Miranda Kerr and a bunch of chicks are topless

November 20th, 2009 // 196 Comments

These are handouts from the 2010 Pirelli Calendar Launch Party in London last night, and I’m not pointing any fingers here, but had Summit Entertainment passed out free porn, maybe I would’ve came to their little launch event this week. — Okay, you’re right, I still wouldn’t have shown up, but I might have sent an intern with a duffel bag and instructions to get Ashley Greene’s phone number because apparently she’s the easy one. So put that in your marketing pipe and smoke it.

Photos: Getty
superficial

  1. Titties

    Itty bitty titties!! I like.

  2. SLOTHS!

    hahaha That sloth is LOVING those titties.

  3. The Clap

    A sloth….. Really?

  4. whatever

    What is she? Like 10 feet tall?
    The golly tittie giant.

  5. what?

    these bitches are uuuugggggglllllyyyy. it looks like the photographer went down to a local dive hick bar beside a trailer park and said to a couple of very underaged girls ‘hey baby…wanna go outside and take some polaroids?”

    nasty bodies – i don’t care what ANYONE says, they are too thin to be attractive and they all have gross tiny little titties…perhaps with the except of the red head – she turned out to have a really nice body…but she has the child-crack-whore look about her face, like all the rest of them.

    i HONESTLY would not touch a single one of these girls. not one. the only reason i would give any one of them a second look is because they are so strange looking. people just think their hot cause they are models…but anyone who says they would find them attractive if they weren’t models is a LIAR.

  6. maeby

    she looks ten years old. gross

  7. Vagoo

    I see vagoo

  8. Blech

    Um, ew, photograph #11 made me nauseous.

    The redhead has pretty hair. Otherwise, yeah, these girls look either way too young or way too thin and overall UNCOMFORTABLE being photographed like this. It’s creepy.

    ::Shudder::

  9. Pizza

    Lol that picture #2′s pepperoni nips are’nt fully covered by the star

  10. RtSS

    Nice! Just in time for thanksgiving. I love breast meat. I’ll take another helping, please.

  11. shvlhd

    This is without a doubt the worst Pirelli calendar I have ever seen in my 48 years.

  12. Leena

    These girls are drop dead gorgeous. Just flawless. Women are the most beautiful thing who ever’s out there created.

  13. Tad Bit Tipsy

    What’s up with the text tattoo’s, does every whore in Hollywood have these? Tasteless crap. I like tattoo’s, but that shit is terrible and they are all going for it like it was a roadmap to success(no ladies its blow jobs just like Miss Fox has perfected, she cups the balls!!!). This is like every porn star who gets a ho tag for the dudes to aim at with their spunk(kind of like color by number… now where’s a little white needed..hmm).

    But the redhead is hot with a decently proportionate body, I just wish I could see if she has red hair all over… he he.

  14. Rupert

    These dudes sure are insensitive to androgens.

  15. Brooke

    Uh… she looks like a 12-year-old farm girl. Small breasts can be beautiful, but combined with her young looking face and boney chicken legs, it’s like she hasn’t hit puberty yet in that first pic.

    And sloth. HA!

  16. 1moreidiotintheworld

    Look at the smile on that Sloth’s face!!! I guess a quick titty-fuck for the camera gives him some smack talk to lay on his cage mates back at the zoo………

  17. kay2

    AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE!

  18. kay2

    AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE!

  19. EuroNeckPain

    Hurry, someone save these girls from this bunch of perverts !!!!!!!!!
    Nasty photographers, terrible pictures. You’re under the impression that after these shots, they were raped, killed and buried somewhere in the jungle.

  20. RtSS

    Man, I just don’t see it. The red haired on has a cubby round face. She is a bit disturbing. Although, I would tend to agree. I am curious if she is a fire crotch, and has those red curly short hairs decorating her love tunnel. If so, I’d give her my schlong and dump my load of protein into her.

  21. Jay

    Thanx Fish!! You rock!! Love them titties!!

  22. Erica

    The sloth… just awesome.

  23. who?

    PLEASE – give those girls a cheeseburger!

  24. Turd da Third

    Two thirds of these picts looks like 12 year olds. These chicks are gross. You know they must be young because they haven’t installed the high performance hooters yet and ruined their rack…give it time..

    Anyway these anorexic little girlies are definately not hot. The one chich with the stupid foot tatt looks ridiculous.

    NNNNNNNNNEEEEEEEEEEEXXXXXXXXXXXTTTTTTTTTTTTT!!!!!!!

  25. iammambo

    Comment #5 is obviously a fatty.

  26. I think it’s really saying something when more than 50% of the comments on The Superficial are complaints that the girls photographed are too skinny.

  27. Dave

    Wow, so that’s what the real one look like.
    Huh.

    They’re not so bad after all.

  28. Sir Mix Alot

    Everyone is so fat now that people of proper weight are considered “too skinny”. go look at what a true anorexic looks like and then look at the photo’s again. Moron’s.

  29. WTF

    @28
    It’s “morons,” moron. No apostrophe.

    And yes, they are too skinny. Far too bloody skinny.

  30. farty mcshitface

    very true number 29. they are far too skinny. i see nothing but a bunch of bony-assed stick-legged women. a big bag of unimpressive.

  31. just sayin'

    better skinny than fat

  32. ew ew ew

    I dont think they’re to skinny, some chicks just naturally look like that and are still healthy and dont need to starve themselves.

    What really is beyond disturbing is that she looks like a 6yr old. 10yrs at the most. Sooooo creepy, and this is what men find atractive???? Ew ew ew ew.

  33. Parker

    Anyone who says these chicks aren’t hot are out of their minds. I would bttfuck any one of them—or all of them—any time, any place.

  34. @what?

    ” 5. what? – November 21, 2009 2:13 AM

    these bitches are uuuugggggglllllyyyy. it looks like the photographer went down to a local dive hick bar beside a trailer park and said to a couple of very underaged girls ‘hey baby…wanna go outside and take some polaroids?”

    nasty bodies – i don’t care what ANYONE says, they are too thin to be attractive and they all have gross tiny little titties…perhaps with the except of the red head – she turned out to have a really nice body…but she has the child-crack-whore look about her face, like all the rest of them.

    i HONESTLY would not touch a single one of these girls. not one. the only reason i would give any one of them a second look is because they are so strange looking. people just think their hot cause they are models…but anyone who says they would find them attractive if they weren’t models is a LIAR.

    Shut the fuck up, fag.. No one gives a fuck if you’d touch them or not, and the fact you would call them ugly, just shows that you’re a fucking liar trying to show your ass on a msg board- that, or youre fucking gay. Period. Theres a difference between not finding them AS attractive as others, because you prefer thicker women, and being just plain ignorant. Shut your fucking cockholster – these women are beautiful, and you’re irrelevant.

    PS- The rest of you whining about them being skinny, need to get off your fat asses and stop believing the hype that ‘chunky is healthy’ and you’re ‘real women’….theres toned, and then theres piglets- I’m guessing you fall under the latter.

    Keep hating though, stupid fucks.Your jealousy is so apparent its pathetic. Dont mind me though, you keep funneling those ho ho’s into your nasty gape of a mouth!

  35. Duke Nukem

    Smoking hot. And NO, DONT feed them a cheeseburger. The last thing we need is more fat chicks.

  36. Smarm

    Agreed wholeheartedly w 35 (and 34, now that I look at it)…I’m into chicks w meat on their bones as well and I’m not saying the chick HAS to be this skinny to be hot but to say they’re ugly, or disgusting….well, fuck that nonsense.

  37. SOS

    yeah #5 you like girls who eat too many twinkies? Because there’s nothing wrong with being that thin.
    So go ahead and get off to pics of girls who don’t take good care of their bodies and abuse them by eating too much junk food.

  38. dk

    @5 your completely right and just voicing a valid opinion. Dont let it bother you that the people attacking you are into molestation, necrophilia and whores that are riddled with cancer and smell like tuna…. Everyone of these bitches needs to eat, workout and get their boobs done, period.

  39. mel gibson

    #5 fuck you homo

  40. Luz

    Everyone has their own ideas of what is attractive. Just because #5 doesn’t find these anorexic looking chicks attractive doesn’t make them gay or fat or some other immature internet attack word. If these twigs are your idea of hot that’s fine, but why do you care so much if someone disagrees with you? Get over it, not that serious.

    And for the millionth time I am so sick of comments calling the nay-sayers fat or ugly or whatever. I have learned that women tend to have a higher standard for gauging a fellow female’s attractiveness. But even so, just because I don’t think these girls are “gorgeous” or “smoking hot”, doesn’t make me jealous, fat, ugly, etc. The world has +6 billion people in it, not everyone is going to agree, but this internet bravery and bullying is the saddest thing to see.

  41. Dj

    ok so first of all, Miranda Kerr is not 6 years old or 10 years old like some of you seem to believe, so it’s ok for men to like her if they want to, quit freaking out. Second, they are not too skinny, it’s called being hot, more ppl should try it. And for the record, i’m a girl. I agree with #28, fat has become the norm, and what was normal weight is now considered super skinny.

  42. kitty_kat

    You guys that are attacking people for saying these women are too skinny are crazy. Their bones are literally popping out. How is that healthy? If you put Miranda Kerr on the cover of National Geographic, every one of you would be talking about how horrible the effects of starvation are. I agree with #15. With the possible exception of the redhead, they look like they haven’t hit puberty yet.

    And I’ve gotta say that the fact Miranda is a VS model just goes to show you how far the publication has fallen.

  43. mehh

    I dont find any of them special, and imo only rosie and the last girl are sexy, but theyre not ugly…. just im not a fan of the boyish, modelesque shape

  44. Dj

    http://thesuperficial.com/2009/08/miranda_kerrs_camel_toe_and_ot.php
    this pic alone should shut everyone up – hot. Anyway that says different needs their freakin head examined…

  45. zulu

    Ok.. There are people who are naturally skinny. I’m 5 ft tall and weigh 80 pounds. I eat cheeseburgers, fries, chinese food, and I love brownies! I just can’t get fat.

    Also, a body that is considered “average” in the US is actually “obese” in many other countries.

    Haha fat people can talk about skinny people all day but skinny people can’t talk about fatties. It’s just mean.

  46. saywha?

    anyone who thinks miranda kerr isn’t hot has been looking at too much porn and has forgotten what real women look like. sorry folks, not every chick has dd’s.

  47. lisa

    wow, lovin’ the lily cole pic #3

  48. jamillah

    Whoever thinks these girls are in shape is delusional — these girls have outright muscle wastage! If they in fact worked out, they’d have more muscular legs and asses worth looking at. At the moment, they appear skinny-fat and sickly — not fit or in shape.

  49. ChEF

    who’s the redhead?

  50. Hungry

    These women really do look nasty…I mean I am looking at them and suddenly feel the need for a 5 course meal, and I just ate not to long ago and was not hungry at all before this. Seeing these types of women will make our obesity problem worse.

Leave A Comment