Okay, everybody, we can all relax now. Kim Kardashian is finally giving her two cents on the Miss California gay marriage debacle. Phew. For a minute there, I thought a national scandal would go by without the insight of a woman whose ass should be overseas protecting our troops from roadside bombs. Anyway, here’s what Kim told People:
“I don’t agree with her narrow mindedness and neither do a lot of people,” Kardashian, 28, tells PEOPLE of Prejean’s much-discussed response to judge Perez Hilton’s query of her opinion the civil rights issue. “I’m not so narrow-minded so I definitely think a lot broader. Everyone has the right to be happy and be treated equally and I think not allowing gay marriage just kind of puts us back.”
Adds Kardashian, “I believe you’re in love with who you’re in love with, and you should be able to marry them. No one should tell someone else how to think or how to feel.”
Kardashian says she appreciates that Prejean was merely saying what she believed, but that may not have been the most tolerant of opinions. “I obviously have a completely different opinion but I think her answer was true to her,” Kardashian says. “That answer represented her and how she felt. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. She stood up for what she believes in so she should be happy with that backlash.”
For those of you with short attention spans, allow me to provide a condensed version of what Kim’s trying to say:
“MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!”
#138/149 That was freakin’ awesome you two – Coach bags is right! Wait and see! Annulments will be the new marriage. Papal annulments will be the equivalent of the black AmEx card. And Rene Zellwegger already has one, god dammit!
#138/149 That was freakin’ awesome you two – Coach bags is right! Wait and see! Annulments will be the new marriage. Papal annulments will be the equivalent of the black AmEx card. And Rene Zellwegger already has one, god dammit!
All of you are hilarious and pathetic. To the rabid, snarling, indignant children on both sides of this “discussion”, thank you for making me feel better about myself.
Recently I found a hot club — SeekingTall . c o m — just for sexy tall gals and guys to find their cupid. Come on, tall singles. Don’t miss your love.
PICTURE ONE!!!!!!SHE GOT MAN HANDS!!!!!!!!!!!!
How judgemental can an out of shape short fat no talent porn star celebrity be? After all she lies about her cosmetic surgery; breast implants, nose job, lipo on her hips and lower bac. She lies about improving her stout body with butt girdles, body shapers, and airbrushing her photos.
Also look at Kim’s botox face! She looks like a freak now!
She wears WWAAAYYYYY too much make-up. She looks like she puts it on with Homer’s make-up gun! POW! Seriously who wants to be with a chick that has to literally paint her face on before she goes out? Not Hot.
Is this piss whore still claiming to be a size 2? Look at the last picture, no way that ass is getting into size 2 anything. Maybe 20, but not 2.
the temptation of uniforms- Whether you are a single people in uniform seeking love, or a civilian interested in dating singles in uniform you will find personals in uniform.chat .-www.uniformmate.com-
“Hey genius, what does the Bible say about people who continue to defile their minds and eyes watching the “unclean” movies you’ve seen?”
Apparently i missed the part condemning extreme cinema.
“And the paedophile in Glass Cage is just that, a child molester, not a homosexual. So you just bore false witness.”
The Nazi only chooses to have sex with male children, so i would say that qualifies him as bisexual, considering he has a wife and kid. The Nazi’s male nurse Angel is the straight-up gay element, who has been warped by the abuse he suffered as a child; Angel’s role in the film is ‘reversing’ the abuse he suffered at the hands of the Nazi, therefore becoming the abuser and making the Nazi the abused. Or do you think one adult male molesting/raping another adult male should be labeled something other than homosexuality?
“Would you like to be stoned tonight for these sins after sundown or can we just get you at dawn tomorrow?”
So by saying “we”, you’re either a Jew or a Christian then? You’re more than willing to cast the first stone, but i wouldn’t say you’re without sin, you confused, YHVH/Je$u$ loving cocksucker. =D
“Narrow mindedness”…now in addition to being a useless, no-talent, brain dead, fat ass whore, she’s a hypocrite too! Actually, her mind can’t be narrow…there’s nothing there!
She is so tall and sexy.I know a place you can date with such girls.
*** Seekingtall.C OM *** which I have joined. I think it is interesting and you will like it.
#133 – I am NOT too sensitive you fucking twat!
@161
“The distinction between a victim’s gender and a perpetrator’s sexual orientation is important because many child molesters don’t really have an adult sexual orientation. They have never developed the capacity for mature sexual relationships with other adults, either men or women. Instead, their sexual attractions focus on children – boys, girls, or children of both sexes.”
You can read the rest of it here
http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/HTML/facts_molestation.html
Why don’t you read it and expand your little mind?
Also, I can name more movies of heterosexual relationships gone wrong than homosexual relationship gone wrong.
Thanks for the information, but i can’t say it applies to In A Glass Cage, which you’d already know if you’d actually seen the film. The Nazi was never abused as a child – he initially preyed on boys and murdered them because it was his job, in a concentration camp; after he flees Germany with his family, he continues to ‘work overtime’ because rape, torture and murder are things he has grown to *LOVE*. Whether or not Angel conforms to your suggested psychological stereotypes is another matter.
“Also, I can name more movies of heterosexual relationships gone wrong than homosexual relationship gone wrong.”
So what’s your point? It’s clear you’ve never seen the films I’ve mentioned; your “I can name more movies of blah blah blah” statement makes that obvious. I’m not looking for bullshit commercial/pedestrian movies about “heterosexual relationships gone wrong” that anyone can rent from Blockbuster – I’m looking for underground films that can literally make one sick, regardless of their characters’ sexual orientations. Now who’s limited?
Am kind of disappointed in Kim just a little bit they asked the girl a question an she answered honestly. If you don’t want an honest answer then don’t ask the flicken question plain and simple. At least she didn’t go up there lien like some would. People have different feelings towards stuff an if that’s how she feels then …..Ok get on with life you people make a big deal out of nothing and it getting old. Shoots is this what the world is coming to, a place where if you say how you feel your called foul names. An Perez Hilton needs to get a life he will never be a woman an he’s mad boohoo:(.
And secondly if God wanted it this way …he would have made ADAM AN STEVE not ADAM AN EVE get it right read your bible …this isn’t rite we all know it an we are accepting it like its nothing …..woman an woman cannot produce …HELLOOOOOOO PEOPLE THERE IS A FREAKIN REASON …HATE ME IF YOU WANT I DON’T CARE AT ALL…I AM NOT HERE TO PLEASE YOU PEOPLE AN BE CAUTIOUS ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS I’M BEING REAL. LIKE THEY KEEP SAYING PEOPLE HAVE RIGHTS AN THEY CAN CHOOSE BUT KEEP IN MIND JUDGMENT IS NEARING AN WE WILL ALL PAY FOR SINS WE COMMIT .
@166
Hahaha, you’re funny. I like how you are telling me that I’m limited because I haven’t seen the movies you’ve seen or have the same taste in films as you do. That’s true, I haven’t seen those movies, but it’s cute how you have seen a few movies about male-male pedophilia/rape and think you have a clear picture of homosexual relationships in general. There was obviously something mentally wrong with those people, so I don’t understand why you are using them as an argument as to why homosexuality in general is wrong.
“I’m looking for underground films that can literally make one sick, regardless of their characters’ sexual orientations.”
That was my point, that there are extreme stories/movies (based on a true story) that do happen with male-female orientations. But to watch a few about people with ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTING male-male sexual tastes and using it as an argument as to why homosexual relationships are wrong in general just boggles me. Care to elaborate more? I don’t see what kind of point you are trying to make.
Do you have any other arguments as to why homosexuality is wrong? Or are you judging a whole group of people on the actions on a select few people that THAT ARE OBVIOUSLY MENTALLY ILL. By the way, men rape/molest little girls and men rape women too, but that doesn’t mean heterosexuality is wrong.
I don’t think i ever stated I’m trying to ‘prove’ homosexuality is wrong; what i mentioned earlier, about homosexuality being condemned in The Bible, is a simple fact. It’s just something i happened to know because religion/spirituality are huge interests of mine, so i shared that information, regarding K.K.’s goofy statements advocating Christianity *AND* homosexuality. Sure, you can take both stances, but doing so goes against the fundamentals of Judeo-Christianity, wherein homosexuals = sodomites. Another huge interest of mine is extreme cinema, especially European exploitation films from the ’70s, wherein just about *ANYTHING* was possible. =D
“Care to elaborate more? I don’t see what kind of point you are trying to make.”
I’m just sharing my 2¢ on a message board; I’m not condemning or advocating homosexuality, I’m just giving out a bit of info regarding my own interests. =P Yes, there are plenty of extreme films that deal with heterosexuality gone waaaaay wrong, I Spit On Your Grave being the best one i can immediately think of; i only mentioned homo-centric films because the theme of this thread is homosexuality. What can i say? I dig anything that expresses the most extreme aspects of the human condition. Thank you for the current discussion.
‘Salud’ from South America!!! =D
I don’t think i ever stated I’m trying to ‘prove’ homosexuality is wrong; what i mentioned earlier, about homosexuality being condemned in The Bible, is a simple fact. It’s just something i happened to know because religion/spirituality are huge interests of mine, so i shared that information, regarding K.K.’s goofy statements advocating Christianity *AND* homosexuality. Sure, you can take both stances, but doing so goes against the fundamentals of Judeo-Christianity, wherein homosexuals = sodomites. Another huge interest of mine is extreme cinema, especially European exploitation films from the ’70s, wherein just about *ANYTHING* was possible. =D
“Care to elaborate more? I don’t see what kind of point you are trying to make.”
I’m just sharing my 2¢ on a message board; I’m not condemning or advocating homosexuality, I’m just giving out a bit of info regarding my own interests. =P Yes, there are plenty of extreme films that deal with heterosexuality gone waaaaay wrong, I Spit On Your Grave being the best one i can immediately think of; i only mentioned homo-centric films because the theme of this thread is homosexuality. What can i say? I dig anything that expresses the most extreme aspects of the human condition. Thank you for the current discussion.
‘Salud’ from South America!!! =D
I hate when that happens.
I hate when that happens.
@170
I don’t have a problem with what the Bible says. The problem I have with it is that there is supposed to be a separation of church and state. Therefore, I don’t believe the Bible should have any merit in determining federal and state laws. Not everyone in the US is a christian, so why should everybody adhere to the bible’s view on what marriage is supposed to be.
I honestly don’t even care about marriage. I care about the government treating heterosexual and homosexual unions equally under the law, like how it should be. Whether it is called marriage or civil unions doesn’t make a difference to me. Everyone should get marriage or everyone should get civil unions. It is an equality issue when heterosexuals are given marriage and homosexuals are shafted with fucking “domestic partnerships” (which doesn’t even afford the same amount of rights,) Christians can keep their religious views but they shouldn’t have a right to use them in politics.
“about homosexuality being condemned in The Bible, is a simple fact.”
There is controversy regarding whether or not those verses were translated incorrectly or edited to someones’ liking. There was a post in one of the miss california topics that elaborates on this. But I’m not a christian so I don’t really care about it anyways.
That’s my 2 cents… I’m not forcing anyone to see the way I do, but that is my view on it all.
I’m glad ignorant people express their opinions, because then the enlightened have a chance to sway it.
who is this Edna Bambrick idiot and why is she reporting everybody? don’t you have anything better to do than police whatever retard website i managed to stumble on? good god, and the rest of the world wonders what is wrong with this country…………….. see this whole page! and the fact this article is even out there, whatever it is about.