Jennifer Aniston’s GQ photo shoot

December 14th, 2008 // 173 Comments

Jennifer Aniston recently posed nude for the cover of GQ, but surprise! She also posed nude inside the magazine. It’s a Christmas miracle! Here are those pics minus the boring interview words about hating Angelina Jolie. Now, if you’ll excuse me, I need to find out whose tie that is and staple it to their neck. ‘Tis the season for helping others.

Photos: GQ
Jennifer Aniston - Jennifer Aniston Wallpaper (81363) - Fanpop
Jennifer Aniston
Jennifer-Aniston-133
Jennifer Aniston - Jennifer Aniston Wallpaper (81355) - Fanpop
Jennifer Aniston: 'I don't feel my age; I feel young every day'
Actress Jennifer Aniston, who was recently named the Hottest Woman of All Time, shows off her age-defying beauty in the March 2012 issue of InStyle. Not surprisingly, fitness fanatic Aniston, 42, feels younger than her chronological years. "I don't feel my ...
Jennifer Aniston vs. Brangelina
Jennifer Aniston thanked her then-husband Brad Pitt when she won an Emmy for "Friends" in 2002. She hasn't won anything or dated anyone of significance ever since. Pitt, meanwhile, left Aniston for Angelina Jolie, had a little league of kids with her and ...

Comments (173)

  1. laney | December 14, 2008 at 1:44 pm

    SHE’S AWESOME.
    1ST.

    Reply
  2. pirhan | December 14, 2008 at 1:47 pm

    Huh. That one guy has a great shot of her ass.

    Reply
  3. bob | December 14, 2008 at 1:48 pm

    yeah baby call me..

    as for john mayor..dude this chick is wifey, and she look like she love the cock

    Reply
  4. Prancer | December 14, 2008 at 1:48 pm

    I love Angelina but Jennifer definitely has a better body

    Reply
  5. titsonsnack | December 14, 2008 at 1:49 pm

    I have a massive hangover and I’m eating pizza in bed.

    Reply
  6. C | December 14, 2008 at 1:49 pm

    SHE’S A TALENTED WOMAN… WHY DOES SHE NEED TO BE NUDE IN ORDER TO SELL HER MOVIE?

    Reply
  7. Joe Mahma | December 14, 2008 at 1:49 pm

    yawn

    Reply
  8. whaaargarbl | December 14, 2008 at 1:51 pm

    I would pay $1000 to see a half-hour Jennifer Aniston porno. Seriously. God, she looks good.

    Reply
  9. Hmmm | December 14, 2008 at 1:53 pm

    I don’t know, she looks a little desperate to stay important, huh? Can’t argue with the guys – she has an amazing body but this doesn’t exactly fill me with a sense of her “serious” acting abilities. It’s too bad her insecurities (two-htree years later, mind you) are still so rampant. I suggest a good therapist and actually moving on. Then maybe she’ll find some fulfillment in herself as a person/actress rather than showing off her body in a blatant attempt to appear important.

    Reply
  10. Hmmm | December 14, 2008 at 1:53 pm

    I don’t know, she looks a little desperate to stay important, huh? Can’t argue with the guys – she has an amazing body but this doesn’t exactly fill me with a sense of her “serious” acting abilities. It’s too bad her insecurities (two-htree years later, mind you) are still so rampant. I suggest a good therapist and actually moving on. Then maybe she’ll find some fulfillment in herself as a person/actress rather than showing off her body in a blatant attempt to appear important.

    Reply
  11. BOSS | December 14, 2008 at 1:55 pm

    she looks happier naked =)

    Reply
  12. Rough Daddy | December 14, 2008 at 1:55 pm

    Would that be less classy if she remove her hands and let me see some toes in pic # 4!

    Reply
  13. eXtasyStef | December 14, 2008 at 2:04 pm

    Her new movie is a comedy about an unruly dog. Apparently that plot hasn’t been done to death by the Beethoven series. So she DOES have to do something to attempt to keep herself relevant, because after that load comes out, she won’t be.

    Reply
  14. Miss Kitty | December 14, 2008 at 2:08 pm

    I’m straight, but this is the only woman that I would love to munch…

    Reply
  15. JTR | December 14, 2008 at 2:13 pm

    Too bad Angelina didn’t go something like this…

    Reply
  16. amy | December 14, 2008 at 2:18 pm

    HAHA. She is SO desperate, probably because everyone keeps dumping her. LOL

    Reply
  17. tanya | December 14, 2008 at 2:18 pm

    Jennifer Aniston is pathetic. She is madly working out, getting surgery and focusing on her “outside” beauty. Angelina focuses on “inward” beauty, which in my opinion is far more important.

    Reply
  18. Nick | December 14, 2008 at 2:24 pm

    Gotta love this one. You’ve just hit it, and she’s put your pants on to go and make breakfast.

    Reply
  19. sunshin625 | December 14, 2008 at 2:29 pm

    Posing nude and being a spokesperson for St. Jude’s Children’s Hospital….what’s wrong with this picture???? This is something I never expected from Jennifer … just let the past go.

    Reply
  20. annie | December 14, 2008 at 2:33 pm

    Dude looks like a lady and thy name is Jennifer Aniston.
    I’m starting to think John Mayer is gay.

    Reply
  21. annie | December 14, 2008 at 2:33 pm

    Dude looks like a lady and thy name is Jennifer Aniston.
    I’m starting to think John Mayer is gay.

    Reply
  22. annie | December 14, 2008 at 2:33 pm

    Dude looks like a lady and thy name is Jennifer Aniston.
    I’m starting to think John Mayer is gay.

    Reply
  23. consumer | December 14, 2008 at 2:38 pm

    10 and 17, jesus, quit pretending you’re friends with her. She’s a celebrity, it’s her job to do what it takes to stay relevant. Right now, pretty much what she has is that she looks amazing in the buff, so she’s going with it. Good on her.

    Reply
  24. Diana | December 14, 2008 at 2:44 pm

    Look what you left BRAD, eat your fken heart out dude! Now all you have is that saggy tit Angelina,haha!

    Reply
  25. Maximus | December 14, 2008 at 2:47 pm

    Thank you, Fish.

    Reply
  26. ? | December 14, 2008 at 2:56 pm

    These photos are so awkwardly posed that they could never be sexy.

    Reply
  27. Aerialgreen | December 14, 2008 at 2:57 pm

    @17 – IMO Angelina’s fans might also want to throw her a 3-meals-a-day extravaganza to her outside beauty, because her skeletal-like frame ain’t healthy to say the least.

    Reply
  28. Quentin | December 14, 2008 at 3:01 pm

    Super Hot!

    Reply
  29. Jonathan | December 14, 2008 at 3:04 pm

    I know it’s not just you but why do you lie to us so. she is not “nude” she is clothed, scantily and sexualy clad but clad nonetheless in clothes. the definition of nude is

    nude Show phonetics
    adjective
    not wearing any clothes; naked:
    She once posed nude for a magazine.
    Nude sunbathing is only allowed on certain beaches.

    nude Show phonetics
    noun [C]
    a picture or other piece of art showing a person who is not wearing any clothes:
    The exhibition includes several superb nudes.

    nudism Show phonetics
    noun [U]
    the activity of wearing no clothes because you believe that wearing no clothes is healthy

    nudist Show phonetics
    noun [C]
    someone who practises nudism:
    The whole family are committed nudists.
    a nudist beach (= beach for nudists)

    nudity Show phonetics
    noun [U]
    when people are not wearing clothes:
    The film was criticized for its excessive violence and nudity.

    thre is also a definition of being “in the nude”
    in the nude
    not wearing any clothes:

    So please spread this to the other news agencies and explain that Nude = naked.

    Reply
  30. Mcfeely Smackup | December 14, 2008 at 3:14 pm

    Jonathan, not only are you correct, but it’s deeper than that. even in the photos where she is wearing no clothes (beyond a tie) she is ‘nude’ only in the most useless technical sense.

    A woman is NOT “posing nude” if her naughty bits are covered, even if they’re covered only by strategic limb placement. The fact that she was nude in the fucking studio is not remotely interesting to the public, the public only cares if they’re getting a look at the good stuff. This is like Howard Stern having naked chicks in his studio and expecting a radio audience to give a fuck.

    If you went into a strip club that said “live nude girls” and every chick in the place was holding an arm across the breasts, or sitting with legs crossed, you’d demand your money back and rightly so…because you’d have been lied to.

    So can we please, collectively as a society, stop saying ” ‘X’ person poses nude”, when they are not showing anything more risque than you’d see at the beach. Hell, we’re ALL nude 24×7 if you define it as “except for what’s covered”.

    jackasses

    S

    Reply
  31. Meow | December 14, 2008 at 3:22 pm

    There’s nothing wrong with a beautiful woman posing naked. It doesn’t mean she’s desperate to sell a movie, only that she’s confident enough not to hide herself.

    Reply
  32. dew | December 14, 2008 at 3:27 pm

    How much longer before this one does a desperate stripper movie like Jessica Biel, Marissa Tomei, Lindsey Lohan, and other losers I can’t remember their name?

    Reply
  33. ailicec | December 14, 2008 at 3:38 pm

    Nice body.. eh.. not so nice face. She has a weird chin.

    Reply
  34. villenuv | December 14, 2008 at 4:00 pm

    I would knock the bottom out of that.

    Reply
  35. fotowhore | December 14, 2008 at 4:01 pm

    Folks, this is not the first time she’s posed nude before. Google her Rolling Stone cover from back in the day. She’s just not afraid to take off her clothes. Big deal.

    Reply
  36. bop | December 14, 2008 at 4:12 pm

    whatever im over this an idc if shes naked….anyone can look like that just need a camera a computer and a light…but whatever I would love to be her therapist. I offer her my therapy services. for real

    Reply
  37. meee | December 14, 2008 at 4:15 pm

    finally…someone who has REAL boobs. i’m so sick of seeing those half bowling ball things.

    Reply
  38. Shep | December 14, 2008 at 4:21 pm

    Somewhere Brad Pitt is crying himself to sleep after seeing this pictures. Way to pick skeletor over that. I’ve seen better decisions from George Bush

    Reply
  39. MLou | December 14, 2008 at 4:29 pm

    She is truly a pretty woman. Very natural. But those are the most forced smiles I have ever seen.

    Reply
  40. azzman | December 14, 2008 at 4:32 pm

    wow. very nice

    Reply
  41. jeezy mc jeeze | December 14, 2008 at 4:42 pm

    photoshop does her body good!! she looks so fug in the picture with the pants gag me

    Reply
  42. bootlips | December 14, 2008 at 4:44 pm

    I hate chicks who tease. Just show your tits.

    Reply
  43. Ted from Davenport | December 14, 2008 at 4:51 pm

    I tried to read that Marley and Me book. I started having suicidal thoughts for the first time in my life so I quit reading it. If you’re going to make a movie about such a dull book, I think it’s a great idea to have Jen star in it. Dylan McDermott should play the male lead.

    Reply
  44. Ted from Lansing | December 14, 2008 at 4:54 pm

    I’d like to throw a shoe at her head like that dude did to President Bush today in Iraq.

    Reply
  45. mazdalover | December 14, 2008 at 4:59 pm

    figures, another lame celebrity trying to get attention
    and photoshopping

    Reply
  46. Ish | December 14, 2008 at 4:59 pm

    I want to know how you get the job of being one of the two dudes hanging around a naked Jennifer Aniston in a photo shoot…

    Reply
  47. mad hater | December 14, 2008 at 4:59 pm

    she is jealous, insecure, wants attention, and that is what i get just from looking at her face. it’s not a good look. she has an attractive body, but it does a person like her no good.

    Reply
  48. biitchy | December 14, 2008 at 5:13 pm

    She’s SOOOO desperate for attention it’s not funny. I bet she thinks that Brad Pitt will see them and be like “ohhh” but I doubt he’d even care. Sometimes I think Angelina can look a bit fugly, but overall she’s way more sexy.

    Reply
  49. Rough Daddy | December 14, 2008 at 5:17 pm

    haha @44 i have got to see this….

    Reply
  50. Desk Jockey | December 14, 2008 at 5:27 pm

    That tie’s from Thom Browne’s Brooks Brothers thing last year. Please do staple it to his neck as the dude’s a whackjob.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Name (Visible)
Email (Required, Not Visible)