Christina Hendricks in GQ UK. Yes.

August 12th, 2010 // 72 Comments

What these shots of Christina Hendricks for GQ UK lack in any type of natural appearance whatsoever compared to Sofia Vergara in Esquire, they make up for it in gigantic breasts that make me forget what the hell I was even talking about. It was about cereal again, wasn’t it? Awesome. Now I’m telling people the same stories over and over again just like my parents. Wonderful. *binge drinks* This was supposed be to a happy post!

NOTE: The GQ UK pics were removed by request so enjoy Christina Hendricks at the Mad Men premiere. Whee.

Photos: GQ UK

Christina Hendricks
Christina Hendricks
Christina Hendricks | Associated Post - United States America
Christina Hendricks
Christina Hendricks made the moves on husband first
Christina Hendricks doesn’t like playing dating games and is a straight shooter. The UK’s Daily Mail reported the Mad Men star was a little too forthright about her feelings for hubby Geoffrey Arend when she first met him. The curvy actress ...
Christina Hendricks Brings Her Dangerous Curves to Cosmopolitan UK
As a norm, Hollywood may favor skinny women but there's one deliciously curvy star who's always bound to get attention. Christina Hendricks graces the pages of the latest issue of Cosmopolitan UK in a spread that should confirm once more that, when it ...

Comments (72)

  1. Taz | August 12, 2010 at 2:33 pm

    big boobs = win

    Reply
    • Matthew | August 12, 2010 at 2:46 pm

      she should do playboy

      Reply
    • Mr. Nice Guy | August 12, 2010 at 4:25 pm

      Picture number 5 should be offered in high end prints.

      Reply
    • tony | August 15, 2010 at 6:38 am

      She’s too fat for playboy.

      Reply
      • Mr. Nice Guy | August 15, 2010 at 11:19 pm

        She is perfect for Playboy.

  2. Mary Jane | August 12, 2010 at 2:35 pm

    Ohmygod yes. :) My idol.

    Reply
  3. McFeely Smackup | August 12, 2010 at 2:36 pm

    wow. should have been titled “large busted woman photographed fully clothed. Nothing to see here, feel free to move on”.

    waste of time

    Reply
    • Shut up, | August 12, 2010 at 4:07 pm

      WHORE!!!

      Reply
  4. First? | August 12, 2010 at 2:36 pm

    First?

    Reply
    • NG | August 12, 2010 at 5:01 pm

      First douche

      Reply
      • MrsEllis | August 13, 2010 at 2:45 pm

        hahahahah

  5. dudeatdudedotdude | August 12, 2010 at 2:43 pm

    she does have an amazing bust. pic 5 she should lose that robe it’s gawdy. pic 6 has a nice 40s pinup feel. isn’t gq for gay guys tho?

    Reply
    • GUY | August 12, 2010 at 4:12 pm

      see man. Now this woman is a perfect example of a 10!! thats a real woman right there my friend.
      I would die peacefully with my penis stuck in her vaj

      Reply
      • dudeatdudedotdude | August 12, 2010 at 4:40 pm

        she’s def sexy but id still rather hookup with my own version of 10 :D

  6. FrankNfrtr | August 12, 2010 at 2:46 pm

    Her big bulging forehead matches her breasts.

    Reply
    • GUY | August 12, 2010 at 4:21 pm

      Well thats good. Her forehead can act as a table for my man stick while she ticles my love sack with her tongue.

      Reply
      • Jen | August 12, 2010 at 4:46 pm

        HAHA!

  7. GirlyGirl | August 12, 2010 at 2:47 pm

    Not bad pix actually, the only problem is she looks nothing like this in real life. :(

    Reply
    • Crusty | August 12, 2010 at 3:14 pm

      Exactly – there are very few women who can look this good in print while looking so unspectacular in person.

      I’m sure she could do an amazing Playboy pictorial but the second she has to hit the road to market that issue, sales would fall through the floor.

      Reply
    • | August 13, 2010 at 2:16 pm

      HA………..HAHAHA……

      it doesn’t make you look any better in real life by saying that, you do know. all it does is highlight pettiness.

      keep reaching for something to complain about, just don’t “enlighten” us with your revelations next time …nothing any envious broad says could possibly diminish my deep, undying lust for this paradigm of feminity, beauty, and unadulterated sexuality.

      Reply
  8. Amy | August 12, 2010 at 2:48 pm

    Sure she’s attractive if you’re into big breasts, small waists, red hair, and hour-glass figures. But men who like those sorts of things are few and far between. She’ll be hard-pressed to find a man.

    Reply
    • Rachel | August 12, 2010 at 2:51 pm

      haha!! Yup no men are into those things at all!! I feel sorry for her.

      Reply
    • dudeatdudedotdude | August 12, 2010 at 2:51 pm

      lool :D dont forget full lips and childbearing hips

      Reply
    • ugottabekidding | August 12, 2010 at 3:00 pm

      Lucky for her that she’s already married then. lol

      Reply
      • dudeatdudedotdude | August 12, 2010 at 3:11 pm

        touché–and another natural blonde she is…

    • Pseudopodia | August 12, 2010 at 3:06 pm

      Roger Rabbit

      Reply
      • dudeatdudedotdude | August 12, 2010 at 3:23 pm

        omg ur right, that last pic is jessica “i’m not bad, i’m just drawn that way” rabbit!

    • InternetPolice | August 12, 2010 at 3:51 pm

      She doesn’t have a small waist.

      Reply
    • Shut up, | August 12, 2010 at 4:08 pm

      How can you speak for all men? Are you a man?

      Reply
    • Shut up, | August 12, 2010 at 4:10 pm

      hah, actually, you sound pretty jealous. Don’t worry Amy, I’m sure you’ll find a guy who likes stupidity and no taste who will take you up :)

      Reply
    • Mr. Nice Guy | August 12, 2010 at 4:20 pm

      Amy is correct. We hate women that look like this.
      I feel so bad for her that if she and her Husband split up I would be willing to step up and allow her to spend the rest of forever with me.
      Give, Give, Give never take is my motto.
      Kind of a public service thing.

      Reply
      • ugottabekidding | August 12, 2010 at 4:22 pm

        Wow, you really are Mr. Nice Guy! lol

      • Mr. Nice Guy | August 12, 2010 at 4:27 pm

        I try to help :-)’

    • oh | August 12, 2010 at 5:58 pm

      Amy, please shut up. You better be trolling.

      Reply
    • anon | August 12, 2010 at 7:10 pm

      she had me at big breasts…

      Reply
      • Amy | August 13, 2010 at 3:18 pm

        Shut up and Oh: Are you guys really that stupid? Welcome to the internet.

  9. Beav | August 12, 2010 at 3:00 pm

    Fat, ugly overrated turd that makes fat women say “yay! She looks so good.”

    Reply
    • Mr. Nice Guy | August 12, 2010 at 4:22 pm

      She is a lot of men’s ideal women, mine included.
      But then I am just a straight guy living in Orange County who likes women that look like women.

      Reply
      • chupacabra | August 12, 2010 at 4:25 pm

        You rock, sir. Thank you for supporting hourglass figures.

  10. Deacon Jones | August 12, 2010 at 3:03 pm

    If I was her husband (who looks like Gollum by the way) I would fuck her until my dick fell off, then I’d use a table leg after that.

    Reply
  11. Just A Horny Dude | August 12, 2010 at 3:10 pm

    She looks great in photo shoots, not so much in real life. But wouldn’t she be super sweet to screw? Ah, yeah!!!

    Reply
  12. Devon | August 12, 2010 at 3:36 pm

    Maybe I’m alone on this, but I find her much more attractive in real life. The pictures don’t look like her, and not in a good way.

    Reply
    • GUY | August 12, 2010 at 4:26 pm

      no my friend you are not alone. I think she is a stunning beauty in real life. I love me some real women and while these pictures are nice, nothing comes close to real thing baby.

      Reply
  13. M | August 12, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    LOL all these losers talking about how bad she looks in real life need to think about their favorite plastic faced/tittied fame whore rolling over in the morning. I bet they are the ones who look frightening.

    This chick is a natural beauty in every sense of the term.

    Reply
    • ham | August 13, 2010 at 1:07 pm

      Really? Natural beauty doesn’t need piled-on makeup, stylists and wardrobes etc. She is quite lovely now, but no natural beauty.

      Reply
      • Mr. Nice Guy | August 14, 2010 at 3:09 am

        Fair enough, she is a classic beauty to a large group of men like me.

  14. Just A Horny Dude | August 12, 2010 at 3:42 pm

    OT: Whatever happened to the new chick whose pic was used at the top of the website? She is much prettier than the photo that’s up there now.

    Reply
  15. Rex Kramer | August 12, 2010 at 3:45 pm

    Balls go boom.

    Reply
  16. mydoggydroppedit | August 12, 2010 at 3:59 pm

    She’s definitely hot in these pics and has a nice body. Once in a while it’s good to see a hot girl who’s not rail thin and bony. She would probably be a lot of fun to fuck around with.

    Reply
  17. Just A Horny Dude | August 12, 2010 at 4:21 pm

    Re Bannergirl Erin, that’s really too bad. She was deliciously pretty.

    Reply
  18. anonym | August 12, 2010 at 4:24 pm

    those tits will be in playboy soon enough.

    all we need to do is get Mad Men off the air.

    Reply
  19. Anon | August 12, 2010 at 6:31 pm

    Why the hell did GQ UK photoshop Christina’s tits to make them SMALLER? Everyone knows she likes to rest her chin on her cleavage.

    Reply
  20. oermens | August 12, 2010 at 10:34 pm

    they need to remake who framed roger rabbit with her as jessica rabbit, except shes naked for the whole movie and theres no one else on screen but her

    Reply
  21. captain america | August 13, 2010 at 1:35 am

    but next year: SHE IS OUT, folks!!

    Reply
    • Mr. Nice Guy | August 13, 2010 at 1:43 am

      captain america on this you are incorrect.

      Reply
  22. eh | August 13, 2010 at 7:04 am

    she looks fat.i prefer women like kate beckinsale or kelly brook.

    Reply
    • Gary | August 15, 2010 at 11:29 pm

      thank you for sharing your opinion in this message board. you have helped the conversation immensely.

      Reply
  23. Gando | August 13, 2010 at 9:11 am

    Not bad at all.

    Reply
  24. Valentina | August 13, 2010 at 5:55 pm

    Fish, knock it off with the fat chicks. I don’t need to see Britney Spears until she loses 25 lbs. or this pig either. Don’t glorify fat women.

    Reply
    • Mr. Nice Guy | August 14, 2010 at 3:12 am

      Valentina not all of us like females that look like little boys. Many of us prefer women like Christina or Britney Spears.

      Reply
    • Phillip | August 15, 2010 at 11:33 pm

      you said it, valentina — boobs are yucky-gross! why on earth red-blooded, american, heterosexual males like giant tits and big, round asses is beyond me! i’d much rather look at girls that look like 15 year old boys!

      signed,

      the gayest man on the internet

      Reply
  25. galtor | August 13, 2010 at 10:02 pm

    They photoshopped her to make her face look less like a man’s.

    I am not interested. Fat and manly looking.

    Reply
  26. t | August 15, 2010 at 6:37 am

    Airbrushed. She is fat in real life. She wears corsets to nip her waist in but is
    overweight. She is pale, ugly and fat. She has the figure of a matron, with big saggy titties. She needs to go on a diet.

    Reply
    • Enigma2099 | August 15, 2010 at 6:58 am

      They can’t ALL live up to your demanding standards, oh master of jackassery.

      Reply
    • All American Guy | August 15, 2010 at 1:45 pm

      Fail. Christina looks great in real life. I saw her at “A Night At Sardis Auction For Charity” and she looked Great, like a women who understands what men love in women.

      Reply
      • t | August 25, 2010 at 5:35 am

        Anyone who says “FAIL” is a retard and a dumb stan who can’t think for themselves. I have seen candids of this fat whore and she is overweight and naturally ugly. FACT. a fat ginger bird with pale skinn and saggy tittays.
        People call Britney fat, but Christina Hendricks is 5 times Britney’s size.

  27. Enigma2099 | August 15, 2010 at 6:56 am

    Megan WHO????

    Reply
  28. Enigma2099 | August 15, 2010 at 7:01 am

    Why the f*** is it 2010 and the flash ads STILL work better than the damn site comments?

    Reply
  29. Sam | August 15, 2010 at 2:29 pm

    I think though she is pretty the touchups they do for these magazines is amazing have you seen most famous woman including this one without makeup it’s horrifying I believe it was us magazine that showed miss Hendricks with no makeup on she looked no where near this perfect shoot.

    Reply
  30. Hugh Gentry | August 15, 2010 at 4:42 pm

    boring pics. what a waste of a busty hot chick

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Name (Visible)
Email (Required, Not Visible)