And all you got are these lousy awesome cleavage photos.
For anyone who doesn’t know, the Kelly Brook issue of Playboy hits newsstands today, and if you’re hoping to see naked pics of her pop up here, those would be the exclusive copyrighted property of Playboy Enterprises and I don’t want to get my dick sued off. I like my dick. It tells me how to respond to things.
On that note, enjoy these shots of Kelly at the 9th Annual InStyle Summer Soiree last night and, I dunno, maybe these ones of her topless back in May. If you’re into that sort of thing.
Photos: Getty, WireImage
You are an ass | August 13, 2010 at 12:56 pm
The mail can’t get here fast enough
FrankNfrtr | August 13, 2010 at 1:03 pm
Never pay for what you can get for free.
If she unveiled it then I’ll see her coin slot someday, somewhere on the internet. Hef doesn’t have dominion over the whole damn thing.
FrankFroof | August 16, 2010 at 4:06 pm
Ain’t worth seeing, without the big padded push up bras this chick’s got a little saggy pair covered in stretch marks. Major disappointment from Playboy and Kelly Brock has lost her mystery for all time. I don’t know if she’s around forty or not but she’s looking worn and the stretch marks are all over the UK press.
Shoulda stuck to those highly airbrushed bikini shots…..
Viv | August 13, 2010 at 1:04 pm
Her top looks like that bubble plastic everyone likes to pop.
(pun intended)
dudeatdudedotdude | August 13, 2010 at 1:08 pm
it’s what’s under it that i wouldn’t mind popping
dudeatdudedotdude | August 13, 2010 at 1:07 pm
love the cover. probly check it out tonite, she’s startin to grow on me
McFeely Smackup | August 13, 2010 at 1:09 pm
Is this going to be another one of those “famous hot chick appears in playboy”, but is actually a bunch of glamor shots of her in swimsuits, lingerie, and bedsheets and no actual nudity?
I remember back when Hugh Hefner ran the mag, there wasn’t a chance in hell any chick would be between the front and back covers without baring her goodies. Now, we’ve got a chick running the show who thinks playboy should be more like fucking Oprahs magazine.
stinky mcpoop | August 13, 2010 at 3:51 pm
Having tried fucking Oprah’s magazine, I would recommend against it. It smells like chicken and shame.
David | August 13, 2010 at 1:10 pm
Are those stretch marks on the tops? Aw. That’s too bad. Now she’s like a real person.
Deacon Jones | August 13, 2010 at 1:12 pm
DO newsstands even exist anymore?
If someone held a gun to my head, I’d have to think hard about where I could buy a hard copy of Playboy.
dudeatdudedotdude | August 13, 2010 at 1:29 pm
was just wondering the same thing. used to just get it at 7-11. i believe barnes and noble or borders.. or just wait till the hi res shots appear on a site like lazygirls
ugottabekidding | August 13, 2010 at 2:05 pm
Don’t know where you live, but in NYC, we still have plenty of newsstands.
McFeely Smackup | August 13, 2010 at 2:18 pm
nobody outside of NYC gives a rats ass about NYC.
dudeatdudedotdude | August 13, 2010 at 2:31 pm
speak for yourself chump, i love ny!
justme | August 13, 2010 at 1:17 pm
Today should be a national holiday. Just sayin.
Crabby Old Guy | August 13, 2010 at 1:18 pm
Well, like the old saying goes, “Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?” (insert Kelly Brook huge titty joke here). But seriously, why would anyone buy Playboy when you can see her naked – FOR FREE? Playboy has to come up with some babe that we would want to see naked – and hasn’t shown the goods to anyone at anytime in order for it to have any value.
sarah | August 13, 2010 at 11:12 pm
who is she and what is she famous for?
Photoshop Police | August 13, 2010 at 1:33 pm
I can’t think of a better way to support economic recovery than buying a nudie mag!
pimp | August 13, 2010 at 1:34 pm
her tits are already all over the internet…FAP FAP FAP FAP!
MEL | August 13, 2010 at 2:07 pm
Her tits, yes.
Her muff, no.
wat | August 13, 2010 at 9:41 pm
She doesn’t show it though. What a rip-off.
Lovethickpubichair | August 15, 2010 at 12:25 pm
We want to see that hairy muff.
Erica | August 13, 2010 at 1:49 pm
She already was mostly nude in a movie years ago, back when she was at her hottest. She’s holding onto her looks very well these days, but that’s what she’s doing: holding on.
Rough, the new blaq | August 13, 2010 at 1:53 pm
Playboy? We seen enough T&A from this girl on this site (no not Textiles & Apparels) It’s time for some Molly Mcbutter spreads.
Ksurfiws | August 13, 2010 at 1:59 pm
Where are the Scans? Post ‘em up fish!
McFeely Smackup | August 13, 2010 at 2:20 pm
I’m sure Fish is on it. He’ll get some pics of her fully clothed and put up a headline that says “Kelly Brook Completely and Totally Naked!”, then in the writeup say “well, under her clothes she is”.
Internet | August 13, 2010 at 4:31 pm
She has the SAME EXACT shtick as my girlfriend.
Pseudopodia | August 13, 2010 at 4:32 pm
Are those stretch mar-HUGGGHLUUGH BARFF
jenna | August 13, 2010 at 5:10 pm
She needs ot have a kid to pass on her fantastic figure! You don’t see many hourglass figures anymore. Lucky Bitch. :P
jenna | August 13, 2010 at 5:11 pm
(to)
Swift | August 13, 2010 at 7:38 pm
Just saw the scans. Nothing to be crazy about. The pictures from the July edition of loaded where far much better (bigger tits). Almost seems like she had a breast reduction (sigh…).
Girlygirl | August 13, 2010 at 11:02 pm
Gross, not my taste.
captain america | August 14, 2010 at 12:21 am
…………..WHO?
Ari Ola | August 14, 2010 at 12:43 am
Wait until you see her nipples – they’re awesome!!!