Holly Madison leaves Hugh Hefner – for Criss Angel

September 12th, 2008 // 199 Comments

Holly Madison has officially left the Playboy Mansion for magician Criss Angel and his one million handcuff necklaces. Hugh Hefner, who’s now down a girlfriend, is reportedly cool with the whole thing. It’s not like he doesn’t have spares. The Dirty reports:

Holly Madison moves out of the Playboy Mansion because she is sleeping with Criss Angel…. according to inside source though Hef is totally fine with it.
Holly Madison was really working her way into everything (will) at Playboy even choosing Playmates for the magazine. Now “The Girls Next Door” Producers are scrambling on how they are going to finish the show with Holly Madison- Ex-Girl Next Door.

I guess Holly was stuck between a cock and a not hard place. Hi OH! But, in all seriousness, folks, talk to your kids about Criss Angel. Because a douche is a terrible thing to be.

The More You Know…

Photos: Splash News
superficial

  1. Or Mr. Tom people may want to get married, because they feel that pre-marital sex is a sin. Not everyone wants to have continuous pre-marital sex for their entire lives. It’s funny that you should mention a man working long hours, because allthough my man works hard at work Im almost always at work longer than he is. He has a 9 to 5, and me on the other hand I work 10 plus hour days. That’s ok though, because it builds character. Oh, and like I mentioned before, I am studying to become a nurse(RN). I want to work in a hospital, and nurses work 12 hour long shifts. That leaves me with no time to complain about my husband to be being at work too long. By the time I’ll get out of work he will be at home for hours already. Don’t generalize women into one group. I hope these things didn’t really happen to you by some gold digger, but if you’re patient by letting yourself run into her you can find the one for you. If you don’t want to find the one then that’s a different story which is your business. Please don’t try and project your feelings onto other men though.

  2. noob

    @99, first off, if you haven’t already, please get a vasectomy, and I’m not trying to be funny or anything, I just think you would be doing yourself and everyone else a favor. You sound like you don’t ever want kids, and would be a horrible father if you ever did, so take steps to prevent yourself from having to support an unplanned child, and protect any unplanned child from having you as a father. Also if you’re one step ahead and have already had a vasectomy, kudos man, for yourself and everyone else.

    on to business, you talk about business monopolies and apply them to relationships as if it works, but it doesn’t. Relationships must be based on trust or they just don’t work. If you are with someone who won’t commit to you, just to leave their options open in case you “let yourself go,” then how much trust can you possibly have in that person? Commitment is about two people who trust each other so much that they are willing to risk something bad happening, but do anyway in the faith that their relationship is worth it. Marriage is considered the final step, because it usually is; when two people are together, but are too afraid to commit to each other, then they pretty much are at a dead end.

    Also you make it seem as though men are they only ones who stand to loose something. Both men AND women have things to loose in a marriage (women can be successful too, it’s 2008… didn’t you get the memo?). You argue as if you are justified and logical, and yet in all your examples you refuse to see the situations of men and women as equal when applied to marriage. I mean, jeeze, someone, at some point must have really done a number on you… I’m sorry, no one deserves to have their trust betrayed like that.

  3. mfbinc

    first hef …now angel……..holly come back to me already!!!!! i’m sick of guys fouling my chick!!!!

  4. noob

    @99, oh also, you do realize that there are prenup agreements that can protect your assets? Oh yeah and for when you die, you can specify in your will who inherits your estate (though if you choose someone besides your significant other you will most likely get bitch slapped in the after-life). So once you take these legal options into account, I guess you’re just a pathetic individual who hates women. I guess that means you just got served.

  5. Yes Noob…he just got served for sure.

  6. @102, you sound like a naive, inexperienced young man with a lot of idealistic theories and fantasies from movies and pop culture about love and marriage. Someday you’ll learn, and hopefully it won’t cost you too much. ;-)

    Sure, Britney Spears has to pay Kevin Federline, but in the real world most men make more money than the women they are with (with exceptions like Britney and SueMe) and produce most of the family financial wealth, so in most cases it’s the man who ends up paying through the nose, especially if there are kids. If your point is that successful women have as much to lose from divorce as successful men, and that neither should get married, then I agree with you! :-)

    With cell phones and text messaging and email and MySpace and Facebook and women in the workplace, it’s just a lot easier for young women today to cheat than it ever was for their mothers and grandmothers. If you end up getting cheated on your cries of “but I TRUSTED you!” are going to look pretty sad and pathetic. And if you are married to her, with the no-fault divorce laws she will STILL be able to take half your wealth and receive vaginamony payments, money that you will send to her every month that she can then spend on her new boyfriend!

  7. noob

    @106, actually I’m not a guy, and to prove you wrong, I’m actually going to be the money maker in my relationship as I am on the way to becoming a lawyer. Even now I help to financially support my boyfriend even though I am not making much now, because I would do anything for him. I hope to one day get married to him because he is my favorite person in the world and so that I can show him and everyone else that I want to spend the rest of my life with only him. So how is that wrong? You can’t say it’s a raw deal for either one of us.

    Also the fact that you thought I was a guy writing shows that not all girls are as stereotypical as you think they are. The only reason that financial gap between men and woman is so large is because of people like you who think that women are only out to cheat and steal all they can using sex as a weapon. You say that 50% of marriages now end in divorce? Well that means that 50% of them are potentially happy, satisfying marriages, and it’s impossible for you to prove otherwise.

    oh yeah and I really hope you took my advice about the vasectomy seriously, because the thought of a child having you as a father makes me want to cry.

  8. @104, as far as prenuptial agreements, if you look at my post #93 you will see that I advised SueMe to get a pre-nup, so you’re not telling me anything that I don’t already know. If you paid closer attention rather than prematurely patting yourself on the back for “serving” me, you would know that. Please try to pay closer attention and keep up with the conversation, thanks! :-)

    Sure, prenups might reduce the damage, but they can be challenged. Using a condom might reduce the chance of getting infected from having sex with someone who has HIV/herpes/HepB, but why take the risk if you don’t have to?

    Sadly, while prenups can reduce the damage, most couples don’t get them. Why? Because they are so IN LOOOOOVE and TRUST each other so much! Theirs is a love like no other love, a love that will last FOR-EV-ER!

  9. PostmortemG

    I’m enjoying this discussion between Tom Leykis, SueMe and noob… very interesting and thought provoking. That aside, Criss Angel must love sticking his tongue in that. Yum. =D

  10. @107, it does make more sense that you are female, but there are so many metrosexual guys posting here it is sometimes hard to tell the difference.

    Another woman like SueMe supporting a loser guy who doesn’t make much money? Like SueMe, you must not be very attractive either. :-)

    If you end up marrying your loser boyfriend I would hope as an attorney that you would get a pre-nup to protect yourself, but you probably won’t, because you are IN LOOOVE!

    Just because 50% of marriages don’t end up in divorce doesn’t mean they are all “happy and satisfying”. As I said earlier (again, please pay closer attention) many of those couples are miserable but stay together for the kids, for financial reasons, out of inertia, or out of fear of change. I would guess that out of all new marriages no more than 25% end up being “happy and satisfying”. Would you fly on a plane that has a 75% chance of crashing, even if you had a parachute (prenup)? ;-)

  11. noob

    @108, you know you are so right, I will absolutely take your advice and not take the risk in having sex with you so I don’t get HIV/ herpes/ Hep B (quite the trio you have!)

    I mean you can go ahead and have fun being alone and all, but I think I’ll be happy and enjoy life. People (and by people I mean women, because you obviously hate them) are better than you think they are. Take it easy and try not to breed.

  12. noob

    @108, you know you are so right, I will absolutely take your advice and not take the risk in having sex with you so I don’t get HIV/ herpes/ Hep B (quite the trio you have!)

    I mean you can go ahead and have fun being alone and all, but I think I’ll be happy and enjoy life. People (and by people I mean women, because you obviously hate them) are better than you think they are. Take it easy and try not to breed.

  13. @111 and 112, please see my post #66 about people who accuse me of hating women or being a misogynist. It’s the last desperate gasp of people who have no arguments and have run out of intellectual steam. I don’t hate women, I just advise men not to get married to them. Spend time (but not money) with them, have sex with them, love them if you desire, just don’t marry them.

    Unless, of course, you are a loser like Kevin Federline or the losers that SueMe and noob are with, then by all means get married to those women, and then when it fails give them a dose of their own community property and spousal support medicine! Maybe then the laws will be changed and marriage will be less of the outdated institution it is today. But until that happens, successful people (mostly men) should avoid marriage, prenup or not.

  14. membrain

    Looks like he can pull more than a rabbit out his pants…

  15. noob

    that’s so sad… I really feel sorry for you, and I hope you find some happiness some day

  16. @115, don’t feel sad for me, I’m the happiest I’ve ever been! :-)

    Only weak and insecure people believe that happiness lies in the false sense of security of that marriage brings. The “commitment” and “permanence” of marriage is an illusion. Just ask Sarah McLachlan. No man needs marriage to be happy, and most men who get married end up divorced or unhappily married. Stop making important life decisions based on fairy tales, movies, and pop culture fantasies.

  17. claire

    I find your arguments against marriage interesting & rational. I believe that marriage between men & women for love is a social construct, imposed on society to create a sense of order, particularly in regards to sexuality. In this sense it is an arbitrary social institution.

    I do not believe that human beings are hardwired (biologically programmed) for monogamy. That said, however, we are hardwired for intense jealousy, envy, hurt etc, that is why many people find staying in relationships more satisfying and balancing emotionally, than being perpetually single (especially women).

    However, I believe that marriage (or a highly committed relationship where two people plan on making it work), makes sense in the context of parenting. Children benefit from having both a mother & a father investing a great deal of time, money & care into their upbringing. This is probably why the institution has lasted for as long as it has…

  18. @ 117, claire, thank you for your thoughtful comments, and I agree with most of what you wrote.

    There is no doubt that the ideal structure for raising children is an intact family unit with a MALE and a FEMALE parent (sorry to our gay and lesbian friends). Sociological research shows that males and females have different parenting styles and each make unique contributions to the child’s development. Research has also shown that children of broken homes are more likely to suffer from depression, drug and alcohol addiction, to commit suicide, become dropouts, and become divorced themselves.

    Ancient and non-Western cultures have recognized the benefits of this social structure called marriage and promoted it by the society arranging marriages between young people, for the benefit of the society’s children. Western cultures tinkered with this successful formula by adding the notions of “romantic love” and mate self-selection, with mixed results.

    The Western version of marriage was able to function reasonably well until modern feminism and contraception started disrupting the roles of men and women in the late 20th century. More women entered the workplace, both married and unmarried, where they could interact with men, both married and unmarried. This placed great strain on Western marriage, accelerated by the communication revolution of the 21st century, with email, cell phones, text messaging, MySpace, AshleyMadison, match.com, craigslist, etc. It became easier and easier for spouses to become unfaithful, even from across the country.

    No-fault divorce laws and the widespread nature of divorce removed the stigma of it and doomed the institution of Western marriage even further. Meanwhile, the financial laws of divorce remain stuck in the pre-feminist, pre-Internet, pre-DNA paternity test era, with outdated notions of “spousal support”, “community property”, and “if you were the husband you must be the father and therefore owe child support”.

    The current state of marriage and divorce is so bad that a man is a fool to voluntarily participate, unless he is a loser who marries a successful woman like Britney Spears. A man who marries for the benefit of his children (assuming he wanted to be a father, frequently not the case) is selflessly putting the interests of his children ahead of his own, for there is no benefit TO HIM to get married.

    The laws of marriage and divorce must be changed to make marriage more fair and attractive to men in the 21st century, for the benefit of our children and our society. Unfortunately, women and attorneys benefit from the current legal structure so change is unlikely. The only rational choice for men is to boycott and avoid marriage. When women have more and more trouble finding suckers willing to sign on the dotted line, they might join men to create the political pressure needed to change the currently outdated institution of marriage.

  19. minigakkun

    116@ Art imitates life and life imitates art. While I do agree that many young adolescents are ideal and fall into the fantasy of love portrayed in pop culture, movies, stories, etc. The basis for these art forms come from REAL LIFE. I guess NO ONE, to you, EVER had a happy marriage? Then where do these stories come from? Thin air? You’re truly a cynical bitter person I hope I never become.

    BTW I too make more than my partner and am female. That doesnt mean I’m unattractive either. I choose to be with someone I LOVE. I dont choose to be with someone just because they’re rich. Only superficial vapid people think that way.

    And honestly is that a fulfilling life? In your mindset, you automatically think every girl that comes your way is interested in YOUR money and nothing else? Hahaha. Young pussy is your motivater in life? How fulfilling!!!

    Some day you might mature and understand the worth of a PERSON of good character, similiar interests in a way of life, and a meaningful relationship. You’re a perfect example of “modern” thinking and times believing in NOTHING, but promiscuity. That’s all you’re promoting, whether you believe it or not. You are definitely NOT promoting a healthy or helpful way of living life – which I’m sure you believe you are. LOL

    Also women could argue gold diggers exist because of men LIKE YOU. Its a circle of life with you people. Both are filthy, lol. It is curious how you chose those 3 of the various STDS out there ;]

  20. claire

    Interesting…

    Your argument seems to be an essentially a legal one. Because I am not married and do not live in the US, I am not qualified to comment on the divorce laws in your country, as I don’t know anything about them. But I am sure that they can potentially devastate people’s lives – (men mostly, I am guessing)?

    That being said, from the perspective of a 23 year old female, if I was in a relationship for over 3 or 4 years, and marriage was not proposed, I would think about moving on from the relationship & dating others. It is sad when men ‘use women up’ as girlfriends, especially during their child bearing years, if they are not serious about commitment & building a life together, which I imagine includes building mutual wealth & having & raising children together.

  21. claire

    directed @118

  22. claire

    @119 – there is no point in getting so emotional about a discussion regarding the institution of marriage. Many people, especially those who are educated, believe that marriage is outdated. However, this does not mean that these people do not have satisfying, long term relationships, or are promiscuous in any way.

    By the way…
    It is a fact that women tend to date men slightly higher in social class (wealth, breeding etc) than themselves, and men tend to date women that are slightly more attractive than themselves. This phenomena has been researched by psychologists, and there are evidence based studies which support such findings. So although you may find some of Mr. Leykis’ arguments offensive, many of them are actually based in reality.

  23. @119 quote: “Art imitates life and life imitates art. While I do agree that many young adolescents are ideal and fall into the fantasy of love portrayed in pop culture, movies, stories, etc. The basis for these art forms come from REAL LIFE. I guess NO ONE, to you, EVER had a happy marriage? Then where do these stories come from? Thin air?”

    Marriage is marketed in pop culture the same way state governments get gullible people to buy lottery tickets. They show the winners and never show the losers, and create unrealistic expectations of the chance of success. Are there happy marriages, of course there are, I already stated it might be as high as 25%. That doesn’t change the fact that 75% are failures. Are there people who win money playing the lottery, of course there are. Does that mean everyone who plays has a good chance of winning? Please.

    Since you are a female I don’t expect you to appreciate the motivating power of young or new pussy to a man. It’s one of the main reasons men are driven to succeed in business, athletics, the arts, government, etc. Just ask Hugh Hefner, Michael Douglas, Raffaello Follieri, David Duchovny, Flavio Briatore, Lance Armstrong, John Edwards, and Bill Clinton. ;-) That’s what motivates real men. Or perhaps you prefer to sensitive, emo, metrosexual types who appreciate your inner soul and covet your mascara. ;-)

    The key to handling a gold-digger is to let her get a whiff of your wealth without actually giving her any of it. She will give you samples of sex as a loss-leader to try and rope you in, which you of course accept. By the time she figures out she isn’t going to get her hands on the gold you move on to the next one. Live by the sword, die by the sword. The absolute worst way to handle a gold-digger is to marry her. Just ask Paul McCartney. ;-)

  24. @120, claire, I should have known by your calm, intelligent, and logical comments that you aren’t an American woman. Compare your comments to those by the obviously American women who have posted. The difference would be obvious to a blind man! ;-)

  25. Minigakkun

    122@———– Funny, I didn’t know you could decipher emotion over the internet, nor was I directing my comments toward you. If you’ve even read Tom Leykis’s earlier posts you might understand what I was saying to HIM. Why are you arguing for someone else’s point of view without knowing their whole picture? Tom Leykis basically called every woman an amateur whore to a professional whore (including you my dear) for accepting dinners and movies in exchange for a relationship (which to him is SEXUAL FAVORS).

    He threw out this long winded post of the unfair legalities of marriage and a shoddy history lesson about women in American culture in a pathetic attempt to sound smart, and not to sound like a misogynist, as if he had all the facts to back up his claims.

    His belief, his claim is simply, PROMISCUITY. Plain and simple. He also hates women. His argument is not a legal one.

    BTW there are many educated people that believe in many things! Wow, what an argument.

    123@—————– I dont even understand the point of your analogy. People will live life. Some marriages work and some don’t. Just because the statistics say you’re choice of getting married will be an uphill battle means what? What is your point, man? It will be a hard battle REGARDLESS. Doesn’t mean it’s not worth it.

    It’s ironic that you take all your examples of “real men” from the hollywood/pop culture scene – who are known for their unhealthy promiscuous way of life and are mostly unhappy drug abusers. Wow, I wonder WHY? Because they live unhealthy lifestyles. Only someone so shallow looks to such individuals as good examples of any moral code and assume what motivates them. I’m beginning to think you are so disconnected with reality that all you know is the superficial side of life. Even your example of a metro is the popular stereotypical emo with mascara. lol.

    Let me repeat.

    Some day you might mature and understand the worth of a PERSON of good character, similiar interests in a way of life, and a meaningful relationship. You’re a perfect example of “modern” thinking and times believing in NOTHING, but promiscuity. That’s all you’re promoting, whether you believe it or not. You are definitely NOT promoting a healthy or helpful way of living life – which I’m sure you believe you are. LOL

  26. minigakkun

    @124 Btw I am Asian.

  27. claire

    @125 “Funny, I didn’t know you could decipher emotion over the internet”

    OK, I’ll rephrase: there is no need to let your writing style deteriorate into verbose excesses over a simple debate about marriage. By excesses I mean repetitive use of capital letters, extreme case formulations (all, never, every etc) and blatant exaggeration. This gives the reader the impression that emotion, as opposed to logic and reason is driving your argument.

  28. @125, anyone can see your over-rought emotional response in your nervous laughter (LOL) and frequent use of CAPITALS, and your tired use of “woman hater” and “misogynist” when you have nothing relevant, logical, coherrent, or interesting to say.

    lol (being ironic, in case it went over your head)

    Please don’t misquote me. A woman who demands or expects payment in exchange for sex is a prostitute or whore, by definition. Look it up in the dictionary. The payment may come in the form of cash, dinners, movie tickets, play tickets, plane tickets, etc. It’s not misogyny, it’s dictionary.

    I never said every woman is a whore. If a woman sees a guy she is attracted to at a club, takes him home, and screws his brains out without receiving any cash or goods, she isn’t a whore. If she continues to see him and doesn’t expect him to spend money on her or goes pays her own way, she isn’t a whore. If she lets him take her out multiple times and spend lots of money on her, with no intention of giving him what he really wants, then she’s a pricktease, but not a whore. It’s only when she requires a guy to take her out to dinner x number of times before she sleeps with him does she become an amateur prostitute, by definition. Payment received, sex delivered. You can try to deny it, but that’s what it is. An anthropologist from another planet would recognize it instantly.

    As you probably know, women who are amateur whores are the cruelest to other women who give sex away without demanding payment. They call them sluts, skanks, etc. Men love so-called “sluts” but other women hate them because the “sluts” are giving away for free what the whores are trying to sell! It’s hurting their business, that’s why they hate the “sluts” so much and are so cruel to them!

    Your definition of a so-called ‘healthy” relationship is very subjective and arbitrary, as is your definition of “promiscuous”. Who is “promiscuous” to you, oh wait, I know, anyone who has slept with more people than you have. To a virgin, you are promiscuous, dear. It’s all relative.

    You can enjoy a “person of good character”, be monogamous, blah blah blah blah blah, without signing a contract that forces you to give cash and prizes to someone when things don’t work out. I’m not anti-women or even anti-relationship, I’m just against marriage for men, especially successful men, but also wealthy or successful women in those rare cases. Oprah is too smart to get married because she would lose millions, even with a prenup. That’s why she has never married and probably never will.

    Misandrist! LOL! (see, I can do it too ;-)

  29. minigakkun

    How you read something is SUBJECTIVE. Just because I capitalized certain words to emphasize a point makes my argument moot, HUH? Lol ok thats cool. I guess you dont have a better argument than to pick on the way I type.

  30. spike

    When Hef kicks the bucket, his kids will get whatever’s left of his money, not some washed-up Playboy bunny.

  31. Tracker

    Hugh’s a sad old man, he shld have left his musky dressing gown in the 60′s. His kids seem nice but a little clueless, though it looked for a while like the daughter had things under control but Holly pulled one over her so if she’s that weak the magazines future is looking bleak.

    Glad Holly’s gone, she’s horrible and fake, her parents would be holding their heads in shame.

    Prostitution might be illegal in the US, but it seems Hugh found a loophole for that by having them all live at his place and earn an allowance rather than an hourly fee.

    Go Hugh! you’ve made prostitutes of thousands of women without spending a second behind bars. You’re pathetic, you and the scrags you bed deserve each other.

  32. Kelly

    “Gold diggers – like hookers, only smarter”

    Seriously though, I’m kinda bummed that this was even posted. The rumor was floating around last week and Holly denied it in her own blog and said they were looking into filming the next season of TGND.

  33. BEN

    @Tom Leykis
    “And not having a legal monopoly for sexual services will keep her on her toes so you will be a happy customer.”
    happy customer? So women are only here to service men?!? dude NOT COOL!

  34. @133, Ben, “dude”, are you really that dense? In your rush to be a sensitive feminist man you didn’t understand my point at all. Do you really think that a married women doesn’t expect to have a monopoly over her husband’s supply of pussy? Do you think a married man could tell his wife “Honey, Ben doesn’t think it’s cool for you to have a monopoly, so I’m going to go out and get some strange tonight.” I never said that women are only here to service men, but sex is an important aspect of marriage, in case you didn’t understand that before. Sheesh!

  35. errent

    Hmm… @128 Tom, I’m a virgin, and I don’t think people who have sex with those they cherish are promiscuous. I think you judge too much (I mean, anyone who chooses to support a man automatically = unattractive? C’mon!) , and in doing so, limit yourself, cutting off any chance of a transcendental sort of love (meaning, more than using a woman’s body) between someone who can truly love you… but you can’t, given all your unresolved issues. You have all my pity. Truly.

  36. kristal

    As always this shitty ass site posting false info!!!!!!!!! So fucking lmae should od more researching before posting shit LOSER!! Anyhow, http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=29472248&blogID=430179645
    this is the address showing this is all a crock of shit!!!!

  37. kristal

    As always this shitty ass site posting false info!!!!!!!!! So fucking lame should do more researching before posting shit LOSER!! Anyhow, http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=29472248&blogID=430179645
    this is the address showing this is all a crock of shit!!!!

  38. Tom didn’t read all of your recent posts, but hey your argument is your argument. So be it, but something you posted just doesn’t make any sense. You call my boyfriend a loser just because I happen to make more than him. What do you say to the couple who has the woman as the bread winner, but they both make 6 figures a year? That doesn’t make the man a loser at all. I know my man’s not a loser, and we split our bills in half. I don’t take care of him. I save my money, and am putting myself through school as well as he is. He just has a little less money in his pocket. No matter what you say, or think buddy…we will be getting married. I don’t need to further explain myself to you, because you can’t live our lives for us.

  39. PostmortemG

    Tom Leykis – your observations are fascinating. I mentioned this argument to my father [ An experienced man in his 60s ], and he says that 25% is a very optimistic percentage – he estimates that perhaps only 10% of marriages, in our modern predicament, are ‘happy’. Sure, there are good girls out there… but in our current opportunistic age, men [ Especially kind-hearted suckers ] should be made aware that today’s marital laws are truly outdated and that the ideals of yesterday sadly don’t apply to most cases today. Tom’s point is easy to see: balance between man and woman has been lost. Where do you get your info, Tom?

  40. eurotrash

    tom;
    you’re mixing up two very different elements in your arguments… you completely undermine your own (valid!) statements about marriage by talking about women as though they are responsible for failed marriages because they are all whores out to get the money, or too stupid or ugly or whatever other insults you included in your posts.
    Try to see that most of the negative responses you have had are all about your ridiculous statements about women, not your attitude towards marriage.
    So which is it then; are you against women or marriage?

  41. @139 if you’re father is correct then count me in on the 10%, because I know for a fact my marrying the love of my life will only result in happiness. Let’s not forget about the fact that many marriages either end soon, or are unhappy due to the fact that so many men just don’t know how to treat a real woman. There’s definately a fault on both parties in these marriages that. It only works well if both people in the marriage are good people. Some men also seem so peachy to the one they’re with until they get that ring on that finger, and vice versa.

  42. @139 if you’re father is correct then count me in on the 10%, because I know for a fact my marrying the love of my life will only result in happiness. Let’s not forget about the fact that many marriages either end soon, or are unhappy due to the fact that so many men just don’t know how to treat a real woman. There’s definately a fault on both parties in these marriages that fail . It only works well if both people in the marriage are good people. Some men also seem so peachy to the one they’re with until they get that ring on that finger, and vice versa.

  43. So SueMe

    SueMe – September 12, 2008 8:07 PM

    “…the dictionary is man made, and my definitions come from the bible. Im sorry for anyone who doesn’t believe in God, but God’s view…”

    FYI the bible (babble) was fabricated by men. Ancient men who did not have the findings of 20 centuries of science. They were guessing. They guessed that the earth was flat for crying outloud.

    Get a clue already before you make a fool of yourself any further.

  44. Ahhh! nice #143 I was so hoping someone would adress me on this, because even so, and Im no idiot ofcourse the bible has been changed, but it still makes more sense than the dictionary definition of a whore doesn’ t it? Get that ish out of here.

  45. Estoy contenta por HOLLY. ya que se le cumplira el deseo de ser madre. y eso es lo mas importante para una mujer.

  46. Wow, guess Heff couldn’t deliver the baby goods.

    If you like the Superficial, you will probably also like http://www.FUNNYCELEBRITY.blogspot.com

  47. devilsrain

    Tom Leykis…Your post 50. Is right on the money. Im 36 now and I used to worry about marriage/ having a family. In the past 10 years all ive seen is divorces or guys and girls cheating on each other. You are right, guys are better off working on becoming successful and having a great time with girls. The people on here that are pissed at you are probably in horrible relationships and are miserable.

    PS Holly couldnt be more of a gold digging whore. Im glad Hef never married her dumb ass.

  48. I think she should start a “GAY-PALACE” now!!
    …………FAGGOTS “parking” only!!

  49. Protect yourselves out there guys, because it’s a mean mean world. In other news boy I can’t wait to graduate so that I can take trips to more exotic places like Jamaica, Barbados, and Hawaii.

  50. Bosco

    No one reads comments over six lines pithy

Leave A Comment