Mischa Barton shows off her butt in tights

February 5th, 2007 // 57 Comments
media-removed.jpg

It’s not really an upskirt so I won’t call it that, but Mischa Barton was spotted showing off her butt in leggings. And what an unappetizing show it was. It’s like looking at my grandma in her panties. The only way these could be any less arousing is if diarrhea was pouring out the bottom.

Wallpaper / Picture of Mischa Barton - mischa_barton_003.jpg (1024x768 ...
Mischa barton
mischabarton Mischa Barton and Stacey Lapidus team up
Mischa Barton
Mischa Barton Looks Back On Her Favorite Outfits (PHOTOS)
It looks like 2012 could be the year of Mischa Barton's comeback, and I'll be the first to say, "Finally!" Ever since I watched Fox's The O.C., I've envied Barton's ability to wear cute, casual looks without treading into adolescent territory.
Mischa Barton Looks Chic For A Walk With Her Dog [PHOTOS]
Thank heavens Mischa Barton is moving more towards fashionable hippie wear and away from the bag lady garb she used to don. Last night (Janaury 31st) in Los Angeles, Barton walked her dog in a long red skirt and nicely tailored white blouse.

Comments (57)

  1. HollyJ | February 5, 2007 at 10:48 am

    Diarrhea* not Diahrea

    Reply
  2. HollyJ | February 5, 2007 at 10:50 am

    ..And WTF is up with those shoes?… Did she just pick those up at Goodwill? Biatch needs a stylist

    and an ass

    ::shudder of revulsion::

    Reply
  3. Niecy | February 5, 2007 at 10:51 am

    I hate leggings. That is a style that didn’t need to come back.

    Reply
  4. Hot Carl | February 5, 2007 at 10:55 am

    Personally I would find it more arousing…

    Reply
  5. ihateyoutoo | February 5, 2007 at 10:56 am

    yuck. She is so disgusting and so is her flat ass.

    Reply
  6. kurtschatovio | February 5, 2007 at 10:56 am

    those shoes are awful but that’s pretty much the only thing I hate about her…

    but I’d prefer rachel bilson :o god I miss the O.C. THIIIIISSSSSSSSSSS MUUUUUCCCHHHHH

    Reply
  7. HollyJ | February 5, 2007 at 10:57 am

    That crotch seam looks like it’s cutting her tiny flat ass in half. I bet it’s also giving her the world’s nastiest cameltoe. I bet her little spelunking cootch is giving the world’s widest oozing split-apart… Not a clamilicious image…

    I have to stop now because I’m running out of euphymisms for her twat.

    Reply
  8. N@ughty | February 5, 2007 at 10:58 am

    if I was Mischa Barton, I wouldn’t even wear clothes until there was at least a 20 pound weight gain in there somewhere. come on now, she’s a stick!
    N@ughty

    Reply
  9. HollyJ | February 5, 2007 at 11:00 am

    1988 called. They want their purse back.

    Reply
  10. RussianMafia | February 5, 2007 at 11:04 am

    She is the new Jen Aniston – wanna be boho-chic, plain jane

    Are those keds..?

    Reply
  11. Monday | February 5, 2007 at 11:14 am

    i see you ladies are on quite a feline estrogen high today…

    Reply
  12. Nikk The Templar | February 5, 2007 at 11:24 am

    *stabs his eyes out*

    There is nothing attactive about her.

    Reply
  13. elizabeththewellread | February 5, 2007 at 11:26 am

    “Mischa Barton was spotted showing off her butt in leggings”

    Uhhhhh. . .what butt?

    Reply
  14. elizabeththewellread | February 5, 2007 at 11:28 am

    “Mischa Barton was spotted showing off her butt in leggings”

    Uhhhhh. . .what butt?

    Reply
  15. whitegold | February 5, 2007 at 11:29 am

    Why is she even famous anymore?! Other than OC, has she done anything noteworthy?! Does she have any chance of doing anything noteworthy in the future?

    Reply
  16. elizabeththewellread | February 5, 2007 at 11:29 am

    oops! Sorry about that double!

    Reply
  17. veggi | February 5, 2007 at 11:31 am

    I wish
    those pants
    were sturup pants.
    I wish
    I knew how to
    spell sturup pants.

    Reply
  18. Fetusiastic | February 5, 2007 at 11:34 am

    Madre m

    Reply
  19. Fetusiastic | February 5, 2007 at 11:34 am

    Madre m

    Reply
  20. shanonorato | February 5, 2007 at 11:35 am

    I came.

    Reply
  21. veggi | February 5, 2007 at 11:35 am

    que?

    Reply
  22. shanonorato | February 5, 2007 at 11:35 am

    #19…como se what?

    Reply
  23. lovelylips | February 5, 2007 at 11:39 am

    Oh God.

    Men don’t actually find this thing attractive… do they?

    Reply
  24. the_stone | February 5, 2007 at 11:39 am

    yes those are the most hideous shoes, but ugly shoes do not bother me as much as when girls (esp. celebs) wear shoes that their toes hang over the front. Holy hell! You have enough money to buy shoes that fit. GRRRR!

    Reply
  25. karifarrell | February 5, 2007 at 11:44 am

    I just want to know why these idiot lately can’t seem to go anywhere without exposing their private parts. I mean WTF!!!

    Reply
  26. karifarrell | February 5, 2007 at 11:46 am

    I should proofread before I send…IDIOTS, you all know what I meant :)

    Reply
  27. BarbadoSlim | February 5, 2007 at 11:54 am

    Is she dead?

    Reply
  28. veggi | February 5, 2007 at 11:55 am

    that looks COLD!

    Reply
  29. F-Sucker | February 5, 2007 at 11:57 am

    I’d shag it.

    Reply
  30. Toom Essence | February 5, 2007 at 11:58 am

    She’s not very careful – just to the left of the crotch seam you can see the little note that says “Sale! Cottage Cheese $2.49/lb!”

    Reply
  31. DecorativePoncho | February 5, 2007 at 12:22 pm

    This approaches the disappointment I felt when I first undressed Barbie. All smooth and alien.

    Reply
  32. DecorativePoncho | February 5, 2007 at 12:23 pm

    She’s so smooth and alien. This approaches the disappointment I felt when I first undressed Barbie. This morning.

    Reply
  33. DecorativePoncho | February 5, 2007 at 12:24 pm

    fuck, double post AND you can seem my self-editing trying to be funnier.

    Reply
  34. yolatengo | February 5, 2007 at 12:47 pm

    HAH! #32/33…but that last addition send it over the top in the funny-o-meter.

    Reply
  35. jrzmommy | February 5, 2007 at 12:55 pm

    Who in the fucking fuck called her a fashion icon?

    Reply
  36. Jim Treacher | February 5, 2007 at 12:58 pm

    That’s not a butt, it’s a bitt.

    Reply
  37. Sheva | February 5, 2007 at 12:58 pm

    Absolutely nothing at all likable about this trainwreck. From the stupid gigantor sunglasses to the low class leggings with the smock thrown over that doesn’t fit.

    Fucking bloody awful. This chick is like a friend of Liz Taylor heading to a senior center.

    Bleech!

    Reply
  38. schack | February 5, 2007 at 2:25 pm

    BIG BIRD BIG BIRD BIG BIRD BIG BIRD

    SHE’S GOT THE BEAK AND THE CHICKEN LEGS TO PROVE IT!!!

    SHE THINKS SHE’S SUCH HOT SHIT, QUITTING THE O.C., BUT NOW THAT SHOW IS HISTORY, AND SHE’S HISTORY WITH IT. STUPID BIG BIRD BITCH

    Reply
  39. Truthseeker013 | February 5, 2007 at 3:07 pm

    Uhhhh…*what* a$$?

    Reply
  40. schack | February 5, 2007 at 3:59 pm

    truth seeker, truth seer

    Reply
  41. LEATHERFACE45 | February 5, 2007 at 7:07 pm

    you can almost see that guy that plays for the st. louis cardinals——-albert poo-holes

    Reply
  42. topjimi | February 5, 2007 at 7:38 pm

    Wow. All you losers must really hate this girl. What she do to you?

    Reply
  43. pixel killya | February 5, 2007 at 8:42 pm

    Flat ass and lots of cellulite – the daily double on Bizarro Jeopardy.

    Reply
  44. Mr. Fritz | February 5, 2007 at 8:52 pm

    Hey numeros 18 y 19, Trat

    Reply
  45. Mr. Fritz | February 5, 2007 at 8:53 pm

    I think Misha Barton is pretty, but seems like a such-a-bitch.

    Reply
  46. mela | February 5, 2007 at 10:27 pm

    What gets me is that the Hilton bitches have called this little stick of a girl a “fat cow”.

    Reply
  47. HollyJ | February 5, 2007 at 10:35 pm

    feliz navidad

    that’s the extent of my Spanish

    so FELIZ NAVIDAD ASSHOLES!! FELIZ NAVIDAD!!! >=0

    Reply
  48. Lowlands | February 6, 2007 at 2:32 am

    This is the biggest bodyshaping underwear i’ve ever seen.Look,they go all up to her ankles.

    Reply
  49. Lowlands | February 6, 2007 at 4:29 am

    (48)Oops!It’s down to her ankles…(cough,cough).

    Reply
  50. tu.lipseclipse | February 6, 2007 at 6:34 am

    #9- that purse is actually vintage chanel. i’d take the purse over mischa any day.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Name (Visible)
Email (Required, Not Visible)