Mary-Kate & Ashley Olsen model for Badgley Mischka

February 16th, 2006 // 129 Comments
*olsen_twins1.jpg

Here are Mary-Kate & Ashley Olsen, wandering through the halls of the Overlook Hotel. They’re supposedly modeling something. Perhaps anorexia. Definitely not breast implants. Remember that big countdown to their eighteenth birthday, when everyone thought they were going to be so gorgeous? And then the birthday came and the world collectively scratched their heads, because screwing them seems about as pleasant as screwing the vacuum cleaner. At least the vacuum doesn’t complain when you use a marker to draw boobs on it.

Ashley Olsen (1920x1440)
Ashley Olsen Pictures - Rotten Tomatoes
Ashley Olsen and her boyfriend, Justin Bartha were on a plane from ...
Ashley Olsen
Mary-Kate & Ashley Olsen: QVC Fashion Week Presentation!
Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen sit front row at QVC’s New York Fashion Week runway show, held at Center 548 on Wednesday (February 8) in New York City. QVC shoppers will be able to pick up Fashion Week’s finest on show airing on Friday (February ...

Comments (129)

  1. Georgia | February 16, 2006 at 3:16 pm

    I don’t get these girls. They are just rich. I see better looking girls walking down the street.

    And they are defenitely not sexy, unless you are a pedophile of course.

    Reply
  2. Nikk The Templar | February 16, 2006 at 3:17 pm

    I said….Goddamn, those are some seriously airbrushed hobbits.

    Reply
  3. Juliette | February 16, 2006 at 3:21 pm

    I never understood people who say they are pretty or hot. They have about as much appeal as a broomstick. On top of that they have zero personality and always look like spoiled bitches.

    And I hate that stupid duck smile they always do.

    Reply
  4. Jacq | February 16, 2006 at 3:28 pm

    The best comparison to make between the Olsens and a vaccum cleaner is that they all suck at life

    Reply
  5. suzy | February 16, 2006 at 3:28 pm

    their dresses are ok, but their makeup is HIDEOUS!!!! They’re clothing line has better clothes than they actually wear… that’s sad when a 5 year old can dress better than you

    Reply
  6. Zanna | February 16, 2006 at 3:28 pm

    Get a load of the picture in the url: Heyyyy, this is a nice big mirror to do lines on!!!!! I’ve seen healthier hair on homeless people coming out of a dumpster.

    http://www.olsen-twins-news.com/newsimages/feb2006/mary-kate-ashley-olsen-badgley-mischka-ad-hq-01.jpg

    Reply
  7. Binky | February 16, 2006 at 3:30 pm

    From their facial expressions – it looks like they’ll both have to put ‘bodily functions’ on their wish list for next Christmas.

    Reply
  8. krahe | February 16, 2006 at 3:31 pm

    *Are* we certain that they’re still actually, you know, alive?

    Reply
  9. outfoxed | February 16, 2006 at 3:32 pm

    #3…I don’t know about that, broomsticks are pretty sexy.

    Reply
  10. Zanna | February 16, 2006 at 3:33 pm

    You think the makeup is bad on that, Suzy? Check this out:

    http://www.olsen-twins-news.com/newsimages/feb2006/mary-kate-ashley-olsen-badgley-mischka-show-feb-7-2006-05.jpg

    It reminds me of silly putty. Tell me when you see this picture you don’t want to press her face on some newspaper.

    Reply
  11. LaydeeBug | February 16, 2006 at 3:34 pm

    Great dresses, but why are there two five-year-olds wearing them? Bedknobs and Broomsticks comes to mind.

    Reply
  12. Devil Is Chrome | February 16, 2006 at 3:38 pm

    #10 pictures – She’s starting to look like the Lioness of New York…

    whawhaawha!

    I wish it were possible to fast forward thirty years.

    Reply
  13. tits_on_snack | February 16, 2006 at 3:41 pm
  14. pookiedoo | February 16, 2006 at 3:42 pm

    They look like a Buy-One-Get-One-Free special at Heidi Fleiss’s House Of Whores!

    Reply
  15. SAPPY14 | February 16, 2006 at 3:45 pm

    is it bad that i think they look really pretty? my only problem is marykate’s eyebrows, they looks like melted crayons.

    #13 probably the funniest thing i’ve ever seen i love it

    Reply
  16. SAPPY14 | February 16, 2006 at 3:46 pm

    also, why does ashley have two purses??

    Reply
  17. xavierout | February 16, 2006 at 3:48 pm

    They’re creepy now, they’ve been creepy for years and they’ll be creepy forevermore. The vacancy of the expression that is always on their faces makes Paris Hilton look contemplative in comparison. Did I mention that they’re really creepy? I did? Well they are.

    Reply
  18. Havet | February 16, 2006 at 3:51 pm

    I don’t care about the twins much… I just really like those dresses!! esp the ones in #10.
    the twins just look wierd… But well, even when they were in ‘full house’ i never thought they were that cute.
    and how can u hav such HUGE eyes?! it doesnt look normal!

    Reply
  19. elvindeath | February 16, 2006 at 3:52 pm

    I’d fuck ‘em.

    Reply
  20. LaydeeBug | February 16, 2006 at 3:53 pm

    #16, ones a purse the other is her big assed bumble bee sunglasses.

    Reply
  21. PinkRose | February 16, 2006 at 3:53 pm

    That picture reminds me of that scene from The Shining, where the twins are at the end of the hallway calling out to the son.

    Creepy..creepy…creepy.

    Reply
  22. Spindoc | February 16, 2006 at 3:58 pm

    Who knew Olive Oil had a twin sister? Anyway, Superficial guy, or whoever it is who writes this blog…I just gotta say that your comment about the vacuum not complaining when you draw boobs on it was just about the funniest damn thing I’ve read. Thanks for that “Almost gonna pee” feeling.

    Reply
  23. baltogirl | February 16, 2006 at 4:05 pm

    which one is which?

    Reply
  24. PostAcidYouth | February 16, 2006 at 4:08 pm

    I dunno, the Olsen on the left is quite a pretty little thing. I don’t care for the twins much, but they’re not ugly

    Reply
  25. MeganHarris | February 16, 2006 at 4:09 pm

    I think they are just great.
    Mary-kate is the red-head.

    Reply
  26. suzy | February 16, 2006 at 4:19 pm

    Posted by Zanna on February 16, 2006 03:28 PM

    “Get a load of the picture in the url: Heyyyy, this is a nice big mirror to do lines on!!!!! I’ve seen healthier hair on homeless people coming out of a dumpster.

    http://www.olsen-twins-news.com/newsimages/feb2006/mary-kate-ashley-olsen-badgley-mischka-ad-hq-01.jpg

    IS THAT A NIP SLIP I SEE IN THE MIRROR???????

    Reply
  27. memichelle77 | February 16, 2006 at 4:22 pm

    I scanned the picture for a nip slip, and i don’t think there is one. however, even more shocking is that when you look at Ashley from the side (not at her reflection), it actually looks like she has boobs. what the hell?

    Reply
  28. LaydeeBug | February 16, 2006 at 4:27 pm

    26 & 27, it’s the strapless, push-up bra she’s wearing. They are made for boob-challenged people like her (and me).

    Reply
  29. em167 | February 16, 2006 at 4:30 pm

    Psh, I think they look great. Mary-Kate looks healthier than she has in a while, and Ashley is just beautiful. I mean, I think this site is hilarious, but, come on, there’s no story here. Post some more stuff on Tom Nutso Cruise

    Reply
  30. ShanDourdan | February 16, 2006 at 4:33 pm

    Forget just boobs, it actually looks like she may actually be female, she’s got an arse too?. I guess that must be real since most photographers try to airbrush that stuff *out* not in…

    I love the dresses, I think they’re stunning and dare I say it, I actually think Ashley looks good in the first one. But I just wish she’d quit with the ‘deer caught in a head light with exceedingly pouty lips’ look. Ecch.

    Reply
  31. playahater101 | February 16, 2006 at 4:35 pm

    I think they look pretty good, too. The makeup’s a little too much. They look kinda like those little girls that mothers put in beauty pageants when they are like 5 years old.

    #1, “I don’t get these girls. They are just rich. I see better looking girls walking down the street”

    What’s the difference between them and any other celeb? Paris isn’t any better. All any of them are is rich.

    Reply
  32. suzy | February 16, 2006 at 4:36 pm

    eh, you never know.. it woulda been funny i was only shocked cuz i know they dont have boobies lol….

    still… funny

    Reply
  33. Phil | February 16, 2006 at 4:36 pm

    “Hello Danny. Come and play with us. Come and play with us, Danny. Forever… and ever… and ever.

    Reply
  34. maiira | February 16, 2006 at 4:45 pm

    AHHHHH!!

    …..

    Holy christ, for a second there I thought I was watching a twisted version of The Shining. Or some weird Japanese horror flick. They seriously look like they’re going to reach through my screen and pull me into some dark underworld. And then they would turn their heads slowly to look at me and whisper “you are one of usssssss.”

    Reply
  35. J. Te | February 16, 2006 at 4:48 pm

    Was that picture, by any chance, inspired by THIS picture: http://www.archiviokubrick.it/film/shining/foto/twins02.jpg

    Reply
  36. tits_on_snack | February 16, 2006 at 4:56 pm

    i posted the Shining picture first, so, neener neener.
    Anyway these two have always weirded me out. When they were little kids, their faces looked like those good luck troll dolls.

    Reply
  37. cibby | February 16, 2006 at 4:57 pm

    I don’t like the current style of overloading the dark makeup on the eyes.

    When that first came out in the magazines, I remember thinking ‘why would you want to make women look like ghouls?’

    Now, it’s all over the place, and it’s revolting.

    Reply
  38. TheRedInk | February 16, 2006 at 5:10 pm

    History’s Mysteries: Haunted Hotels

    Reply
  39. dimestoredetective | February 16, 2006 at 5:11 pm

    I love it when celebs complain about how hard it is to be in the limelight etc. att the time. When, after one semester at college crushes them, sends them packing. And these bitches don’t have to worry about rent, and food as we all did. I really feel for these girls. It’s so hard to be filthy rich and gnomish. Gnome gnome gnome.

    Reply
  40. alicat | February 16, 2006 at 5:15 pm

    I’m starting to wonder what is wrong with their mouths. Has anyone seen them smile since Full House? Did they catch some horrible disease that transformed their teeth and tongues into something only Beetlejuice would touch? Or Stavros…which isn’t saying much since he has moved on to Paris.

    Reply
  41. HughJorganthethird | February 16, 2006 at 5:19 pm

    This fucking picture is freaking me out. It looks like a scene shot from “The Others 2″

    Reply
  42. Lavis | February 16, 2006 at 5:26 pm

    Remeber the movie “The Shining” and those evil twins that kept showing up in the hallways of the haunted hotel? Yeah, scary!

    Reply
  43. eatyourfeedback | February 16, 2006 at 5:37 pm

    Good God, the likeness to the Overlook Hotel is amazing! At any moment they will be saying “Come play with us Danny…forever and ever and ever!” All they need are matching dresses.

    I’ve never found anything particularly attractive about the Olsen twins and, for that matter, I don’t know any men who find them to be anything extraordinary either. There is something distinctly monkey-ish about their facial features.

    Reply
  44. SMF121490 | February 16, 2006 at 5:42 pm

    21 That is exactly what I thought when I first saw the photo. REDRUM REDRUM

    Reply
  45. downshine | February 16, 2006 at 5:47 pm

    the duck smile makes me want to slit my wrists! and since when did 5foot2inch pre-pubescent girls become models?

    Reply
  46. HollyJ | February 16, 2006 at 5:53 pm

    I hate to say it…but I think they look very pretty in this particular shot. The blonde has the prettiest face but her hair sucks. Dark hair is better.

    I haven’t seen them look this “feminine” in…well…ever… Despite the complete titlessness.

    Reply
  47. kuennen sux | February 16, 2006 at 6:06 pm

    Are these chicks happy?

    Reply
  48. MP$40 | February 16, 2006 at 6:26 pm

    They look like coked out prom whores!

    Reply
  49. manunited | February 16, 2006 at 6:26 pm

    One monkey carries 2 handbags…one with 12 candy bars inside… the other bag to throw up into once candy bars have been inhaled.

    Reply
  50. MP$40 | February 16, 2006 at 6:26 pm

    Courtney Love’s secret love twins! ROFL…

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Name (Visible)
Email (Required, Not Visible)