Kim Kardashian is the reason for the season

October 30th, 2007 // 175 Comments
1022_kim_kardashian_birthday_00.jpg

I debated whether or not to look at these photos of Kim Kardashian’s Playboy shoot. I was kind of hoping to see them for the first time on Christmas morning. You know, the snow is falling outside. The tree is sparkling and lit up. The whole family is abuzz with holiday cheer. I’ll take a seat near the fireplace and open up to Kim Kardashian’s photos. “Look, Grandma, a nipple! Can you believe it?” As I sip from my mug I’ll call for the children because only their innocent eyes can tell me if Kim Kardashian’s ass truly is a portal to the magical world of Narnia. Sure their parents might call the police and Aunt Sarah’s Nativity scene gets broken in the scuffle. But, darn it, that’s what the holidays are all about. Family. Oh yeah, and also sweet, heavenly asses surrounded by white fur. That too.

The photos below are totally NSFW. Unless your boss is super cool, or perhaps he’s, I dunno, Jesus. Then click away.

EDIT: Sorry guys, had to take it down.

superficial

  1. Texas Tranny

    Texas Tranny NEVER trolls, NEVER EVER.

    *snaps finger*
    *tosses head back*
    *swishes out of the room*

  2. Art

    Wow, I’m so proud women across the world have died for equal rights and for what? Guys to whack off to images on a computer. Cheers Kim, here’s to you and your giant arse

  3. Mike

    The artist they hired to paint these pictures is really good. They almost look like photographs!

  4. Maxx

    #97, your last sentence says it all and I couldn’t agree more. It’s enough to make me mad!

  5. Christina

    Man she’s gross. How can anyone like her? She’s talentless with a low IQ.
    Why is she famous? Oh yeah because she has big boobs and a huge ass.

  6. A

    If i were a lesbian……..

  7. poo

    Omg look at the terrible photoshop job on her ass in the 6th photo…

  8. Anonymous

    what’s wrong with you people?
    first off, I smell LOTS of nasty jealousy here.
    second, she’s really hot, and has a great bod, fake, but great nevertheless.
    It’s great that a chick who is actually -HOT- is praised and considered really hot, I was so sick of hearing chicks who are average and are curveless and assless sticks being praised and people claiming they were hot, when they are NOT (like Jessica Alba… average super overrated lady). At least, unlike Alba, Kim Kardashian is truly hot and she’s got such a great body, the praise is fair.
    I love Kim and I love her brunnette/dark Spanish/latin like look. I think hot spanish/latin like brunnettes like this one beat every blonde on Earth anyday when it comes to hotness.
    Second, you people have a problem with sex and nudity. You post comments claiming she’s so horrible for posing naked or having a sex tape or performing sexual acts. People, it’s tits, ass, you all have that, it’s the most natural thing in the world and there’s nothing to be ashamed of. If the girl is proud and wants to show it off, leave the girl alone, she’s not doing anything bad at all, you people are sick for saying otherwise, what’s so wrong about a naked body? And sex, it’s the same. It’s the most natural thing in the world. Everyone has sex or wishes they could. If she has a sex tape and she likes performing certain sexual acts, what’s wrong with that? don’t look if you don’t like it, don’t do it yourself if you don’t like it, but respect others who feel different because she’s not doing anything wrong at all and she’s not hurting anybody.
    So get your facts right you ignorant jealous prudes. There’s nothing wrong with sex and nudity, it’s a natural thing. There’s something wrong with killing people, with hurting people… that is gross and nasty, that’s trash, that’s low. But with sex and nudity? nothing wrong.

  9. sva1994

    Jesus CHRIST they did a shitty job airbrushing her ass in pic #7. Don’t they even have anyone checking these things? It’s bad as when they airbrushed Tori Spelling’s gigantic chin when she the 20 questions feature years ago, and ended up giving it a sharp point.

  10. Jeff L

    GOD I HOPE THIS IS STILL UP WHEN I GET HOME FROM WORK

  11. kristina

    she is fucking gross

  12. AZLez

    ok. I know she is disgusting, but seriously… tits ass and vagina, and I don’t even have to pay?
    merry christmas, happy channukah/hannukah, and merry kwanza

  13. kristina

    photo six, look at her ass, you can bluntly see the poor airbrushing skills. I don’t blame them though, it’s too hard to airbrush

  14. Erin

    #108 — I agree with you to some extent. Yes, it’s just T&A, and I think she’s a great looking girl in my opinion, too. But it’s unfortunate that she should pride herself on “just T&A.”

    Let’s get this straight: It’s not the content that angers me. It’s the social ramifications. Society as a whole is being conditioned to view the female as nothing more than a sexual object. Being a female myself, this bothers me. If you’re a female as well, this should bother you too. It’s the fact that I am probably paid less because I’m a woman. It’s the fact that every time a woman interviews here, the guys have to gossip about the number 1 priority: what did she look like? You’ll never ever hear anyone speak like that about a male interviewee. It’s not just Kim Kardashian but a great majority of women who promote this societal tendancy. Sure, some people who speak out about this kind of thing are prudes and maybe jealous even. But I think there is a respectable and sincere basis for my argument, and I hope you can recognize that.

    #107 – Thanks! I almost didn’t even post since usually anything half-serious on these forums gets completely bashed…Makes me mad too.

  15. A

    #45, Why can’t you be a dark haired brunette and achieve sex symbol status

  16. Erin

    #108 — I agree with you to some extent. Yes, it’s just T&A, and I think she’s a great looking girl in my opinion, too. But it’s unfortunate that she should pride herself on “just T&A.”

    Let’s get this straight: It’s not the content that angers me. It’s the social ramifications. Society as a whole is being conditioned to view the female as nothing more than a sexual object. Being a female myself, this bothers me. If you’re a female as well, this should bother you too. It’s the fact that I am probably paid less because I’m a woman. It’s the fact that every time a woman interviews here, the guys have to gossip about the number 1 priority: what did she look like? You’ll never ever hear anyone speak like that about a male interviewee. It’s not just Kim Kardashian but a great majority of women who promote this societal tendancy. Sure, some people who speak out about this kind of thing are prudes and maybe jealous even. But I think there is a respectable and sincere basis for my argument, and I hope you can recognize that.

    #107 – Thanks! I almost didn’t even post since usually anything half-serious on these forums gets completely bashed…Makes me mad too.

  17. alibi

    94- right o!

    108- “first off, I smell LOTS of nasty jealousy here”. No hon, that is the smell of reality. If you smell something foul, it’s your finger from having it so far up your ass, you can’t tell the difference between hot and plastic nonsense.

  18. Danielle

    I’d like to see the original photos.

  19. 21st century digital boy

    Ugh. The obligatory feminist backlash that always ensues…

    Look, nobody forces women to take off their clothes and pose for Playboy. They know the game. They know what they’re getting into, and what they want to get out of it. Fame, fortune, loads of cash, all that. Girls make bank just to be naked. Must be nice.

    Maybe some of these girls do have esteem issues, but so do a lot of guys who try to compensate by becoming rich and powerful and dating women like this. Kim’s an adult, and she made her decision good or bad. Whatever.

    Can’t a women decide for herself about these things? Of the many things that are so annoying about feminist crusaders is how they think they must always butt in and pronounce their judgement every time a woman doesn’t share their aversion to showing off the female body. Like each and every woman can’t think for themselves and make their own decision instead of adopting someone elses ideology and cause. And yeah, I think that while a lot of classic feminism was good, a lot of it is just a modern incarnation of our Puritan heritage that refuses to die.

    Men find women’s bodies desirable. That’s a fact. Men are not women, and they will never become sexless Vulcans who only value women for their minds, anymore than women will stop dumping less successful guys when they find their Prince Charming/Alpha male with the bigger, better bank account.

  20. fat cow

    WHAT A DIRTY SLUT!!!

  21. saralicious

    whats up with her vagina? it looks like the top of a dawn soap detegent…lol

  22. Radar

    I hate friggin’ Playboy celebrity spreads. They fucked up Debbie Gibson as well. Where’s the friggin beaver? Where’s the full on total frontal nudity. Showing a glimpse of pubes and a 4/5ths covered nipple isn’t “baring it all”.

    Piss poor, Playboy.

    And yes, she’s still a lard ass!

  23. Riotboy

    Hit It Meter:
    _____________________+
    1…2…3…4…5…6…7…8…9…10
    _____________________+

    /so friggin’ HOT!!!

  24. LAME. She’s a beautiful woman and they’ve made her look 1987 sub-par. Who was in charge of the set and props? Her grandmother? And her hair and make-up are pathetic. She does a better job doing them herself. All in all, what a freaking let-down. And, you know what? I blame Hugh Hefner. That’s right, I said it. If you’d take a little less time pretending to be a befuddled old man surrounded by ditsy cosmetic surgery nightmares, and more time worried about what’s going in your magazine, this could have been awesome. DAMNIT!

  25. CoM

    Crap, they’re gone. Anyone got a link…?

  26. lentista

    whos cares about playboy,she should’ve did these pose’s for hustler,so i can puke on my cock and get off……teehehe

  27. shakeit

    there’s nothing to be jealous about. any woman can look good in hollywood. anyone can look good in playboy. natural beauty is lost.

    i mean didnt she just get through saying that she felt bad for doing a video?

  28. Ted from LA

    I’ve been around the block a couple of times, but this is the first time I’ve ever seen an ass with a step in the middle of it.

  29. Photo #6

    I believe the main problem in Photo 6 is that it is part of the mag spread and didn’t align properly during the scan. HOWEVER, the pshop on the roundness of the ass is TERRIBLE. Terrible makeup, scenery, accessories, photography, pshop, and publishing. Someone else said it best, she does better herself. She’s a nice speciman, but that facts are the facts, she’s fake and sold out AGAIN. And stop standing up for her actions because they are WRONG.

  30. whatGfunk

    Are those stretch marks on her side?

  31. Quinn

    what a shame they did such crappy airbrushing.
    She’s HOT, but they made her waist half the size it is in any other pic.
    In the pics of her birthday she has belly action.

  32. another feminist

    Erin, I do not understand feminists like you at all. You are SOOOO judgemental . You say that a lot of women hold other women down and I hope you realize you’re one of them. Why can’t some women show off their bodies in Playboy and STILL get respect, and why would that affect womens’ careers in general? If you think it’s because men don’t respect women when they see pics like Kim’s, well then BLAME THE MEN. That’s where we need to start, instead of bashing Kim for posing nude. Men should be able to watch women show off their bodies and still respect them, and so should you.

  33. # 127 thanks for the link

  34. Skip Smith

    @114

    >>”It’s the fact that I am probably paid less because I’m a woman.”

    No, you’re paid less because you’re stupid.

  35. FeministSchmeninist

    DON’T blame KIM for posing in Playboy, blame the MEN?!?!?!?!??!?!

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  36. Kim

    I’ll just wait til my issue comes in the mail to see her gigantic booty. I really don’t think she looks that bad. She is a no talent bimbo who does NOT deserve an entire 1/2 hour devoted to her on TV, but she looks good.

  37. Patrick

    These pics ARE “really classy!” I mean, nobody’s peeing on her, right?

  38. M

    It was great while it lasted, thanks…

  39. Mr. Pickles

    WEAK. keep them up. make them sue you.

  40. cowcat

    #119, the women who perpetuate sexual objectification as a source of empowerment, rather than education and intelligence, are the same women who would choose their husbands/boyfriends based on their bank account. So, you’re preaching to the choir on that one. True feminists aren’t hypocrites, and there’s nothing wrong with wanting a little equality.

  41. Emmyem

    What’s funny are the remarks from the guys (or gals!) who write “I’d do her”, or something really filthy they’d do to her. LIKE SHE WOULD LET PEOPLE who write about her here, “do” her.
    She’s all FAMOUSY now! She’s PURE CLASS! NOT! Ray WHO? The women in Playboy have been airbrushed since airbrushing was invented.
    Does anyone remember when JOAN COLLINS posed nude for Playboy? I think they had to redo her entire body, and face. My older brother had the mag, and he said “flat ass, booze legs, gut”. I remember laughing so hard.
    Then my Mom yelled at me, because I was a young girl and was not supposed to hear “that kind of talk”.
    Ahhhh, how times have changed. Now, sadly, I don’t think twice when I see Brit’s lady parts, or, as I like to call them, the gates to Hell.
    A very smelly Hell, just fire, and torture, no food.
    Oh, I got off topic.
    Kim K is a skank. And she will be a HUGE fat ass when she gets older, COMPLETE with a mustache and chin hair….coming out of a mole. DINNER TIME!

  42. Ript1&0

    Yawn… well, they’re gone by the time I get here. It’s ok, I saw them Friday anyway already.

    I’m gonna vote for shaved in the Shaved v. Not Shaved debate.

  43. lastangelman

    Got a look see elsewhere on the net, small inconvenience, after studying the pictures scrupulously with my buddy, the ever trusty one eyed trouser python, ’tis amazing what you can do with Photoshop, Blender, a rendering farm of 500 Xserves and 270 MacPros and skilled technicians using the most advanced protective eyewear this side of the galaxy. This technology could be used to make Barbara Bush (both of ‘em) bonerific.
    I’ve seen Kimmy K in the flesh two days ago – a Harry Hines ninth level skank-ho with Haitian Death VD, your penis withers and crawls inside your body cavity to die within fifty yards of her mere presence, so wear protection, for the sake of the human race, wear protection.

  44. Erin

    @#119: You sound intelligent so I do respect your opinion. I too agree that it may be some kind of convoluded puritanism that still lingers as a part of feminism today, but I hope that any part of my posts didn’t lead you to believe that I have an aversion to the naked female body. It’s just the manner in which it is too often represented. It doesn’t uplift a woman or cause her to be admired/appreciated but instead just provokes a desire to conquer, objectify and subjugate her. Until I can view a comments forum following revealing pictures of a woman that don’t include vulgar comments, I find it hard to believe that I’m wrong. Until men can handle nude images of women without taking it as a medium of their own dominance, women should be ashamed to partake and therefore encourage this kind of behavior. It’s self-defeating and only exists because women allow it to exist.

    @#142: Amen. I started getting awfully flustered and thought of posting yet another response, but I realized that it was just more trouble than it was worth. You put together the bottom line very concisely though, and you echoed my thoughts exactly: I’m not a feminist, but there’s nothing wrong with wanting a little equality. Keyword: Equality. It has nothing to do with valuing one sex over the other or turning men into “sexless vulcans who only value women for their mind.” I don’t expect men to ONLY value a woman for her mind, and I like a man with a healthy sex drive just like most women. But I do expect men not to ONLY value a woman as a living tubesock. Thanks for posting.

  45. Uppity Cunt

    I HATE PLAYBOI BECUZ IT LIKE DEGRAIDS WOMIN. IT SHOWS NASTIE BODIE PARTS LIKE BOOBYS AND SNACH.

    WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!

    HOO WANTS TO SEE NATERAL BODYS IN ALL THEYR GLORIE? BOOBYS AND SNACH ARE RONG RONG RONG, REEL WOMIN DONT HAVE BOOBYS OR SNACHES.

  46. kix

    Wow– some of the most intelligent posts I’ve ever read on here (#97, #104, #117, #142). Like 142 implied, these people tend to stick together- mindless women who rely on their sex to get by and the cavemen who are controlled by their hormones. The way these kind of people hookup makes it easy to weed out the idiots from the rest of productive society. Unfortunately these people can still reproduce.

  47. kaytee

    Why is it that beautiful women must act so damned stupid? Is there some sort of law that says “if you have a beautiful face and body, you MUST act like a brainless bimbo who is always willing to trade sex for attention and stuff, and peddle videos of yourself getting fucked on the Internet. Bonus points is someone pees on you.”?

    KK is nothing – useless. A breathing blow up sex doll. She is pretty. Would be prettier still if all her body parts are home grown. (Maybe they are) And would be absolutely beautiful if she had (or used her) brains to go along with the body.

    Too bad.

    The problem with Playboy and it’s ilk is that they photoshop to bits beautiful women. They have always cleaned up reality in the past but with the digital age, hell, even Joan Rivers is a potential contender for a layout!

    It would be kind of interesting to have disclaimers at the bottom of the photo – you know, list all the body bits photoshopped and surgically altered. Wouldn’t take away the viewing pleasure, but would introduce some reality to the women displayed.

    And yeah – what is it with the labia in Playboy? No woman has pubic hair OR labia? Hard to keep up with the trends. It would be cheaper to just go with totally cartoon women – save on paying the models AND on all the money they seem to be paying for photoshop artistes!

Leave A Comment