Jennifer Aniston recently posed nude for the cover of GQ, but surprise! She also posed nude inside the magazine. It’s a Christmas miracle! Here are those pics minus the boring interview words about hating Angelina Jolie. Now, if you’ll excuse me, I need to find out whose tie that is and staple it to their neck. ‘Tis the season for helping others.
Photos: GQ






























laney | December 14, 2008 at 1:44 pm
SHE’S AWESOME.
1ST.
pirhan | December 14, 2008 at 1:47 pm
Huh. That one guy has a great shot of her ass.
bob | December 14, 2008 at 1:48 pm
yeah baby call me..
as for john mayor..dude this chick is wifey, and she look like she love the cock
Prancer | December 14, 2008 at 1:48 pm
I love Angelina but Jennifer definitely has a better body
titsonsnack | December 14, 2008 at 1:49 pm
I have a massive hangover and I’m eating pizza in bed.
C | December 14, 2008 at 1:49 pm
SHE’S A TALENTED WOMAN… WHY DOES SHE NEED TO BE NUDE IN ORDER TO SELL HER MOVIE?
Joe Mahma | December 14, 2008 at 1:49 pm
yawn
whaaargarbl | December 14, 2008 at 1:51 pm
I would pay $1000 to see a half-hour Jennifer Aniston porno. Seriously. God, she looks good.
Hmmm | December 14, 2008 at 1:53 pm
I don’t know, she looks a little desperate to stay important, huh? Can’t argue with the guys – she has an amazing body but this doesn’t exactly fill me with a sense of her “serious” acting abilities. It’s too bad her insecurities (two-htree years later, mind you) are still so rampant. I suggest a good therapist and actually moving on. Then maybe she’ll find some fulfillment in herself as a person/actress rather than showing off her body in a blatant attempt to appear important.
Hmmm | December 14, 2008 at 1:53 pm
I don’t know, she looks a little desperate to stay important, huh? Can’t argue with the guys – she has an amazing body but this doesn’t exactly fill me with a sense of her “serious” acting abilities. It’s too bad her insecurities (two-htree years later, mind you) are still so rampant. I suggest a good therapist and actually moving on. Then maybe she’ll find some fulfillment in herself as a person/actress rather than showing off her body in a blatant attempt to appear important.
BOSS | December 14, 2008 at 1:55 pm
she looks happier naked =)
Rough Daddy | December 14, 2008 at 1:55 pm
Would that be less classy if she remove her hands and let me see some toes in pic # 4!
eXtasyStef | December 14, 2008 at 2:04 pm
Her new movie is a comedy about an unruly dog. Apparently that plot hasn’t been done to death by the Beethoven series. So she DOES have to do something to attempt to keep herself relevant, because after that load comes out, she won’t be.
Miss Kitty | December 14, 2008 at 2:08 pm
I’m straight, but this is the only woman that I would love to munch…
JTR | December 14, 2008 at 2:13 pm
Too bad Angelina didn’t go something like this…
amy | December 14, 2008 at 2:18 pm
HAHA. She is SO desperate, probably because everyone keeps dumping her. LOL
tanya | December 14, 2008 at 2:18 pm
Jennifer Aniston is pathetic. She is madly working out, getting surgery and focusing on her “outside” beauty. Angelina focuses on “inward” beauty, which in my opinion is far more important.
Nick | December 14, 2008 at 2:24 pm
Gotta love this one. You’ve just hit it, and she’s put your pants on to go and make breakfast.
sunshin625 | December 14, 2008 at 2:29 pm
Posing nude and being a spokesperson for St. Jude’s Children’s Hospital….what’s wrong with this picture???? This is something I never expected from Jennifer … just let the past go.
annie | December 14, 2008 at 2:33 pm
Dude looks like a lady and thy name is Jennifer Aniston.
I’m starting to think John Mayer is gay.
annie | December 14, 2008 at 2:33 pm
Dude looks like a lady and thy name is Jennifer Aniston.
I’m starting to think John Mayer is gay.
annie | December 14, 2008 at 2:33 pm
Dude looks like a lady and thy name is Jennifer Aniston.
I’m starting to think John Mayer is gay.
consumer | December 14, 2008 at 2:38 pm
10 and 17, jesus, quit pretending you’re friends with her. She’s a celebrity, it’s her job to do what it takes to stay relevant. Right now, pretty much what she has is that she looks amazing in the buff, so she’s going with it. Good on her.
Diana | December 14, 2008 at 2:44 pm
Look what you left BRAD, eat your fken heart out dude! Now all you have is that saggy tit Angelina,haha!
Maximus | December 14, 2008 at 2:47 pm
Thank you, Fish.
? | December 14, 2008 at 2:56 pm
These photos are so awkwardly posed that they could never be sexy.
Aerialgreen | December 14, 2008 at 2:57 pm
@17 – IMO Angelina’s fans might also want to throw her a 3-meals-a-day extravaganza to her outside beauty, because her skeletal-like frame ain’t healthy to say the least.
Quentin | December 14, 2008 at 3:01 pm
Super Hot!
Jonathan | December 14, 2008 at 3:04 pm
I know it’s not just you but why do you lie to us so. she is not “nude” she is clothed, scantily and sexualy clad but clad nonetheless in clothes. the definition of nude is
nude Show phonetics
adjective
not wearing any clothes; naked:
She once posed nude for a magazine.
Nude sunbathing is only allowed on certain beaches.
nude Show phonetics
noun [C]
a picture or other piece of art showing a person who is not wearing any clothes:
The exhibition includes several superb nudes.
nudism Show phonetics
noun [U]
the activity of wearing no clothes because you believe that wearing no clothes is healthy
nudist Show phonetics
noun [C]
someone who practises nudism:
The whole family are committed nudists.
a nudist beach (= beach for nudists)
nudity Show phonetics
noun [U]
when people are not wearing clothes:
The film was criticized for its excessive violence and nudity.
thre is also a definition of being “in the nude”
in the nude
not wearing any clothes:
So please spread this to the other news agencies and explain that Nude = naked.
Mcfeely Smackup | December 14, 2008 at 3:14 pm
Jonathan, not only are you correct, but it’s deeper than that. even in the photos where she is wearing no clothes (beyond a tie) she is ‘nude’ only in the most useless technical sense.
A woman is NOT “posing nude” if her naughty bits are covered, even if they’re covered only by strategic limb placement. The fact that she was nude in the fucking studio is not remotely interesting to the public, the public only cares if they’re getting a look at the good stuff. This is like Howard Stern having naked chicks in his studio and expecting a radio audience to give a fuck.
If you went into a strip club that said “live nude girls” and every chick in the place was holding an arm across the breasts, or sitting with legs crossed, you’d demand your money back and rightly so…because you’d have been lied to.
So can we please, collectively as a society, stop saying ” ‘X’ person poses nude”, when they are not showing anything more risque than you’d see at the beach. Hell, we’re ALL nude 24×7 if you define it as “except for what’s covered”.
jackasses
S
Meow | December 14, 2008 at 3:22 pm
There’s nothing wrong with a beautiful woman posing naked. It doesn’t mean she’s desperate to sell a movie, only that she’s confident enough not to hide herself.
dew | December 14, 2008 at 3:27 pm
How much longer before this one does a desperate stripper movie like Jessica Biel, Marissa Tomei, Lindsey Lohan, and other losers I can’t remember their name?
ailicec | December 14, 2008 at 3:38 pm
Nice body.. eh.. not so nice face. She has a weird chin.
villenuv | December 14, 2008 at 4:00 pm
I would knock the bottom out of that.
fotowhore | December 14, 2008 at 4:01 pm
Folks, this is not the first time she’s posed nude before. Google her Rolling Stone cover from back in the day. She’s just not afraid to take off her clothes. Big deal.
bop | December 14, 2008 at 4:12 pm
whatever im over this an idc if shes naked….anyone can look like that just need a camera a computer and a light…but whatever I would love to be her therapist. I offer her my therapy services. for real
meee | December 14, 2008 at 4:15 pm
finally…someone who has REAL boobs. i’m so sick of seeing those half bowling ball things.
Shep | December 14, 2008 at 4:21 pm
Somewhere Brad Pitt is crying himself to sleep after seeing this pictures. Way to pick skeletor over that. I’ve seen better decisions from George Bush
MLou | December 14, 2008 at 4:29 pm
She is truly a pretty woman. Very natural. But those are the most forced smiles I have ever seen.
azzman | December 14, 2008 at 4:32 pm
wow. very nice
jeezy mc jeeze | December 14, 2008 at 4:42 pm
photoshop does her body good!! she looks so fug in the picture with the pants gag me
bootlips | December 14, 2008 at 4:44 pm
I hate chicks who tease. Just show your tits.
Ted from Davenport | December 14, 2008 at 4:51 pm
I tried to read that Marley and Me book. I started having suicidal thoughts for the first time in my life so I quit reading it. If you’re going to make a movie about such a dull book, I think it’s a great idea to have Jen star in it. Dylan McDermott should play the male lead.
Ted from Lansing | December 14, 2008 at 4:54 pm
I’d like to throw a shoe at her head like that dude did to President Bush today in Iraq.
mazdalover | December 14, 2008 at 4:59 pm
figures, another lame celebrity trying to get attention
and photoshopping
Ish | December 14, 2008 at 4:59 pm
I want to know how you get the job of being one of the two dudes hanging around a naked Jennifer Aniston in a photo shoot…
mad hater | December 14, 2008 at 4:59 pm
she is jealous, insecure, wants attention, and that is what i get just from looking at her face. it’s not a good look. she has an attractive body, but it does a person like her no good.
biitchy | December 14, 2008 at 5:13 pm
She’s SOOOO desperate for attention it’s not funny. I bet she thinks that Brad Pitt will see them and be like “ohhh” but I doubt he’d even care. Sometimes I think Angelina can look a bit fugly, but overall she’s way more sexy.
Rough Daddy | December 14, 2008 at 5:17 pm
haha @44 i have got to see this….
Desk Jockey | December 14, 2008 at 5:27 pm
That tie’s from Thom Browne’s Brooks Brothers thing last year. Please do staple it to his neck as the dude’s a whackjob.