When I wrote a post yesterday about Page Six columnist Lydia Hearst making out with Aubrey O’Day, I figured, “Hey, here’s a chick I’ll never write about again for the rest of my life.” But then Lydia launched the new Myla lingerie ad campaign (above) and hosted National Underwear Day in New York last night. Wait, National Underwear Day? Now they’re just making shit up. Our forefathers fought to make this a free nation, and I specifically recall that applying to the hanging state of my testicles. No, really, It was in the original version of the Constitution, not the compromised second draft.
Photos: Splash News
Que | August 6, 2008 at 2:18 pm
Que googling.
playa | August 6, 2008 at 2:21 pm
2nd?
I’d hit fanta pants
Sergio | August 6, 2008 at 2:30 pm
Yucky!!! She’s ugly
TOOL | August 6, 2008 at 2:32 pm
boo yahhh
JC | August 6, 2008 at 2:33 pm
Is this an ad for the positive side effects of meth.. or is this just the consequence of thinking you look good?
typical superficial loser | August 6, 2008 at 2:38 pm
She’s ugly, fat and has a weird manly face.
literarycritic | August 6, 2008 at 2:39 pm
In pic 6, the retoucher forgot to airbrush her reflection!! She’s clearly one of those skinny-fat chicks who are stick-thin and yet have no tone whatsoever. Ribs showing, yet the stomach’s hanging out over the panties. WTF.
Homer Erectus | August 6, 2008 at 2:41 pm
She looks like a prepubescent boy.
Chris | August 6, 2008 at 2:43 pm
Cindy Crawford topless is a legit celeb-world story. The semi-nudity of D-listers isn’t (Nereida Gallardo, Paz Vega, this chick).
RichPort | August 6, 2008 at 2:44 pm
You could stack a pack of peanut M&Ms in her cavernous belly button.
literarycritic | August 6, 2008 at 2:45 pm
@#10: LOL
jumpin_J | August 6, 2008 at 2:46 pm
No question the shots for the ads are terrible but she looks damn fine on the runway / carpet shots. Too bad a chick that hot has to write for Page Six. Guess she uses her assets to get the scoop. Oh did I say assets like a pun? Crap.
Jimmy | August 6, 2008 at 2:48 pm
Huge forehead.
Paris wannabe.
Ted Mosby | August 6, 2008 at 2:49 pm
Pasty Delight!
literarycritic | August 6, 2008 at 2:50 pm
@#13: I think it only looks that way because her facial features are all crammed into the bottom 1/3 of her skull.
Sheva | August 6, 2008 at 3:03 pm
fuck the homos, chick is slamin.
Not that there’s anything wrong with homos. Just we don’t need them criticizing what they don’t like.
granada | August 6, 2008 at 3:09 pm
Thanks Fish, for posting those pics of her yesterday…because she looks NOTHING like this in real, candid, live shots. However, her dress is stunning.
JT | August 6, 2008 at 3:13 pm
Trannylicious
sierra | August 6, 2008 at 3:15 pm
I love that dress.
Robin | August 6, 2008 at 3:18 pm
Holy-digital-nip-tuck-and-airbrush Batman!
RichPort | August 6, 2008 at 3:23 pm
#16 – I’m sorry… should we call you Mr. Sheva?
ed. | August 6, 2008 at 3:31 pm
“chick is slamin” her trannycock up my ass.
*fixed*
penacka | August 6, 2008 at 3:41 pm
Seems like she really wants to be taken seriously as a journalist….
Score | August 6, 2008 at 3:42 pm
At first I didn’t get why people on this website would dog an attractive woman other than it’s the superficial website, but now I see it’s just jealousy. Women on here especially, and men with mediocre girls or no girl are jealous that they can’t be apart of this kind of beauty. Even after all the bad comments said about black women; I can honestly say that this is a pretty woman who has a nice figure. Now I get it so no reason to get butt hurt about any of these ironically negative comments.
rough daddy | August 6, 2008 at 3:45 pm
id like to pump that with some rough yogurt, isnt that the chick from yesterday doing the lezbo show?
der duh doye | August 6, 2008 at 3:46 pm
Wow, #24, I don’t think anybody’s EVER suggested that before!!!
Sheva | August 6, 2008 at 3:59 pm
Rich Port, you don’t have to call me Mr. Sheva is just fine.
Now airbrush or not, I’m not taking back one word. She looks damn good.
She’s also in today’s New York Post kissing some other chick. But I digress…
Okay but to your tranny porn loving commenters. Fucking homos puke at the smell of a nice moist babe ready to go. But think we care what they think about chicks.
Get the fuck off and stay off.
costamar | August 6, 2008 at 4:04 pm
You could land a plane full of lezbos on her forehead.
costamar | August 6, 2008 at 4:04 pm
You could land a plane full of lezbos on her forehead.
Scott | August 6, 2008 at 4:16 pm
Yay! I’m the first to point out the subtle “Big Lebowski” reference! (‘compromised second draft’)
I find it hilarious that people who would never have a shot at a woman this attractive can sit here and eviscerate her based on small flaws. You know who you are, and you’re all idiots.
sla | August 6, 2008 at 4:17 pm
She looks too made up, too retouched and too plastic. Does anyone see any personality coming through? She looks like a mannequin.
Everything, from the lingerie to her perfect photoshopped tummy, just looks so… predictable. Blah.
Dr. Phil | August 6, 2008 at 4:25 pm
Sheva, just come out already. All the anger and obsession about “homos” will go away, and you’ll feel much better (possibly a little sore, but an inflatable donut will help).
literarycritic | August 6, 2008 at 5:00 pm
@#24 & #30: Apparently you never considered that your standards of beauty are not, in fact, universally accepted.
Allow me to explain what I mean.
The girl in these photos:
a) has been airbrushed into oblivion in the lingerie shots;
b) is almost frighteningly thin, with full ribcage and sternum showing through her skin;
c) has an objectively oddly-proportioned face, however attractive its individual features may be.
These are all FACTS.
Not everyone is jealous of people who look like things you personally consider attractive/beautiful. Some people — I’m one — are turned off by airbrushing, repulsed by the sight of women so thin they look like starving African children, &/or oddly-proportioned or unusual faces.
Can’t believe that someone has to spell this out for you, but rantings like “You’re just jealous!!!111!!” and “You rag on her because you’re losers who’ll never get a woman this attractive in real life!” are so incredibly ironic. YOU’RE the ones who are so insecure about a difference of opinion that you have to assign negative personal characteristics to strangers who don’t share your definition of attractiveness.
Silvia | August 6, 2008 at 5:01 pm
Oh Shit, this is all we need – Another Paris Hilton!
Professional Photographer | August 6, 2008 at 5:04 pm
These pictures would have more impact if she were photographed in her coffin.
sara | August 6, 2008 at 5:08 pm
longest. torso. ever.
Nathiest | August 6, 2008 at 5:37 pm
She is one of the worlds most sought after model. Everyone wants shoot her for adds and magazine covers and for high fashion art.
You people that call her ugly no nothing about beauty and the world of fashion. You fucking inbreed assholes should all just go chock on your daddys dick.
CJ | August 6, 2008 at 5:42 pm
Tastefully done and over the top sexy…..surely no one can find fault in this!
Zane | August 6, 2008 at 5:47 pm
“She is one of the worlds most sought after model. Everyone wants shoot her for adds and magazine covers and for high fashion art.
You people that call her ugly no nothing about beauty and the world of fashion. You fucking inbreed assholes should all just go chock on your daddys dick.”
Gay men pick the fashion models. That, plus your last sentence (one of your flashbacks), says it all.
Nathiest | August 6, 2008 at 5:53 pm
Really “ZANE” you’re calling me gay “ZANE”?
shut up you little bitch.
Score | August 6, 2008 at 5:53 pm
@26 if that’s a good thing then thanks. @ 33 ok I don’t believe that everyone is going to be attracted to the same thing, and realize that just about every woman in hollywood these days gets photoshopped. BUT! in no way, shape, or form is this woman unattractive or even remotely fat. WTF does the fat on this girl’s body reside? Seriously Im confused. She has a pretty face, beautiful eyes, and a fairly thin body Im sure. Even if she were over weight she’d be pretty. This is coming from a black woman, and believe me black women to the world are not even considered that attractive. I don’t know why, but my point is it clear to me that she is attractive. Didn’t anyone see her in the non photoshopped pic from earlier this week?
tp | August 6, 2008 at 5:53 pm
FAT ASS!!!!!!!!
Score | August 6, 2008 at 6:00 pm
#33 shame on you. Any person that has to say something negative about another person’s outer appearance for personal gain is definately the insecure one. It takes a woman with confidence to compliment another woman, because many women are too catty to admit another woman is beautiful. Point blank, the woman is not ugly nor is she fat.
dogonabone | August 6, 2008 at 6:02 pm
She has the face of a RODENT …. can’t even look at the body with that rat face staring at me.
cranky | August 6, 2008 at 6:08 pm
I’d eat a bucket of shit to get at her bunghole.
somuchbetter | August 6, 2008 at 6:08 pm
I’m sorry but the majority of everyone that has commented on here is simply jealous. I’d love to be half as beautiful as her. Yes, she has a long torso and she may not define your image of beauty, but I think she’s beautiful. They don’t just pick random people to be *lingerie models*.
Score | August 6, 2008 at 6:09 pm
Ok lets try a different aproach. Rather than me disagree with you all’s personal opinions I have a question instead. What women do the men currently on this thread consider attractive?
Zane | August 6, 2008 at 6:23 pm
lmao@”Really “ZANE” you’re calling me gay “ZANE”?”
…from somebody with a lisp-name: “Nathiest”
literarycritic | August 6, 2008 at 6:27 pm
@#41&43: You said this:
“BUT! in no way, shape, or form is this woman unattractive or even remotely fat. WTF does the fat on this girl’s body reside? Seriously Im confused. She has a pretty face, beautiful eyes, and a fairly thin body Im sure.”
And this:
“Point blank, the woman is not ugly nor is she fat.”
You didn’t even read my comments, did you?
In my first comment I said that this girl is “skinny-fat,” by which I mean that she is very skinny but lacks muscle tone (i.e., has a high percentage of body fat relative to her size, EVEN THOUGH she is skinny). I even added the bit about muscle tone in the original comment, if you had read past the word “fat,” which apparently you didn’t.
In my second comment I said REPEATEDLY that she is frighteningly thin. I also said REPEATEDLY that her features, while individually attractive, are oddly proportioned. The only one using the word “ugly” is YOU. What is wrong with you? Learn to read before you shoot your mouth off at someone about shit they didn’t say.
You also said this:
“Any person that has to say something negative about another person’s outer appearance for personal gain is definately the insecure one.”
What in the world would I have to “personally gain” from saying anything negative about this girl’s appearance? Absolutely nothing. All I’m doing is saying something about her appearance that you personally don’t agree with, which YOU can’t deal with, which apparently makes ME jealous and insecure. Hmm.
“It takes a woman with confidence to compliment another woman, because many women are too catty to admit another woman is beautiful.”
Take a look at yesterday’s post about Paz Vega. I said that I was jealous of her good looks and her body, but that I could admit it, appreciate it, and move on. This girl, however, I simply do not find attractive. PERIOD. Your opinion is not objective fact, and if you have an issue with that, I suggest you deal with it.
blah | August 6, 2008 at 8:13 pm
shes so pretty and classy…hope shes bi!!