Kiefer Sutherland victim: ‘Attack was unprovoked’

By: The Superficial / May 6, 2009

It’s starting to look more and more like Kiefer Sutherland was simply in a headbutting mood Monday night thanks to his unbridled passion for Jack Daniels. Seen above in New York this morning, alleged victim Jack McCollough is claiming it was an unprovoked attack. People reports:

“Anyone who knows Jack McCollough knows that he would not hurt a fly,” a rep for McCollough, of the New York-based fashion empire Proenza Schouler, tells PEOPLE exclusively. “All we can say at this point is that he was the victim of a vicious, violent, unprovoked assault and that the matter is in the hands of the authorities.”

Brooke Shields already backed Jack’s story earlier today, and eyewitnesses are coming forward with similar stories:

But one guest at the event tells PEOPLE that the altercation came as a surprise to bystanders. “Jack walked into the party and tried to order a drink, and then the next thing he knew, he got headbutted for no identifiable reason,” the partygoer tells PEOPLE. “Jack did nothing other than walk into a party. He did not bump into Brooke. It’s just puzzling.”

Wait wait wait. He walked between Kiefer Sutherland and the bar and is surprised he got headbutted? Jesus. That’s like stealing a mother bear’s cub and blaming it for eating your face off. How about taking some responsibility, man? Seriously, find me a judge who will convict Kiefer Sutherland for this, and I’ll show you a terrorist.