Considering some of you would rather stab yourself in the eye than look at Megan Fox’s tattoos because you’re 90 and/or love men, I figured I’d post this pic of an ink-free Kat Von D demonstrating her new tattoo concealer for Sephora. Personally, I’m cool with her either way. Unless a woman’s tattoo tries to bite my penis off, who cares? Also, I hope my open-mindedness will be returned when they realize I have the Bat-symbol on my chest – in finger paint. That’s right, ladies, witty and an artist.
UPDATE: Reader Elena sent in a non-airbrushed pic of Kat with the concealer on, and uh, wow, that looks like an amazing product. If you like eczema.
Photos: Sephora
Fiona | August 12, 2009 at 4:00 pm
She’s promoting Photoshop for Sephora?
lizzy | August 12, 2009 at 4:00 pm
way too airbrushed to be taken seriously. like anything would ever conceal all her tattoos that well without the help of photoshop.
hmna | August 12, 2009 at 4:00 pm
I’m sure I’m not the first to wonder how many gallons of concealer it took.
Biggus Dickus | August 12, 2009 at 4:02 pm
Tattoo concealer? Isn’t that just called “Photoshop”?
Seriously… I’m not a fan of inked up women, but I think I’d be more turned off with a woman coated in pancake makeup.
DRUNKEN BROAD | August 12, 2009 at 4:02 pm
Without tats she looks just kinda plain. Like every other woman whose kinda cute…sort of boring
DRUNKEN BROAD | August 12, 2009 at 4:02 pm
Without tats she looks just kinda plain. Like every other woman whose kinda cute…sort of boring
eat me screaming | August 12, 2009 at 4:02 pm
so who was the lucky bastard that got the job of rubbing all that on her naked body??
ROUGH Daddy | August 12, 2009 at 4:04 pm
I dont people hating tats either, basically shes telling you theres no holes barred…
ROUGH Daddy | August 12, 2009 at 4:05 pm
(get)
NOT STUPID | August 12, 2009 at 4:06 pm
KAT VON D’S NEW TATTOO CONCEALER A.K.A. PHOTOSHOP.
IDIOTS | August 12, 2009 at 4:07 pm
You guys are morons.. RIGHT AWAY “”OUU PHOTOSHOP”.
I actually seen the episode of her show where she does the photoshoot.. They clearly show VIDEO of her with the concealer on and she looks the same.. Obviously they just put a shit load on.. STFU if you don’t know anything. kthx.
Blubble | August 12, 2009 at 4:08 pm
She actually looks decent for a change. The one time I saw that stupid ass show, there was some friend of hers on that was amazingly hot, except for being covered in a bunch of ugly ass tattoos. What a waste.
jlylec | August 12, 2009 at 4:10 pm
either way this proves how stupid tattoos are…she looks about 80x better without those shitty tats. still not great though. fat and small tits.
Willie Dixon | August 12, 2009 at 4:11 pm
Not a tattoo hater, but she looks way better without them.
Old Gay George | August 12, 2009 at 4:11 pm
I’m ninety and like men….WhooooHoooo!
Oliver Chester The Molester Lester | August 12, 2009 at 4:13 pm
Why have tattoos if you are going to conceal them?
gotmilk? | August 12, 2009 at 4:13 pm
11, ok so let’s say they didn’t use photoshop to get rid of the tattoos – they still retouched the photo big time. there is no way in hell she’d come off not looking like an embalmed corpse with all that make up caked all over her.
put it in the pooper | August 12, 2009 at 4:20 pm
what ever happened to her friend Pixie. I wanted to do dirty, nasty things to that girl….and video it……then show it to my mom.
Charles Few | August 12, 2009 at 4:21 pm
I hate to say “photoshop” but between all the work she’s had done and the obvious PHOTOSHOP she’s barely recognizable. Kinda sad really, I liked the original.
Nameless | August 12, 2009 at 4:24 pm
Definitely more than just that concealor at work here. Some Hollywood lighting and Photoshop too.
She is also a crappy shade of blonde these days too.
gavin | August 12, 2009 at 4:24 pm
desperate white trash fame whore with or without tatts
gil | August 12, 2009 at 4:31 pm
looks better without the ugly trashy tattoos.
she should get them removed
shankyouverymuch | August 12, 2009 at 4:31 pm
You mean to tell me that this pretty girl is what’s under all that garbage graffiti & chicken scratching!!!!!!
So sad to see a good looking person throw their looks away with a bunch of self mutilating, gross skin-paint -
minty | August 12, 2009 at 4:32 pm
she’s dyed her hair blonde since this shoot.
Deacon Jones | August 12, 2009 at 4:32 pm
I’d say the tatts would probably increase my hard-on % at least 3-5 % due to the trashiness factor.
Carley | August 12, 2009 at 4:32 pm
I love tattoos but hate Megan Fox’s tattoos, that doesn’t mean I’m a prude or whatever. Her tattoos just doesn’t appeal to me. What evs.
I love Kat’s tattoos though.
will | August 12, 2009 at 4:37 pm
This bitch’s voice is like nails on a chalkboard….and the goth thing is SOOO 1999.
Corbett | August 12, 2009 at 4:37 pm
I certainly don’t mind tattoo’s on a woman, but only if they actually mean something. A symbol, not a picture. Which is why woman with a lot of tattoo’s tend to be more attractive, than a chick who *only* has a tramp-stamp. If a girl has loads of tattoo’s, they’re more likely to actually mean something, rather than the girl who just gets one “because it’s hot”.
I admit, I have a preference for girls without any ink. But an attractive woman will still be attractive, with or without tattoo’s. But if you’re *not* inherently attractive… I might advise avoiding tattoo’s :P
me | August 12, 2009 at 4:38 pm
Its kinda sad to see that she could have been an attracitve woman, instead, she looks like a tramp, the tats will look really stupid 10 to15 years from now. especially the ones on her head,
Watched_the_show_LA_INK | August 12, 2009 at 4:44 pm
I watched the LA Show they did this on.
Her “make-up” concealer was in fact used. We watched them apply it.
Sure… photoshop was used to slip her stomach area down but that’s it.
JJ | August 12, 2009 at 4:44 pm
Ha did someone actually call her fat? Have you ever actually seen a naked woman? Gain some freakin perspective
havoc | August 12, 2009 at 4:46 pm
Bangable either way…..
I don’t mind playing pin the jizz on the tat.
.
Turth Hurts More than Needles | August 12, 2009 at 4:46 pm
Tattoos are for those craving attention. Unfortunately, the attention the tattoos will 10 years after injected in their skin is vastly different than the attention the tattos will get when the ink, and the skin it is injected into, is young and fresh.
Of course, those who get these tattoos will argue this point with you without concession.
No worry. But. Just. Sit. Back. And. Wait.
Eddy | August 12, 2009 at 4:47 pm
@ 21: Kat Von D is not white trash… she’s not white! Mexican trash??
@13: If you think she’s fat I feel sorry for you. Every woman must look like a whale to you.
Sadie | January 13, 2012 at 2:27 am
She is not even 1 oz. Mexican. She is white. A tiny bit of Italian and tiny bot of Spanish with a lot of German. White.
beavis | August 12, 2009 at 4:50 pm
wrinkled tattoos……… he..he..he
McHuge | August 12, 2009 at 4:53 pm
@11 – sorry some of us have better things to do that to watch a show about people getting gigantic, tacky tattoos put on them. Either way if you think the above picture wasn’t photoshopped, color corrected and cleaned up before it was finished and shipped to the magazines, you’re dreaming.
This chick used to be kind of hot, but whatever she’s done to her face lately, wether it’s surgery or botox needs to stop…
John | August 12, 2009 at 4:55 pm
Kat’s parents are of Italian and German heritage, lived in Argentina,moved to Mexico where Kat grew up.
- White Trash
Tapeworm | August 12, 2009 at 4:56 pm
@33, you’re right. There’s a 48-year-old woman on my block who’s heavily tattooed, she walks around SoCal bundled up like a damn mummy.
I got to talking to her about it (nice gal actually) and she said “I look like a total jackass who was screaming for attention if I go to the pool or the beach”.
Don’t worry, only another 40 years or so to pay for that mistake. It’ll go quickly.
Queenmab | August 12, 2009 at 4:58 pm
#13 are you serious? What are you 12? She’s fat? Grow up.
ralphy boy | August 12, 2009 at 4:58 pm
the real Kat Von Dipshit has quite a big gut…yuk……. google it
Clamhammer | August 12, 2009 at 5:04 pm
so much cuter without. 9 out of 10 dentists boners agree
jim | August 12, 2009 at 5:06 pm
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTTTTTT AND UGLY whore, I love her without the tats though!
Mary | August 12, 2009 at 5:31 pm
#21 b4 u go trashing someone find out what ethnicity they are..She is not WHITE so therefore cannot be considered “White trash”
Sadie | January 13, 2012 at 2:29 am
She is white. Look it up.
tunaman | August 12, 2009 at 5:35 pm
“Why have tattoos if you are going to conceal them?”
Because she was doing an ad for some perfume company, and the two types of perfume are “Heaven” and “Hell” (or something like that). She wore her tats for the “Hell” shoot, but had them put concealer on for the “Heaven” shoot.
And yes, as others have said, this whole thing was on an episode of her show (the only one I’ve ever seen, actually). Certainly there’s Photoshopping going on, but the tats were covered with makeup.
Pistol | August 12, 2009 at 5:42 pm
This is what she actually looked like without the photoshopping………I’m assuming all the red is where she DOESN’T have tattoos and therefore didn’t need the concealer.
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_CNe_Ww09xTo/Sf8s-MpNmSI/AAAAAAAAm_M/SjiQp9RIajk/s400/DSCN1382.JPG
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_CNe_Ww09xTo/Sf8s-BwTOxI/AAAAAAAAm_E/S6AWIUGCA_A/s1600-h/DSCN1388%5B1%5D.JPG
tunaman | August 12, 2009 at 5:53 pm
“Why have tattoos if you are going to conceal them?”
Because she was doing an ad for some perfume company, and the two types of perfume are “Heaven” and “Hell” (or something like that). She wore her tats for the “Hell” shoot, but had them put concealer on for the “Heaven” shoot.
And yes, as others have said, this whole thing was on an episode of her show (the only one I’ve ever seen, actually). Certainly there’s Photoshopping going on, but the tats were covered with makeup.
tunaman | August 12, 2009 at 5:54 pm
“Why have tattoos if you are going to conceal them?”
Because she was doing an ad for some perfume company, and the two types of perfume are “Heaven” and “Hell” (or something like that). She wore her tats for the “Hell” shoot, but had them put concealer on for the “Heaven” shoot.
And yes, as others have said, this whole thing was on an episode of her show (the only one I’ve ever seen, actually). Certainly there’s Photoshopping going on, but the tats were covered with makeup.
George | August 12, 2009 at 6:28 pm
“I actually seen the episode of her show where she does the photoshoot.. They clearly show VIDEO of her with the concealer on and she looks the same.”
So did I. You could clearly see a shadow of every one of her tattoos under the “concealer.” Along with a totally different body than shown in the photo above.
Photoshop was heavily used for both the tattoo shadows and to slim her/curve her where they thought it was needed. The concealer doesn’t claim to totally hide tattoos, merely to make them less noticeable.
Mike Walker | August 12, 2009 at 6:32 pm
Did I mention my fondness for young Thai boys?
Hmmmm, where’s my lobster bib…
meh | August 12, 2009 at 6:39 pm
I bet it looks great when it start to melt off. Who cares about her, just looks at that great wallpaper, I’ve got the same wallpaper in my house.