Lily Allen is topless again. What are the odds?

September 11th, 2009 // 163 Comments

Lily Allen poses topless for the October issue of GQ UK, and based on her inability to wear a bra, I can only assume Lily was molested by a Victoria’s Secret mannequin as a small child. That her or her stepmother was a cardigan with a penchant for cruelty. Could go either way.

NOTE: Pic links to NSFW version of British charm.

Photos: GQ UK
VEVO
Alfie
VEVO
Smile
Lily Allen - Lily Allen Wallpaper (154989) - Fanpop
Lily Allen - Lily Allen Wallpaper (154986) - Fanpop
Lily Allen
Lily Allen
Lily Allen 'dropping pregnancy pounds'
Lily Allen is finding her post-baby body blitz "hard", but is "totally on track". The British star gave birth to daughter Ethel Mary in November and is reportedly keen to drop the extra pounds she gained while pregnant. The 26-year-old songstress is said ...
Lily Allen Slams 'Motivational' Popstars Over Twitter
Always one to speak her mind Lily Allen has blasted"motivational" popstars over her Twitter. The singer, who gave birth to her first child towards the end of last year, criticised modern artists for preaching. Allen wrote to fans on Twitter: "Sorry are ...

Comments (163)

  1. Sexy | September 11, 2009 at 1:11 pm

    Those are pecks.

    Reply
  2. Gina | September 11, 2009 at 1:13 pm

    They are very nice, classy pictures. Who cares if she’s topless? Everyone is naked underneath their clothes. Nudity is a natural part of life.

    Reply
  3. TheStoic | September 11, 2009 at 1:14 pm

    No ass. No tits. This chic is figuratively broke.

    Reply
  4. Wow! | September 11, 2009 at 1:14 pm

    Thank God you said she was topless cause I would never have noticed those tits!!! I thought he ginnypig had pooped on her chest!

    Reply
  5. Semi Wood | September 11, 2009 at 1:15 pm

    Where are the sophie monk bikini pics. I need to get my jerk on.

    Reply
  6. martygras9 | September 11, 2009 at 1:16 pm

    well put, Gina.

    Reply
  7. Sam | September 11, 2009 at 1:16 pm

    Whats the big deal about breasts? Their made for feeding babies, nothing else. I don’t know why america has turned them so sexual.

    Reply
  8. martygras9 | September 11, 2009 at 1:16 pm

    Well put, Gina.

    Reply
  9. NEVER BACK DOWN MAN | September 11, 2009 at 1:18 pm

    Flat chested skank. Booooo. BORING SMALL TITS ARE BORING

    Reply
  10. TheStoic | September 11, 2009 at 1:21 pm

    Right, #5 is one of those women who has no sensitivity in her breasts.

    Or is a gay man.

    Flip a coin.

    Reply
  11. @7 | September 11, 2009 at 1:24 pm

    @7

    Well.. that’s the non fun way to look at it. I like to think, as American’s we are so attuned to finding pleasure that we know the more hide them, the more we can enjoy them when we see them. I mean is it a bad thing that we’ve made them so sexual?

    Hide them from everyone publicly enjoy them extra privately.

    But she’s no my girlfriend, so she should totally keep bringing them out. Every time i see a lily allen post on this site i smile, and 75 percent of the time she is topless, so of course that’s better.

    Reply
  12. Spam | September 11, 2009 at 1:26 pm

    I’m pretty sure that half of you who are complaining about her breasts have never seen any in person, and are trying to make up for it with such childish remarks…

    Reply
  13. Hank Arron Allen | September 11, 2009 at 1:26 pm

    If I wanted to see a smoking topless nine year old boy I’d visit Father Donovans Choir practice, thanks for ruining my lunch.

    Reply
  14. Sam | September 11, 2009 at 1:28 pm

    Breasts are mostly just blubbers of fat, most women don’t really get off them being touched or whatever.

    99% of women would prefer a back massage or a foot massage

    Reply
  15. alex | September 11, 2009 at 1:33 pm

    pepperoni guy tits

    Reply
  16. jay | September 11, 2009 at 1:35 pm

    this is the reason for plastic surgery
    what an amazing candidate for boob implants

    Reply
  17. Marie | September 11, 2009 at 1:37 pm

    lol its true I would rather have a back massage!! when my boyfriend massage them, i don’t feel much but i could sure go for a back massage right nwo

    Reply
  18. Ellie | September 11, 2009 at 1:39 pm

    I think her small boobs are really beautiful…. at least they aren’t gonna sag when shes older, shes gonna have that amazing petite looking body forever… I always wished I could have small cute boobs

    Reply
  19. sista | September 11, 2009 at 1:40 pm

    she is soooooooo pretty.
    and real.

    Reply
  20. sista | September 11, 2009 at 1:40 pm

    she is soooooooo pretty.
    and real.

    Reply
  21. Becky of Londinium | September 11, 2009 at 1:51 pm

    Sam – actually breasts have pretty much been sexual objects since human beings began. The only reason we have large breasts is for the satisfaction of men, when we stopped doing it doggy style the men needed something to mimic the roundness of breasts so women with larger breasts were more desired. The internal and external mechanism is for feeding babies – the reason people gain fat there during puberty is to attract men.
    Oh and I am British, we have naked breasts on the 3rd page of our most popular newspaper in the whole country every day. They are sexual as hell everywhere. Why we are embarrassed/shocked by them is a different matter.

    Reply
  22. Beau Tocks | September 11, 2009 at 1:53 pm

    Where’s the third nip?

    Reply
  23. Colin | September 11, 2009 at 1:55 pm

    NEVERBACKDOWN MAN, seriously dude? Boring? You’ve been laid few (if any) times I’m guessing. Sorry about that.

    Reply
  24. Fegirst | September 11, 2009 at 1:56 pm

    They airbrushed out her third nipple.

    Reply
  25. @21 | September 11, 2009 at 1:59 pm

    Actually #21 your breasts are large cause you’re storing fat there as well as other places. Just cause you store fat in your thighs doesn’t mean we want fat thighs. Look at the more undeveloped parts of Africa, they don’t see sexuality in breasts at all, the women walk around freely breast feeding their babies and it doesn’t phase anyone and the women don’t have to worry about men gawking at them and thinking sexual. That’s how it should be.

    Reply
  26. M | September 11, 2009 at 2:00 pm

    Sam- shut the fuck up you don’t speak for everyone here. You sound like a 14 year old who is off school today. Now go do your homework and let the adults enjoy the boobies.

    And for the record I would much rather have my tits massaged than my back or feet. Ladies…?

    Reply
  27. @21 | September 11, 2009 at 2:00 pm

    Actually #21 your breasts are large cause you’re storing fat there as well as other places. Just cause you store fat in your thighs doesn’t mean we want fat thighs. Look at the more undeveloped parts of Africa, they don’t see sexuality in breasts at all, the women walk around freely breast feeding their babies and it doesn’t phase anyone and the women don’t have to worry about men gawking at them and thinking sexual. That’s how it should be.

    Reply
  28. Anon | September 11, 2009 at 2:04 pm

    What a hypocrite she is.
    She was interviewed by Jayne Middlemiss and asked about her saying she was a feminist and what that meant to her.
    She seemed stumped and said that being a feminist meant she had to be a role model for young girls and that meant not taking her clothes off.

    I only wish she was as good as her word.

    Reply
  29. Sarah | September 11, 2009 at 2:06 pm

    Personally I would rather have my back/feet massaged too!!!!! It may just be me but I don’t feel much when my man massages my boobies!

    I think I feel a lot more with feet and back its cause you’re massaging all the tendons and ligaments in your back from the work during the day, while boobs you’re not really massaging anything but my fat and boob goo or w/e

    Reply
  30. play with them please! | September 11, 2009 at 2:13 pm

    #26
    I vote for a titi massage any time!!!

    Reply
  31. Spud McKenzie | September 11, 2009 at 2:29 pm

    shes hot! big boobs are not always attractive. her figure is beautiful

    Reply
  32. http://www.thefamousphere.com | September 11, 2009 at 2:29 pm

    Something about her makes me horny. She’s such a trainwreck that you know she’d be a dynamite fuck. She’s a ‘swallow girl’.

    Reply
  33. Dr. Fil | September 11, 2009 at 2:39 pm

    She’s no Kathy Griffin, but she’ll do…

    Reply
  34. Richport's Ghost | September 11, 2009 at 2:41 pm

    This mutt looks like a cross-breed between Joan Jett and Pink.

    Bow wow.

    Reply
  35. negative creep | September 11, 2009 at 2:43 pm

    so if most of you would reject girls whose tits aren’t big enough for you, i suppose its ok if they reject you ’cause your dick isn’t big enough?

    Reply
  36. All Women Stalker | September 11, 2009 at 2:45 pm

    I admire her lack of inhibitions. :)

    -meream

    Reply
  37. DonkeyPunch | September 11, 2009 at 3:00 pm

    Keogan has bigger boobies than this chick

    Reply
  38. Dave ain't here, man | September 11, 2009 at 3:07 pm

    @26 and 30:
    How are YOU doin’?

    Reply
  39. LOL | September 11, 2009 at 3:08 pm

    I see where they removed her third nipple using a graphics program. LOL!! It’s right over the word, “W O M A N”

    Reply
  40. TempInsanity | September 11, 2009 at 3:16 pm

    She needs more cowbell!

    BTW, for the record, statistically speaking, >80% of women enjoy/prefer their breasts to either be touched, massaged, kissed, licked, and/or sucked on.

    The other 20% are either from underdeveloped countries whose women are nasty or are prudes who don’t want to be touched anywhere, anytime.

    Reply
  41. chupa | September 11, 2009 at 3:17 pm

    simple unattractive in any way.

    Reply
  42. Sam | September 11, 2009 at 3:17 pm

    She’s flatchested and has thick thighs and a round butt. Which means I’m attracted to her. It’s just how I am, and you can’t change me.

    Reply
  43. lulu | September 11, 2009 at 3:20 pm

    who cares if she’s topless.

    why isn’t anybody mentioning how ugly this girl is? o yeah, i forgot about that geekologie post about men not even paying attention to a woman’s face.

    Reply
  44. agree | September 11, 2009 at 3:24 pm

    #40
    HAHA!!

    Reply
  45. m | September 11, 2009 at 3:31 pm

    there’s really nothing sexy or womanly about a non-existent chest. she doesn’t even have a LITTLE bit, jeeze.

    Reply
  46. @45 | September 11, 2009 at 3:33 pm

    And her butt blends right in with her back. You’re right. nothing here but a 12 year old boy trying to be a sexy lady.

    Reply
  47. Tards | September 11, 2009 at 3:38 pm

    I wonder how many people here even know how much boobs flatten out when someone lays down or stretches upwards. Learn the human figure dipshits.

    Reply
  48. ROUGH daddy | September 11, 2009 at 3:40 pm

    Go start your rumors by the water cooler you fools, this broad doesnt have a 3rd nipple. I know her chest like the back of my hands :-) ( and theyre small and super sweet) I think Kate Moss got some weird thing by her boobs….

    Reply
  49. Erica | September 11, 2009 at 3:45 pm

    #47 is right. These are all really weird, stretchy poses. If she’d lean her chest forward a little nobody would think flatchested, merely small-breasted. But she’s sexy any way.

    Reply
  50. JJ | September 11, 2009 at 3:47 pm

    isnt lily allen the one with the third nipple?

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Name (Visible)
Email (Required, Not Visible)