Lindsay Lohan had reportedly been asked to pose nude for Playboy and recreate Marilyn Monroe’s swimming scene from Something’s Gotta Give. But Dina Lohan set the record straight with Us Magazine:
“That [offer] never happened,” she tells Usmagazine.com. “That would be a no.”
Yeah, because the first round of shots of Lindsay as Marilyn turned out so awesome. Let’s do that again but with the class and style of a Playboy photo shoot. Actually, I’m serious about that. Those guys are airbrush masters. Maybe, for once, I can see Lindsay Lohan naked and say “Yippee!” instead of being bored to tears by her breasts. I mean, that’s just sacrilege. Right, Pope? Pope? Hey, man, put down the Guitar Hero and commit yourself to this joke. Don’t you point that hat at me. Oh, that’s real cute. You bless people with that finger?
airr3ca | March 6, 2008 at 11:02 am
omgz
IWONKY | March 6, 2008 at 11:03 am
Really Bad Stretchy Tits – Lazy Low-hands
buttinskly | March 6, 2008 at 11:03 am
I don’t get why they are pushing this whole Marilyn Monroe thing. She doesn’t even look REMOTELY like Marilyn Monroe. And the Superfish is right, those first photos were HIDEOUS. I can’t even believe they printed them.
ewww | March 6, 2008 at 11:05 am
She’s gross, ugly and fat. They would have to photoshop to heck out of her beer belly, her freckle-ghostly white pale body, her flat ass, etc. Who would want to see this thing naked?
Jennifer2 | March 6, 2008 at 11:06 am
She was said to have a personal account on ‘BillionaireCupid.co m’ club with her hot pictures and blogs there. The site is getting hotter and hotter, cuz quite a few millionaires and celebrities tend to go there.
IWONKY | March 6, 2008 at 11:07 am
…plus her tits taste like armpit
sportsdvl | March 6, 2008 at 11:11 am
It is now official, Hef is losing his mind if he wants this unattractive skank in Playboy.
RichPort | March 6, 2008 at 11:11 am
My skin looks just like hers… when I put too much brown paint on the rollers.
IWONKY | March 6, 2008 at 11:11 am
Jennifer2…stands for a two-headed Jabba the hut shaped tranny who supports himself by spamboting…not that there’s anything wrong with that.
Gerald_Tarrant | March 6, 2008 at 11:15 am
I must be the only one who really enjoyed the New York Mag pics. Lindsay is hot. She’s not the brightest bulb on the tree (drugs, Riley Giles, etc.) but magically delicious nonetheless.
jrz | March 6, 2008 at 11:15 am
Dina and Lindsay should pose for a firing squad.
Josh | March 6, 2008 at 11:16 am
You guys must all be dating supermodels, ’cause all I know is that her tits looked great and still look great. I would fuck her without a moment’s notice.
Anonymous | March 6, 2008 at 11:20 am
#11: I completely agree with you. The world would be a much better place with no Lohans in it.
Josh | March 6, 2008 at 11:23 am
So, I just actually took real time to read through some of your guy’s comments, and let me say, about 88% of you are up tight metros. Don’t get me wrong, I’m all about objectifying women, I could care less if the bitches life is in shambles, but to say you wouldn’t fuck her or that she looks bad is like staring at a million dollars and saying, “Nah, a million dollars ain’t good enough for me, I’ll only take two”.
You’re all a bunch of fat, losers behind a keyboard, just like me, so get your god damn heads out of the clouds if you think otherwise.
dude_on_a_wire | March 6, 2008 at 11:24 am
@3 – I couldn’t agree more.
If she was eligible for a celebrity of the past redux it might be Ann Margret – although she ain’t nearly as hot as Ann was in her day. For those unaware Ann was a hottie singer/actress of the last century – check link.
The story here is what the bleep is up with Hef? The Olsen children and now LiLo? I already have LiLo’s snatch as my screen saver and I want to see those little trolls naked like I want to swap spit with Rosie, or bump dickheads with Doogie – in other words…. not so much.
Ted from LA | March 6, 2008 at 11:25 am
#12, Josh, you can get arrested for that.
If Lindsay is going to do this, I think Britney should imitate Rita Hayworth too (while we’re mocking pretty dead people).
mimi | March 6, 2008 at 11:27 am
All you guys are losers…
Lindsay is NOT nor will ever be as beautiful or vulnerable as Marilyn.
GO AHEAD and POSE Lindsay… you have already FLUSHED your career.
FRIST!!! | March 6, 2008 at 11:30 am
Hef is getting dementia
Wait…they said there was NO offer!!
But still, the Olsen twins? Geh!!
Andy | March 6, 2008 at 11:32 am
I agree, it’s crazy for her to try to imitate Marilyn Monroe. She’s much more similar to Wendy. That’s the look she should go for.
(Wendy lives a few doors down from me. She’s a nice college girl, fair-skinned, freckles. Runs every day. Very nice body. No delusions that she’s a movie star celebrity. I try to say “hi” to her every so often, but I always choke up because I get intrusive flashbacks to the last time (usually the previous day) that I jerked off to her. I will marry her one day, once I figure out how to kill that guy.)
RichPort | March 6, 2008 at 11:42 am
Now that mimi has declared her opposition to a potential nude Lohan spread, I change my position (much like Lindsay does every 3 or 4 minutes with Random Guy X on any given night) and now support it.
Did you see what I just wrote? “Lohan spread”? Comic gold… I’m like Fort Knox and shit.
Fifi | March 6, 2008 at 11:43 am
good because I don’t want to see her fire crotch.
Phandral | March 6, 2008 at 11:48 am
#12
You said it all. Thanks for that! I’m serious.
steve | March 6, 2008 at 11:50 am
Hef needs to come to his senses, and realize that we want to see real, empowered women now. He needs to do a pictorial with all the girls from Katie Price’s lingerie photo shoot. The magazine issue will need a record number of fold-out pages, but that’s what it takes to present real empowered women. Personally, I can’t wait to see the one on the far right naked on a bearskin rug, although Hef will have to deal with the PETA protest over the number of bears killed to make a suitable rug. AND NO PHOTOSHOPPING! For real empowered women, stretch marks are signs of honor, much like gang signs – “check it out, I aint messin with that chick, she belongs to the Blubs.”
Ted from LA | March 6, 2008 at 12:13 pm
#19,
Hey Andy Andy,
I loved you in Cheers.
Duckstyle | March 6, 2008 at 12:16 pm
I’m gonna have to agree wish Josh here. She’s still way fuckin hotW IS she perfect, absolutly not. But if she walked up to you at a bar and gave a wink, you’d get all antsy in your pantsy and fuck her at a moments notice. That being said, trying to redo all the Monroe stuff is ridiculous, why can’t anyone say, i dunno, have an original idea for once.
Shawn | March 6, 2008 at 12:18 pm
Lindsay is hot, you guys are just too f’ing shallow, complaining about her freckles? Are you kidding?
kitty_kat | March 6, 2008 at 12:24 pm
Playboy would make the shots look much better, though.
mamadough | March 6, 2008 at 12:28 pm
jesus christ…. did you new people to the site not get the fucking memo about what we do here?
1) why don’t people spontaneously combust anymore? specifically the big ol whore in the picture up there….
2) is all that is required for a girl to be “fuckable” is that she has a pulse and vagina? you’d saying you’d fuck her almost impresses me as much as you saying you’d fuck a paper bag soaked in warm water. she’s about as attractive as a 40-year old leather purse that reeks of gin, cigarettes, and an occasional cat.
D. Richards (Sociopath.) | March 6, 2008 at 12:31 pm
Lohan should do a Hustler shoot. A little DP; some ass-to mouth; a gape — I’d check it out.
Bigheadmike | March 6, 2008 at 12:32 pm
I likey her alot. I know its wrong but something about her is just too perfect for me…..
IWONKY | March 6, 2008 at 12:33 pm
Who can fuck someone while they have their mouth like that? I can’t.
She's soooo ugly | March 6, 2008 at 1:03 pm
She is FUCKING UGLY. I can’t believe some people here think she’s not ugly, I feel pity for you, you must live in a small town full of 220 lbs ugly stinky women and haven’t seen a good looking girl in your life. For the love of all that’s holy, how can anyone think Lohan is not ugly? She’s sooo fucking ugly as sin! Look at her ugly face man! Ewwww! Fart face! That’s right, her face looks like a fucking fart.
stevie g | March 6, 2008 at 1:16 pm
i would do unspeakable things to that girl. she’s so hot it actually makes me cry.
Jeff | March 6, 2008 at 1:16 pm
#32 – Hey, what kind of man are you even noticing her face? There are boobs on display. The boobs command all attention. Men are genetically programed to care only about the boobs. Face…hell, I have a face…what does a chick need one of those for?
texascHIC21 | March 6, 2008 at 1:16 pm
WTF??!! you mean to tell me that dina lohan would let linsday lohan pose nude for a magazine but doesn’t pose for playboy?? does that even make sense?? first of all… EVERYONE has seen that slut’s vagina, at least playboy will manage to make it look decent…and EVERYONE has seen are tits, at least playboy will make her seem like she had a lift… this bitch needs to stop acting like she’s all innocent and shit… bitch please…
Auntie Kryst | March 6, 2008 at 1:22 pm
Dina Lohan is a fucking she-pimp. Calling her a madam is an insult to madams. If I read between the lines, there was no offer from Playboy. The offer was from Dina to Lindsay; “Make me money, do Playboy.” The answer of no was from Lindsay to Dina, not Lindsay to Hef.
BunnyButt | March 6, 2008 at 1:23 pm
15, Dude, you beat me to the Ann-Margret comparison! I’ve noticed the physical similarity, too, the last couple of years, especially when LL is dressed in late ’60s-early ’70s retro mode.
The similarity ends there, though. Yep, Ann-Margret was definitely hotter – very pretty, actually had talent, seems to have an IQ that’s at least triple LL’s, and was sexy in way that wasn’t slutty and didn’t conjure up fears of STDs. A-M was simply likeable – the sexy, stunning, down to earth girl next door – something LL stopped being long ago, if she ever was. And A-M was and is holding up better than LL ever will. At 21, LL looks like A-M did at 45. Eh, kids these days …
Phonecto | March 6, 2008 at 2:02 pm
Oh no, these are bad news. NOT!
FFF | March 6, 2008 at 2:28 pm
But would she show pink?
Grunion | March 6, 2008 at 2:31 pm
Oh yeah she’s aging well
Harry Ballzack | March 6, 2008 at 2:50 pm
Okay – I Give
After reading everything else in the news today, I have come full circle back to this story …… I still didn’t read it from lack of interest, but I had to stop by to say
” Meh ….. so what “
Lidiya | March 6, 2008 at 3:11 pm
god. she looks older than many people i know in their 30′s.
vertmont | March 6, 2008 at 5:54 pm
22 going on 42, she looks more like her mother sisters than her sisters sister.
Such a boring chick, she makes Kim K look exciting and talented.
Gerald_Tarrant | March 6, 2008 at 5:58 pm
I’m glad this isn’t happening. The way Playboy fucked up the shots of celebs in the past (Kristy Swanson, Darryl Hannah, Denise Richards) I think it would be a total waste. Lindsay just needs to come to my place and make a video with me. Just an innocent video, shhh, no, no one will ever see it. I promise, I’ll erase it after we finish.
Joe C | March 6, 2008 at 6:49 pm
Based on this wonderful news, I may have to reevaluate my thoughts on the existence of God. There may be a God after all.
Mark | March 6, 2008 at 7:57 pm
Surprise, surprise, Lindsay Lohan’s personal ad with many photos are found at a celebrity site richromances.com where she is looking for love~~~~~
herbiefrog | March 6, 2008 at 8:15 pm
it’s easy
some are daughters
some are lovers
need we say more… ?
…or again?
STFU you
and yet…
…and yet
very hard [but not impossible] to make that transfer
not here
shhhh…
guy | March 6, 2008 at 11:15 pm
for what its worth; playboy uses full body makeup and photographic technique extensively and tries to avoid photoshop.
eXtasyStef | March 6, 2008 at 11:37 pm
There has to be a celeb with better boobs willing to get naked for Playboy. Please.
jstunnah | March 6, 2008 at 11:47 pm
her body is like a big, freckle-y lump of dough. the marilyn pics she did for new york mag were tragic.