Fergie completely sells out

July 2nd, 2007 // 73 Comments
fergie-sunglasses.jpg

Fergie has become the first singer to use product placement and is being paid a ridiculous $4 million by Candie’s to promote their clothing line in her songs. An executive at Interscope says:

“With record sales in decline, you must find novel ways to make money out of the music. The trick is to make the brand part of the song so that it slips down easily rather than chokes the fan. Candie’s will have no say over exactly what Fergie will sing, or when. Fergie does not sing jingles so it will have to work unobtrusively in the song.”

Fergie? Really? They want Fergie to promote their clothing line? Maybe they should sit back and think about this a little longer. Why not just ask a bear in a clown outfit to promote their clothes? Or my four-year-old niece? She puts on garbage sometimes. Why not ask her?

Fergie photo, pics, wallpaper - photo #217248
Fergie - Fergie Wallpaper (34737) - Fanpop
Fergie | Photos Of Celebrities | OfCelebrity.Net
Fergie - Fergie Wallpaper (34745) - Fanpop
Fergie looks lean in green as she adds a splash of colour to a dreary day in LA
It wasn't her immediate reaction when greeted by photographers at Los Angeles airport on today. But Black Eyed Peas singer Fergie couldn't stop smiling when her Uncle Jack waved at photographers while they rushed to catch a flight. The 36-year-old - who's ...
Fergie's Top 10 Red Carpet Moments! Which Glamorous Look Is Your Fave?
Fergie's got this red carpet thing down easy. The Glamorous singer goes girlie every time. Just take a look back at her best fashion moments—she's all about being ultra feminine. And the Dutchess will have another chance to score a style victory when she ...

Comments (73)

  1. Gerald Tarrant | July 2, 2007 at 7:51 pm

    *shudder*

    That is one ugly dude.

    Reply
  2. Likeomg | July 2, 2007 at 7:54 pm

    Almost first! I feel so cool.

    Reply
  3. DumbAss | July 2, 2007 at 7:55 pm

    She’s a bit mannish….

    Reply
  4. Smirkin' Judas | July 2, 2007 at 7:56 pm

    well, she already promoted Dolce & Gabbanda, Fendi and NaDonna…

    Reply
  5. Kris | July 2, 2007 at 7:57 pm

    So tired of her.

    Reply
  6. Screw you Superfish | July 2, 2007 at 7:59 pm

    Is your four year old niece hot?

    Mind introducing her to me?

    Reply
  7. Screw you Superfish | July 2, 2007 at 8:01 pm

    Ironically enough, I think your four year old niece could come up with more creative and fresh blog content, as well.

    Reply
  8. SaraDevil | July 2, 2007 at 8:04 pm

    She sold out, that’s just not…oh wait, Fergie, right? Never mind.

    Reply
  9. haroof | July 2, 2007 at 8:06 pm

    lol.

    fergie’s a joke. biggest stefani wannabe in the biz.

    Reply
  10. Mad?nna | July 2, 2007 at 8:25 pm

    Teenaged girls should be temporarily banned from buying music for a few years until things get back to normal.

    Reply
  11. oh hi | July 2, 2007 at 8:25 pm

    Actually Korn was sponsored by Adidas, the detones by Puma, and the Teriyaki Boyz are sponsored by Bape.

    Reply
  12. Gordy | July 2, 2007 at 8:50 pm

    Umm…rappers and booze brands (Alizé, Seagrams, Cristal, etc., have been doing it for years. Shoes, you say? Two words…’My Adidas’. Nothing new here.

    Reply
  13. Candice | July 2, 2007 at 8:51 pm

    I must object to this, if only because my name is Candice. Any song containing the word “candy” gets sung at me incessantly when it’s new, and pops up every now and then to haunt me when it’s old. I can only assume the same for a song with “Candie’s” in it.

    Reply
  14. Italian Stallion | July 2, 2007 at 8:52 pm

    She should change her name to “Fugly”…..

    Reply
  15. DucatiDan | July 2, 2007 at 9:05 pm

    “I Want My MTV”
    Dire Straits – 1985 – Money For Nothing

    Reply
  16. Linds | July 2, 2007 at 9:19 pm

    Hey Smirkin’ Judas.

    It’s Donna Karan.
    Not NaDonna.

    Reply
  17. ACriminalSmile | July 2, 2007 at 9:20 pm

    I really hate her sunglasses. They do absolutely NOTHING to flatter her face.

    Then again, not much does.

    Reply
  18. holla | July 2, 2007 at 9:30 pm

    hey Smirkin Judas,

    also, its not Gabbanda… its Gabbana. welcome to 2007.

    Reply
  19. Smirkin' Judas | July 2, 2007 at 9:35 pm

    Hey Linds,
    tell that to azlyrics.com, not me.

    that’s all

    Reply
  20. annala | July 2, 2007 at 9:38 pm

    yes she ugly, but this is not new she been doing candies ads for months now and it has actually made me like candies less than before, not that i’d even wear that cheap shit anyway

    Reply
  21. Smirkin' Judas | July 2, 2007 at 9:39 pm

    holla,
    that was a typo, jesus tits people. It’s actually “holler,” Welcome to the English language.

    Reply
  22. Fast Eddie | July 2, 2007 at 9:39 pm

    she is the first? Blink-182 was endorsed and paid by Hurley back in 2000 and launched the trend of product placement in bands…nothing new here

    Reply
  23. Mad?nna | July 2, 2007 at 9:43 pm

    She’s actually going to mention Candies IN THE SONGS! Not just be sponsored by them. And it will probably work, teenaged girls are generally stupid (as are teenaged boys). It’s going to start a new trend. Like above poster said though, rappers have been doing it, I don’t know if they were getting paid though. Run-DMC never got paid by Adidas as far as I know.

    Reply
  24. rosie's mustach | July 2, 2007 at 9:48 pm

    It’s the incredible man looking woman… FERGUS!
    I mean Fergi..
    I mean… what?

    Me confusi.

    Reply
  25. Binky | July 2, 2007 at 10:02 pm

    My people are saying Fergie was already negotiating with Depends, but she decided it may alienate her 8 to 13 year old target market.

    Reply
  26. nagger please | July 2, 2007 at 10:39 pm

    SHE LOOKS LIKE A WALKING STD.

    Reply
  27. Brianna | July 2, 2007 at 10:41 pm

    Fergie used to be SO pretty before her meth addiction.

    Never do drugs kids, that stuff turns you into that.

    Reply
  28. Em | July 2, 2007 at 10:46 pm

    11: The Teriyaki Boyz’s DJ -owns- Bape. Not quite the same.

    But yeah, product placement is all over in songs. At least Ferg’ has the fore-thought to be paid for it.

    Reply
  29. anon | July 2, 2007 at 10:47 pm

    What about the song “Air Force Ones”?

    Reply
  30. joflo | July 2, 2007 at 11:21 pm

    i hate this shit. this is why people don’t respect musicians anymore. did you know that bach was imprisoned for not wanting to do product placement?

    Reply
  31. krazihottkelli | July 2, 2007 at 11:50 pm

    /Fergie zuckz azz….she an
    ugly bitch..shez hiding something
    under thoze glazzez…

    Reply
  32. Megan | July 3, 2007 at 12:01 am

    Not only did she sell out, but her boyfriend josh also sold his home Cali. Check it out at canyon-news.com

    Reply
  33. jakebarnes | July 3, 2007 at 12:07 am

    This would only be bad if she actually had any integrity.

    Reply
  34. Smoking Hot | July 3, 2007 at 12:07 am

    Candies. Now those are real G-L-A-M-O-R-O-U-S. Fergie is trash with cash, that’s why she gets so excited about drinking champayyaign up in the sky.

    Reply
  35. Upmine? | July 3, 2007 at 12:10 am

    Hey, this is a good thing!
    I mean…they didn’t want to sell any more clothes or shoes, right…?

    Reply
  36. thingofcourse | July 3, 2007 at 12:19 am

    gwen put her l.a.m.b. shit in all her songs. but i guess she started that line. but still.

    Reply
  37. Andrew | July 3, 2007 at 12:36 am

    What is John Duhamel thinking…

    Reply
  38. Italian Stallion | July 3, 2007 at 1:08 am

    Four, tres, two, uno

    Listen up ya’ll, ’cause this is it
    The meth that I’m smoking is delicious

    Fergalicious definition make them boys go loco
    They want a meth-head so they get their pleasures from my photo.
    You could see me, you can’t squeeze me.
    I sure am easy, I look real sleazy.
    I got reasons why I suck ‘em.
    Only for the meth will I fuck ‘em.

    Fergalicious (meth addicted)
    But I’m very promiscuous.
    And if you was suspicious,
    All that shit is methalicious.
    I blow kisses (mmmwwahhh)
    I fuck them boys for rock, rock.
    And they be lining down the block just to smoke what I got (four, tres, two, uno)

    Meth addicted (it’s hot, hot)
    Meth addicted (I fuck them boys for rock, rock)
    Meth addicted (they wanna taste of what I got)
    I’m Fergalicious (n-n-n-n-n-nasty, nasty)

    Reply
  39. Steve Sharp | July 3, 2007 at 2:35 am

    This is the first time??? Are you kidding me here? Do you research anything, or just type?

    Reply
  40. TEL | July 3, 2007 at 3:41 am

    A sellout? This coming from a guy who has more ads on his page than content. Nice

    Reply
  41. TEL | July 3, 2007 at 3:42 am

    A sellout? This coming from a guy who has more ads on his page than content. Nice

    Reply
  42. woodhorse | July 3, 2007 at 6:04 am

    Fergie is just one more Halloween costume for the gay guys but, come on, they needed one – Cher is getting too old. The young Halloweenies will be wearing Candies and saying “I’m Fergalicious” – which is way more appealing than Fergie saying it.

    Reply
  43. bstargurl | July 3, 2007 at 7:11 am

    She’s so goddamn manly. It burns.

    Reply
  44. Guy | July 3, 2007 at 7:43 am

    #4

    If I was any of those clothes companies I would sue her for using my brand, fuck.

    Reply
  45. jakebarnes | July 3, 2007 at 8:11 am

    @17
    The only sunglasses that would flatter her face would be ones that completely cover it.

    Reply
  46. jrzmommy | July 3, 2007 at 8:28 am

    Does Candie’s make nooses? I’d like to see her model one.

    Reply
  47. ckot | July 3, 2007 at 9:04 am

    They look like those glasses you wear when you cut wood, uh..safety goggles? As for Candies, it suits her fine – cheap & a little tacky. Wearing Candies, much like listening to her music – sometimes you do it, but you dont want anyone to know! LOL

    Reply
  48. krazihottkelli? | July 3, 2007 at 9:22 am

    #32=I’d zell my home to
    if it sat in California..
    3 earthquakez a day..U
    fuckerz R nutz to live there.

    Fergie could be someonez boyfriend.
    §???->

    Reply
  49. BlohansDeviatedSeptum | July 3, 2007 at 9:32 am

    #41 yeah good point. Except this is the internet and this sight is free and the guy running it isn’t making millions off record sales, appearances, publishing and concerts.

    So actually stupid fucking point moron.

    Reply
  50. djthecat | July 3, 2007 at 9:35 am

    Oh 38, you make me giggle. How long did that take you?

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Name (Visible)
Email (Required, Not Visible)