Katie Price is very lumpy

April 9th, 2007 // 80 Comments
katie-price-pregnant-02.jpg
Sorry, there are no Video results for this search.
Sorry, there are no Image results for this search.
Sorry, there are no News results for this search.

Comments (80)

  1. Poroleishon | April 9, 2007 at 3:13 pm

    WTF?

    Reply
  2. jazzdrummer420 | April 9, 2007 at 3:14 pm

    Damn!!!
    When will she just pop already, she looks like an oompa loompa ready to pop from the special blue candy

    Reply
  3. Gerald Tarrant | April 9, 2007 at 3:16 pm

    Jesus Christ, if kids don’t pop out of those tits too I will be shocked.

    Reply
  4. Lowlands | April 9, 2007 at 3:16 pm

    This girl has to do some pressing soon!

    Reply
  5. Poroleishon | April 9, 2007 at 3:16 pm

    Right… mmm.. I wonder if her belly will ever grow bigger than her breasts… Eww…

    Reply
  6. Dave Barnes | April 9, 2007 at 3:19 pm

    I am shocked that she is pregnant again after her first experience.

    Reply
  7. mane | April 9, 2007 at 3:21 pm

    3some? wtf UK trash as always…

    Reply
  8. my opinion | April 9, 2007 at 3:21 pm

    Whoever told pregnant women that veins, stretch marks and outy belly buttons make them look attractive is crazy. Cover up and spare us!!!!!

    Reply
  9. Lowlands | April 9, 2007 at 3:21 pm

    Is she pregnant of a set of triplets?

    Reply
  10. woodhorse | April 9, 2007 at 3:25 pm

    I would rather see another post on Brian Peppers than for you to keep giving press to a prostitute. So she bought big breasteses – Michael Jackson keeps chiseling off his face and you don’t throw up a post on him. You are wearing your brains in your underwear Fish.

    Reply
  11. HollyJ | April 9, 2007 at 3:26 pm

    I’m going to get pregnant and wear pants with holes in the back so I can show off those huge bulbous blue-with-blood pregnancy hemorroids.

    The public shouldn’t miss ANY of the joys of pregnancy, cuz it’s just all so sexy.

    Reply
  12. p911gt10c | April 9, 2007 at 3:28 pm

    man, that dude should not have long hair.

    Reply
  13. Lowlands | April 9, 2007 at 3:29 pm

    She got to have a great counterweight on the back to be able to walk up right.

    Reply
  14. hilaroushillary | April 9, 2007 at 3:32 pm

    She must have the strongest back muscles on the planet. dayumn.

    Reply
  15. saradevil | April 9, 2007 at 3:33 pm

    Chav.

    Reply
  16. Fifth Stooge | April 9, 2007 at 3:38 pm

    A toilet plunger could help her with her problem.

    Reply
  17. clarkehead | April 9, 2007 at 3:50 pm

    Good Christ, she looks like David Lee Roth.

    Reply
  18. libratem | April 9, 2007 at 4:06 pm

    Thesupafishal needs a copy editor or proofreader. Not to get pedantic on your ass, but

    “For some reason the UK is sending America all it’s useless celebrities”

    It’s ITS not it’s.

    And in that Alessandra Ambrosio piece today you talked about “Scientific America”. It’s Scientific American.

    signed,

    pain in the ass

    Reply
  19. schack | April 9, 2007 at 4:11 pm

    and this is the superficial, not the new york times

    Reply
  20. imran karim | April 9, 2007 at 4:43 pm

    the baby is going to get lost

    Reply
  21. WinnieZePooh | April 9, 2007 at 4:58 pm

    Is the chich in the red shirt behind her pregnant as well or did she just eat a small country…. perhaps she is paid to follow Jordan around and make her look smaller in comparison?

    Reply
  22. sympathee | April 9, 2007 at 5:43 pm

    She’s smuggling hams!

    Reply
  23. Giomon_Rocks | April 9, 2007 at 5:47 pm

    Uhhhhh…I am so confused and frankly, I am speechless…

    Reply
  24. Caoimhe | April 9, 2007 at 6:33 pm

    How did this bitch go from a name like Katie Price to Jordan? It seems like a far leap as far as nicknames go. And why is she famous?

    Reply
  25. Lizzikins | April 9, 2007 at 6:34 pm

    I thought pregnant women were supposed to glow…but not glow orange.
    She looks horrible!

    Reply
  26. Hemlock Queen | April 9, 2007 at 6:47 pm

    Um, yeah. We need another wannabe porn star skank like we need another Paris Hilton. Unless this trashball is the UK’s answer to that. Fuck!

    Reply
  27. Binky | April 9, 2007 at 7:12 pm

    - I agree with #23
    - I thought it was a joke previously, but I seem to have become a 9/11 Conspiracy guy – it’s sapping my sense of humor, and I don’t even know how change my fucking phaser to ‘stun’
    - Believe me it’s a tough topic to bring up at parties. I tried Saturday. Not the usual move. Prepare for ridicule.
    - Before any trash talk – go to Google video. Watch: “Improbable collapse”. Watch: “911 Mysteries”. Then hit the link. Don’t pass judgment until you’ve done that.
    - Watched CBS news today and Don Anus’ comments about a female basketball team seemed to be the top news in the US today. As Edward R. Murrow screamed in his grave.
    - I thought # 7 was weird, but why was there molten steel in the ruins for weeks when gravity supposedly brought it down ? – as fast as free fall.ETC !!!
    - If this treason is true – it’s like the original 9-11. We’re all Americans.
    -Six Canadians died in Afghanistan yesterday, And the strength of American democracy turns to the sturdy shoulders of Rosie O’Donnell !?
    (Crips -you can’t make this stuff up ?!)
    (Off topic ? And that Jordan – what a ho )

    Reply
  28. mika85 | April 9, 2007 at 7:41 pm

    superfish: do you just hate pregnant women for the simple fact that you’re so unfortunate-looking that you’ll never get a woman pregnant, ever?? or is there more to this story?

    BTW: all the hetero male posters on here are losers.

    and no, i am not fat and/or ugly. hey kids! check out my myspace!

    oh, and hey fellas! never EVER reproduce if you can’t even handle the sight of a pregnant woman without calling them fat.

    or at least if you can’t afford it.

    Reply
  29. Pointandlaugh | April 9, 2007 at 8:38 pm

    I wanna hit that large-n-in-charge broad in the red tablecloth.

    Reply
  30. Manistoned | April 9, 2007 at 8:39 pm

    ^ Don’t be so hard on yourself mika. Your fat and ugliness ranks up there with the worst of them.

    Reply
  31. Binky | April 9, 2007 at 8:57 pm

    TV news with ‘Binky’ (your internet pal)
    -Well after the holidays – Stewart avoids the Rosie topic completely. (But looked a bit stressed after holidays.)(And not very funny)
    Letterman: ‘Barrick wants The View canceled’ (Not exactly Che Guevara, but perhaps a burp)
    (And kudos to Google. The company that vowed “not to be evil.” Remember when that used to be so lame ?)

    Reply
  32. Caoimhe | April 9, 2007 at 9:03 pm

    #28–We don’t hate pregnant chicks, we hate pregnant chicks who dress like they have the body of a bikini model. Pregnancy may be beautiful to experience, but it’s not beautiful to see a pregnant chick in a revealing top that doesn’t cover anything.

    Reply
  33. Jordan | April 9, 2007 at 9:05 pm

    She still looks the same sexy katie. I am waiting for her pics after pregnancy… I am sure she will come back to her original hot shape.

    Reply
  34. ivve | April 9, 2007 at 9:06 pm

    Wow, busted face. Ignoring for a minute that her breasts make the rest of her body look ill-proportioned, what’s going on with her face/head? She would look a lot less unappealing with a breast reduction/implant removal, darker hair, less tan, and a good shower.

    Her pregnancy has nothing to do with what’s wrong with her; that belly just emphasizes how ridiculous her tits are.

    Reply
  35. grits2005 | April 9, 2007 at 9:10 pm

    #32 To each there own and as a mommy of three just because you have that opinion it doesnt mean u or even 10 like u share the same opinion as everyone in the world. I know tons of people that find pregnant women very sexy and think they should show off that cute preggo belly. What one person finds gross or ugly, 100 others find sexy and beautiful. Opinions are like assholes, everyones got one and there all different!!

    Reply
  36. Jordan | April 9, 2007 at 9:21 pm

    She still looks the same sexy hot bitch. I am waiting for her pics after pregnancy… I am sure she will come back to her original hot shape.

    Reply
  37. Binky | April 9, 2007 at 9:22 pm

    # 28,29,30,32,33,34 – you haven’t done your homework ! (Watch the videos (at #27)- Look up the word ‘Treason’ etc)
    The guys with jobs are going to be talking about this ladies. Sooner or later – to get an ‘in’ – you’ll have to know this shit around the water cooler.
    According to Cosmo – Trashing the NWO is the new black !

    Reply
  38. Rachelraquel | April 9, 2007 at 9:53 pm

    Note to Superfish guy,
    If there isn’t anything newsworthy, please don’t post anything at all…

    Reply
  39. Binky | April 9, 2007 at 10:51 pm

    Did you do your homework # 38 ?
    What’s you opinion ?

    Reply
  40. Binky | April 9, 2007 at 10:51 pm

    r*

    Reply
  41. Rachelraquel | April 9, 2007 at 10:57 pm

    Er, um…
    I didn’t actually read the story, therefore I have no opinion.
    I just saw some woman I didn’t know didn’t think it was news.
    Hold on, I shall read the thing.

    Reply
  42. Binky | April 9, 2007 at 10:57 pm

    It’s probably – thousand’s of times more important than the crap on your site – but you don’t care ?
    Please explain.

    Reply
  43. Rachelraquel | April 9, 2007 at 11:03 pm

    Oh did you mean on the google videos? I haven’t watched them. It sounds like a lot of work.
    But saying Cosmo said something will not likely convince me. I just today posted a Myspace blog about how Cosmo is for losers.
    well it was actually an analysis of their April 2007 cover and the contradictions about loving/hating men that are posed.
    Dammit. I’ll do my homework…

    Reply
  44. Rachelraquel | April 9, 2007 at 11:04 pm

    Wait, Binky. Before I watch said videos, can you please explain what it has to do with this unidentified pregnant woman?
    I am so very lost…

    Reply
  45. Binky | April 9, 2007 at 11:14 pm

    Well 44 – some people like to call it “reality” – but what do they know ?
    There are major problems in the world – and this is … the superficial
    (Cosmo comment was actually slightly sarcastic.-
    But I think we may have dated)

    Reply
  46. Rachelraquel | April 9, 2007 at 11:18 pm

    Well, yeah there are problems in the world! But people like you and me like to come to websites like this and talk about the unimportant things!
    And i caught the sarcasm, i was just promoting my new blog.
    And perchance we dated in another life or something. I doubt it though.
    Oh wait, I was supposed to be watching videos…

    Reply
  47. Rachelraquel | April 9, 2007 at 11:26 pm

    Well I didn’t realize watching some conspiracy videos would take 3 hours, so i guess it will be a this weekend thing. But just remember Blinky, in all respect and I am not trying to argue with you, but you are on this “superficial” site a lot too. So something about the unimportant aspects of life must entertain or at least amuse you to some degree.
    Just because people think about silly things like celeb gossip doesn’t mean they aren’t also thinking about important things that really affect life.

    Reply
  48. Rachelraquel | April 9, 2007 at 11:27 pm

    oops. you know I meant Binky.

    Reply
  49. guymorgan | April 9, 2007 at 11:29 pm

    #7

    Not that their is any American trash at all…

    dolt.

    Reply
  50. Binky | April 9, 2007 at 11:30 pm

    OK. 44
    -I’ve been here for a year or two at this site.
    Some people may suspect I’m not a complete moron.(the losers)
    - I’ve done the research for you on the 9/11 story thing over the last week or more.
    It seems the Twin tower buildings were blown up – not just hit by planes – by thermate that melted the steel,and that steel fumed for weeks underground after the murder… err event.
    No One seems to be able to contradict this event. Watch the vids. American media will not talk about it.
    (This is more important than Jordan)

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Name (Visible)
Email (Required, Not Visible)