get two-thirds of the tax revenue; you get to make the red states pay their fair share.
Since our aggregate divorce rate is 22% lower than the Christian Coalition’s, we get a bunch of happy families.
You get a bunch of single moms.
Please be aware that Nuevo California will be pro-choice and anti-war, and we’re going to want all our citizens back from Iraq at once.
If you need people to fight, ask your evangelicals.
They have kids they’re apparently willing to send to their deaths for no purpose, and they don’t care if you don’t show pictures of their children’s caskets coming home.
We do wish you success in Iraq, and hope that the WMDs turn up, but we’re not willing to spend our resources in Bush’s Quagmire.
With the Blue States in hand, we will have firm control of 80% of the country’s fresh water, more than 90% of the pineapple and lettuce, 92% of the nation’s fresh fruit, 95% of America’s quality wines, 90% of all cheese, 90% of the high tech industry, 95% of the corn and soybeans (thanks Iowa!), most of the U.S. low-sulfur coal, all living redwoods, sequoias and condors, all the Ivy and Seven Sister schools plusStanford, Cal Tech, Berkeley, UCLA and MIT.
With the Red States, on the other hand, you will have to cope with 88% of all obese Americans (and their projected health care costs), 92% of all
U.S. mosquitoes, nearly 100% of the tornadoes, 90% of the hurricanes, 99% of all Southern Baptists, virtually 100% of all televangelists, Rush Limbaugh, Bob Jones University, Clemson and the University of Georgia.
Additionally, 38% of those in the Red states believe Jonah was actually swallowed by a whale, 62% believe life is sacred unless we’re discussing the war, the death penalty or gun laws, 44% say that evolution is only a theory, 53% that Saddam was involved in 9/11 and 61% of you crazy bastards believe you are people with higher morals than we lefties.
Finally, we’re taking all the good pot, too.
You can have that dirt weed they grow in Mexico
Peace out,
– the Blue States
Kahlee | November 13, 2008 at 9:54 pm
@36 Hahahaha. Love it.
Medievalist | November 13, 2008 at 10:11 pm
Blue States — You’ve been brainwashed by too much exposure to Jon Stewart and the Bravo channel. Check yourself into the nearest Benedectine monastery and get help immediately.
Coming down on Jesus because of the Iraq War is so 2004. Learn to see through the lies, because there’s no honor in being a spoon-fed T.V. baby. What if your mom had “pro-choiced” you out of existence because it was interfering with her sex life? Then we wouldn’t have had your delightful murderous rant to enjoy.
Ted from LA | November 13, 2008 at 10:11 pm
#36. You have a point there. Go Blue.
Medievalist | November 13, 2008 at 10:12 pm
“because it was” = “because you were”
Knee Ya Ha Ha | November 13, 2008 at 10:18 pm
# 36 & # 38
Gr8 points all !! You must be real intellectual….
So…..Inside job ? Having any problems with free fall collapse speed through undamaged steel structure ?
You know, That type of thing… ?
lola richie | November 13, 2008 at 10:39 pm
Obama is portrayed as the HOPE candidate by the corporate controlled media. Please don’t buy into the hype.
OBAMA voted FOR the patriot act and the bailout bill. He is for wiretapping phones, regulating the internet, and the creation of a new citizens army- in addition to our military. Obama wants to fight in Afghanistan and is considering waiting longer to withdraw troops from Iraq.
Obama will take away more rights than Bush and you can bet your @ss that he won’t repeal any of the previous administration’s unlawful policies. Just look at his voting record. Our media only covers Republicans and Democrats, whose policies are controlled by so many special interests and lobbyists that America has become a corporate fascist nation.
It is not the job of the federal government to babysit me and my family. If you do not like how your state is run then you can move to another one far easier than you can move to a different country.
Secondly, welfare programs caused the increase in broken families. 50 years ago 80% of black babies were born to a married couple. Now only 20% of black babies and 60% of white babies are – which can be attributed to America’s policies. If our leadership did not want this outcome then the government would change these policies. The more we rely on the government the more power we give up.
Another problem. EVERY WAR WE HAVE BEEN INVOLVED IN WAS COORDINATED by the elites (the real rulers if this country and many others). Case in point: The main purpose of the civil war was to give the government more power over the states.
The Federal Reserve gives campaign contributions and media support to presidential candidates if they support their agenda. The main one? WAR… It is the most costly way to control population and push through “necessary” legislation that takes away our rights. The more money we spend the richer the elites get. The more war we have = the more interest the international bankers earn funding it WHILE FREEDOM slips farther and farther out of our grasp.
Do not believe me? Do your own research. The information is there; you just won’t find it in any classroom or on any television program.
The whole media is owned by 5 corporations, one of which is PepsiCo. Do not get your news from CNN, FOX, MSNBC, etc. Go out and do your own research. These are not sources of news as they are proponents of what the machine wants us to believe.
Just watch how their is no third party candidate in the debates. News stations constantly calls people who vote for anyone but a Rep or a Dem as “spoilers.” I cannot stress enough: Read books. Read SMALL local sources of news, if you can find any.
If the president just laughs about leaving the United Nations and ending the Federal reserve then they do not have the nation’s best interests at heart.
Americans need to wake up. Stop buying anything that is made in China. DO NOT SHOP AT WALMART. Everything from Walmart is from China. Buy locally made goods and products. Expect everything to cost more. It is cheaper than devaluing the dollar to nothing and being China’s b*tch. Use your money as power and buy from companies that support American workers, the environment, and your health. We all have to work together and we have limitless influence, but not if people refuse to WAKE UP!
There are many free informative movies available online. Please check out “The Zeitgeist” movie. It puts things into perspective. I think Obama may be a good person and will push forward a liberal agenda – which he may actually think is good for the American people. I can guarantee you that he will take away our gun rights, starting with a ban on assault weapons.
Bush already took away our right to privacy and habieous corpus. Obama will continue the legacy.
Ted from LA | November 13, 2008 at 10:46 pm
Why do people need asault weapons? Fuck that. Aside from that, I agree with much of what you say. Wal-Mart is the root of all evil. I went to one once because I had no other choice. What a shithole.
Ted from LA | November 13, 2008 at 10:48 pm
And Obama will be a huge improvement over the next 4 years. Bush, like Palin, is too fuckin’ stupid to be president.
jealous | November 13, 2008 at 10:51 pm
by the way she has THREE kids, that’s her youngest one
jealous | November 13, 2008 at 10:52 pm
by the way she has THREE kids, that’s her youngest one
some gal | November 13, 2008 at 10:59 pm
I like Pivarova better, but….. let’s wait until she has children. Vodianova has a fabulous body after her own 3 children. Just wow.
kitty_kat | November 13, 2008 at 11:16 pm
@17- You don’t have to be pretty to be a model. You just have to be tall and extremely thin. A lot of the “supermodels” these days aren’t half as good-looking as previous ones.
That being said however, I think she looks pretty good. But of course she has a tight body, people. Its her job to.
kitty_kat | November 13, 2008 at 11:17 pm
@17- You don’t have to be pretty to be a model. You just have to be tall and extremely thin. A lot of the “supermodels” these days aren’t half as good-looking as previous ones.
That being said however, I think she looks pretty good. But of course she has a tight body, people. Its her job to.
Fernando Narcos | November 13, 2008 at 11:22 pm
You know,the thing about Russian women is they’re either hot as hell,or they look like Boris Yeltsin.There’s no in between,no average.It’s either smokin’ or scary.I like that,because you know exactly how much vodka ya gotta down before the ugly ass bitch you’re gonna nail is gonna start looking good,because you’re sorry ass isn’t a member of the Russian Mafia and you’ll never get to so much as sniff a good looking girl’s soiled undies.