Lindsay Lohan was released from rehab with plenty of time to attend the premiere of her latest movie Machete yet was noticeably absent on the red carpet. Turns out Robert Rodriguez didn’t want her there, according to Us Weekly:
“He was frantically trying to track down her manager to make sure she didn’t go,” says the source.
While a 20th Century Fox rep says it’s “not true,” the source tells Us, “She wasn’t welcome there.”
I find it odd that Robert Rodriguez would turn down free publicity – the large breasted kind at that – but then again, I could see how Lindsay being there might take the focus off the film. “Jessica Alba, how does it feel to have an ‘actress’ here who’s barely in the movie yet she’s all everyone wants to talk about? Ha! Just kidding. I don’t care what you think. Look, Lindsay’s got droopy eyes! Whee!”
UPDATE: Mr. Skin confirms Lindsay is NOT nude in Machete, despite Internet reports to the contrary, which proves she had no business being on that red carpet. Or even in the same town if you ask me.
Photos: Splash News
































Taz | September 2, 2010 at 12:27 pm
Is she really topless in this movie?
McFeely Smackup | September 2, 2010 at 12:43 pm
why, you haven’t seen her tits enough already?
let me help you out…they sag like your grandmothers.
Richard McBeef | September 2, 2010 at 1:01 pm
but not like McFeely’s grandmother. She has a tight rack and a firm ass.
McFeely Smackup | September 2, 2010 at 1:12 pm
True. Granny Smackup has rockin tits
dudeatdudedotdude | September 5, 2010 at 8:10 am
she’s starkers the entire film except for the last scene
LiLo Lili | September 2, 2010 at 12:29 pm
Nice open fly, Linds!
IlIlIlI | September 2, 2010 at 12:34 pm
nicest she’s looked in a long time…with pig goggles on to hide the old eyes
dudeatdudedotdude | September 2, 2010 at 12:35 pm
wow her thighs are gettin back to like the good ol days. muy über fuckin sexxy (heart heart) ♫ happy days are here again.. ♪
McFeely Smackup | September 2, 2010 at 12:42 pm
Rodriguez is a bit of a hypocrite. The only reason he put her in a cameo part in this movie was for free tabloid publicity, now he doesn’t want her around…lame dude, really lame.
That being said, I think Rodriguez is one of the best directors out there. Quentin Tarrantino proved he couldn’t go toe to toe with him.
ps. lindsay, your fly is open
anonymous | September 2, 2010 at 1:17 pm
Rodriguez is being smart. Use her ass then lose her ass and not have to deal with her bullsh*t.
sobrietyisacrutch | September 2, 2010 at 4:01 pm
That would be all her boyfriends, especially Samantha Romsen
Rutabaga | September 2, 2010 at 12:44 pm
Who’s gonna say she doesn’t look good?
Yeah. You like the cock.
Turd Ferguson | September 2, 2010 at 12:48 pm
She looks gross, but she always has to me.
Not a fan of Blake Lively – but LOOK at the difference in complexion and skin between the two. Lindsey is scabby looking, pasty white and always looks skanky and whoreish.
Rutabaga | September 2, 2010 at 12:51 pm
True.
But I never fucked a crack whore so maybe I’m sowing my wild oats.
Lady Blah Blah | September 2, 2010 at 12:53 pm
To me, Bar Refaeli, Miranda Kerr, Candace Swanepoel, Taylor Momsen, and countless other women look good. Compared to them, Miss Freckly Pout Lips Fake Mammary Glands doesn’t look so good. That doesn’t make me gay, it makes me discriminating.
Rutabaga | September 2, 2010 at 12:55 pm
Take that shit to wwtdd
Rutabaga | September 2, 2010 at 12:56 pm
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA Taylor Momsen looks good?
Richard McBeef | September 2, 2010 at 1:02 pm
taylor fuckin momsen? the only reason she looks good is because all 15 year olds look good to child molesters.
McFeely Smackup | September 2, 2010 at 1:16 pm
Taylor Momsen is 17 years old, that’s old enough in 38 states.
I”m not sure what it tells us about YOU that you look at women and imagine them all to be 15 years old. you sick fuck.
Lady Blah Blah | September 2, 2010 at 1:18 pm
“HAHAHAHAHAHAHA Taylor Momsen looks good?”
17 year old Taylor looks damn good compared to the scabby looking, pasty white, skanky, whoreish Sam Ronson crotch licker.
(Mr. McBeef, Momsen is 17, not 15, and the age of consent is 16 in Canada and a number of US states including mine. Attraction to a 17 year old girl does not make one a “child molestor,” asshole.
Mallory | September 5, 2010 at 4:46 pm
No, it doesn’t make you a child molester, just a creep.
Lady Blah Blah | September 2, 2010 at 12:44 pm
I’d be surprised if Rodriguez, guerrilla filmmaker that he is, would do anything that would lessen ANY publicity for his new film Machete, given that it seems to be true that “There’s no such thing as bad publicity.”
Kelley | September 2, 2010 at 1:10 pm
Nice Birkin, Lindsay, it doesn’t look at like a $4,000 purse when YOU carry it …
ShoulderFrecklesMakeMeBarf | September 2, 2010 at 1:16 pm
Glad I haven’t eaten recently, or I’d be covered in puke!
Myles Kilometers | September 2, 2010 at 1:16 pm
I can’t tell…is “red carpet” being used as a pun in this post?
RoboZombie | September 2, 2010 at 1:24 pm
I think she wants to show everyone HER red carpet! WHOAAAA!
Brendan | September 2, 2010 at 1:27 pm
She is definitely topless in Machete. I saw a screening last night. She’s actually in the movie more than I thought she would be in it. Most of her lines seem to be making fun of herself and her daddy issues.
Richard McBeef | September 2, 2010 at 1:49 pm
I think I will wait until it comes out on bluray so i can rotate my tv 90 degrees and get all of those tube sock titties in frame.
Dicky | November 14, 2010 at 11:56 pm
Its not her! Its a body double, you never see her full face when they show her tits! They cut away with another camera a second before the tits are shown!
♫ | September 2, 2010 at 1:39 pm
Ditch the tan and go back to red ….and eat a few cheesesteaks. Everything else will fall into place.
meh | September 2, 2010 at 2:07 pm
She doesn’t look horable here, just nothing special, no different than any normal person you’d run into.
girl who takes it in da butt | September 2, 2010 at 2:14 pm
Her lower half has always been disgusting.
M | September 2, 2010 at 2:20 pm
She’s pathetic… She busts out with all these expensive things all the time like she’s trying to prove to everyone that she’s still rich and famous. All she comes across as is a pathetic, desperate wannabe. Go swimming with the sharks, Linds. Nobody gives a shit about you or your lies, denial, and immaturity.
Turd Ferguson | September 2, 2010 at 2:43 pm
Totally nailed it. Exactly how I feel about this pasty skank.
Gene | September 2, 2010 at 2:37 pm
I’d fuck her yeah…probably lick the lezzie twat too…but would you want this professional buzz kill anywhere near your next commercial venture? Oh HELL no!!!!!
lulacrazygirl | September 2, 2010 at 4:49 pm
Anyone else notice her fly’s down? Just me and my annoying eye for detail? Fair enough…
Bill Clinton | September 2, 2010 at 5:32 pm
yeah – like only the second fvcking post, dumbass.
burton | September 2, 2010 at 5:08 pm
if your over a certain age and attracted to 17 year old then you need to get help, sorry but my daughter is 17 and I am not attracted to her friends who are the same age…all i am reminded of when i see them is how fast time has gone by. I don’t get why men are told they are loser pretty much if they like a woman over the age of 40…so what, my wife is 43 and still hot and thats great because I am not interested in being with a teen, not every man desires this.
Bill Clinton | September 2, 2010 at 5:34 pm
Sorry for you that your daughter and all her friends are ugly.
Lady Blah Blah | September 2, 2010 at 5:53 pm
Sexual attraction is subjective. Period. It’s not “sick” to be attracted to a 17 year old girl, any more than it’s sick to find a 43 year old woman whose had children “hot.”
It’s kind of weird, though, when people talk about sexual attraction as if it’s objective, e.g., “If your [sic] over a certain age and attracted to 17 [sic] year old then you need to get help,” and “Who’s to say she [Lindsay Lohan] doesn’t look good? Yeah. You like the cock.” It’s not sick to think sexual attraction is objective, it’s dumb.
EnSerio | September 2, 2010 at 9:22 pm
She’s not nude because she has a body double, I was at the premiere though….someone WITHOUT freckles totally gets naked. twice.
captain america | September 3, 2010 at 6:34 am
american DO reckognise losers like paris & lilo now?
Kelley | September 3, 2010 at 5:29 pm
Hahaha, her fly is open. :)
Bored with life | September 3, 2010 at 5:54 pm
Ha ha! Banned from your own movie. You stupid, ugly, talentless, cunt!
Gary B | September 5, 2010 at 10:27 pm
Now that I hear Lindsay is nekkid in this film, I now have lost all interest in seeing it.
Another thing, where has Tara Ried been lately? She was another drunken waste, maybe Lindsay can take that as an example and dissapear.