Daniel Radcliffe shows off his wang

February 23rd, 2007 // 419 Comments
daniel-radcliffe-fully-nude-penis-thumb.jpg

Remember those promo shots for Equus and that shot of Daniel Radcliffe’s bare ass? If you thought to yourself, “Hey, I really wish I was on the other side of that photo” then you’re in luck. I’d never thought I’d ever be saying this, but here’s a super NSFW full frontal shot of Harry Potter’s penis. And if you’re wondering what’s up with all the horse erotica lately, it’s because I’ve slowly been turning this site into a home for animal sex perverts. What, you couldn’t tell? Then you must be one of them.

Thanks to everybody that sent this in. And when I say ‘thanks’ I mean it in the loosest least thankful way possible.

Daniel - Daniel Radcliffe Photo (2435424) - Fanpop
Daniel Radcliffe Wallpaper | Daniel Radcliffe Desktop Background
Daniel Radcliffe
Daniel Radcliffe at the Movies
Daniel Radcliffe has a crush on Ryan Gosling
London, Feb 10 (PTI) ''Harry Potter'' star Daniel Radcliffe says he has a "crush" on Ryan Gosling because he admires his work so much. The 22-year-old actor, who is dating Rosie Coker, says he has developed a fascination for Gosling, Femalefirst reported.
Daniel Radcliffe - Daniel Radcliffe Wants Gay Marriage For All, Internationally
Harry Potter star Daniel Radcliffe is urging the world's leaders to legalise gay marriage in their nations - because no human being should be denied the chance to love whoever they please. Like many celebrities, the 22-year-old actor is thrilled by news ...

Comments (419)

  1. jessiewessie | February 23, 2007 at 1:14 am

    Ahhhhhhh!

    Reply
  2. Catnip | February 23, 2007 at 1:16 am

    What a hottie.

    Reply
  3. NunoH | February 23, 2007 at 1:18 am

    Nasty.

    Reply
  4. Aaron | February 23, 2007 at 1:21 am

    Isn’t Photoshop great? :)

    (But also capable of so many wrong things.)

    Reply
  5. loveli | February 23, 2007 at 1:31 am

    Can someone show this to Cisco Adler? Just to let him know what normal balls look like?

    Reply
  6. AmberDextrose | February 23, 2007 at 1:38 am

    Why did I click on that? I mean, sure the kid’s cute, but I really didn’t need that “pimento stuffed olive” thing right now. Miss Car Crash Fascination, that’s me.

    Reply
  7. mrsreynolds | February 23, 2007 at 1:41 am

    Oh why did I look?

    I really must break my curious streak.

    Reply
  8. Jessa85 | February 23, 2007 at 1:46 am

    Can anyone say photoshop? Cause I sure can!

    Reply
  9. Spetsnaz | February 23, 2007 at 1:55 am

    Isn’t that kiddie porn?

    I’m sad that Harry Potter’s magic wang looks normal. I was hoping for something I could point and laugh at!

    Reply
  10. hellcat1983 | February 23, 2007 at 1:56 am

    Why did I have to click on Mr. T.?! That just goes to show that I need a more interesting job to keep me from looking at horsey pics.

    Reply
  11. machinegundolly | February 23, 2007 at 2:00 am

    oh dear god. thats scary.

    Reply
  12. ProbablyTooOld | February 23, 2007 at 2:07 am

    Wow. Am I the only one who is a little freaked out when I look at an uncircumcised penis (on a 17-year old boy caressing a horse).

    Poor kid. I bet he’s sick of being Harry Potter. He’s already one of the richest people in Great Britain, yet more slash, pound per pound, has been written about his wang than any other person in motion picture history. I’m surprised he hasn’t cut it off.

    Reply
  13. A Spoonful of Lester | February 23, 2007 at 2:09 am

    God, you’d think he’d be rich enough to get circumcised by now.

    Reply
  14. FeldBum | February 23, 2007 at 2:13 am

    I so did not need to see that. But I clicked anyway. Same reason I looked up that Zoo movie you mentioned. I have a problem.

    Reply
  15. RunningWithCarsAndBoysWithScissors | February 23, 2007 at 2:14 am

    A selection from the Prisoner of Azkaban script:

    Harry steps back. Afraid to look. Afraid not to. Wand outstretched… he TRIPS, tumbles over the forgotten trunk. The tip of his wand BLAZES. BANG! TWIN BEAMS of BLINDING LIGHT spear the night.

    Kid’s movie my ass.

    Reply
  16. saradevil | February 23, 2007 at 2:19 am

    He’s hung like a horse.

    Reply
  17. AmberDextrose | February 23, 2007 at 2:23 am

    Nimbus 2000 issues aside, where oh where can we go for our gossip kicks now that the Fish has been trolljacked? I quite like celebitchy, but it doesn’t have that dry nasty Fish tone.

    Reply
  18. Stink | February 23, 2007 at 2:36 am

    Instead of Mr. T, I would have used a pic of Hermione eating a ball gag, but that’s just me.

    Reply
  19. ImaCracka | February 23, 2007 at 2:39 am

    ARRRGHHHH!!!!!! I LOOKED!!!!!!

    ARRRGGHHHH!!!! TURTLE HEAD TURTLE HEAD!!!!!

    Ok ladies… you prefer a turtle or a helmet?

    Reply
  20. HovisGovis | February 23, 2007 at 2:43 am

    What do size do you think our Harry Potter is… Expecto patronum or ridikulus???

    Reply
  21. leog | February 23, 2007 at 2:48 am

    #13 – unlike americans, the rest of the world doesn’t see the need to cut off something that’s SUPPOSED to be there!
    I mean really, earlobes aren’t that vital but you don’t see people cutting them off willy nilly (pun intended).

    But that pic is still wrong. I don’t need to see his man-wand… I agree with #6 entirely!

    Reply
  22. woodhorse | February 23, 2007 at 3:07 am

    i don’t want to see this movie. i def get the feeling that this movie not only shows way more than the original (with Richard Burton) but that the story line has been quite a bit embellished. again, eeewwwwww.

    Reply
  23. Tephlon | February 23, 2007 at 3:17 am

    Oh god, it’s his Hairy Potter!

    #15: From bash.org:

    Purely in the interests of science, I have replaced the word “wand” with “wang” in the first Harry Potter Book

    I have found, definitive proof
    that J.K Rowling is a dirty DIRTY woman, making a fool of us all
    “Yes,” Harry said, gripping his wang very tightly, and moving into the middle of the deserted classroom. He tried to keep his mind on flying, but something else kept intruding…. Any second now, he might hear his mother again… but he shouldn’t think that, or he would hear her again, and he didn’t want to… or did he?
    Something silver-white, something enormous, erupted from the end of his wang

    Reply
  24. kamihi | February 23, 2007 at 3:19 am

    Oh my GOD I love Harry Potter, the little boy wizard I mean, this was just not meant to be, I still watch the DVD’s sometimes I can never think of little Harry the same way again after seeing this. More than his “man wand” though his perky nips are freaking me out. He’s actually quite cute but its just SO wrong, this is HARRY POTTER not a drug crazed rockstar or something. I need to lie down to get this vision from my head.

    Reply
  25. ashla | February 23, 2007 at 3:30 am

    not gonna lie, it’s kinda hot, maybe cause I’m a little drunk..

    Reply
  26. WD-40 | February 23, 2007 at 3:46 am

    Now, I haven’t the courage to look at the NSFW photo, but am I to assume something in that you chose a picture of Mr. T over another person, like, Gary Coleman or Emmanual Lewis?

    Reply
  27. Wow Just Wow | February 23, 2007 at 3:56 am

    That poor horse!

    Reply
  28. Ososita | February 23, 2007 at 4:07 am

    “Am I the only one who is a little freaked out when I look at an uncircumcised penis?” (n.12)

    …ah…. yes ^^

    Reply
  29. oshkoshb-goshdammgosh | February 23, 2007 at 4:12 am

    That horse is, like, so laughing at him.

    Reply
  30. CakeGirl | February 23, 2007 at 4:35 am

    I love British men.

    Reply
  31. Stasmi | February 23, 2007 at 4:49 am

    He’s bigger than Jude Law, so at least he has THAT going for him.

    Reply
  32. churva_ek_ek | February 23, 2007 at 4:50 am

    ok.. that was clearly photoshopped. I can’t even see the horse’s feet. and Dan’s thigh down doesn’t look like it’s the same picture of the same quality as the rest of the photo. but anyways…
    #23 you do have a point. i’ll go look for other pages in the book and replace wand with wang. lol…

    Reply
  33. BlueAthena | February 23, 2007 at 4:50 am

    You know, that is not nearly as bad as I would have thought, considering that in previous pics his happy trail made it look like he had glued a wolverine to his crotch. I was betting that I would even get to see his Nimbus for all the pubes.

    But not bad, not bad at all.

    So, how long do you think it took before someone got a still/picture of Hermoine with her mouth open and just photoshoped it on there?

    Oh, the masturbation that will occur then . . .

    Reply
  34. Spetsnaz | February 23, 2007 at 4:52 am

    #34, unfortunately the size of a flaccid penis gives no indication of it’s size when erect.

    No, I don’t even have a penis.

    Reply
  35. horriblecherry | February 23, 2007 at 4:56 am

    ‘You people are losers’ says the person who just copied and pasted that for the last half and hour. Got to love the irony. They didn’t even explain who they thought was a loser so it won’t even effect anyone. I bet it was some 14 year old who feels jilted by the fact Harry Potter has a small weird penis.

    Reply
  36. horriblecherry | February 23, 2007 at 5:00 am

    Yes, welldone.

    Reply
  37. grits2005 | February 23, 2007 at 5:03 am

    13 IT ONLY COSTS LIEK 50 BUCKS TO HAVE IT DONE LMAO, IM PRETTY SURE WITH WHERE HES FROM THEY DONT DO THAT VERY MUCH. ACTUALLY HERE LATELY IN THE USA MORE AND MORE ARE NOT BECAUSE ITS FOUND NOT TO BE NECESSARY ANYMORE AND A LOT OF INSURANCE COMPANIES WONT EVEN COVER IT NOW A DAYS. I HAVE TO AGREE THOUGH. MY BOYS ARE AND I PERSONALLY THINK IT LOOKS WIERD AND SCARY WHEN ITS NOT LMAO

    Reply
  38. stevob2006 | February 23, 2007 at 5:29 am

    Firstly, this is just a complete waste of server space and processing.

    Secondly, the guy who sits there holding ctrl+v for 20 minutes, doesn’t have the right to call other people losers.

    Thirdly, who says loser? Where are you from, the 80′s?

    Reply
  39. stevob2006 | February 23, 2007 at 5:30 am

    I would like to make it clear that I thought the ‘YOU PEOPLE ARE LOSERS’ comments are the things wasting server resources. Not this article.

    Reply
  40. jrzmommy | February 23, 2007 at 5:34 am

    I like them better without the invisibility cloak.

    Reply
  41. MrSemprini | February 23, 2007 at 5:38 am

    Oh gee whiz thanks a lot. Now I’m having nightmares about Mr T riding a horse. And, Hoff in drag is singing to him. And, I’m standing next to a statue of Dumbledore that has the word “Pringles” etched at the bottom. What I want to know is who is going to help me pay for the extra bottles of Xanax I need now?

    Whoops, gotta go, Sirens!

    Reply
  42. didey23 | February 23, 2007 at 5:40 am

    Yikes…thats not a sight I would ever look forward too!

    Reply
  43. alaskanchicsickle | February 23, 2007 at 5:48 am

    We all prefer what we’re used to, but I hear that uncircumsized wangs feel more pleasure.

    Reply
  44. churva_ek_ek | February 23, 2007 at 5:50 am

    omg can someone please ban the “you people are losers” guy???

    Reply
  45. hermione_q | February 23, 2007 at 5:58 am

    er, looks like you’re the loser for wasting so much time with the copy and paste function, genius23.

    As for the above picture: Daniel Radcliffe does look disturbingly hot, even with the horse backdrop. Though thanks to Harry Potter, the douches at my local coffeehouse whistle the theme tune to the film every time I order my latte. Some jokes really can wear too thin, especially at 9 every morning. Why couldn’t J.K. Rowling have named her bookworm wizardess Sally?

    Reply
  46. alaskanchicsickle | February 23, 2007 at 6:03 am

    I agree that British men are hot; men, not boys. I still looked, couldn’t help it.

    Reply
  47. TheExpatriot | February 23, 2007 at 6:18 am

    He surely is in shape.

    And, he is not circumcised because circumcision is unnatural.

    Reply
  48. em167 | February 23, 2007 at 6:22 am

    I think some twelve year old boy discovered copy and paste. What a retard.

    Reply
  49. sassi_chic | February 23, 2007 at 6:25 am

    #13 I was thinking the same thing

    Reply
  50. jhuck | February 23, 2007 at 6:30 am

Leave a Comment

Name (Visible)
Email (Required, Not Visible)