Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen look, uh, nice?

March 2nd, 2007 // 127 Comments
mary-kate-ashley-olsen-paris-cave-03-thumb.jpg

Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen were spotted shopping in Paris. And even though they both look like idiots, at least Ashley looks like she made it through the evolutionary process. If I didn’t tell you who this was you probably would’ve thought it was photographic evidence of the missing link.

Ashley Olsen (1920x1440)
Ashley Olsen Pictures - Rotten Tomatoes
Ashley Olsen
Ashley Olsen and her boyfriend, Justin Bartha were on a plane from ...
Mary-Kate & Ashley Olsen: QVC Fashion Week Presentation!
Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen sit front row at QVC’s New York Fashion Week runway show, held at Center 548 on Wednesday (February 8) in New York City. QVC shoppers will be able to pick up Fashion Week’s finest on show airing on Friday (February ...

Comments (127)

  1. brujeriadiosa | March 2, 2007 at 9:46 am

    FRIST!!

    Skeletor!!

    Reply
  2. bizbomb | March 2, 2007 at 9:47 am

    Okay… which one is which? They both look like they are homeless.

    Reply
  3. woodhorse | March 2, 2007 at 9:49 am

    Severe Advanced Osteoporosis.

    Reply
  4. brujeriadiosa | March 2, 2007 at 9:50 am

    WTF is with the Space-Hooker boots?

    I’m sure it helps to weigh 86 pounds to walk in them but they are NOT ATTRACTIVE!!

    Geez, someone get these bitches some rice & gravy for crying out loud!

    Reply
  5. thestraightshooter | March 2, 2007 at 9:52 am

    This is merely an illusion caused by the light color of her hair.

    -OR-

    AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!

    Reply
  6. Chemicakitty | March 2, 2007 at 9:55 am

    Why does Mary-Kate always look like death warmed up?

    Reply
  7. hdroadkng | March 2, 2007 at 9:55 am

    WTF they have Starbucks in France?

    Reply
  8. anothershityear | March 2, 2007 at 9:56 am

    it’s the Statue of Liberty !!

    IT’S THE STATUE OF LIBERTY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  9. anothershityear | March 2, 2007 at 9:56 am

    FRIST

    Reply
  10. RichPort | March 2, 2007 at 10:01 am

    Now all she needs is 101 Dalmations and she can make a fucking coat.

    Reply
  11. Tits_McGhee | March 2, 2007 at 10:01 am

    So, what in the name of sweet baby Jesus are these twats thinking when they leave the house? I mean, do they ACTUALLY think they look sexy?

    Helen Keller could be their stylist, and they would look better than they do now.

    Reply
  12. MargeAggedon | March 2, 2007 at 10:02 am

    She looks fine for a homeless crack whore.

    Reply
  13. hairpin | March 2, 2007 at 10:06 am

    FirtTEEnFT!

    wasabi!

    Reply
  14. PunjabPete | March 2, 2007 at 10:07 am

    Nice boots… Are they in Detroit… Rock City!!!! Get up…

    Reply
  15. Clete | March 2, 2007 at 10:11 am

    Yikes! She is more hideous looking than Sickhole Bitchie. What is with that scraggly gray hair? Those spindley spider monkey legs with those clunky shoes put the icing on that overbaked cake. GET A STYLIST!
    BATH…COMB YOUR HAIR…EAT!

    Reply
  16. Clete | March 2, 2007 at 10:12 am

    #12 to the point and perfect!

    Reply
  17. chochoka | March 2, 2007 at 10:14 am

    Hey guys ! We DO have Starbucks here in Paris and I think shoes are Marc Jacob’s or Balenciaga’s( despite they are very ugly … )

    Reply
  18. marist89 | March 2, 2007 at 10:15 am

    You’re just jealous because you could have a million dollars for every inch of your pecker and you’d still have less than one of them carries in their wallet.

    Reply
  19. BarbadoSlim | March 2, 2007 at 10:15 am

    These pictures prove it, these two are Jawas, now all we need are some Sandpeople to come in and slaughter them.

    Reply
  20. kamihi | March 2, 2007 at 10:16 am

    Ashley is the one with the band on her head I assume. They both look pretty grim but the other on MK does look sad. SO sad and yet so rich – how can it be, does this evidence mean money doesn’t buy happiness?

    Reply
  21. woodhorse | March 2, 2007 at 10:16 am

    So, she could have fed all of Appalachia if she had just shopped at Goodwill?? (and have had a better selection)

    Reply
  22. lolabeat | March 2, 2007 at 10:22 am

    They both look like they didn’t make it through the evolutionary process.

    @18… It’s not about the money; Britney Spears has better taste in clothes than this two.

    Reply
  23. lolabeat | March 2, 2007 at 10:24 am

    And, my god, this is the first time I have witnessed how someone can make a fur coat look cheap.

    Reply
  24. biatcho | March 2, 2007 at 10:25 am

    marist89, if I am correct in thinking you’re a Marist Grad then I am ashamed to have the same alma mater as a loser such as yourself.
    Nice fucking website, talking about your walks with your dog??? He’s cute & all but, are you serious??? And then you post it on The Superficial???? You’re asking for a beat down of extreme proportions.

    Reply
  25. lolabeat | March 2, 2007 at 10:25 am

    And, my god, this is the first time I have witnessed how someone can make a fur coat look cheap.

    Reply
  26. jesseeca | March 2, 2007 at 10:27 am

    yeah Miss. Cleo called, she wants her headband back.

    Reply
  27. F-Sucker | March 2, 2007 at 10:27 am

    Look!

    It’s the Scarecrow and Mrs. King!

    Reply
  28. Spindoc | March 2, 2007 at 10:35 am

    Jeesus she looks like GOLUM from Lord of the rings. Seriously, she is so malnourished she can’t even hold her head up any more.

    Bjork in her Swan Dress looked better than these two messes.

    Reply
  29. InstantAsshat-AddFame | March 2, 2007 at 10:35 am

    I like marist’s blog, it’s sweet. That said, though, this is the Superficial. It is the place to diss celebs. It has nothing to do with jealousy or envy of how rich anyone is. It’s a place to diss celebs who seem to go out of their way to look and behave in ridiculous ways, which is why some celebs are seldom seen here–they aren’t asshats. So if we come here to diss celebs, and you come here to tell us how pathetic and jealous we are for dissing celebs, hey, at least we’re doing what this website is meant for–you’re the pathetic one for wasting time on a website you don’t seem to like, taking time to post comments dissing us, time you will never get back. That said, you may fuck off now.

    And what the fuck is with these disgusting platform boots! They make these emaciated teats look like praying mantises. Is it mantises? What’s the fucking plural for mantis? And posh was just wearing these damn boots on the blog yesterday…but I must say, I like ‘em better than those really nasty brown leather zip-up boots with jeans tucked into them look from last summer. That was heinous.

    But gawd, these girls are too young to look so terrible.

    Reply
  30. D'oh Eyes | March 2, 2007 at 10:37 am

    Looks like she’s been baptized in bleach.

    Reply
  31. D'oh Eyes | March 2, 2007 at 10:42 am

    Personally, Barbado, I think she looks more like Salacious Crumb.

    Reply
  32. DingleberryJam | March 2, 2007 at 10:43 am

    haha #28 I got a Lord of the Rings vibe when i first saw the photos too.
    Though i was thinking this was taken right before they leaped on their black horses and chased hobbits.
    I can almost hear their mournful howls and sinister hisses between sips of coffee.

    Reply
  33. veggi | March 2, 2007 at 10:46 am

    #24 just shut up. the “fights” among the institutionalized retarded commenters have been absent over the past few days, and nobody has missed them.

    Reply
  34. biatcho | March 2, 2007 at 10:48 am

    veggi – suck it! and choke on a big greasy piece of steak fat, fairy.

    Reply
  35. Whammer Jammer | March 2, 2007 at 10:55 am

    The two unhappiest multi-millionaires ever.

    Reply
  36. NicotineEyePatch | March 2, 2007 at 11:01 am

    Those boots may be shaped like feet, but neither of the Olsen twins have any feet, just like Posh. I’m guessing they were all developed in the same lab by the same cricket/katydid fetishist.
    So the question now is: how many more are there, and how much time do we have to destroy them all?

    Reply
  37. catan | March 2, 2007 at 11:02 am

    they dress like this so people know who they are wherever they go! they’re so plain-looking that if they wore normal clothes, nobody would look twice. then they wouldn’t make any money.

    Reply
  38. RichPort | March 2, 2007 at 11:08 am

    So veggi, you’re picking a fight about not wanting people to fight? I’m confused. #24 sounded more like a heads up than starting a fight to me. I do agree, the quiet has been pleasant.

    Reply
  39. elvisfanlaura | March 2, 2007 at 11:24 am

    what the hell is up with her hair???? ever heard of a brush????

    Reply
  40. gatorgirl | March 2, 2007 at 11:33 am

    oh mi god, number 28, she IS Golum!
    Please please give me some of her money, just an ounce, so I could show her how to buff and scruff and look fantastic like Reese Witherspoon. Can you imagine Reese picking up her kids looking like this?!

    Reply
  41. Stink | March 2, 2007 at 11:38 am

    Smart enough to make megamillions yet too stupid to eat. Yeesh. I’ve seen healthier zombies than this.

    Reply
  42. bigponie | March 2, 2007 at 11:39 am

    This is the direct result of a nonexisting sex life, you turn into Nanny McPhee.

    Reply
  43. queenie | March 2, 2007 at 11:50 am

    Aii! So old!

    Reply
  44. JaeMae | March 2, 2007 at 12:21 pm

    I think she stole these tranny shoes from posh spice on. Seriously!
    http://thesuperficial.com/2007/02/victoria_beckham_is_kind_of_a.html

    Reply
  45. herbiefrog | March 2, 2007 at 12:22 pm

    so… you’ve run the gauntlet

    and still here : )
    we need to start spending that money babe

    …as you know

    and you look fine : )

    Reply
  46. serial snarkalec | March 2, 2007 at 12:25 pm

    The old gray-haired crone in the first pic looks like the Barbie whose hair I snatched out of its head after my mother made me put it back.

    Reply
  47. Lowlands | March 2, 2007 at 12:26 pm

    Her hair couldn’t get any essential nutrition anymore outta her starved body and turned white.

    Reply
  48. JaeMae | March 2, 2007 at 12:26 pm

    #29 you beat me to it!

    Reply
  49. mrs.t | March 2, 2007 at 12:37 pm

    Sure you can get Starbucks in paris (and small Taiwanese fishing villages at this point). But why would you?

    For chrissake, sit down, order some nice french coffee, and enjoy your cigarette for 5 minutes. That’s what is ultimately so lame about these stupid little girls-they have no idea how to just chill the fuck out and spend their money on something other than hideous fashion. How can they attend EVERY show EVERY season and manage to walk away with the ugliest items? Are they so fucking short that the view is distorted? Can they ONLY see the shoes? Designer’s probably hold onto to the pieces that didn’t quite work for these two little monster-dwarves.

    Reply
  50. polypam | March 2, 2007 at 12:39 pm

    There are a million cute little cafes in Paris, why the fuck are they going to Starbucks? It’s like going to Pizza Hut when you’re in Italy!!!

    Seriously, with creativity like that, I can’t WAIT to see their new “high fashion” line. Retards.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Name (Visible)
Email (Required, Not Visible)