Naomi Watts in a bikini

July 21st, 2009 // 34 Comments

Here’s Naomi Watts and Liev Schreiber on vacation yesterday in Italy with their sons Sacha and Sammy. While it’s kind of cool seeing Naomi in a bikini, I can’t help but find these pics a little disappointing. Mostly because they don’t involve Liev Schreiber drowning himself to atone for making X-Men Origins: Wolverine. That’s $8 and 90 minutes I will never get back no matter how many action figures I perform voodoo on.*

*NOTE: Should Hugh Jackman suddenly get gang-raped by Spider-man and Snake Eyes from G.I. Joe, you never read this. Wink.

Photos: Splash News
1024x768 Naomi Watts Glamour 5 desktop wallpapers and stock photos
Naomi Watts Picture / Photo 1800x2289 - 892.144 kB | Perfect People
Naomi Watts - Naomi Watts Wallpaper (4894937) - Fanpop
Naomi Watts
Naomi Watts takes Princess Diana role in new movie
(Reuters) - Actress Naomi Watts will play Britain's Princess Diana in a new feature film about the last two years of her glamorous life that ended in tragedy, Britain's Ecosse Films said on Thursday. Called "Caught in Flight", the movie is ...
Naomi Watts: Filming on the Beach!
Naomi Watts is beach ready as she works on her latest film project on Tuesday (February 7) in Sydney, Australia. Last week, Naomi hosted a dinner for some of her close friends in order to promote Jacobs Creek’s new wine, Cool Harvest.

Comments (34)

  1. Truth Teller | July 21, 2009 at 5:17 pm

    Gross. A picture of a woamn who shot a baby out her vag. DO NOT WANT. That is not a woman – it is a housekeeper and nanny.

    Woman = nubile hot girl who has never given birth.

    Reply
  2. Deacon Jones | July 21, 2009 at 5:17 pm

    First? More like no thanks

    Reply
  3. ROUGH daddy | July 21, 2009 at 5:23 pm

    What is the purpose of filming a nucleus family on vacation? is there a demand for this?

    Reply
  4. 100 Mortgage | July 21, 2009 at 5:26 pm

    She really shouldn’t wear a bikini with a stomach like that – get a cosy!

    Reply
  5. jbones | July 21, 2009 at 5:33 pm

    nice milk jugs.

    Reply
  6. Frank Lucas' Bitch | July 21, 2009 at 5:42 pm

    She looks absolutely lovely! What a gorgeous and happy family.

    Reply
  7. Janelle | July 21, 2009 at 5:52 pm

    Its refreshing to see that not all stars have super human bodies. This is what a NORMAL woman looks like after two kids.

    Reply
  8. Pill | July 21, 2009 at 5:55 pm

    Puke.

    Baby = disaster to the female form.

    Reply
  9. your mama | July 21, 2009 at 5:59 pm

    You pale piggish pink skanks and skankettes better stay out of the sun. It looks like 5 minutes will give you skin cancer. Besides, your piggish pink skin will look like a prune by the time you’re 30

    Reply
  10. jennifer_hammond | July 21, 2009 at 6:07 pm

    She didnt shoot anything out her vag, she had c-sections because she was too posh to push. And as for #9 I would rather be pink skinned then be borned in the world looking like a wet turd . I’d be jealous too tar baby.

    Reply
  11. me | July 21, 2009 at 6:08 pm

    $8. stop crying. It’s $14 here. Good thing I saw it for free.

    Reply
  12. keijo | July 21, 2009 at 6:10 pm

    I’d hit her

    Reply
  13. Truth Teller my @## | July 21, 2009 at 6:17 pm

    #1. You are a waste of flesh.

    This is what women look like after having babies.

    Anyone who is disgusted by this beautiful body must have serious issues with them self…

    She looks happy and is enjoying her family. What are you doing??? Oh, let me guess. You are sitting on your computer.

    Reply
  14. disgusted | July 21, 2009 at 6:23 pm

    i agree… giving birth to a child doesn’t turn a woman into a “housekeeper and a nanny”. naomi is still beautiful. i think she looks great; she created two people with her body. motherhood isn’t shameful and it shouldn’t be repulsive.

    giving birth isn’t disgusting. where do you think you came from? would you say that kind of thing about your mother, that she is no longer a woman if she is not a “nubile hot girl”? Of course, giving that your definition of “woman” includes the word “girl”, you in all your ignorant, infantile glory would likely not understand.

    Reply
  15. WTH? | July 21, 2009 at 6:47 pm

    Who gives a shit about her and her kids!

    Truth Teller – Your 13 year old girlfriend is calling you, she’s wondering what all the blood in her panties is.

    Reply
  16. jesus | July 21, 2009 at 7:22 pm

    god damn what a gross figure. no wonder so many of us guys dump bitches when they get pregnant.

    Reply
  17. me | July 21, 2009 at 7:24 pm

    give the lady a break!!!!!! No one was suppose to take these pictures, they were taken from 500 yards away by some loser trying to make a buck. she is on vacation trying to enjoy herself. Give her some time….she’ll bounce back. until then, if you dont want to see her in a bikini than dont look, ….ASSHOLES!!

    Reply
  18. I get stabby | July 21, 2009 at 9:03 pm

    She looks nice but I hope shes wearing an spf 1000 sun lotion.

    Reply
  19. hell bent on leather | July 21, 2009 at 10:24 pm

    I think she is very pretty for a white woman.

    Reply
  20. Tom K | July 21, 2009 at 11:42 pm

    She looks like big foot in a blonde wig. Giant bitch!!

    Reply
  21. marka | July 22, 2009 at 4:48 am

    I hate this site, everyone on here is a f*cking immature 12-year old boy with the IQ of an ant.

    Reply
  22. Narcissist | July 22, 2009 at 4:54 am

    Dull pics. King Kong should’ve shopped around. Naomi only looks 50 to100x better than Uma Thurman in a bikini. That’s just not enough for me.

    @ 11 – Hah! Think I only wasted $3!

    @ 14 – GO TO OPRAH! GO TO OPRAH!

    @ 20 – Maybe that caught Kongs eye…

    Reply
  23. RichPort's Ghost | July 22, 2009 at 8:16 am

    Interesting fact: these were taken at night… she just fucking glows…

    Reply
  24. Nero | July 22, 2009 at 9:10 am

    These baby pics start to annoy me.Nature is crying another tear.

    Reply
  25. Darth | July 22, 2009 at 9:14 am

    The virus is spreading quick.

    Reply
  26. vito | July 22, 2009 at 9:19 am

    Naomi doesn’t look beautiful, incredible, or spectacular. She looks “OK.” She’s an attractive woman who looks fairly good, even after giving child birth.

    I find it interesting (read: really fucking absurd) that Britney Spears, who looks great and has also given birth to a pair of house apes, gets ragged on and called fat or just downright ugly.

    Just sayin’…

    Reply
  27. mirror mirror | July 22, 2009 at 2:46 pm

    She doesn’t need to look airbrushed and plastic-surgery-perfect. She has talent.

    Reply
  28. get real | July 22, 2009 at 4:44 pm

    the woman iis 41 YEARS OLD.

    and she looks STUNNING for her AGE.
    stop bullshitting about “white chichks who would have a piggish sagging skin by the age of 30.
    with the right sun protection everyone can have a beautiful skin.

    Reply
  29. regarding your sexuality. | July 23, 2009 at 6:55 am

    why are 99% of the men who comment on this site so disgusting? actually… why are they on this site at all. its a celebrity gossip site… something alot of queer men go looking for. got something to put out in the open, fellas?

    Reply
  30. Fadeke | July 30, 2009 at 5:27 am

    She looks great for her age, most of you won’t look 1/2 that great.

    Reply
  31. aboutwomen | May 29, 2010 at 5:26 am

    whats upppp

    Reply
  32. film izle | May 29, 2010 at 5:27 am

    thnx

    Reply
  33. flash drive | June 3, 2010 at 2:44 am

    I agree … Giving a child a “do not turn a woman in maid and a nanny. Naomi is still beautiful. I think she looks great, he made two people with his body. Motherhood is not shameful and it should not be repulsive.

    Reply
  34. film izle | June 8, 2010 at 5:25 pm

    Good photos,

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Name (Visible)
Email (Required, Not Visible)