Jordan Shows Boobs, Hides Boobs

February 1st, 2006 // 71 Comments
Posted Under:
Men Air Jordan 2009 Shoes | replica mens shoes blog
Jordan Shoes: A quality brand « can I wear .it?
Athletic Jordan Shoes in Trendy » Blog Archive » Air Jordan IX ...
Jordan Shoes Wallpaper – Jordan X | Shoes
Dwight Howard Trade Rumors: Will "Superman" Team Up with Rose?
Nike recognized his “deity” potential in 1984 and his Air Jordan shoes sold nearly $130 million that year. Although it is unlikely that any other player in Chicago will ever overtake Jordan’s legendary status, his legacy is finally being challenged ...
Kicks: Air Jordan 2012
Today, Jordan Brand, a division of NIKE, Inc., unveiled the AIR JORDAN 2012, the 27th shoe in the AIR JORDAN franchise. The all-new AIR JORDAN 2012 is designed to encourage today’s athletes to rethink performance. This year’s model builds upon the ...

Comments (71)

  1. prideofchucky | February 1, 2006 at 3:33 am

    errhh, I’m sorry- you were saying something?….

    Reply
  2. Nikk The Templar | February 1, 2006 at 3:52 am

    Oh, that wacky Katie Price. What article of clothing will she pop out of next?

    Reply
  3. Shaun | February 1, 2006 at 4:22 am

    She looks huffed out from the night before.

    Reply
  4. BlackMamba | February 1, 2006 at 4:48 am

    WHO IS THIS PERSON???? why does he seem to start appearing more frequently in your coverage????????

    Reply
  5. mylittleporny | February 1, 2006 at 5:23 am

    Is it me? Or can other people see a hint of a penis in that revolting little skirt too?

    Reply
  6. SoulHonky | February 1, 2006 at 5:25 am

    I’m with Kobe on this one. This broad is more random than the Brooke Burke/Burger King campaign. Covering bimbos that couldn’t even get cast on Baywatch seems a bit excessive. Whereas Lisa Loeb stripping to a thong for attention is sad, Jordan is just pointless.

    Reply
  7. AmberDextrose | February 1, 2006 at 6:01 am

    I feel ashamed and embarassed. Not because I’m from the country of this Spawn of Santa but for all those tired years of not realising what you guys cut to straight away:

    The fact that this bitch is in fact a dog. I mean, hell yes, we all knew she barked like Tom Cruise when offered a bone; that she was barking full stop.

    But damn it, why did it take until now to notice those veiny arms, that manly stance, that… bulge! Surely the makeup alone should’ve alerted me.

    I’m just surprised that s/he chose to be known as “Jordan”. Why not Susan or Dorothy or Madame Mimi?

    Reply
  8. Kim | February 1, 2006 at 8:22 am

    Who is she???
    I don’t watch porn, is she a porn star?

    Her boobs look like they are just trying to come up for some air!

    Reply
  9. gossipmonger | February 1, 2006 at 8:27 am

    k, these pics just made me laugh… she seems to find it quite funny too, according to pic # 2.. and when I say she finds it funny, I mean in a “teehee, that nipslip was perfect, looked almost like a real accident… gossip site/mags, here I come again” kinda way

    Reply
  10. mronceler | February 1, 2006 at 8:48 am

    I like her. She seems nice. Also talented. Even if she IS a man, she’s got a great rack. You have to admit.

    Reply
  11. kylieer | February 1, 2006 at 9:04 am

    PLLLLLLLLLLLEEAAAASSSEEEE don’t start repoting on THIS ONE!! She gets enough coverage in the UK…and she has not actually DONE ANYTHING! ughhhhhh

    Reply
  12. talnik | February 1, 2006 at 9:18 am

    Who is this woman and why is she so ugly?

    Reply
  13. reesestet | February 1, 2006 at 9:18 am

    I am the third person to post this question: WHO THE HECK IS JORDAN?????!!!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  14. bigdog | February 1, 2006 at 9:26 am

    I think its funny that guys would look at this sight and want real news the reason you look at a site like this is to see hot women. If this is the same girl Jordan I think it is she was in Playboy. To the guys that don’t like these type of pictures go watch your broke back mountain with your boyfriend and get a drink with two straws and have fun.

    Reply
  15. Lavis | February 1, 2006 at 9:32 am

    If this “woman” didn’t have those incredibly large implants, she would have nothing. Nothing but an ill-fitting bustier!

    Reply
  16. julema | February 1, 2006 at 9:39 am

    Transexuel can have large implants too…they can wear extra make up too… she really look like a man who got implants, make up, hair done, …

    Reply
  17. PapaHotNuts | February 1, 2006 at 9:41 am

    For those of you who don’t who Jordan is, she used to play for the Chicago Bulls. You knew her/him back then as Michael Jordan. Fed up with basketball, he received a sex change and dropped his first name. That’s why she has a few masculine features. C’mon people- keep up with the times!!

    Reply
  18. Miss Diamond | February 1, 2006 at 9:52 am

    Jordan is a glamour model (ie she poses naked) who married an ex z-list celebrity and writes tell all books and hates Victoria Beckham because she so longs to be her.

    They’re the cheap version of Posh and Becks, Dosh and Pecks.

    Except she’s useless, talentless and completely and utterly pointless. I agree with whoever said not to report on her. She’s not interesting.

    Reply
  19. Lil Timmy | February 1, 2006 at 10:01 am

    Jordan (Katie Price) is the UK version of Pam Anderson, if Pam hadn’t done any TV shows or movies.

    Reply
  20. Kitchy | February 1, 2006 at 10:22 am

    I see an Adam’s apple…Hey, I’m just saying…

    Reply
  21. ESQ | February 1, 2006 at 10:56 am

    Slag, get a top that fits. She is also WAY too tan for a Brit.

    Reply
  22. HollyJ | February 1, 2006 at 10:59 am

    I’m with 5 & 20: I’m not SAYING it’s a man. But I definitely see what COULD BE a pecker in the last shot, and there’s no question it has a big adam’s apple.

    I agree that we should stop covering it. This is a nobody to anyone not living on the British Isles. ‘May as well report on the bag lady on the corner, for all the rest of the world cares.

    Reply
  23. SMF121490 | February 1, 2006 at 10:59 am

    TRASH! Simply Trash.

    Reply
  24. LaydeeBug | February 1, 2006 at 11:14 am

    OH MY GAWD!!!!! That is a dude! What the F##K is going on here? Mike honey, you needs to know that less is more. Less make up, less tanning salon, less moustache, oops. Lawd have mercy, get me a barf bag. ughkkk, too late!

    Reply
  25. Whatup | February 1, 2006 at 11:28 am

    Boobs fake but I think that lump under her dress is real.

    Reply
  26. HeeHaw | February 1, 2006 at 11:34 am

    All the focus on the adam’s apple, the manly face, the penis poking through the skirt, blah blah blah I mean…what about that bird’s nest perched on top of her head??

    Reply
  27. ESQ | February 1, 2006 at 11:40 am

    That is just got fucked in the ass looking hair.

    Reply
  28. Larry | February 1, 2006 at 11:45 am

    Oh, come on people. Leave her alone. She’s a typical B-list Brit “celebrity,” in that she looks like the mongoloid half-sister of the American glamour girl, and no one outside of the UK has ever heard of her before.

    US glamour girls look like Barbie dolls, and Brit glamour girls always look like they are on welfare. And the news in that is … ?

    Reply
  29. mags | February 1, 2006 at 11:48 am

    Is she pulling them back out in the last shot?

    Reply
  30. SuperSpence | February 1, 2006 at 11:59 am

    I’ve always considered breasts to be God’s greatest gift to the human species. Please stop making me question this cherished assumption of mine.

    Reply
  31. Darby | February 1, 2006 at 12:18 pm

    Who is this chick and why do we care???

    Reply
  32. Mary45 | February 1, 2006 at 12:37 pm

    We shouldn’t care. She is a “page 3″ model from the UK who decided her tits weren’t big enought so she got implants 3 times. Now she is a doulbe FF! She auditioned for Baywatch and didn’t make it (that should tell you something right there). She’s posed for Playboy, and has a kid that is blind. She is now trying to launch a “singing” career. Now no more of this skank please.

    Reply
  33. mary | February 1, 2006 at 12:40 pm

    Why do people keep claiming Jordan is really a man? lol

    I hope she retires the Jordan image soon.

    Reply
  34. xd | February 1, 2006 at 1:14 pm

    WOWOWOWOWOWOW she is so FUCKING HOT and pretty!!!!!! god Jordan’s definately one of the hottest girls on the planet, you people who critizice her are a bunch of hypocrite moralist fucks… if you don’t think she’s hotter than hell then either you are gay or you are a fucken jealous woman.

    Reply
  35. M@ce | February 1, 2006 at 1:28 pm

    No talent? How in the world can anyone in their right mind claim this ‘shim’ has no talent? S(he) is a veritable Einstein of tittie tucking. Have you ever tried stuffing a bowling ball into a sandwich bag? Not too bloody easy. She is the Michelangelo of mellon mashing, the DaVinci of the D-cup… I think you get the idea. S(he)’s effing brilliant.

    Reply
  36. ohyeah | February 1, 2006 at 1:57 pm

    #34 are you on medication? If not, please see your doctor. I am a woman, and no, I would never want to look like that. With you as the rare exception, I doubt anyone of either sex would want that. Maybe Rupaul… They could start a really interesting drag show in Vegas.

    Reply
  37. Hohlraum | February 1, 2006 at 2:03 pm

    mmmm boooooooobies.

    Reply
  38. Connoriscool | February 1, 2006 at 2:04 pm

    Her face is as nasty as Fergie’s from the Black Eyed Peas.
    That is one ugly mugged gal.
    I think I saw an outfit like that on a hooker down on Eight Mile Road.

    Reply
  39. amma | February 1, 2006 at 2:25 pm

    ….Hallo boob-fairy! At least I know where the rest of mine went! Geeeezus…who is she anyway?

    Reply
  40. Tracy | February 1, 2006 at 2:30 pm

    Satin bustier? That’s sooooo ’97.

    Peek-a-boo nipple? Never goes out of style!

    Reply
  41. Solaera | February 1, 2006 at 2:40 pm

    Celebrity unworthiness aside, I think she’s pretty. Okay, a bit too obvious and overdone perhaps, but pretty. She reminds me of Gina Gerschon.

    Reply
  42. Gritty Kitty | February 1, 2006 at 2:43 pm

    er, I’d hit it!

    Reply
  43. BufordTJustice | February 1, 2006 at 2:51 pm

    You have to love a shot like that .. wasn’t this the one on Rockstar : INXS ? and I agree .. Buldge, Adams Apple, Large HOOOOOTERS .. tough call ..

    Reply
  44. HughJorganthethird | February 1, 2006 at 3:57 pm

    I know how he/she feels. I’m always having to tuck my dong back up inside the leg of my pants. what a pain.

    Reply
  45. Popz9 | February 1, 2006 at 4:01 pm

    ummm… who is this chick???

    Reply
  46. jknUK | February 1, 2006 at 4:07 pm

    Jordan aka Katie Price is a British glamour model with 2 kids and her own TV show, its like the UK version of NewlyWeds. Underneath all that make up she is pretty and a damn good mum. She has shit loads of money and if she heard u lot bitching she’d probably kick your ass!!

    Reply
  47. A2Bcom | February 1, 2006 at 4:24 pm

    HAHA, not sure what all the fuss is about. If Katie wants huge hooters then so be it. Kind of makes me appreciate the girl with a natural rack. She looked way better when she was natural back in the page 3 days, but I still like her. Cute girl.

    Reply
  48. Mikaesu | February 1, 2006 at 5:35 pm

    So nasty D: That corset doesn’t even look nice.

    Reply
  49. JTTenuf4Me | February 1, 2006 at 5:50 pm

    Can Superficial please stop reporting on wanna-be British celebrities. And if you want to include Gwynneth Paltrow in that mix as well, that’s fine by me.

    Reply
  50. andrewthezeppo | February 1, 2006 at 5:57 pm

    Isn’t this site for news on celebrities, not ugly british chicks with strech marks and fake boobs?

    Reply
1 2

Leave a Comment

Name (Visible)
Email (Required, Not Visible)