Joanna Krupa’s nude PETA ad worked

December 1st, 2009 // 226 Comments

Because they didn’t make it to actually save animals, PETA’s latest ad featuring Joanna Krupa has already managed to piss off the Catholic Church. Fox 411 reports:

“The fact is that cats and dogs are a lot safer in pet stores than they are in the hands of PETA employees,” Catholic League President Bill Donohue said in a statement. “Moreover, pet stores don’t rip off Christian iconography and engage in cheap irreligious claims.”
“PETA is a fraud,” Donohue continued. “It also has a long and disgraceful record of exploiting Christian and Jewish themes to hawk its ugly services. Those who support this organization sorely need a reality check. They also need a course in Ethics 101.”
Krupa issued a statement responding to the Catholic League, saying: “As a practicing Catholic, I am shocked that the Catholic League is speaking out against my PETA ads. I’m doing what the Catholic Church should be doing, working to stop senseless suffering of animals, the most defenseless of God’s creation.”

Of course, this is all just smoke and mirrors to cover up the real travesty here: Nipple airbrushing. Seriously, are you kidding me, PETA? Joanna Krupa basically has a Crucifix jutting out of her vulva, but even after Keeley Hazell, a nipple would be too much? Fuck this. I’m going outside to punt Pomeranians.

Photos: PETA

  1. Que

    Que peta go etinct like dinosar.

  2. d-money



  3. everyonepoops

    Excommunicate her! Draw and quarter her!

  4. ashley

    The Catholic church considers spaying and neutering pets as a “cruel and ugly” practice…

    I don’t give a crap about PETA and I sure as heck won’t stop eating meat over an ad, but being against spaying and neutering your pets is a ridiculous reason to call the organization ugly and cruel. It’s ok to molest boys, but don’t neuter your dog!

  5. Liz

    See? I would think with dwindling attendance to the Catholic Church, they’d be sending her a Thank You letter and a muffin basket.

  6. Leonidas

    I beg to differ with Mr PETA. The most defenseless of God’s creations are altar boys–which the Catholic church knows only too well.

  7. Zifnab

    Phil Donahue is to the Catholic Church what a leech is to my penis. A persistent appendage existing solely for its own gratification and otherwise having absolutely no relation to the membership.

    Fucking probably can’t even make it into an open Mass without bursting into flames.

  8. Parker

    Does this mean crucifixes are the biblical version of chastity belts? I always thought angels wore long robes. If this is what they look like then maybe I should look into this catholic church stuff. If angels are like nuns with wings then that means they only have anal sex. That is so cool.

  9. aprilstp

    This ad was not about saving animals. PETA knew this would disgust Christians, because they are disgusting. Wish they could save animals without being such assholes to other humans.

  10. $30 nike jordan prada timberland supra,lacoste,gucci shoes


    $30 coogi jeans,armani,Crow Holder,D&G,Evisu jeans,Diesel,Christian Audigier,Rock,True Religion,Affliction,Ed Hardy,RMC jeans etc

    $35 Coogi,Crow Holder,D&G,Evisu,Bape,BBC,Diesel,Christan Audigier,Rock, True Religion, Affliction, Ed Hardy, RMC hoodies

    $15 Michael Jackson, Armani t-shirts,Affliction,Coogi,Ed hardy,LRG,Crown older,Evisu,G-star,Polo,Christian Audigier t-shirts

    $40 ed hardy ,Coogi ,Christian Audigier ,Gucci Hoodies

    Top quality! Free shipping!Free returns!No any extra cost!

    Please visit ——————————

  11. Polk

    I’d like to nail her to the cross, if you catch my drift!!!

  12. timbo

    Is her left foot standing on a dogs head?

  13. Harold^Sick

    I beg to differ. Technically, the most defenseless of “God’s creations” is man. Man, unlike all other animals, has virtually no biological defense mechanisms.

    I’m surprised PETA and the Catholic League are at odds. One would think crazies would all band together but, then again, they are crazy…

    Now, don’t get me wrong, I’m all about naked models jabbering away while I look at their boobs, but this is a bit absurd. No?

  14. SO RIGHT

    I’ve looked at the ads and I still have no idea why they used crosses or rosaries. It makes no sense at all. They could have just stuck with the halo and wings and called it a day. I support a lot of what PETA stands for, especially their message to spay and neuter AND to NOT purchase dogs from breeders or pet stores (since there are a bazillion and one dogs already living who don’t have homes, food OR water), but the use of the crucifix is senseless and offensive. Be careful, PETA… you don’t want to offend your supporters.

  15. Jim

    “PETA knew this would disgust Christians, because they are disgusting.”

    Christians are disgusting. Just look at that fat fuck Rick Warren, who refused to speak out against the proposed Ugandan law sanctioning the death penalty for homosexuals. Because the christian movement in Uganda supports the law.

  16. GlennFrank

    Fuck Catholics & Fuck Peta.

    They both suck donkey dick

  17. kenortega

    This ads are flimsy excuses for skanks to get naked, i already know but they need to get better looking skanks that this one. The whole picture looks retarded.

  18. Harry Doyle

    The ad says “Never Buy” I guess PETA is against an open market and would like more people to be put out of work. Look, I am as sensitive as the next when someones animal is mistreated. But, damn, people these are just animals. There is no need to keep cats and dogs alive that will never be adopted and are mangy and dirty. Just go buy a pure breed and get a better animal. It is a waste to send tax dollars to local shelters to house animals that are next to worthless.

  19. James

    Man I don’t know Photoshop very well but I could have probably done a better job masking her in to that picture.

  20. blt

    defenseless creatures, eh? I’m pretty a german shepherd or a bear could take down any of PETA’s activists

  21. angelchrome

    I can’t believe I’m saying this, but I’m with the Catholics here. That’s how nasty PETA is.

  22. mohammed

    Instead of using a crucifix and messing with catholics, if peta had any real balls, they would have used little pictures of mohammed’s face to cover the girl’s nips & hooha – i betcha that would have gotten them a sh!t ton more publicity than this crap.

  23. Vince Lombardi

    Bummer of a tattoo.

  24. Shep

    No fair says the Catholic Church, we made up these figures first so only we’re allowed to use them to make money off the people, not you!

  25. most of us think, if they were looking for attention, whether it be positive or negative, they got it.


    god how many times does PETA have to put out a stupid fucking ad with a naked woman?

    and now the cross controversy — jesus christ (no pun intended) …so fucking stupid!!! those dogs look retarded as she irish step dancing above them in the buff. this ad is so pathetic!

    and joanna joanna… what a sad career… posing for playboy and comparing it to the work of kate winselt, dancing with the stars and PETA ads.

    she may have a beautiful body (which is awfully photoshopped, why photoshop such a nice body?), but anyway, bitch needs to get her act together.

  27. Drew

    Terrible foreground removal.

    I’m with the Catholics here (never thought I’d say that.) Shit, I’d rather be Hitler’s dedicated mustache comber then be associated with PETA.

  28. DUH

    The problem isn’t the message. The problem is she’s posing naked with Christian imagery.

  29. bribios

    I don’t like Bill Donohue at all, but I have to agree with him on this one. Not a very classy move on PETAS part. Then again, the only reason they seem to exist anymore is to create controversy.

    I think the whole thing he is referring to about animal safety is in regards to PETA euthanizing a third of the pets they claim to rescue. There are other, better animal rights organizations out there that don’t bother to kill animals, but they don’t have the money/celebrity support/PR department PETA has.

    That bit about the Pope denouncing neutering your pets is pretty retarded though.

  30. SO RIGHT

    # 18 — YOU are an idiot. I’ve had two rescue dogs from the pound (mixed breeds) and they are the smartest dogs I’ve ever encountered. Often times purebreds are finely inbred and have a lot of issues. DO NOT buy from breeders or pet stores or any of the other facilities that encourage more dogs on the planet for profit. Only if you need a working dog or a specific hunting dog should you go to a breeder.

  31. Harry Doyle


    You didn’t state any reason why I am an “idiot”. You got 2 dogs? Good for you. I am glad that I helped keep them alive with my tax dollars till you decided you were ready for the responsibility. If we got rid of all the animals in these pounds then there would not be the excess you are having a hard time with.



    PETA actually kills more like 97% of all the animals they take in. I believe one year, they took in about 6,000 animals and adopted out about a dozen,

    I’m anti-catholic league, but even more anti-PETA.

  33. Curses

    I’d like to know what those wings are made out of. If fur “looks better on animals,” why not feathers? Or do birds not count to PETA? And why does it look like she’s stepping on puppy heads? I didn’t know crush porn aficionados were such a key demographic for this campaign.

    P.S. Mutts as a population are healthier than purebreds, even though individuals (especially the mistreated ones that are likely to end up in shelters) of course will have their unique health issues. Unfortunately, the same selective (in)breeding that yields desirable traits also leads to a lot of unintended problems. Great Danes, for example, are bred to be massive, but the huge size puts a lot of extra strain on the heart; they frequently die rather young of cardiac complications.

  34. SO RIGHT

    Because # 31 — This is a total LIE:

    “Just go buy a pure breed and get a better animal”.

    Furthermore, there are millions of dogs running around the earth already. There is no reason to breed MORE! Perhaps you should take a look at some of the disgusting breeding purebred puppy mills out there before you tell people to use breeders:

  35. saywha?

    that’s seriously the hottest nude peta ad i have ever seen.

  36. saywha?

    “28. DUH – December 1, 2009 4:41 PM

    The problem isn’t the message. The problem is she’s posing naked with Christian imagery.”

    oh heaven forbid if someone depicted an image of nudity with a christian theme…

    that’s why people hate christians so much: they’re such hypocrites (especially when it comes to sexuality).

  37. saywha?

    “28. DUH – December 1, 2009 4:41 PM

    The problem isn’t the message. The problem is she’s posing naked with Christian imagery.”

    funny how the vatican is so offended by this display of christian nudity but the sistine chapel is just fine & dandy. hypocrites…

  38. Randal(l)

    PETA doesn’t give two shits about any of the animals they claim they rescue. They support terrorist and make over $30 million a year. Here is an audit of Peta’s record for the last 10 years

    Year Received Adopted Killed Transferred % Killed % Adopted
    2008 2,216 7 2,124 34 95.8 0.32
    2007 1,997 17 1,815 35 90.9 0.85
    2006 3,061 12 2,981 46 97.4 0.39
    2005 2,165 146 1,946 69 89.9 6.74
    2004 2,655 361 2,278 1 85.8 13.60
    2003 2,224 312 1,911 1 85.9 14.03
    2002 2,680 382 2,298 2 85.7 14.25
    2001 2,685 703 1,944 14 72.4 26.18
    2000 2,681 624 2,029 28 75.7 23.27
    1999 1,805 386 1,328 91 73.6 21.39

    I hate to agree with these looney boy hungry Catholic Leaguers, but I don’t have any way to finish that sentence


  39. Joel

    Curses… I was wondering the same thing! Were large birds donating those feathers? If they were fallen, than so was my fur! If they are fake (bs) then so is my fox.

    So very ironic, over-zealots ironicasizing themselves. Classic.

    MAAD – We got these causal mothers drunk as crap and let them drive to show everyone exactly how dangerous it really is!

  40. Randal(l)

    oops, I forgot this site doesn’t allow spaces so most of that last post didn’t make any sense. Point is, the killed over 95% of the animals they took in in 2008 and only had 0.32% adopted…Also While I still hate to agree with the Pederast..I mean catholic league, #38 there’s a huge difference between the Michelangelo’s Sistine Chapel and Tits McShaved Snatch fucking herself with a cross to say be nice to puppies. See what you made me do, you made me agree with NAMBLA…I mean the catholic league…I feel so dirty


  41. honeybee

    wait, are those REAL feathers on her wings? did the chickens/ducks/swans willingly give up those feathers? I sense some hypocrisy here!

  42. dino

    I agere with the church on this one. PETA SUCKS!

  43. dino


  44. netstarman

    Kind of reminds me of the movie the Exorcists, Linda Blair with a crucifix in bed in the beginning of the movie if anybody remembers.
    Oh yes i forgot the best Vegan I ate was on a plate with steak sauce and the meat was medium rare. the bake potato wasn’t too bad either with lots of bacon on top.
    Peta sucks rancid cyst covered hairy donkey balls, they love it because there Peta.

  45. Naked Chicks Rule


    You’re an idiot because you push an industry that is… uneven, at best. Yes, there are some respectable breeders. Most, however, are not. The pets they raise are nothing more than machines to these folks, and the animals live in appalling conditions. Just like the Catholic Church, you are big on supporting torture & cruelty, just love it, can’t get enough of it. Killing is a no-no, because the victims must suffer as much as possible. I wonder if you’re also a big supporter of raping children. And like the Catholics, you’ll deny it vehemently.

  46. Jim Jones

    Ha ha, Bill Donohue saying PETA needs to take an ethics class. Pot, meet kettle. I’d also suggest Mr. Donohue do a little research first. Pet stores are notoriously bad for animals. Maybe the Catholic church should focus on their pedophile issues before criticizing other. Who was it that said to turn the other cheek? Jesus…something?

  47. Uncle Eccoli

    Vulva FTW

    Are we arguing about PETA and animal rights and things? I want to play!! Has anybody used the words “pot” and “kettle” in the same sentence yet?

  48. Randommolecules

    Timbo @12
    “Is her left foot standing on a dogs head?”

    DUDE, For real? You were looking at her feet out of all things on this pix?

    Seriously, just sayin’ *wink*

  49. What a hypocrite

    Oh yeah, she’s a practicing catholic alright. Because the bible clearly says that, as a woman, you should have yourself photographed nude with a crucifix covering your tits & pussy. Oh definitely…

Leave A Comment