Keira Knightley posed “topless” for the latest issue of Interview magazine. She’s definitely soft on the eyes, though a bit too thin for my taste. Contrary to popular belief, I’m not into tying a rock to my lover so she doesn’t take flight in a slight breeze.
 |
Courteney Cox's Shocking Confession About Her Sex Life – Huffington Post |
 Why Was This Celebrity Booed Off This Hit TV Show? – Fox News | |
| 50 Most Scandalous Cheerleaders in Sports History – Bleacher Report | |
| Skinny Star in a Bikini Talks About Being Anorexic – Evil Beet Gossip | |
| Sasha Grey keeps doing it for the kids. – TMZ | |
| Kate Middleton Steps Out On Her Own – Lainey Gossip |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Adam Levine Signs 'Glee' Guy to New Label, Poses For Terry Richardson (PHOTOS) |
Relationship Expert on Halle Berry's Reported Move: It's About Being Selfless, Not Selfish (PHOTOS) |
Camila Alves Flashes Engagement Ring, Talks Wedding Plans (PHOTOS) |
'Madly in Love' Robert Pattinson & Kristen Stewart Hang Tight in Los Angeles |
Lady Gaga's Tattooed 'Born This Way' Costar Reveals 'Top Secret' Project with Singer |
Lindsay Lohan's Platinum Blonde Locks: Yay or Nay? (PHOTOS) |
soph | December 7, 2007 at 4:22 pm
she is like a skeleton
Pylon | December 7, 2007 at 4:23 pm
First!
Its not like she really has anything to cover =/
Alban | December 7, 2007 at 4:23 pm
EAT please !!
Gerald_Tarrant | December 7, 2007 at 4:28 pm
Sex, thy name is Keira. I don’t hate the suspenders, they didn’t even slow me down from rubbing one off.
Rebecca | December 7, 2007 at 4:28 pm
Surprisingly, when her chest is barely hanging on the protruding ribs her legs look incredibly normal (esp. the thighs) …
Fred | December 7, 2007 at 4:29 pm
Rosie has some extra she can donate to the cause.
moka | December 7, 2007 at 4:29 pm
she looks like a trasvesti
Gerald_Tarrant | December 7, 2007 at 4:29 pm
I forgot to add the obligatory “if you don’t think she looks good it is because you are fat and jealous.”
Warren Piece | December 7, 2007 at 4:30 pm
2 words…
Can. Kles.
p911gt10c | December 7, 2007 at 4:32 pm
That first pic is questionable. The second is hot though.
Oh, and #2, you’re a loser.
cowcat | December 7, 2007 at 4:32 pm
She looks even older than Tara Reid in these pictures.
Jimbo | December 7, 2007 at 4:36 pm
This might be hot if she had some boobs. Is she competing with Nicole Kidman to see who can be the whitest??
Warren Piece | December 7, 2007 at 4:39 pm
2 words…
Can. Kles.
PunkA | December 7, 2007 at 4:39 pm
She looks great. I would hit that hard. Bet she is a total minx.
Fenster | December 7, 2007 at 4:39 pm
Why is it even the skinniest girls have normal, sexy, legs? I would hit it in picture #2, I’d hit picture #1 with a bag
lala | December 7, 2007 at 4:40 pm
shes amazing, i think she looks gorgeous !
axeugene | December 7, 2007 at 4:40 pm
I’m sorry, that’s a girl?!
JC | December 7, 2007 at 4:40 pm
Just what the HELL is wrong with her left eye?
I mean, it’s not like she has any boobs to distract me from that hideous thing.
teddy | December 7, 2007 at 4:41 pm
she’s not that skinny.. will you fatties please recognize!
RENEE... | December 7, 2007 at 4:43 pm
Manly face, manly chest. Is she on the cover of Tranny times?
Rick | December 7, 2007 at 4:44 pm
She’s was attractive before, now she just looks anorexic. Thank you suspenders.
sick | December 7, 2007 at 4:45 pm
I belive that the usual photoshop technique of making fatasses look skinny is being reversed…and adding thickness to her legs. Funny how photoshop can’t even help this lost cause.
feg | December 7, 2007 at 5:00 pm
EW!!! put it on, put it on!
gorgeous face, keep that body to yourself doll.
Erica | December 7, 2007 at 5:00 pm
Too hot for words. She looks like Charlotte Rampling here(http://www.nndb.com/people/991/000086733/rampling-1-sized.jpg). Keira, I don’t care if you’re looking increasingly like a bobble-head, you’re still gorgeous.
Ugh | December 7, 2007 at 5:05 pm
She’s sickly thin! Give me Jennifer Love Hewitt any day.
BunnyButt | December 7, 2007 at 5:06 pm
#8, you should’ve spelled a few things wrong and used incorrect grammar. Sorry, you’re too smart, we can’t take your statement seriously.
Auntie Kryst | December 7, 2007 at 5:08 pm
I gotta agree with the tranny comments. Lady looks like a dude. I always thought she was very pretty despite being a filthy limey, but damn what’s with these pics? I’ll defer to T T for clarification.
grossed out | December 7, 2007 at 5:09 pm
ugly.
flat.
wtf happened to her face???
i’ve never been more turned off by a naked woman.\
Auntie Kryst | December 7, 2007 at 5:10 pm
@26 Bunny’s right, also throw in a couple “haters” too!
Lexatron | December 7, 2007 at 5:17 pm
I am disturbed by her photoshopped right hand. Her left one fiddling with her trousers is big and manly and the right one covering her ‘breast’ is dinky and ladylike. At least make them match!!
Dude | December 7, 2007 at 5:17 pm
Looking pretty rough in these shots. Not to mention that topless or not..her upper body does nothing but encourage yawns. Im in the market for say, a topless Aguilera pre fetus.
ScuttlingCrab | December 7, 2007 at 5:26 pm
“The English actress says that she is sickened by celebrities who expose themselves to photographers, and claims their actions make them ‘s**ttier than everybody else.’
Actress Keira Knightley has taken a pot-shot at celebs like Britney Spears and Lindsay Lohan for flashing their private assets more often than not.
The ‘Pirates of the Caribbean’ actress insists that she has too much class to follow in their footsteps.”
—-
This is sort of like that joke where a woman is nude except for a monocle — because she’s classy. Except here it’s suspenders. HY-PO-CRITE.
I’ve never seen any pictures of Lindsay that are this sleazy. As for flashing her crotch, that was all Photoshop — she never did.
Gerald_Tarrant | December 7, 2007 at 5:26 pm
Shit, sorry.
U h8terz r jus jelous cuz ur all fat.
amma | December 7, 2007 at 5:33 pm
Keira does make this look classy, don’t ask me how. No comparison to Lohan, etc. I don’t get why people say she is too thin here–I don’t see any ribs, etc. And the best part? Her boobs are obviously real. Wait! I just figured out how Keira makes naughty look classy–cause her naughty bits are out on purpose and her eyes are going in the same direction. As opposed to Lohan & company who are usually flashing as they fall out of a car on their way to a club to score some coke. Yeah, I’ll take Keira ANY day. This girl rocks.
BunnyButt | December 7, 2007 at 5:35 pm
* clap, clap, clap * There you go, Gerald!! Good job!!
shaggy | December 7, 2007 at 5:36 pm
michael jackson? *shudder*
Dar | December 7, 2007 at 5:36 pm
That’s a man, Baby!
Somebody give her a Twinkie–STAT!
chriso | December 7, 2007 at 5:42 pm
Jesus, she looks like a reanimated corpse.
Spiraticus | December 7, 2007 at 5:45 pm
Did she have a pea for dinner?
Spiraticus | December 7, 2007 at 5:45 pm
Did she have a pea for dinner?
Spiraticus | December 7, 2007 at 5:45 pm
Did she have a pea for dinner?
BishOP | December 7, 2007 at 5:56 pm
Tranny.
ScuttlingCrab | December 7, 2007 at 6:03 pm
#34, she doesn’t rock at all. Lohan rocks, she has fire and energy and she’s funny, AND she has never flashed her crotch which is just an urban legend. Keira Knightley is nothing but a mannequin full of useless attitude. Other girls like all that fashion-plate bullshit but this girl would bore anyone to death after two days.
These pictures are only classy if you think Nazi cabaret is classy. Perhaps you want Keira’s high heel in your back as she stubs out a cigarette in your eye?
Zee Brat | December 7, 2007 at 6:04 pm
She looks like she’s from brazil. Nice ass and legs, and absolutely no chest.
ella | December 7, 2007 at 6:07 pm
The makeup makes her look like Patsy from Absolutely Fabulous
veggi | December 7, 2007 at 6:09 pm
Are those suspenders or mosquito bite balm?
s0fa | December 7, 2007 at 6:14 pm
a little too old and creepy looking too
Googolygoo | December 7, 2007 at 6:21 pm
She looks like an ugly tranny– that make-up can make Amanda LaPore equally as attractive.
The girl has pectorals instead of titties!
Yuk. Give me some meat on the bones, please!
Googolygoo | December 7, 2007 at 6:21 pm
She looks like an ugly tranny– that make-up can make Amanda LaPore equally as attractive.
The girl has pectorals instead of titties!
Yuk. Give me some meat on the bones, please!
erica | December 7, 2007 at 6:25 pm
actually she has big ass legs for how big her torso is, i would expect little spindly legs, but it looks like she wears like a size 6-8 pant