Mary-Kate Olsen needs new shoes

July 10th, 2007 // 57 Comments
mary-kate-olsen-legs-candids-00.jpg

Mary-Kate Olsen was spotted walking around Hollywood showing off her legs and shoes I couldn’t even begin to describe. There’s gotta be a point where shoes get so ridiculous they’re not even considered shoes anymore. And Mary-Kate Olsen is so past that point she couldn’t hit it with a rock. Heck, she’s so past that point she couldn’t even see it with a telescope. She’d look less silly if she was wearing watermelons on her feet.

Mary-Kate Olsen Pregnant – Fact or Fiction?? | Have U Heard??
Mary-kate Olsen - Top Modèles - jeanlouys - Photos - Club Doctissimo ...
mary-kate-olsen
Mary Kate Olsen Image - Mary Kate Olsen Graphic Code
Mary-Kate & Ashley Olsen: QVC Fashion Week Presentation!
Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen sit front row at QVC’s New York Fashion Week runway show, held at Center 548 on Wednesday (February 8) in New York City. QVC shoppers will be able to pick up Fashion Week’s finest on show airing on Friday (February ...
Elizabeth Olsen can't model clothes
The 22-year-old actress - younger sister of fashion designer twins Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen - says she has always loved getting dressed up but insists she isn't a natural in front of the cameras. She told VS magazine: 'I love playing dress-up ...

Comments (57)

  1. Amnesia | July 10, 2007 at 5:43 pm

    First!

    Reply
  2. Jimbo | July 10, 2007 at 5:44 pm

    Who the fuck cares

    Reply
  3. brooke | July 10, 2007 at 5:44 pm

    ugh, that girl’s depressing.

    Reply
  4. miguelito | July 10, 2007 at 5:47 pm

    those are balenciagas

    Reply
  5. emilyj | July 10, 2007 at 5:49 pm

    shes cute, i dont care what anyone says.. and the shoes are cute too!

    Reply
  6. Donkey | July 10, 2007 at 5:51 pm

    This picture reminds me that I need to return my copy of “A Nightmare Before Christmas” to Blockbuster.

    Reply
  7. James | July 10, 2007 at 5:55 pm

    @6 are you sure it is not your copy of Gremlins you need to return?

    Reply
  8. Xanthia | July 10, 2007 at 5:58 pm

    Did anyone else see that bag and automatically hear the quote, “Quoth the raven, nevermore.”?

    Reply
  9. lambman | July 10, 2007 at 6:00 pm

    commenting on women’s shoes? When did the superficial become a gay site?

    I guess that explains the lavender background

    Reply
  10. Ducati | July 10, 2007 at 6:02 pm

    She sure has nice legs.

    Reply
  11. Mick | July 10, 2007 at 6:07 pm

    She has a pretty large bruise on her leg in picture 6. It’s light but there.
    I think the shoes are cute too. I wish she would brush the back of her hair once in a while though. It gets ratty.

    Reply
  12. Bugman4045 | July 10, 2007 at 6:15 pm

    I think I saw Grace Jones in those shoes in like 1983!
    @10 Yeah she has nice legs….for an eleven year old!

    Reply
  13. Donkey | July 10, 2007 at 6:15 pm

    - #7 -
    Nope it’s definitely Nightmare….

    See what I mean;
    http://images.entertainmentearth.com/AUTOIMAGES/NC32544lg.jpg

    Reply
  14. Guy | July 10, 2007 at 6:23 pm

    Haha! I love it, work them match sticks

    Reply
  15. rocko | July 10, 2007 at 6:24 pm

    Who dresses her Britany Spears? BTW what breed of dog is that under her arm

    Reply
  16. TigerLilly | July 10, 2007 at 6:25 pm

    Peter and I could turn her back in time to the littl girl she was and fly her away, because no one would even miss her if she went playing with us.

    Reply
  17. JrsyGrl | July 10, 2007 at 6:31 pm

    I’d like to see her wearing watermelons on her feet.

    Reply
  18. Kamihi | July 10, 2007 at 6:34 pm

    Fuck I know skinny 9 year olds with fatter legs. Its sick that a grown woman feels the need to look like a child.

    Reply
  19. Hulla | July 10, 2007 at 7:02 pm

    Terrible clothes, terrible hair…

    Reply
  20. evilance | July 10, 2007 at 7:15 pm

    oh c’mon…the shoes are hot…she’s not really too skinny..it’s the starbucks that make her look tiny….and I like the lavender background…

    Reply
  21. redink | July 10, 2007 at 7:15 pm

    i like the shoes

    that coffee is probably her days worth of “food”

    Reply
  22. Aubree | July 10, 2007 at 7:15 pm

    I look at that picture and think Guns and Roses

    Reply
  23. Ace | July 10, 2007 at 7:30 pm

    Ok what in the world is wrong with these girls they have ALL the $ in the world and look like this! The shoes aren’t event he half of it look at that purse!

    Reply
  24. lastangelman | July 10, 2007 at 7:44 pm

    She has ten times more money than Paris Hilton so in theory she can have you vapourized and no one would be all the wiser. Billionaires have that power, ‘strue, no honest.

    Reply
  25. lula mae | July 10, 2007 at 7:45 pm

    i swear i’ve seen pics of her in those things before… they look so comfy.

    Reply
  26. Magpie | July 10, 2007 at 7:48 pm

    These beautiful Balenciagias have been dissed for months now on other online goss sites, it really must be a slow celeb day! She wears them nonstop. Personally I love the shoes and the bag, but with the nightshirt and Starbucks cup midday? NO!

    Reply
  27. squirlgal1 | July 10, 2007 at 7:53 pm

    Did she forget to put on pants?

    Reply
  28. miss oblivious | July 10, 2007 at 8:09 pm

    ick, these Olsen chics are freakin’ nasty. And everyone was counting down until they turned legal…HA! Instead they turned nasT!

    Reply
  29. Clarence the Clown | July 10, 2007 at 8:29 pm

    I think the shoes are the least of her problems.

    Reply
  30. Bored Again | July 10, 2007 at 9:27 pm

    Balenciaga shoes from last winter. Prada bag from this summer. She looks hot and she knows how to put it together. Bow down.

    Reply
  31. wad | July 10, 2007 at 9:35 pm

    She’s wearing Cousin It over her shoulder. Has that handbag been neutered? Has anyone ever seen these sisters smile this century?

    Reply
  32. breezy | July 10, 2007 at 9:54 pm

    im sorry i completly disagree, those shoes are balenciaga, and i have them and they are to die for comfy and incredible, get better fashion sense people!

    Reply
  33. ammyl | July 10, 2007 at 10:05 pm

    another of the mantis girls, guess they don’t jog, they’d combust!

    Reply
  34. Hollywood Agent | July 10, 2007 at 10:40 pm

    Is she the Evil twin ?

    Reply
  35. Quinn | July 11, 2007 at 12:01 am

    I couldn’t care less about her shoes or pants (lack of). She’s so weird looking. Her posture, her body, her hair, her skin… stop posting her fckn’ picture here pleeeeze!!

    Reply
  36. farty_mcshitface | July 11, 2007 at 12:52 am

    this girl is seriously scary looking just like her sister. my god!, look at that area where her calves are supposed to be… nothing but bone. and then her thighs are nothing but bones too! she has to wear crazy shoes like that so a mild breeze doesn’t cause her to fly away. why in the hell does ANYONE think she is attractive? anorexia ALWAYS looks like shit!!

    Reply
  37. crazy otto | July 11, 2007 at 2:38 am

    feed the children

    Reply
  38. qba | July 11, 2007 at 2:50 am

    those balensiagas are fabulous, better look at her face! & she should wash her hair!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  39. Candice | July 11, 2007 at 3:13 am

    The shoes are great. The girl, on the other hand…

    Reply
  40. Choocher | July 11, 2007 at 3:48 am

    From those Jodi Foster circa Taxi Driver mini-gams you can bet those bucket sized iced coffees are her sole sustenance. She probably uses the empty cup or a commode, and then it looks exactly the same as when she purchased it.

    Reply
  41. nuclearzombie | July 11, 2007 at 5:53 am

    those shoes are hideous. I love how you tards are throwing around the designer name like it justifies having clothes that look like shit. I could see how they would be comfortable, that is if your idea of comfort is wearing ski boots in a marathon.

    Reply
  42. SickSickSick | July 11, 2007 at 10:27 am

    I wouldn’t fuck her with Samantha Robson’s dick.

    You’ll know what I mean when the “Blohans a lesbo” post goes up heheh

    Reply
  43. missj | July 11, 2007 at 10:28 am

    @41- I second that! They look like a black version of them horrible shoes that pinochio (sp) wore. *clop clop*!

    Reply
  44. dog collar | July 11, 2007 at 11:03 am

    ugly shoes! i guess that lotsa’ money can = no taste….

    Reply
  45. gee | July 11, 2007 at 11:26 am

    they are balenciaga, they rock, you obviously have no idea

    Reply
  46. Mick | July 11, 2007 at 12:49 pm

    I have no idea who designed the shoe.. but I do like them. They are pretty different and cute.

    Reply
  47. Petite | July 11, 2007 at 4:24 pm

    The people commenting that they think these shoes are cute are the people designers make this stuff for. It’s a small market, but they are still making money!

    Personally, I think they belong with pants only. Too all-covering, boot-style to be “shoes”.

    Reply
  48. Socket2Me | July 11, 2007 at 4:32 pm

    Just *because* they’re some high and mighty fashion designer and expensive as hell doesn’t mean it’s cute. Beyonce’s gold pants cost %100,000 and they’re STILL ugly.

    Money = Cute. Comfy? Maybe. But that outfit w/ those shoes is a no-no. Hell, that outfit period, ugh.

    Reply
  49. Socket2Me | July 11, 2007 at 4:32 pm

    $100,00 typo =P

    Reply
  50. Mona | July 12, 2007 at 4:41 am

    Those Balenciagas are great but pretty “dépassées” and Nicolas Ghesquière is a genius. I pity the girl.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Name (Visible)
Email (Required, Not Visible)