January Jones’ breasts pose for GQ

October 13th, 2009 // 76 Comments

Mad Men‘s January Jones poses for the November 2009 issue of GQ looking the hottest I’ve ever seen her look. And I’m not just saying that because she’s basically topless underneath a leather jacket. I’m saying it because I want to touch her breasts, too. I’m a complicated man that way.

Photos: GQ
January Jones takes over for Alice Eve in X-MEN: FIRST CLASS ...
January Jones
January Jones
January Jones - January Jones Photo (9018765) - Fanpop
Jones' repaired new helps him get back into the swing
3B Chipper Jones' surgically repaired right knee was really sore after he played in C Brian McCann's charity softball event in November. But after resting the knee until January, Jones feels great. He's able to get down into his swing the way he is used to doing.
Personal Thoughts: January Jones as Emma Frost
The 34 year old actress, who took on the role as the villainess of the film, Emma Frost. January is most likely best known for her work on the hit show, Mad Men, where she plays a chain-smoking, waspy, housewife. I find her to be very talented, myself, but ...

Comments (76)

  1. Boobies | October 13, 2009 at 3:04 pm

    You motor boating mother….

    Reply
  2. :) | October 13, 2009 at 3:05 pm

    *yawn*
    where’s lilo, britney, and paris?!
    i think i’m actually starting to miss them.

    Reply
  3. sarah | October 13, 2009 at 3:06 pm

    january is way hotter than christina hendricks!

    Reply
  4. Who? | October 13, 2009 at 3:06 pm

    Who? I need to start watching more TV.

    Reply
  5. Who? | October 13, 2009 at 3:08 pm

    She kinda reminds me of Claire Daines, Like a little sister. but…Who the hell is she?!

    Reply
  6. Randal | October 13, 2009 at 3:09 pm

    Not a bad catch at all for the premier mens magazine GQ. It’s always been a strong catch for young men who are looking to add a little extra flair or even pick up a tip or two on attracting women. It certainly has never needed women on the cover to sell their magazine but I guess it’s OK now and then.

    Randal

    Reply
  7. The indoctrination of Rough | October 13, 2009 at 3:10 pm

    Here, here fish. I dont know what a mad men is but you can include me as one of them from now on…

    Reply
  8. Ruby | October 13, 2009 at 3:15 pm

    The photographer should be taken out back and shot. How in the hell did he take a gorgeous girl like that (yes, I would totally be into swinging that way. Her way that is) and make her look awkward. There is something off about every picture, and it’s definitely not her.

    P.s. I’d motorboat them suckers too.

    Reply
  9. wow | October 13, 2009 at 3:16 pm

    I hope those are pre-processed photos, else GQ’s photographers need to be replaced.

    That said, who the fuck is January Jones?

    Reply
  10. Jason | October 13, 2009 at 3:23 pm

    Holy crap. I have been watching Mad Men for 3 years and I never knew she was rocking those.

    @2 You are out of your fucking mind.

    Reply
  11. ehh. | October 13, 2009 at 3:26 pm

    her breasts look unbelievably hot in the jacket photo. but i hate to be the bearer of bad news – as much as i want them to look like that for real – i can say with a relative amount of certainty that they don’t. please note how small they look in every other photo. in my experience, women’s breasts are not usually larger than they look in a bra (often times, a bit smaller).

    since they did such a nice job photoshopping her boobies, you think they could have helped the face in that first photo. these pics would have been a bit more useful that way.

    Reply
  12. bribios | October 13, 2009 at 3:32 pm

    Anyone who doesn’t know who January Jones is, needs to start watching television that is actually GOOD. Mad Men is one of the best shows on TV, shame on you for not watching it.

    I’m not usually into blondes, but January Jones is a big exception. She actually makes the whole late 50′s early 60′s housewife look doable.

    Reply
  13. Steve O | October 13, 2009 at 3:37 pm

    “11. ehh. – October 13, 2009 3:26 PM

    her breasts look unbelievably hot in the jacket photo. but i hate to be the bearer of bad news – as much as i want them to look like that for real – i can say with a relative amount of certainty that they don’t. please note how small they look in every other photo. in my experience, women’s breasts are not usually larger than they look in a bra (often times, a bit smaller).

    since they did such a nice job photoshopping her boobies, you think they could have helped the face in that first photo. these pics would have been a bit more useful that way.

    Uh, yea….ok….luckily for us, your experience amounts to breast feeding for the first year or so of your otherwise bland and depressing life. I can appreciate you trying to sound like the authority, but unfortunately, anyone who IS experienced w ‘womens breasts’ can tell that photoshopping did not make those what they are.

    er , wait- these are photoshopped too right?

    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ZZ-CqtHjAnk/Si7Otlmtk_I/AAAAAAABaKk/GkHionUDhDY/s400/January+Jones.jpg

    Theres plenty more pics out there that back up that those fuckers are real, and they’re spectacular….but keep thinking youre the ‘authority’.

    Reply
  14. Steve O | October 13, 2009 at 3:38 pm

    My mistake- this is the one I meant to post…

    http://coedmagazine.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/january-jones.jpg

    Yea…..hella fake.

    Moron

    Reply
  15. semi wood | October 13, 2009 at 3:40 pm

    A perfect spot for a DNA deposit =========D — – — –

    Reply
  16. Hugh Gentry | October 13, 2009 at 3:43 pm

    i would go to town on those titties!!!

    Reply
  17. Uh, OK | October 13, 2009 at 3:43 pm

    @3, you are insane. Pretty girl, sure, maybe. I guess so.

    Christina Hendricks. Smoking hot.

    Reply
  18. farty mcshitface | October 13, 2009 at 3:44 pm

    at first i thought this was claire danes.
    but who cares anyway.
    i just read another site that reported on what oprah has been up to.
    it turns out the fatty has given up on a low fat diet and went to the texas state fair and threw down on the carny foods. corndogs and such.
    however, the funniest part was when they confirmed that oprah did the worst offender. she ate some fried butter and proclaimed it the best treat of the fair!!
    it’s good to know this fat bitch has totally lost the war on her big, fat ass and gut!!!

    Reply
  19. Jess | October 13, 2009 at 3:45 pm

    What is this place, the Fake Titty Committee? Who gives a fuck if they’re real or not? How sexually removed are you that you’re looking a a truly gorgeous woman and wondering if her tits are fake? Mental.

    Reply
  20. The indoctrination of Rough | October 13, 2009 at 3:48 pm

    Im not sure but I think ms Jones might be sporting what you call a banana tits, (best kind) which come once a generation, the last person in the media that had them was Tracy Lords…if true I might have to stalk ms Jones and propose…

    Reply
  21. Mouthfull | October 13, 2009 at 3:51 pm

    Did all you tossers forget the movie Anger Management? January was so fucking hot in that flic I have her scenes with Krista Allen on a permanent loop running in every room in my house….

    Reply
  22. Dave ain't here, man | October 13, 2009 at 4:20 pm

    I go ape for banana tits.

    Reply
  23. Losahs! | October 13, 2009 at 4:23 pm

    Magazine photos are invalid and pointless.

    Everything is photo shopped.

    Perhaps it doesn’t matter for the delusional or those who never get near a live woman. Might as well jerk off to a cartoon. Although the loser masturbators probably do that, too.

    Reply
  24. Oliver Chester The Molester Lester | October 13, 2009 at 4:45 pm

    I didn’t know she was sporting those babies. I should watch Mad Men!

    Reply
  25. Venom | October 13, 2009 at 4:54 pm

    That’s a very nice rack. Real or not, to me what matter is that they look as real as possible (real tits aren’t supposed to look like soccer balls stuck to your chest, you know).

    Anyway, more of this and less of Pam Anderson, please.

    Reply
  26. um | October 13, 2009 at 4:59 pm

    20, please enlighten me: what are banana tits?

    Reply
  27. http://www.thefamousphere.com | October 13, 2009 at 5:02 pm

    My good god those are some funbags. I’d certainly try to hit her with something other than my car.

    Reply
  28. Lame-O | October 13, 2009 at 5:05 pm

    @13, in an attempt to say LOL THERE BIG HERE 2 UR WRONG LOL, you linked a photo in which you can’t even see any cleavage, let alone any sort of breast size. Are you just thick, just plain stupid or did you link the wrong image? The rest of your comments suggest the first 2.

    Your inexperience with breasts sure shows when you are disagreeing that bra’s don’t typically make them look larger (or rather, more full) then without. The only people that can get away with that, are people with fakes (fake breasts hardly move). Regardless whether hers are fake or not, there was some definite “propping” going on in the jacket photo’s compared to some of the rest. However, this is common practice among good photographers and isn’t something to pop pearls out your vagina over. It’s unfortunate that GQ’s photographers are not very good judging by this shoot, so the claims that they’re photoshopped are valid. Whether you care or not, is another story.

    But you go “Steve O”. Prove to all the self loathing females that actually look at these images how much of a man you really are. Pat yourself on the back big guy.

    Reply
  29. abbz | October 13, 2009 at 5:08 pm

    this site is getting so strange.

    excuse my gender generalizing, but for the most part celebrity gossip has been read predominantly by women. Far be it from me to begrudge men their gossip but don’t you think this imbalance would lead to more gossip and less fap-fare?

    ok yay boobs. i fucking get it already.

    Superfish all your female readers hate you. Just give up and make it official soft-core porn already. Or fucking throw me a bone here.

    Reply
  30. Delgo | October 13, 2009 at 5:10 pm
  31. TERRI | October 13, 2009 at 5:21 pm

    amazing tits but i miss britney why doesnt any sit have her walking around i wanna see how she looks if shes on a diet what shes wearing i miss her daily news updates

    Reply
  32. Frank Lucas' Bitch | October 13, 2009 at 5:28 pm

    #29 Amen. How is this gossip again? It’s unfortunate because I really really liked this site and has been on here for a couple of years now. But I might start looking for something else. Oh well, pity, it was a fun ride while it lasted (until it became Gosselins’ and Speidi’s personal website along with some Z-list “celebrity” tit shots…ugh).

    Reply
  33. The indoctrination of Rough | October 13, 2009 at 5:30 pm

    What am I the resident perv…the name says it all, its curved, long, and pointing north, very rare…

    Reply
  34. See Alice | October 13, 2009 at 5:32 pm

    Is January Jones her real or porn Name ?

    Reply
  35. See Alice | October 13, 2009 at 5:32 pm

    Is January Jones her real or porn Name ?

    Reply
  36. Richport's Ghost | October 13, 2009 at 5:39 pm

    @8 – Get the fuck ot of here, you carpet munching dyke.

    Reply
  37. Ruby | October 13, 2009 at 5:56 pm

    @ Richport’s Ghost

    I’m no dyke, sir! But no one can accuse me of not being woman enough to admit what is the truth. The truth being that I would motorboat those bad boys.

    Reply
  38. Freddo | October 13, 2009 at 6:11 pm

    Great tits, she needs support though, otherwise they’ll be framing her vajay in 10 years time. But I reitterate…great tits. Oh yeah, I totally see the Claire Danes thing too. *Applause*.

    Reply
  39. #28 is right | October 13, 2009 at 6:26 pm

    Steve – O, you don’t know what you are talking about. I looked at the photo you claim makes it clear that they are not fake. I don’t think #11 ever said she had fake breasts, I am pretty sure he meant that what was there was enhanced by computer. I think maybe some clever taping also helped. That photo you posted only proves his point, I think. They look decent. But they look like B cups, and in these photos they look like at least D cups. And they look like B cups, maybe C cups, in every other photo I have seen of her. They are still pretty nice, just not this huge. Sorry to disappoint! If you want to believe that is what they look like, please do, because you are never going to actually see them in the flesh.

    Reply
  40. #28 is right | October 13, 2009 at 6:30 pm

    Oh and on last thing, Steve – O: No need to be so angry! No one is insulting her, they just are saying her tits are a bit smaller than they look in photo. And she isn’t your girlfriend, I don’t really know why you feel the need to defend her honor…opps, I mean her tits.

    Reply
  41. PieCream | October 13, 2009 at 6:41 pm

    She’s fantastic. She even looks hot all ‘normal’ and ‘everyday’ – doesn’t have to have a photoshoot to see that. She’s a natural beauty!

    Reply
  42. dude_on | October 13, 2009 at 6:56 pm

    The Fish obviously pissed off the big-boned girls (again) today. Sure, The Fish could have an occasional Matty Mac post or that vampire dude, but if they aren’t out showing themselves what do you expect the Fish to do? JJ’s breasts require our attention, that is why she posed in this manner. To ogle and defile is practically a civic duty… like voting.

    Reply
  43. Asian Cams | October 13, 2009 at 7:23 pm

    i fucked her

    Reply
  44. boysaredumb | October 13, 2009 at 7:36 pm

    her boobs are obviously painted on. but if it makes the boys happy, whatever. disguisting how degrading these photos are. half naked in fron of a car about to be run over? blindfolded as if her body is all that matters? this looks like Maxim & not GQ. C’mon GQ I thought you were classier.

    Reply
  45. luis | October 13, 2009 at 8:06 pm
  46. peoplearestupid | October 13, 2009 at 8:31 pm

    “The Fish obviously pissed off the big-boned girls (again) today. Sure, The Fish could have an occasional Matty Mac post or that vampire dude, but if they aren’t out showing themselves what do you expect the Fish to do? JJ’s breasts require our attention, that is why she posed in this manner. To ogle and defile is practically a civic duty… like voting.”

    #42, I think you’re quite possibly gay. Why else would you be on a site that’s mainly meant for celeb gossip? I know your comment was all about January Jones’ nice rack, but c’mon. If you were a straight guy wanting to stare at some boobs, wouldn’t you be on a porn site instead? Just sayin’.

    Reply
  47. KY | October 13, 2009 at 8:41 pm

    butterface

    Reply
  48. Mr Fleshlight | October 13, 2009 at 8:49 pm

    Man…she is smoking…she could be a Bond girl…

    Reply
  49. farty mcshitface | October 13, 2009 at 9:29 pm

    why won’t people talk about oprah going to the texas state fair and eating corndogs and fried butter? that’s what this discussion is about people. time to get back on topic!!
    oprah, corndogs and fried butter!

    Reply
  50. KB | October 13, 2009 at 10:39 pm

    I think these are majorly Photoshopped. She looks great, but here is how she usually looks:

    http://evilbeetgossip.film.com/category/january-jones/

    She looks great, but easily way less busty.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Name (Visible)
Email (Required, Not Visible)