Here’s Katy Perry posing topless for the UK edition of Esquire and if Russell Brand wants to win the hearts and minds of Americas, he needs to remove those arms on the ASAP. No, really, I’ve seen pics from Ground Zero that are less offensive than what’s happening here. WHO ARE YOU WORKING FOR?!
Photos: Esquire UK
 |
Jessica Simpson Looks Surprisingly Good While Keeping Quiet – Huffington Post |
 You Won't Believe What Taylor Momsen Just Admitted – Dlisted | |
| Kim Kardashian's Latest Accomplishment – Celebuzz | |
| PICS: Lindsay Lohan Takes it Off in 'Machete' – I Don't Like You In That Way | |
| WOW: Tatyana Ali is All Grown Up – Moejackson | |
| Does Rihanna Look Better From Behind? – Lainey Gossip |
McFeely Smackup | June 25, 2010 at 1:15 pm
topless, but with boobs covered is pretty much the same as “not topless”.
fail to see why this is interesting.
Michael G. | June 25, 2010 at 1:18 pm
agree….where is the less part?
arealcad | June 25, 2010 at 1:21 pm
No nips = not topless.
Mr. Nice Guy | June 25, 2010 at 1:59 pm
One step forward, looks good to me.
Bright Side | June 25, 2010 at 2:38 pm
No, I agree with Mr. Nice. We ease her into this. First this. Then a hint of areola. Then a nip. Then a double penetration, full vag orgy.
OK, there might be a few steps I left out.
Lol | July 7, 2010 at 5:17 am
lol totally agree!!! we must certainly skip these steps you did not mention!
duh stupid | June 27, 2010 at 10:32 pm
Hottest girl in the frekking world.
super crazy wildly hottttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt
Duncan Cade | June 25, 2010 at 1:19 pm
Headline should read – Katy Perry ‘Covering up her tits’ for Esquire UK
Brad | June 25, 2010 at 1:20 pm
I agree. Unless you can see 85% boob (as well as nipples), it’s not a topless shot. Big deal
White667 | June 25, 2010 at 1:20 pm
We do need someone to remind the entire media what TOPLESS means and what I CAN’T SEE ANYTHING means.
Racer X | June 25, 2010 at 1:24 pm
FAIL.
Clara | June 25, 2010 at 1:27 pm
Need I remind people that I own the Russell Brand’s cock? Much better than this! This is just a complete load of shizzz!!
bar room hero | June 25, 2010 at 1:33 pm
Who cares; this twat’s “music” sucks…
slag.
Mr. Nice Guy | June 25, 2010 at 1:55 pm
bar room fool what’s the deal? Hot Women always reject you, right?
im wearin my party pants tonight | June 25, 2010 at 2:54 pm
funny, i was thinking the same thing about you mr. nice guy
bar room hero | June 25, 2010 at 8:07 pm
Not really, shagged a couple pretty well right. Don’t get me wrong, I would deposit some baby batter between them bussoms but her “music” is absolutely painful to listen to…(and totally part of the ‘agenda’)
Gen | June 25, 2010 at 3:37 pm
Ugh, her new “hit” sucks hard. I hate it. And I’m a hetero female, so I have absolutely no reason to not hate her.
Jack Armstrong "The All-American Boy" | June 25, 2010 at 6:23 pm
Hell, I didn’t even know she’s, allegedly, a singer. All I know is she is hotter than 9 acres of onions and her tits are magnificent! Nice legs, too. I’ll bet she has a yummy ass as well.
Blech | June 25, 2010 at 10:49 pm
I didn’t think she sang. All I’ve heard her do is yell.
Rush | June 25, 2010 at 1:34 pm
14 minutes and 53 seconds on the clock….
The Loon | June 26, 2010 at 12:46 am
oh a 15 minutes of fame joke…real fuckin original
kz | June 25, 2010 at 1:40 pm
What a good Christian! I see the word of God now! I mean, using blasphemy is cheap, BUT LOOK AT MY TITTAYS!!
Mr. Nice Guy | June 25, 2010 at 1:57 pm
Best kind of Christian! One that is not a Prude! God gave you Tits, show off his work!
harry spencer | June 28, 2010 at 11:58 am
They’re FAKE, you moron
kz | June 25, 2010 at 1:41 pm
It’s “topless” because she has no top, morons, regardless if you see nip.
McFeely Smackup | June 25, 2010 at 1:45 pm
maybe you could define “top” for us in some meaningful fashion? If she were wearing a bikini that showed the exact same amount of skin she’s showing here, you’d consider THAT a top. Since i’m a practical person, and not a pedantic jackass, I just consider that her hands are the “top” in this photo, and therefore she is not topless by any useful definition.
Drew | June 25, 2010 at 1:49 pm
That’s probably because you’re not very bright.
jess | June 28, 2010 at 8:05 pm
lol
Viva La Cooch | June 25, 2010 at 1:42 pm
I don’t care what anyone says. She is super hot. Music is a joke, but her body is not. And she has a cute face. I bet she’s a real ball drainer, an ace fuck. I bet she fucks as well as a pornstar.
Cock Dr | June 25, 2010 at 3:43 pm
Since porn stars are whores, with one eyeball on a paycheck while they fake orgasms for the camera that isn’t really a complement.
Viva La Cooch | June 25, 2010 at 6:33 pm
Being as hot as a porn star is a very high compliment. And if you think pop stars and actresses aren’t whores you’re not very smart, now are you?
Mr. Nice Guy | June 26, 2010 at 3:11 pm
Porn Stars fuck Great. It’s women that have had kids that become boring in bed.
Meryl Streep | June 25, 2010 at 10:17 pm
Did that cooch just call me a whore? Fuck U!
Dame Judi Dench | June 25, 2010 at 10:18 pm
I say, that cooch can piss off!
Betty White | June 25, 2010 at 10:21 pm
The art of theater is a noble profession. Only ignorant people hold this opinion that performing artists are in some way prostitutes.
So cooch go fuck yourself.
Photoshop Police | June 25, 2010 at 2:02 pm
Everyone look up the definition of the term ‘canard’.
Dammit, Katy! JUST SHOW ‘EM ALREADY!
Jack Armstrong "The All-American Boy" | June 25, 2010 at 6:26 pm
Canard…??? What the hell does this have to do with airplanes? ;o)~
Opticzoom | June 25, 2010 at 2:11 pm
For those arguing on the definition of topless, The fish put half quotes around ‘topless’ so ur free to interpret it any way u want. I personally like suggestive photos like this over full blown nudity, much sexier IMO.
McFeely Smackup | June 25, 2010 at 2:22 pm
that’s because we abused him for so long for not knowing the difference between words like “nude”, “naked”, “topless”, etc and actually being able to see a persons naughty bits. He’s finally started to get it, now is not the time to relax and let him backslide.
Eventually, he might even start using actually descriptive titles like “Katy Perry Covers Boobs With Hands for Esquire”
Fiend | June 25, 2010 at 4:12 pm
Totally agree. I read an article the other day about how the Internet has forever changed, among other things, “sexy.” What ever happened to the allure of being suggestive but not in-your-face T&A? Porn has skewed our perspectives.
Blech | June 25, 2010 at 10:52 pm
I’m not a prude, but porn is so gross. Over 90% of participants are fucking nasty and nasty-looking.
I prefer soft porn/erotica. At least the participants look hot and “into it” for the most part.
Mr. Nice Guy | June 26, 2010 at 3:14 pm
Then Bleah, buy better Porn! 100% of the chicks I watch are nasty in a good way.
Momar | June 30, 2010 at 8:03 pm
absolutely right optic, couldn’t agree more, look how sexy her elbow is…oh my, what a wrist…I can’t wait for Katy’s to release a few shitty albums and revive her career with a good old fashion sex tape “leak”…
FrankNfrtr | June 25, 2010 at 2:15 pm
I’ve been told these aren’t real. Bought ‘em from a Dr.
This ruins things for me. I need to examine them in person for a reality check.
Russell darling you don’t mind that do you?
FrankNfrtr | June 25, 2010 at 2:15 pm
I’ve been told these aren’t real. Bought ‘em from a Dr.
This ruins things for me. I need to examine them in person for a reality check.
Russell darling you don’t mind that do you?
FrankNfrtr | June 25, 2010 at 2:16 pm
I did NOT tap that submit button twice.
Even though I am upset about the boobs.
Peanutty | June 25, 2010 at 3:23 pm
I think that you were Tommy Lee’ing your keyboard. Ooo
Grand Dragon | June 25, 2010 at 2:19 pm
i came
dpbefun | June 25, 2010 at 2:23 pm
I guess it’s the way the photo was taken but, she looks to be about 8 foot tall.
VandaL | June 25, 2010 at 2:46 pm
Obviously been stretched in this pic. Why? She’s fine as she is. Fuckin mags and their Photoshop happy editors. I’d fuckin ruin her for normal men.
Jack Armstrong "The All-American Boy" | June 25, 2010 at 6:34 pm
Jesus Christ, a little bit of knowledge makes everyone an expert. The illusion of height is the result of the picture being taken from about knee-level. It has nothing whatsoever to do with Photoshop.
Every time one of you nitwits sees something that doesn’t agree with your limited perception you invoke the name of Photoshop. Fer fucksake, get some imagination.
Jen | June 25, 2010 at 2:52 pm
im a straight female and i would love to squeeze her titties. i think i am obsessed with them.
Gen | June 25, 2010 at 3:40 pm
Don’t you have your own to squeeze?
real Chick | June 25, 2010 at 3:54 pm
It’s not the same. I shouldn’t have to explain that.
Peanutty | June 25, 2010 at 4:06 pm
Why? Are they fake?
Jack Armstrong "The All-American Boy" | June 26, 2010 at 1:38 am
Just say the word and I’ll squeeze those puppies for all you ladies. Girls, too, as long as you don’t tell mommy. Unless she wants hers squeezed too.
ryry | June 25, 2010 at 2:52 pm
was the 9/11 joke truly necessary? i’m disgusted…that was like a big deal for america, thats why we dont fuck around and let heavin honkers get covered like UK magazine bullshit, shoulda knocked down their towers.
Ron Burgandy's BallSack | June 25, 2010 at 3:16 pm
I would play with those funbags until my hands turned callous.
Cardinal Fang | June 25, 2010 at 3:23 pm
No nips or vag lips, no nudity,
Bored | June 25, 2010 at 3:37 pm
Great tits aside, is anybody else getting impatient with Fish’s delay in entertaining us with another post?
Wiley | June 25, 2010 at 3:39 pm
Big deal. Giant fake boobs. See them same boobs all the time on the waitresses at the local eatery. They probably would show them to me if I asked because they’re fake and not the real boobs that they never would think of showing. Isn’t it time to move away from fake boobs? A lot of us would like to see a variety of boob sizes and shapes but apparently all women have giant fake boobs now. Why support fight against breast cancer when women are spending their money on fake boobs that actually hinder detection of cancer?
dee | June 25, 2010 at 8:38 pm
This would make sense if her boobs were, in fact, fake. They are au naturale
Bob | June 27, 2010 at 1:05 am
Hey retard? They’re real.
Nameless | June 25, 2010 at 3:45 pm
Normally not into her. Nice bod…buttaface.
She does look hot here.
Whaa? | June 25, 2010 at 3:57 pm
@Nameless: I’m a pretty critical person, but I would not classify Perry as a butterface. I’m actually genuinely curious to know which faces Superficial readers are fond of.
Anonymous | June 25, 2010 at 10:04 pm
Yeah this chick’s face is so pretty she doesn’t feel the need to prop up her tits 24/7….oh wait…nevermind. Face it, people around here are talking about how beautiful her face is but how big her tits are.
Carolyn | June 25, 2010 at 3:59 pm
Butterface? I love the comments on this site which are probably from sub-human looking men. Exactly what are you hanging out with that makes Katy Perry look Butterface? I constantly hear moronic men on this site who worship big fake boobs and shaved pussies that make women look like pubescent girls.
frisbeeken | June 25, 2010 at 4:09 pm
Because a guy loves a shaved pussy he’s wrong? Personally I hate hair getting in the way when I’m bangin. When have guys been any different. You talk like it’s something we just got into a few weeks ago.
Randal(l) | June 25, 2010 at 4:29 pm
What’s wrong with liking shaved pooters. liking someone to shave their lady parts has nothing to do with wanting them to look like pubescent girls (90% of the time, that last 10% are weirdo’s or country music fans) People like shaved hoo-haws for the same reason they liked shaved armpits, legs and lips (I’ve seen more than my fair share of girls with a mustache that would make Tom Selleck vomit in shame).
Blech | June 25, 2010 at 10:55 pm
Shave your balls and we might have a deal.
Mr. Nice Guy | June 26, 2010 at 3:17 pm
You want me to spend money on a night out or a trip to Hawaii, better be Bald.
Nameless | June 25, 2010 at 5:59 pm
And yet you still keep coming back to read about what sub-human looking men have to say?
Get over yourself hypocrite.
casm-claw | June 25, 2010 at 4:25 pm
Katy Perry is PERFECT! HER LOOK, HER BREAST! YUM
Randal(l) | June 25, 2010 at 4:33 pm
I like men.
Randal(l) | June 25, 2010 at 5:32 pm
I like women…women with boobies…and a peni…I mean vagina!
Randal(l)
Akiyama | June 25, 2010 at 4:35 pm
Mmn.. boobs.
Carolyn | June 25, 2010 at 5:56 pm
Sorry, trimmed is one thing, but shaved is reducing women to looking like the children they once were. Everything has to be perfectt now and if it isn’t it’s time to get a new nose, new boobs, get rid of cellulite, wrinkles, etc. No one wants to look their age or to “age gracefully” as it was once called. If it’s beautiful who cares if it has a decent personality, is kind, or good to other people? Some of the comments here are hilarious, but for the rest “The Superficial” is the right description.
Mr. Nice Guy | June 25, 2010 at 7:59 pm
Wrong, Shaved is great for those of us that like to eat pussy. If you are with a women with a body like Katy Perry’s, trust me, you are not into 12 year old girls.
Nothing has to be perfect, but we get to choose who we have relationships with. I will take Curves and Bald Pussy every time.
Bob | June 27, 2010 at 1:08 am
So in other words, you’re fat and have a hairy pussy and guys don’t like fucking you.
Anon | June 27, 2010 at 7:09 pm
Gotta luv a b*tch who bags on anyone who posts on a celeb site like the Superficial; yet posts multiple times themselves.
Lonely internet surfing chicks are lonely when they surf the internet..
McFeely Smackup | June 29, 2010 at 12:43 pm
How exactly does shaving reduce women to looking like children? Is the presence of body hair the only thing that separates children from adults to you? I suppose you only like men who have full facial and back hair right? because shaving makes them look like little boys?
You’re fat and hairy, aren’t you?
The Man | June 25, 2010 at 7:01 pm
I would like to slide my throbbing member between those suckable funbags until I explode a load!
Cock Dr | June 25, 2010 at 7:14 pm
And what does Ms Perry get out of this selfish encounter (besides the obvious)?
A box of tissues & an affectionate pat on the head?
Mr. Nice Guy | June 25, 2010 at 7:54 pm
As good of time as I would have. Should be enough.
The Man | June 25, 2010 at 8:31 pm
I think when I slipped the pole between her lips, she would also explode!!
Sugar | June 25, 2010 at 7:53 pm
I’m not a fan of her music but that pic is absolutely gorgeous. Her body is amazing.
Randal | June 25, 2010 at 10:04 pm
very tasteful superior quality photo of a fine artist .
seductive yet coy !
FrankNfrtr | June 25, 2010 at 10:25 pm
Ask her to show them to us. For the fans. It’s a love thing, it’s not dirty. It’s ART!
Jack Armstrong "The All-American Boy" | June 26, 2010 at 1:45 am
Heyyy…it’s the GEN-YOU-WINE Randal. Where the fuck you been, dude. Been seeing lots of imposters using your name in vain. You all up on your meds and stuff? Earned yourself a 48 hour furlough? Good goin’, bud.
Now hurry up and say something asinine.
tc | June 26, 2010 at 3:48 am
Move on.
Nothing worth reading here…
Anon | June 26, 2010 at 6:50 am
Those are some saggy tits, I never saw the appeal of this chick. She’s fugly.
Mr. Nice Guy | June 26, 2010 at 3:19 pm
Those Tits are Perfect!
Darth | June 26, 2010 at 8:02 am
That’s quite shiny hair isn’t it?
Gando | June 26, 2010 at 8:07 am
It looks like a halo but we’d know better.
Jenny | June 26, 2010 at 8:57 pm
Im a straight girl, but I would definitely do some bad things to her. Her body is banging, but I would ask her to shower because Im from Ireland and know far too much about Russell Brands sex life, some of the girls he has been with, tramps is too kind a word.
Jenny | June 26, 2010 at 8:58 pm
Also, how in hell are her boobs saggy?
Anonymous | June 27, 2010 at 7:18 am
LOL–you must be a pathetic AAA cup size. Just use a couple band aids.
Jenny | June 27, 2010 at 4:48 pm
Im actually a 34E, thank you very much.
Anon | June 27, 2010 at 7:13 pm
Yeah…right. Pics or GTFO
FRIDAY99 | June 27, 2010 at 2:50 am
love that she constantly poses all tramp-style, yet judges gaga for her “scandy” video. kp sux
Darth | June 27, 2010 at 6:36 am
I wish i had the same hairdo!
ohreallyyy | June 27, 2010 at 3:33 pm
this was photoshopped…you can look at any recent pics of her and tell that her bottom half is much more curvy.
Frazer Potson | June 27, 2010 at 4:42 pm
She should do it on a California beach with lots of boys in the background and call them the Beach Boys then they could all sing California Girls then end up in jail for theft of intellectual property. Hmmm.
lacy | June 28, 2010 at 12:13 am
she’s beautiful, let her do what she wants.
gigi | June 28, 2010 at 2:20 pm
oh Katie…. you’ll never be Bettie Page my dear…. try as you may, not happening…. good effort tho
gigi | June 28, 2010 at 2:34 pm
oh, oops *Katy* whatev….
Mr. Nice Guy | June 29, 2010 at 12:42 am
Much Better than Bettie Page ever was.
meeeeaaaaah | June 29, 2010 at 1:32 am
Not topless, but huge tits
Jughead | June 29, 2010 at 2:06 am
Those are so photoshopped and small. Google How does Katy Perry measure up to see how shitty she is without photo shop. Most overrated pair in the world!
Kim Kardashian | June 29, 2010 at 1:00 pm
Looking good, Katy! Love u girl! Guys, check out my official site and comment! Thank you, love you all. xoxo Kim
Jennifer | June 30, 2010 at 2:02 am
I got that same Bettie Page wig that Katy is wearing.
tony | June 30, 2010 at 2:10 am
Katy’s got nice tits. But she has no hips and ass. So that doesn’t make her curvy to me, just somebody with big tits like Pamela Anderson. Plus, Katy has a rather ordinary looking face. Not a fantasy girl to me.