Madonna’s 1979 nude photo shoot

April 15th, 2009 // 86 Comments

These are shots of Madonna taken in 1979 for photographer Martin H.M. Schreiber that will be shown for the first time in the UK at the Brighton Festival’s “The Madonna Nudes – 30th Anniversary Exhibition.” Despite everything I’ve said about Madonna, I have to admit she looks damn good here at 45 – which proves her sorcery. To the torches, men!

NOTE: Pics link to NSFW versions that may cause a winged spider monkey to shoot you with a crossbow if you don’t start masturbating. *KATWANG* I’m going! I’m going!

Photos: Fame
Madonna - Madonna Wallpaper (1262433) - Fanpop
Pictures & Photos of Madonna - IMDb
madonna thumb Who is Aging more Gracefully Madonna or Belinda Carlisle
Madonna - Pictures from the Movies
Hicks: Madonna fans ask Israel to wait after singer's concert to bomb Iran
Hell no, we won't go ... until we see Madonna. In a newly launched Facebook page, Israeli fans of Madonna ask Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to hold off on any plans to strike Iran until after May 29, Madge's planned show in Tel Aviv.
Madonna giving out album for free with purchase of tour tickets
Madonna has announced news that may make fans slightly more likely to "work all year, scrape the money together, and come to my show," as the superstar requested. Fans who purchase tickets to the Material Girl's world tour will receive a free copy of her ...

Comments (86)

  1. OldGuy | April 15, 2009 at 12:17 pm

    Playboy ran these way back when.

    Reply
  2. Ali Knievel | April 15, 2009 at 12:20 pm

    And THIS friends and fellow perverts is what Lourdes Leon will look like in 6 years. The other set shot in NYC with the bush monster are better though.

    Reply
  3. Paul | April 15, 2009 at 12:20 pm

    But I want ample amounts of pubic hair!

    Reply
  4. OldGuy | April 15, 2009 at 12:21 pm

    And you forgot to remove the stars off the large versions again. Do you check your posts at all?

    Reply
  5. The Real anthonyOA | April 15, 2009 at 12:22 pm

    you can just tell she’s disguising a fro down there.

    Reply
  6. Mia | April 15, 2009 at 12:27 pm

    I remember seeing this when it first came out, but Maddona had a lot of arm pit hair and they airbrushed it out.

    Reply
  7. TheBlogPolice | April 15, 2009 at 12:29 pm

    The larger pics are still censored with the stars. You keep doing this with all the NSFW pics. Why must you toy with our emotions.

    Reply
  8. a reader | April 15, 2009 at 12:32 pm

    #6

    They could airbrush back when they first published those photos?
    It was like 1985 or so…

    Reply
  9. B. Deep | April 15, 2009 at 12:33 pm

    She looks like “Danger” from For the Love of Ray J.

    Reply
  10. Rough Daddy | April 15, 2009 at 12:35 pm

    These pics cant fully be experienced with that damn star over it…Now i know she had a hairy crack, but a hairy areola wouldve been easily realized without the stars…

    Reply
  11. he hates the pretty ones | April 15, 2009 at 12:37 pm

    And yet Shauna Sand’s disgusting nipples are visible without a click-through. I see what’s happening here….

    Reply
  12. Drunkman | April 15, 2009 at 12:39 pm

    Fish. The stars are still there. You need to correct this asap.

    Reply
  13. RichPort's Ghost | April 15, 2009 at 12:40 pm

    Nice… she’s playing with her pussy…

    Reply
  14. a reader | April 15, 2009 at 12:42 pm

    Madonna’s nipples have been published “cuntlessly” through the years, these pictures are rather old so just remeber her nipple pics from back then and insert the mental pic instead of the stars….wait, that doesn’t do it….I see your point.

    Damn you fish

    Reply
  15. Vince Lombardi | April 15, 2009 at 12:50 pm

    I remember when Playboy published similar photos in the 80s. Back then, when she was the sex kitten (no pun intended to the tabby in the pics) these were considered extremely hot. Given the passage of time, looking at her now as a then no-name 20-something, I have to say I was mistaken. She was a butterface.

    Reply
  16. chick | April 15, 2009 at 12:50 pm

    Here is a nude picture of Madonna from 1979 that I did not expect/ want to see:

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/01/16/madonna-nude-going-on-auc_n_158527.html

    Reply
  17. Regan | April 15, 2009 at 12:51 pm

    if you’re that keen on seeing madonnas tits, how hard would it be for you to just google it?

    Reply
  18. RichPort's Ghost | April 15, 2009 at 12:52 pm
  19. smarg | April 15, 2009 at 12:58 pm

    Nice titties back then, but now, gravity has caught up. Getting old sucks.

    Reply
  20. duh! | April 15, 2009 at 12:59 pm

    45?!?! what the fuck are you talking about? a lame joke that doesn’t come across, perhaps. she’s 21 here.

    Reply
  21. dee | April 15, 2009 at 12:59 pm

    At least she shaved her body for these photos. Hustler Magazine published photos of her in the early 80′s where she had a full underarm bush, hair on the stomach, arms, etc. She is one hairy Italian.

    Reply
  22. Galtacticus | April 15, 2009 at 1:03 pm

    Hello?

    Reply
  23. Nero | April 15, 2009 at 1:05 pm

    Any bottom up pics?

    Reply
  24. White | April 15, 2009 at 1:07 pm

    What’s with the stars dude

    Reply
  25. justifiable | April 15, 2009 at 1:08 pm

    She ruined waffle-weave high-waisted long johns for me.

    Reply
  26. Pat C. | April 15, 2009 at 1:10 pm

    As long as we’re posting old shots, how about doing Marilyn Monroe’s nude calendar shots from the early 1950′s ? She was much prettier than Madonna ever was.

    Reply
  27. friendlyfires | April 15, 2009 at 1:10 pm

    What, no more nipples?
    In this instance, a wise foreign policy!

    Reply
  28. Rough Daddy | April 15, 2009 at 1:18 pm

    Sweet Lourdes already have a unibrow, is she ripe yet? how many years i need before this sentence sound creepy?

    Reply
  29. Where's Darkwing Duck? | April 15, 2009 at 1:27 pm

    So, about her mole, You can’t even see it here. It was very visible in the 80′s, now it’s gone. Conclusion: FAKE!

    Reply
  30. cranky old man | April 15, 2009 at 1:28 pm

    Come on, if we have to look at these pictures of a woman who has never been attractive, at least go the full National Geographic route and post the massive pelt pictures too. As I recall, the line of dark pubes from her pussy to her butthole looked exactly like Lourdes’ monobrow.

    Reply
  31. Jim Jones | April 15, 2009 at 1:37 pm

    I have the book of these photos, and her armpit hair is NOT airbrushed in it.

    Reply
  32. Wheredaboobs? | April 15, 2009 at 1:55 pm

    Any chance we can see some napple over here junior?

    Reply
  33. Tyrone Biggums | April 15, 2009 at 2:04 pm

    Picture #3:

    She’s rubbing her kitty. LOL.

    Reply
  34. Sick World | April 15, 2009 at 2:04 pm

    What’s with this “The Cougar” TV show being advertised here? Are the guys on this show morons? If an older woman looks hot to you because she has managed to manipulate her appearance so that at a glance and with some imagination she kind of looks like a younger woman, don’t you freaking get that what attracts you are younger women? Which is at it should be because you evolved that way. The hell with these old bags – like Madonna today. Accept aging, it’s part of life. You really want a menopausal woman? Or do you have a mommy complex? What’s next, a reality TV show about mummified rich men and young gold diggers?

    Reply
  35. Madonna's CIA code name: BUSH GALORE | April 15, 2009 at 2:11 pm

    Just click on BUSH GALORE above to see why Malawi won’t let her adopt.

    Reply
  36. rachel | April 15, 2009 at 2:39 pm

    at number 16

    ewwwwwwwww

    Reply
  37. cavy | April 15, 2009 at 2:43 pm

    Holy Crap, the 3rd pic looks just like Lourdes – beautiful!

    Reply
  38. Bosco | April 15, 2009 at 2:54 pm

    For an Italian she isn’t that hairy……

    Reply
  39. bud | April 15, 2009 at 2:59 pm

    this site has gone gay, madonna gay adds and kathy griffin. Its too much, im done.

    Reply
  40. Hugh Janus | April 15, 2009 at 3:01 pm

    These were taken back before she became famous, when she was a starving drummer living on popcorn… I mean come on she couldnt afford tweazers.

    Oh and to those of you who haven’t worked out the secret yet – click on the big pics and you see the original shots with full nippleage.

    Reply
  41. Jenna Jamizen | April 15, 2009 at 3:08 pm

    They should send these to the adoption court. I’m sure they’ll help with her case.

    With boobs like that they should be throwing any staving, undernourished kids her way.

    I wish mine would sit like that. I really like the perkiness, mine just sag… :0(

    Reply
  42. dude | April 15, 2009 at 4:20 pm

    What the fuck? This isn’t news. I was fapping to this in the stone age.

    Reply
  43. testington | April 15, 2009 at 4:36 pm

    see this is what a natural, and attractive, you woman looks like. Her skin is not orange, or airbrushed to look like plastic, her hair isnt weave and she’s not shaved too look 12 or wearing a pound of makeup

    Reply
  44. Anna | April 15, 2009 at 4:42 pm

    She was so much prettier (read: natural) back then.
    Let’s hope this spares Lourdes the trouble of doing that when she turns 18. The resemblance between the two is uncanny!

    Reply
  45. CV | April 15, 2009 at 4:44 pm

    Pretty sexy, there is nothing like a B/W of a good looking nude woman.

    Reply
  46. lulu | April 15, 2009 at 4:51 pm

    wow so she’s always been this ugly?!

    Reply
  47. Leppy | April 15, 2009 at 5:47 pm

    you forgot the one of her with her really hairy vajayjay

    Reply
  48. BBW Jewel | April 15, 2009 at 6:30 pm

    The first one with the pus$y she looks like mila kunis.

    Reply
  49. Erica. | April 15, 2009 at 6:33 pm
  50. alexjaness | April 15, 2009 at 6:34 pm

    Oh my god. I’ve heard of 70′s Bush but never 70′s asshole. Was she on a strict diet of mop

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Name (Visible)
Email (Required, Not Visible)