Debbie Rowe wants the kids and restraining order against Joe Jackson

July 2nd, 2009 // 59 Comments

Debbie Rowe has thrown down the gauntlet and plans to seek custody of Michael Jr. and Paris who she maintains are her biological children. NBC Los Angeles reports:

“I want my children,” Rowe said during a 90-minute phone conversation Thursday morning with NBCLA’s Chuck Henry.
She said she would seek a restraining order to keep Jackson’s father, Joe Jackson, away from the children. The agreement does allow for visitation, but Rowe said it’s a very difficult process. She said if she misses a visitation date, it is difficult to reschedule with the Jacksons.
“I am stepping up,” Rowe said. “I have to.”
Rowe said she was still grieving. She said she decided she had to seek custody after Jackson’s death.
“We had an agreement… he didn’t keep his end,” Rowe said, referring to Jackson’s death.
Rowe said she was concerned about splitting up the children. She said she did not expect the court to grant custody of the third child, but added that she would be willing to accept custody.

Okay, I understand Debbie wants to be with her children, but she’s overreacting a little bit over Joe Jackson. I mean, once you look past the facial mutilation and pedophilia, Michael Jackson grew up to be one of the most influential musicians of a generation. Who died at 50 from a fatal addiction to medication specifically reserved for knocking out people for surgery. But, again, besides that stuff…

Photos: Getty
superficial

  1. Burungi

    Think of it this way, if some guy was a sperm donor for that woman and the mother passed away when the kid was 12, should the sperm donor get the kid? Come on. She’s an egg/womb donor….

  2. Burungi

    Think of it this way, if some guy was a sperm donor for that woman and the mother passed away when the kid was 12, should the sperm donor get the kid? Come on. She’s an egg/womb donor….

  3. ladyofargonne

    the person who should get them is the person who loves them. it’s obvious who that is. MJ must have been confident that katherine would protect his children from his father. he would know.

    the age thing is nonsense. she doesn’t have to cook and clean. she can devote herself to providing the children with all her love. she is better suited at her age to do that. no career or marriage concerns to get in the way.

  4. kyle1988

    I’s a joke,isn’t if?i found her chatting with the guy on the site== KissCougar.com == a place for searching beautiful mature women and have fun Whether romantic or flirtation. Thousands of single members with real photos are here waiting for you.

  5. chickster

    I second that, Boba & Blue07. Poor Michael had a broken soul, seemed generous and maybe too trusting. If you perpetuate the allegations against him, you’re just a product of the media. Way to be douchey, Superficial writer.

  6. umstbdreaming

    he’s dead and you make fun of his face and call him a pedophile? not funny, rude.

  7. I usually appreciate your bitingly sarcastic remarks about moronic celebrities and find it a rare occurrence that I take offence to your posts.

    southpark episodes online

  8. cassie

    Now Michael Jackson has gone, Debbie Rowe is a free woman and the gag order of course has been lifted. Low life is Joe Jackson and no wonder Debbie wants her children kept away from him. Those kids will suffer if they are involved in a tug of war over what is obviously, money. Wonder why MJ kept Debbie Rowe out of his will. Must be a reason.

  9. She gave her children. He calls his own right given their mother. And now he thinks it is in the best interest of children, the youngest two separate? He is up at night. Sorry Deb, but which the court will give them that before they did.

Leave A Comment